A Fusion Rocket Could Soon Reach a World We Haven't Seen Since the Stone Age
In 2076, the dwarf planet Sedna will make its closest approach to the Sun in 11,400 years, and scientists are now figuring out the best way to visit the outer solar system visitor before its too late.
Although this is its 'closest' approach, Sedna will still be more than twice the distance that Sun is from Pluto, so any mission will have a plethora of challenges, including how to get there in the first place.
A new study examines the possibility of using direct fusion drives (DFD) or solar sails for such a mission, and while each have their benefits, a reliable fusion drive could deliver a 1,500 kg payload in orbit around Sedna, providing an unprecedented opportunity to learn about the furthest reaches of the Solar System.
The story of the past 35 years in astronomy has been discovering just how massive our Solar System really is. In 1992, astronomers spotted the minor planet 15760 Albion, the first object ever spotted beyond Pluto and the first official member of the Kuiper Belt. Later, at the turn of the century, astronomers (especially Mike Brown at Caltech) made a string of discoveries, including Quaoar, Maki, Makemake, Eris, and Sedna. Although these discoveries in aggregate is what eventually doomed Pluto to a planetary demotion (Eris is just a sliver smaller than pluto), Sedna was particularly eye-catching.
Roughly three times smaller than our Moon, Sedna has an extremely narrow and elliptical orbit, making its closest approach to the sun (perihelion) at roughly 76 AU—some 12.3 times closer than its aphelion at 937 AU. This makes Sedna a kind of planetary emissary to the far-flung Oort cloud. Oh, and astronomers discovered another interesting aspect about Sedna: Its closest approach was just one human lifetime away.
Fast-forward 22 years from its initial discovery and astronomers are debating how to best study this astronomical event that hasn't occurred since humans first developed agriculture during the tail end of the Stone Age. A new study, published in the online preprint server arXiv, scientists from the U.S. and Italy analyze a hypothetical mission using two distinct approaches—solar sails and direct fusion drives (DFD).
While conventional propulsion systems could require up to 30 years to perform a flyby maneuver, both solar sails and DFDs could pull off the feat in about one-third of the time. However, the outcomes of those twin missions would be vastly different because a DFD drive could actually perform an orbital insertion maneuver whereas a solar sail would be a strictly flyby mission, much like New Horizons swinging by Pluto in 2015.
'Due to the limitations of traditional methods, innovative propulsion systems are crucial to reach distant targets like Sedna,' the authors write. 'Chemical propulsion, while providing high thrust for launches, suffers from low efficiency and high fuel mass requirements for long-duration missions. Electric propulsion, including ion and Hall effect thrusters, offers much higher efficiency and finds many applications nowadays but produces insufficient thrust for rapid deep-space travel.'
A DFD, like the Princeton Field-Reversed Configuration (PFRC), would by and large be the preferred method. By the study's estimates, a fusion drive would reduce the mission time compared to conventional rockets by 50 percent while also delivering a 1500 kg payload, which is 1,000 times more than the solar sail alternative. However, this is far from a fool-proof plan. For one, fusion drives have yet to prove plasma stability and reliability during deep-space missions and that's not even beginning to consider things like communication. Secondly, while Sedna is making its 'closest' approach in 2076, it's still more than double the distance from the Sun to Pluto, meaning one-way-light-time (OWLT) would be about 13 hours—not exactly an easy environment for reliable communication.
Sending a spacecraft to Sedna would be one of the greatest challenges in the history of spaceflight, but a rewarding one. Due to its extremely strange orbit, Sedna could provide an unprecedented opportunity to learn about some of the farthest reaches of our own Solar System. Luckily, we still have a few more years to perfect a mission (especially if we go the DFD route), but scientists would need to get working sooner rather than later so that this once-in-140-lifetimes opportunity doesn't slip through our orbital grasp.
You Might Also Like
The Do's and Don'ts of Using Painter's Tape
The Best Portable BBQ Grills for Cooking Anywhere
Can a Smart Watch Prolong Your Life?
