logo
I starred in a Super Bowl ad on Black, Jewish partnership. But Israel divided us.

I starred in a Super Bowl ad on Black, Jewish partnership. But Israel divided us.

USA Today09-02-2025

I starred in a Super Bowl ad on Black, Jewish partnership. But Israel divided us. | Opinion Blacks are not being asked; they're being challenged to a loyalty oath of action – you support Israel's fight against Hamas or, de facto, you don't support our domestic Jewish struggles.
Show Caption
Hide Caption
Ad Meter 2024: Foundation to Combat Antisemitism
Watch this Super Bowl ad from the Foundation to Combat Antisemitism. Be sure to vote for your favorite Super Bowl ad with Ad Meter! Go to admeter.usatoday.com.
One year ago, I starred in a Super Bowl commercial.
The spot was produced by New England Patriots owner Robert Kraft and his Foundation to Combat Antisemitism, which strives to curb antisemitism and hate speech. They came to me because of my work with Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. (I spent the '60s as his adviser, lawyer and draft speechwriter.) The ad traded on the idea of a shared history of support between persecuted African Americans and persecuted Jews.
Today, I fear that the Black-Jewish coalition celebrated in my ad is virtually nonexistent.
Criticizing Israel is not equivalent to promoting antisemitism
In my estimation, the armed assault by Hamas on Israel's music festival and its surrounding Jewish communities on Oct. 7, 2023, marked not only the start of the Gaza war but also the beginning of the end of the Black-Jewish civil rights coalition in the United States.
The coalition, a 65-year working relationship between the Black and Jewish communities, had developed during the American Civil Rights Movement, motivated by their common struggle for equal treatment and an end to racial or religious discrimination.
Opinion: I helped write MLK's 'I Have a Dream' speech. Its message remains essential.
During my years as a participant, architect and promoter of this partnership, it never appeared to me that either party embraced any third party outside of the coalition.
But appearances can be deceiving. I didn't clock that third party: the state of Israel.
This is likely because there was no single event that acted as any kind of wedge issue to spotlight this. Israel hovered over our coalition like a ghost. But after the Hamas attack, Israel cast a shadow over the coalition that made it solidly visible. The armed assault was the equivalent of a dagger plunged into the heart of the American Black-Jewish coalition. Because now we're being challenged to what effectively has become a 'loyalty oath' to the state of Israel.
Decades of 24/7 African American support wasn't sufficient to many Jewish organizations and leaders. Now, to be authentic if you were a Black leader, your support in the Black-Jewish coalition is only 'acceptable' if you also support the actions of Israel, right or wrong.
Criticism of Israel the state is tantamount to promoting antisemitism. This is a false equivalency at best. I would suggest that loyalty to country and preservation and protection of a religion are apples and oranges.
US Black community is being challenged with an ultimatum
Blacks are not being asked; they're being challenged to a loyalty oath of action – you support Israel's fight against Hamas or, de facto, you don't support our domestic Jewish struggle against antisemitism. The U.S. Black community is offered an ultimatum by the political leadership of the Jewish community.
Regrettably, they seem to be saying to us, 'We no longer are prepared to fight racism in America without your public support for the state of Israel against his war with Hamas.'
Opinion: I'm Jewish. I can't stay silent on Trump's plan for the US to own Gaza.
The context of my Super Bowl ad against hate was limited to the domestic fight against antisemitism across the board in all communities in the United States. It did not suggest that if you were Black you had to commit yourself to Israel's struggle against Hamas (though one could argue perhaps the subtext was something different).
Yet as subsequently relevant as the struggle in Gaza is, a blanket commitment to that struggle by African Americans is beyond the scope of the domestic civil rights coalition that had developed between the Black and Jewish communities.
As readers of my memoir "Last of the Lions" will know, I've never pledged loyalty to any government. When I was drafted during the Korean War, I was court-martialed for refusing to sign a loyalty oath to the United States.
Now, seven decades later, I don't intend to abide by what is effectively the same idea imposed by the Jewish community on the Black community regarding a country for which none of us even claim citizenship.
My hope is that we begin to reconsider and untangle the issues between a sacred way of life ‒ Judaism ‒ and a geopolitical situation, tied to very earthly things indeed, before the very deep bonds of these two groups of persecuted Americans permanently shears apart.
Clarence B. Jones was personal attorney, adviser and speech writer for the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. and credited as a co-author of King's 1963 "I Have a Dream" speech. He is chairman of the board of the Spill the Honey Foundation and co-founder of the Clarence B. Jones Institute for Social Advocacy. His new memoir, written with Stuart Connelly, is "Last of The Lions."

