logo
Pakistan army chief meets senior American political, military leadership during US visit

Pakistan army chief meets senior American political, military leadership during US visit

Arab Newsa day ago
ISLAMABAD: Pakistan's army chief Field Marshal Syed Asim Munir has engaged with senior American military and political leadership during his ongoing visit to the United States, the military's media wing said on Sunday, as Islamabad seeks closer defense and security ties with Washington.
The development takes place as Pakistan eyes greater collaboration with the US under President Donald Trump. After years of strained relations, mainly over counter‑terrorism disagreements, both nations appear keen to rebuild military and economic ties under the new American administration.
'Field Marshal Syed Asim Munir, NI (M), Chief of Army Staff (COAS), is undertaking an official visit to the United States,' the Inter-Services Public Relations (ISPR), the military's media wing, said in a statement.
'During the visit, he has engaged in high-level interactions with senior political and military leadership, as well as members of the Pakistani diaspora.'
In Tampa, the Pakistan army chief attended the retirement ceremony of outgoing United States Central Command (CENTCOM) Commander General Michael E. Kurilla, and the change of command ceremony that marked the assumption of command by Admiral Brad Cooper, his successor, the military's media wing said.
Munir lauded General Kurilla's leadership and his contributions to strengthening bilateral military cooperation between Pakistan and the US.
He extended his best wishes to Admiral Cooper, expressing confidence in continued collaboration to address shared security challenges, the ISPR added.
The Pakistani army chief also met US Chairman Joint Chiefs of Staff General Dan Caine, where matters of mutual professional interest were discussed, the military's media wing said.
'On the sidelines, COAS interacted with Chiefs of Defense from friendly nations,' the statement added, without mentioning the names of the countries.
Munir's engagements included an interaction with the Pakistani diaspora in the US, during which the army chief urged them to 'remain confident in Pakistan's bright future and to actively contribute to attracting investments.'
'The diaspora reaffirmed their commitment to supporting Pakistan's progress and development,' the ISPR said.
Munir's visit to the US signifies growing closeness between Pakistan and the US. This is the Pakistan army chief's second visit to the country since June, when Trump hosted him for an unprecedented lunch at the White House.
Both leaders discussed the tensions in the Middle East, particularly the then Iran-Israel military conflict.
Under Trump's renewed outreach, Washington has praised Pakistan's leadership and reinstated military cooperation previously curtailed over Afghanistan-related concerns. Islamabad, in turn, seeks to balance its longstanding partnership with China, including arms supply and defense infrastructure, with growing engagement with the US.
Both countries last week finalized a trade deal according to which the US will charge a 19 percent tariff on imports from Pakistan, compared to a 29 percent reciprocal tariff announced in April that had raised alarm in Islamabad.
Separately, Trump highlighted a partnership with Pakistan to develop the country's oil reserves.
Pakistan's powerful military, which has ruled the country directly for nearly half of its history and holds sway in political matters even when not in power, plays a central role in shaping its foreign and security policies.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The Russian past of Alaska, where Trump and Putin will meet
The Russian past of Alaska, where Trump and Putin will meet