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Ready-made stem cell therapies for pets could be coming
Earlier this week, San Diego startup Gallant announced $18 million in funding to bring the first FDA-approved ready-to-use stem cell therapy to veterinary medicine. If it passes regulatory muster, it could create a whole new way to treat our fur babies. It's still an experimental field, even though people have been researching stem cells for humans for decades. Seven-year-old Gallant's first target is a painful mouth condition in cats called Feline Chronic Gingivostomatitis (FCGS), which Gallant says could receive FDA approval by early 2026. The field has shown some encouraging early results. Studies on dogs with arthritis showed improvements in pain and mobility, with some benefits lasting up to two years. But when researchers tried similar treatments for kidney disease in cats — that's another condition Gallant wants to tackle — the results were more mixed. What makes Gallant's approach different is convenience. Most stem cell treatments today require harvesting cells from the patient or donors with matching tissue, whereas Gallant's therapy uses ready-to-use cells from donor animals, even if they are a different species. Investors clearly see potential here. The funding round was led by existing backer Digitalis Ventures, with participation from NovaQuest Capital Management, which previously invested in the first FDA-approved human stem cell therapy. The company has an interesting backstory. Gallant's founder, Aaron Hirschhorn, previously sold DogVacay to its biggest rival in the dog-sitting marketplace, Rover. Hirschhorn passed away in 2021; Gallant is now led by Linda Black, who joined as its president and chief scientific officer from nearly the beginning. Gallant has now raised at least $44 million altogether from investors. Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Massive Review Finds No 'Safe' Level of Processed Meat Consumption
We know that processed meat isn't particularly good for us, having already been linked to dementia, diabetes, and cancer, but how much of it counts as a 'safe' level of consumption? According to new research, there's no such thing. US researchers reviewed over 70 previous studies (involving several million participants in total), analyzing the relationships between ultra-processed food and three health issues: type 2 diabetes, ischemic heart disease, and colorectal cancer. Associations for processed meat, sugar-sweetened beverages, and trans fatty acids were looked into, and it was the processed meat that came out with the worst results – even if the amount eaten is only small. "The monotonic increases in health risk with increased consumption of processed meat suggest that there is not a 'safe' amount of processed meat consumption with respect to diabetes or colorectal cancer risk," the team from the University of Washington in Seattle writes in their published paper. Related: It's important to put the research into context. The associations found are relatively weak, they don't prove direct cause and effect, and the analyzed studies relied on self-reported dietary habits (which may not be completely accurate). However, the study has several strengths too – it uses a Burden of Proof method, which is more conservative when assessing impacts on health. The results tend to be minimum values, which means they likely underestimate the true health risk. What's particularly notable here is that minimal increases in consumption still raised risk levels. "Habitual consumption of even small amounts of processed meat, sugary drinks, and trans fatty acids is linked to increased risk of developing type 2 diabetes, ischemic heart disease and colorectal cancer," University of Washington nutrition biologist Demewoz Haile told CNN. For example, the equivalent of one hot dog a day was associated with at least an 11 percent greater risk of type 2 diabetes, and at least a 7 percent greater risk of colorectal cancer, compared to eating no processed meat at all. For beverages, an extra can of sugar-sweetened pop a day was linked to a 8 greater risk of type 2 diabetes, and a 2 percent greater risk of ischemic heart disease, compared to not drinking anything sugary. For trans fatty acids, a small daily amount was associated with a 3 percent increase in risk of ischemic heart disease, compared with zero consumption. "This information provides critical data for public health specialists and policymakers responsible for dietary guidelines and potential initiatives that aim to reduce the consumption of these processed foods," write the researchers. While the study has limitations, its scale and conservative methodology make it worth taking note of. This is backed up by a commentary in the same journal, which does note the role of ultra-processed foods in improving food accessibility and shelf life, particularly in areas with limited access to fresh food. The message from the research team is that cutting out ultra-processed foods as much as possible is the best option for our health. The research has been published in Nature Medicine. Ozempic-Like Drugs Could Treat Chronic Migraines, Trial Finds Gut Bacteria Found to Soak Up Toxic Forever Chemicals Gene Therapy Can Restore Hearing in Adults, First-of-Its-Kind Trial Shows
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Could signs of Mars life be hidden in its thick layers of clay?
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. The thick, mineral-rich layers of clay found on Mars suggest that the Red Planet harbored potentially life-hosting environments for long stretches in the ancient past, a new study suggests. Clays need liquid water to form. These layers are hundreds of feet thick and are thought to have formed roughly 3.7 billion years ago, under warmer and wetter conditions than currently prevail on Mars. "These areas have a lot of water but not a lot of topographic uplift, so they're very stable," study co-author Rhianna Moore, who conducted the research as a postdoctoral fellow at the University of Texas' Jackson School of Geosciences, said in a statement. "If you have stable terrain, you're not messing up your potentially habitable environments," Moore added. "Favorable conditions might be able to be sustained for longer periods of time." On our home planet, such deposits form under specific landscape and climatic conditions. "On Earth, the places where we tend to see the thickest clay mineral sequences are in humid environments, and those with minimal physical erosion that can strip away newly created weathering products," said co-author Tim Goudge, an assistant professor at the Jackson School's Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences. However, it remains unclear how Mars' local and global topography, along with its past climate activity, influenced surface weathering and the formation of clay layers. Using data and images from NASA's Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter — the second-longest-operating spacecraft around Mars, after the agency's 2001 Mars Odyssey — Moore, Goudge, and their colleagues studied 150 clay deposits, looking at their shapes and locations, and how close they are to other features like ancient lakes or rivers. They found that the clays are mostly located in low areas near ancient lakes, but not close to valleys where water once flowed strongly. This mix of gentle chemical changes and less intense physical erosion helped the clays stay preserved over time. "[Clay mineral-bearing stratigraphies] tend to occur in areas where chemical weathering was favoured over physical erosion, farther from valley network activity and nearer standing bodies of water," the team wrote in the new study, which was published in the journal Nature Astronomy on June 16. The findings suggest that intense chemical weathering on Mars may have disrupted the usual balance between weathering and climate. RELATED STORIES — NASA's Curiosity Mars rover discovers evidence of ripples from an ancient Red Planet lake (images) — Ocean's worth of water may be buried within Mars — We finally know where to look for life on Mars On Earth, where tectonic activity constantly exposes fresh rock to the atmosphere, carbonate minerals like limestone form when rock reacts with water and carbon dioxide (CO2). This process helps remove CO2 from the air, storing it in solid form and helping regulate the climate over long periods. On Mars, tectonic activity is non-existent, leading to a lack of carbonate minerals and minimal removal of CO2 from the planet's thin atmosphere. As a result, CO2 released by Martian volcanoes long ago likely stayed in the atmosphere longer, making the planet warmer and wetter in the past — conditions the team believes may have encouraged the clay's formation. The researchers also speculate that the clay could have absorbed water and trapped chemical byproducts like cations, preventing them from spreading and reacting with the surrounding rock to form carbonates that remain trapped and unable to leech into the surrounding environment. "[The clay is] probably one of many factors that's contributing to this weird lack of predicted carbonates on Mars," said Moore.