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump moves to restore Confederate names on 3 Va. Army bases
Trump moves to restore Confederate names on 3 Va. Army bases

Axios

timean hour ago

  • Axios

Trump moves to restore Confederate names on 3 Va. Army bases

President Trump announced this week that he wants to restore the original names of seven Army bases, including three in Virginia, that once honored Confederate leaders. Why it matters: A federal law bans U.S. military bases from being named after Confederates. But the Trump administration is working around it by designating the bases after other people with the same names or initials. Catch up quick: Trump vetoed that bill in 2020 but was overridden in a bipartisan vote from Congress. Then in 2023, Virginia's Fort Lee became Fort Gregg-Adams, named after two Black officers — including the first Black woman in the Women's Army Corps and a three-star general. Fort A.P. Hill, named after the same A.P. Hill who once had a Richmond statue dedicated to him, became Fort Walker, after the Army's first female surgeon. Fort Pickett was redesignated as Fort Barfoot, the first Army base in the U.S. to be named after a Native American soldier. By the numbers: The cost of renaming nine bases honoring Confederates was estimated to total nearly $40 million, per the Military Times. To change the names of the three Virginia bases: at least $4.7 million, per a congressional report estimate. Zoom in: It's unclear how much it'll cost to change them back, but here's who they're technically named after now, per the Army: Fort Lee won't be honoring Confederate Gen. Robert E. Lee, who had the largest Confederate monument in the country before its 2021 removal in Richmond. Instead, it'll be named after Pvt. Fitz Lee, a Black soldier from Dinwiddie who fought in the Spanish-American war. Fort A.P. Hill is now named after Pvt. Bruce Anderson, 1st Sgt. Robert A. Pinn and Lt. Col. Edward Hill.

Michael Goodwin: Democrats with Trump Derangement Syndrome are undercutting Israel
Michael Goodwin: Democrats with Trump Derangement Syndrome are undercutting Israel

New York Post

time3 hours ago

  • New York Post

Michael Goodwin: Democrats with Trump Derangement Syndrome are undercutting Israel