Arab News

time2 hours ago

  • Arab News

The Russian past of Alaska, where Trump and Putin will meet

WASHINGTON: Presidents Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin will hold a high-stakes meeting about the Ukraine war on Friday in Alaska, which the United States bought from Russia more than 150 years ago. Russian influence still endures in parts of the remote state on the northwest edge of the North American continent, which extends just a few miles from Russia. When Danish explorer Vitus Bering first sailed through the narrow strait that separates Asia and the Americas in 1728, it was on an expedition for Tsarist Russia. The discovery of what is now known as the Bering Strait revealed the existence of Alaska to the West — however Indigenous people had been living there for thousands of years. Bering's expedition kicked off a century of Russian seal hunting, with the first colony set up on the southern Kodiak island. In 1799, Tsar Paul I established the Russian-American Company to take advantage of the lucrative fur trade, which often involved clashes with the Indigenous inhabitants. However the hunters overexploited the seals and sea otters, whose populations collapsed, taking with them the settlers' economy. The Russian empire sold the territory to Washington for $7.2 million in 1867. The purchase of an area more than twice the size of Texas was widely criticized in the US at the time, even dubbed 'Seward's folly' after the deal's mastermind, secretary of state William Seward. The Russian Orthodox Church established itself in Alaska after the creation of the Russian-American Company, and remains one of the most significant remaining Russian influences in the state. More than 35 churches, some with distinctive onion-shaped domes, dot the Alaskan coast, according to an organization dedicated to preserving the buildings. Alaska's Orthodox diocese says it is the oldest in North America, and even maintains a seminary on Kodiak island. A local dialect derived from Russian mixed with Indigenous languages survived for decades in various communities — particularly near the state's largest city Anchorage — though it has now essentially vanished. However near the massive glaciers on the southern Kenai peninsula, the Russian language is still being taught. A small rural school of an Orthodox community known as the 'Old Believers' set up in the 1960s teaches Russian to around a hundred students. One of the most famous statements about the proximity of Alaska and Russia was made in 2008 by Sarah Palin, the state's then-governor — and the vice presidential pick of Republican candidate John McCain. 'They're our next-door neighbors, and you can actually see Russia from land here in Alaska, from an island in Alaska,' Palin said. While it is not possible to see Russia from the Alaskan mainland, two islands facing each other in the Bering Strait are separated by just 2.5 miles (four kilometers). Russia's Big Diomede island is just west of the American Little Diomede island, where a few dozen people live. Further south, two Russians landed on the remote St. Lawrence island — which is a few dozen miles from the Russian coast — in October, 2022 to seek asylum. They fled just weeks after Putin ordered an unpopular mobilization of citizens to boost his invasion of Ukraine. For years, the US military has said it regularly intercepts Russian aircraft that venture too close to American airspace in the region. However Russia is ostensibly not interested in reclaiming the territory it once held, with Putin saying in 2014 that Alaska is 'too cold.'

Security footage from Syria hospital shows men in military garb killing medical worker
Security footage from Syria hospital shows men in military garb killing medical worker

Arab News

time5 hours ago

  • Arab News

Security footage from Syria hospital shows men in military garb killing medical worker

DAMASCUS, Syria: Footage from security cameras at a hospital in the city of Sweida in southern Syria published Sunday showed what appears to be the killing of a medical worker by men in military garb. The video published by activist media collective Suwayda 24 was dated July 16, during intense clashes between militias of the Druze minority community and armed tribal groups and government forces. In the video, which was also widely shared on social media, a large group of people in scrubs can be seen kneeling on the floor in front of a group of armed men. The armed men grab a man and hit him on the head as if they are going to apprehend him. The man tries to resist by wrestling with one of the gunmen, before he is shot once with an assault rifle and then a second time by another person with a pistol. A man in a dark jumpsuit with 'Internal Security Forces' written on it appears to be guiding the men in camouflage into the hospital. Another security camera shows a tank stationed outside the facility. Activist media groups say the gunmen were from the Syrian military and security forces. A Syrian government official said they could not immediately identify the attackers in the video, and are investigating the incident to try to figure out if they are government-affiliated personnel or gunmen from tribal groups. He spoke on condition of anonymity because he was not immediately cleared to speak to the media on the matter. The government has set up a committee tasked with investigating attacks on civilians during the sectarian violence in the country's south, which is supposed to issue a report within three months. The incident at the Sweida National Hospital further exacerbates tensions between the Druze minority community and the Syrian government, after clashes in July between Druze and armed Bedouin groups sparked targeted sectarian attacks against them. The violence has worsened ties between them and Syria's Islamist-led interim government under President Ahmad Al-Sharaa, who hopes to assert full government control and disarm Druze factions. Though the fighting has largely calmed down, government forces have surrounded the southern city and the Druze have said that little aid is going into the battered city, calling it a siege. The Syrian Arab Red Crescent, which has organized aid convoys into Sweida, said in a statement on Saturday that one of those convoys that was carrying aid in the day before 'came under direct fire,' and some of its vehicles were damaged. It did not specify which group attacked the convoy. On Sunday, the UN Security Council adopted a statement expressing 'deep concern' at the violence in southern Syria and condemning violence against civilians in Sweida. It called for the government to 'ensure credible, swift, transparent, impartial, and comprehensive investigations.' The statement also reiterated 'obligations under international humanitarian law to respect and protect all medical personnel and humanitarian personnel exclusively engaged in medical duties, their means of transportation and equipment, as well as hospitals and medical facilities.' It expressed concern about 'foreign terrorist fighters' in Syria, while calling on 'all states to refrain from any action or interference that may further destabilize the country,' an apparent message to Israel, which intervened in last month's conflict on the side of the Druze, launching airstrikes on Syrian government forces.