One way to look at the first six months of Donald Trump's second term is that the wily president has managed to trick Democrats into fighting common sense and adopting bizarre and unpopular positions. Consider how he lured them into wildly protecting waste, fraud and abuse in the budget simply by having a plan to cut it. Then the president, by keeping a campaign promise, fooled his opponents into engaging in violent riots and trying to block his deportations of illegal immigrants, including those who had committed serious crimes here. And now comes Trump trick No. 3, which is unfolding before our eyes. Because the president's support for Israel is ironclad in its war with Iran, those infected by Trump Derangement Syndrome are reflexively pulling away from the Jewish nation. Already there are signs that Dems and their media handmaidens are moving toward condemning Israel for daring to protect itself from Iranian aggression. The left's budding resistance is camouflaged in squishy, both-sidesism mush. House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries began by saying that 'Iran should never be allowed to become nuclear capable,' but quickly called for 'a reduction in hostilities.' 'I'm hopeful that cooler heads will prevail in the Middle East and the situation is de-escalated,' Jeffries told MSNBC. Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz, the doofus Dems thought was veep-ready, addressed the initial Israeli strike by bemoaning that America is no longer a 'neutral arbitrator' and added: 'Who is the voice in the world that can negotiate some type of agreement and hold the moral authority? It might be the Chinese.' His fellow Minnesotan, Rep. Ilhan Omar, chimed in with her usual antisemitic dog-whistles. 'Israel knows America will do whatever they want and feels confident about their ability to get into war and have the American government back them up,' she posted. She also insisted Americans should be ready to 'either see their tax dollars being spent on weapons supplies to Israel or be dragged into war with Iran.' Connecticut Sen. Chris Murphy plowed similar ground when he bizarrely insisted Israel's attack 'was clearly intended to scuttle the Trump Administration's negotiations with Iran, and risks a regional war that will likely be catastrophic for America.' Amid all the crazy talk on the left, there are a few voices of sanity. One is Sen. John Fetterman, with the Pennsylvania Dem telling Jewish Insider he was shocked by his party pals' views. 'It was just astonishing to see colleagues criticizing these things. It's like, do you think you can negotiate with that regime? Do you think you want to run that scenario and allow them to acquire 1,000 pounds of weapons-grade uranium?' 'I can't understand, I can't even begin to understand that,' Fetterman said. Exceptions to the rule In the same vein, Bronx Congressman Ritchie Torres scoffed at an article in The Economist that doubts Iran was actually racing toward a nuke. Noting that the mullahs expanded their stockpile of 60% enriched uranium by 50% — a level far beyond any plausible civilian use, Torres writes on X that 'To cast doubt on Iran's nuclear ambitions at this point requires not just skepticism, but a willful suspension of one's functioning cerebral cortex.' Unfortunately, Fetterman and Torres are exceptions. For the vast majority of Dems, including those with press passes, the rule that Trump must be relentlessly resisted is forcing them into a corner that looks and sounds like a political loony bin. It's not a new phenomenon, but the shocking thing is that neither his second election nor the seriousness of America's problems at home and abroad have cured their derangement. Instead of being selective in their opposition to Trump, they are embracing their madness across the board with increasing intensity. Whatever he's for, they instantly and mindlessly are against. The Iran nuke issue is an especially strange example. As Fetterman and Torres note, the criticism of Israel ignores the crucial point: Iran is seeking a nuclear weapon, has hidden its enrichment facilities for years and lied to UN inspectors. On its face, that would be troubling enough. But the most egregious element is that Iran has pledged not only to develop a nuke — but to use it on Israel. Keep up with today's most important news Stay up on the very latest with Evening Update. Thanks for signing up! Enter your email address Please provide a valid email address. By clicking above you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Never miss a story. Check out more newsletters An enemy of the US The quivering Dems presumably are saving their full support of Israel for the day after it gets nuked. Then they'll wail and somehow blame Trump. Fortunately, the Jewish state is not in the mood for suicide and so it struck first, hitting enrichment facilities, degrading weapons systems and taking out the military leadership along with top scientists. The refusal of so many on the left to join Trump and back Israel wholeheartedly is all the more absurd when you remember that Iran pledges that after it destroys Israel, which it calls 'the little satan,' it will go after the US, the 'great satan.' That means Israel is attacking a sworn enemy of America, and displaying why it is one of our best and most important allies. Yet still most Dems can't see the moral imperative and national interest in Israel's action. Nor do they understand how the horrible events of Oct. 7 affect Israeli decisionmakers. That was the deadliest day for Jews since the end of the Holocaust, and it would be unforgivable if Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and others did nothing to stop Iran's race for nukes. Imagine if one of the ballistic missiles that hit Tel Aviv Saturday was carrying a nuclear warhead. That's the nightmare scenario, and it is reason enough to justify the Israeli strikes. Trump gets that, which is why he and Netanyahu adopted a good cop, bad cop routine. The president sincerely wanted Iran to voluntarily give up its nuclear ambitions and tried to make it happen through two months of direct negotiations. At the same time, he warned repeatedly there would be hell to pay if the Ayatollah said no. How much hell now depends on whether the Supreme Leader faces reality and tries to save himself and his regime by making a deal. If he doesn't, it's entirely possible the US, with its unique 30,000-pound buster bombs, will join Israel in obliterating the nuclear sites. Trump's calibrated, forceful stance is a welcome break with Joe Biden's many missteps after the Hamas attack in 2023. Initially, he was completely in Israel's corner, but, faced with criticism from within his party in an election year, Biden began threatening to withhold munitions unless Israel agreed to limit its responses. He even had Secretary of State Antony Blinken attend Israel's military cabinet meetings to decide which Gaza targets Israel could hit. All the while, Biden, who had lifted some of Trump's oil and banking sanctions on Iran, tried to sweet-talk the regime into another weak nuclear pact. Instead, Iran shifted much of the money to Hamas, Hezbollah and the Houthis and kept working on developing the bomb. Thankfully, for both Israel and America, those days of Oval ­Office weakness are over.

‘Oh my God, what's going on?' Miami visitors stranded as missiles target Israel
‘Oh my God, what's going on?' Miami visitors stranded as missiles target Israel

Miami Herald

time5 hours ago

  • Miami Herald

‘Oh my God, what's going on?' Miami visitors stranded as missiles target Israel

Dahlia Bendavid is no stranger to the sound of sirens. The Aventura woman has spent the last three years raising millions in emergency funding for Israel and visiting several times after the Hamas terrorist attack as director of the Greater Miami Jewish Federation's overseas department. Still, the shrill alarm that echoed on Friday morning as Israel announced airstrikes on neighboring Iran gave her that familiar feeling. 'I'm telling you, like, jumping out of bed, 'Oh my God, what's going on?' because you're all discombobulated,' she said, describing the moments before she and and a friend ran into a bomb shelter to wait out the expected barrage signaled by the sirens. Bendavid is one of several Miamians caught in the conflict that started Friday following Israel's targeted attack on Iran's nuclear facilities and military chain of command. Paul Kruss, an Aventura city commissioner visiting family in Israel, also took cover in a bomb shelter as sirens went off. Friday night saw counter strikes from Iran, with missiles hitting at least seven sites near Tel Aviv, and Saturday saw Israeli missiles flying over Tehran in the morning with a retaliatory attack by Iran in the evening. The death toll is estimated to be 78 in Iran, including four top security chiefs, according to the country's U.N. ambassador, while three casualties have been confirmed in Israel as reported by the Associated Press. The attacks, launched over Israel's concerns about Iran's growing nuclear program, happened days shy of a U.S.-Iran meeting where both countries planned to discuss curbing the program in exchange for the U.S. lifting its sanctions. Bendavid, 58, arrived in Israel on May 30, two weeks before the missiles started flying, for a routine visit to Israeli organizations that her nonprofit funds. On Thursday, the day before the first strike by Israel, she attended a computer coding hackathon for Orthodox Jewish women studying technology. Though the attacks marked a stark escalation in a decades-long conflict, Bendavid says daily life in Israel is not much different than 'preparing for a hurricane' in South Florida. She describes the same unease and uncertainty about where a storm might land to where a missile might hit in Modi'in-Maccabim-Re'ut, the central-Israel city she's staying in halfway between metropolises Tel Aviv and Jerusalem. Schools and workplaces are closed and national events like the week-long Tel Aviv Pride parade have been canceled. Grocery shelves are wiped clean of essentials like milk and eggs as residents stock up their 'safe rooms,' small-scale shelters set up in homes or apartment complexes. Alerts from the Home Front Command app wake locals from restless sleeps, often giving a three-minute window to enter the nearest 'protected space' before the next attack is expected. The sirens, she says, go off 'in the middle of the night. The other day it was at 3 in the morning. Last night it was at 1 in the morning. You're not sleeping because of the stress and the anxiety.' For others, safety has proven even harder to come by, Bendavid said. Her 29-year-old son Ariel, who moved to Tel Aviv a year and a half ago, is one of many Israeli residents who live in outdated buildings with no bomb shelters. He sleeps in his clothes because when alarms sound, he has about a minute to bolt across the street to an underground parking garage. Neighbors of Bendavid's have woken up to shrapnel in their backyards and have been urged by locals to not post photos of the debris on social media or share them via messaging apps for fear that the Iranian government will have more information on its targets. Vacationers from South Florida and study-abroad students from schools including the University of Miami and Florida International University found themselves stranded in highly targeted cities Jerusalem and Tel Aviv. Israeli media predicted airport shutdowns for the next three to four days and some U.S. airlines have halted flights through the summer. Benadvid isn't sure if her flight back home, scheduled for Tuesday morning, will take off. Israel is in a state of trauma and shock, she said, even though morale remains high. 'I've been getting a lot of texts asking 'Are you OK?' ... Like, how would you be in the middle of a war?' she said. 'But at the same time, I trust the army to defend us. They're doing an amazing job, the people are optimistic. We have hope.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store