Savage capitalism: Thriving economy or fractured society?
Savage capitalism: Thriving economy or fractured society?

Arab News

time8 hours ago

  • Arab News

Savage capitalism: Thriving economy or fractured society?

In an era of polarized debates, two influential recent Washington Post articles shed light on America's economic and social challenges. Fareed Zakaria's piece, 'Don't believe the MAGA doomers on trade,' staunchly defends free trade as a pillar of the US' success. He posits that America has flourished under open markets and warns against upending global systems with misinformation. Conversely, Shadi Hamid's 'Men are struggling to find love. Here's why' delves into the romantic hardships faced by men, citing factors such as educational disparities, the pitfalls of dating apps and deepening gender divides. While both authors provide compelling analyses, they arguably underemphasize a pervasive force: 'savage capitalism,' a hypercompetitive system that enriches a minority while fostering inequality, debt and social disconnection. That said, capitalism's dynamism has undeniably spurred innovation, growth and opportunity. A balanced perspective requires weighing these benefits against the systemic costs to chart a path toward equitable progress. Zakaria's argument for free trade is rooted in historical evidence and economic data. Post-Second World War, the US-led Bretton Woods system established the dollar as the global reserve currency, facilitating unprecedented trade expansion. Zakaria highlights how agreements like the North American Free Trade Agreement and World Trade Organization membership have elevated America's gross domestic product, with exports reaching $2.5 trillion annually. Manufacturing output also remains at an all-time high, in contrast to protectionist claims of decline. Booms driven by easy credit lead to asset bubbles, followed by busts that disproportionately harm the working class Dr. Turki Faisal Al-Rasheed He debunks 'exaggerations' by noting that job losses from offshoring are offset by gains in the services and tech sectors. Protectionism, as seen in President Donald Trump's tariffs on steel and aluminum, has led to retaliatory measures from China and Europe, inflating costs for American consumers by an average of $1,200 per household, according to studies from the Peterson Institute for International Economics. Globally, free trade has lifted more than a billion people out of poverty, stabilized alliances and reduced conflict risks in a multipolar world. However, this narrative overlooks how savage capitalism twists free trade into a tool for elite enrichment. Ray Dalio's framework in 'How Countries Go Bankrupt' illustrates the debt-credit cycle: booms driven by easy credit lead to asset bubbles, followed by busts that disproportionately harm the working class. In the US, income inequality has soared — the top 1 percent captures 20 percent of national income, per Federal Reserve data, while median wages have stagnated since the 1970s despite productivity gains. Free trade's 'winners' are multinational corporations that exploit cheap labor abroad, decimating communities in places like the Midwest. Consider the opioid crisis in deindustrialized towns linked to economic despair or rising homelessness amid corporate tax cuts. Geopolitically, American commitments exacerbate imbalances. Annual military aid to Israel exceeds $3 billion, defended as vital for Middle East security against threats like Hamas, yet criticized by groups like Amnesty International for enabling Tel Aviv's actions in Gaza and the West Bank that fuel humanitarian concerns. This spending diverts resources from domestic priorities, such as Arizona's school voucher programs, which expand choice but have shuttered public schools due to funding shortfalls, underscoring misaligned investments in education amid technological disruptions that automate jobs. A vivid personal story underscores these realities. At a lavish Napa Valley party attended by individuals earning over a million dollars annually, I posed a provocative hypothesis to my American friend, who made $100,000 working in Saudi Arabia: 'You are richer than everyone here.' The room erupted in heated debate. Once calm returned, I explained. Most 'wealthy' attendees owned less than 5 percent of their assets outright, the rest was leveraged through loans from financial institutions. Challenging them to produce $25,000 from savings in a year elicited silence; even $5,000 seemed unattainable for many, as they are trapped in cycles of high-interest debt. Vacation time? A month was impossible; a week was a stretch. This revealed savage capitalism's trap: a paradigm in which income barely covers interest payments, leaving even high earners in perpetual liability. My debt-free friend, with disposable income and flexibility, embodied true financial freedom. The group fell into thoughtful silence, confronting how the system prioritizes institutional profits over personal security. America's strength lies in free trade and individualism, which drive innovation. But unchecked savage capitalism risks collapse Dr. Turki Faisal Al-Rasheed Turning to social dimensions, Hamid's exploration of men's romantic struggles is timely and nuanced. He outlines a 'crisis of connection' — men face higher unemployment and lower college enrollment rates, with women outpacing them in degrees by between 10 percent and 15 percent. Dating apps amplify this, creating a winner-takes-all dynamic in which the top profiles receive disproportionate attention. Studies show 80 percent of women message the top 20 percent of men. Cultural shifts, like #MeToo's emphasis on consent, have made approaches riskier, while political polarization widens rifts: young men lean conservative, women liberal, shrinking compatibility pools. Hamid, drawing from his Muslim background, notes the erosion of traditional structures like arranged marriages or community matchmaking, leaving individuals adrift. However, Hamid glosses over savage capitalism's role in amplifying these woes. Corporate-driven inequality breeds precarious gig economy jobs that offer no stability, deterring family formation. Debt burdens — from student loans averaging $30,000 to housing costs — heighten anxiety, making vulnerability in relationships unappealing. Individualism, a capitalist hallmark, celebrates autonomy but dismantles communal ties: family sizes shrink, religious affiliation drops (Pew research shows 29 percent of Americans to be unaffiliated) and social isolation rises, with one in three men reporting no close friends. Women, empowered by career advances, seek partners who match their ambitions, but systemic barriers leave many men economically sidelined. On the flip side, capitalism's opportunities foster personal growth; women's progress enhances societal equity and tech such as apps have facilitated millions of marriages. Globally, not all cultures succumb — parts of Asia or Europe with stronger social safety nets report higher relationship satisfaction. America's strength lies in free trade and individualism, which drive innovation in artificial intelligence, biotech and renewable energy, positioning it as a global leader. But unchecked savage capitalism risks collapse: debt-fueled volatility, as Dalio warns, could trigger inflation or austerity, while social fragmentation breeds extremism, evident in rising populism. Balanced solutions are imperative: reform trade deals with labor and environmental safeguards, redirect foreign aid toward diplomacy over militarism, and bolster domestic investments in universal healthcare, affordable education and infrastructure via bills like the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act. Culturally, promote policies that rebuild communities, such as paid family leave, mental health support and incentives for civic engagement. Embracing multipolarity, with partners like the EU and emerging economies, can distribute burdens. As Zakaria and Hamid illustrate, dismissing critiques as 'lies' or surface issues ignores root causes; addressing them fosters resilience. True greatness demands equity for wallets and hearts, ensuring prosperity benefits all, not just the elite. • Dr. Turki Faisal Al-Rasheed is an adjunct professor at the University of Arizona's College of Agriculture, Life and Environmental Sciences, in the Department of Biosystems Engineering. He is the author of 'Agricultural Development Strategies: The Saudi Experience.' X: @TurkiFRasheed

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store