Angela Rayner refuses to rule out removing whip over welfare vote
Speaking at Prime Minister's Questions, Rayner, who was standing in for Keir Starmer, claimed to be 'committed to ending child poverty' but refused to answer whether Labour MPs would be allowed to oppose proposed welfare cuts without facing repercussions.
Labour have previously said they are planning on changing the eligibility criteria for Personal Independence Payments (PIP), which the UK Government's own analysis has said will push 250,000 people into poverty, including 50,000 children.
The Welfare Reform Bill has faced fierce criticism from opposition parties and some Labour MPs as it looks to reduce the number of working-age people on sickness benefits in a bid to save £5 billion a year by the end of the decade.
READ MORE: Angela Rayner refuses to not rule out following US into war on iran
SNP MP Pete Wishart challenged Rayner on Wednesday about whether she believes that Labour MPs have the right to oppose the proposed 'devastating cuts'.
(Image: PA)
He said: 'I remember when the Deputy Prime Minister was a fierce critic of austerity and a proud champion for the disabled.
'But today, her government is introducing its five billion pounds disability cuts bill, which will push another 250,000 people into poverty.
'Does she agree that everyone has the right to oppose such devastating cuts?
'So, is it the Prime Minister's intention to remove the whip from any Labour MP who does the right thing and votes against these disability cuts?'
Rayner refused to answer Wishart's question as she replied that she would like to 'gently' say that the current Labour Government has given the biggest amount of increase to Scotland's budget.
She went on to say: 'We're absolutely committed to ending child poverty. We've already introduced free school meals.
'We're already supporting families. 'We've given a living wage rise to over millions of workers that need it.
'We're getting the job.'
Despite Rayner's claims about giving the biggest amount of increase to Scotland's budget, the Fraser of Allander Institute at the University of Strathclyde said there were 'significant reductions in funding for the Scottish Government' relative to what was previously forecast.
Following the Chancellor's announcement in March, Scotland's top financial institution estimated that the Scottish Budget will be around £900 million worse off on the current side in 2029/30 than previously projected.
Labour are also facing a potential rebellion over the vote on the Welfare Reform Bill as around 100 MPs have already signed a letter warning Starmer that they will not support sweeping cuts to disability benefits.
The letter warned Labour ministers that a significant group of MPs who are not 'consistent rebels' have major misgivings about plans to cut back both Pip and the health component of Universal Credit.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Powys County Times
35 minutes ago
- Powys County Times
Keir Starmer chairs Cobra meeting as Donald Trump says he ‘may' strike Iran
Sir Keir Starmer has chaired an emergency Cobra meeting as Donald Trump considers whether to join Israeli strikes against Iran. The high-level meeting follows the Prime Minister's return from the G7 summit in Canada at which he and other world leaders reiterated their 'commitment to peace and stability'. But the US president, who left the summit a day early, told reporters outside the White House on Wednesday that he was considering strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities. He said: 'I may do it. I may not do it. I mean, nobody knows what I'm going to do.' Israel and Iran have exchanged fire over the past six days after air strikes which Tel Aviv said were aimed at preventing Tehran developing a nuclear weapon. Iranian officials insist the country's nuclear programme is peaceful, and claim Israel has caused hundreds of civilian casualties. Israeli jets continued to attack Tehran on Tuesday night, but the Iranian response appears to have diminished, with only 10 missiles intercepted by Israel's Iron Dome defence system during the night. Mr Trump said Iran had 'got a lot of trouble and they want to negotiate', adding it was 'very late to be talking' but 'we may meet'. On Tuesday night, the president had used his Truth Social platform to describe Iran's supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei as an 'easy target'. He later posted the words 'Unconditional surrender', prompting Mr Khamenei to warn that any American military involvement would result in 'irreparable damage' to the US. Amid questions over potential American involvement in the conflict, Sir Keir convened his senior ministers for a meeting of the Government's emergency Cobra committee to discuss the deteriorating security situation in the Middle East. The Foreign Office has evacuated family members of embassy staff from Israel, but has not advised British nationals to leave the country. The department said the evacuation was temporary and a 'precautionary measure', with staff remaining at the embassy in Tel Aviv and the consulate in Jerusalem. A spokesperson for the Foreign Office said: 'Our embassy in Tel Aviv and consulate in Jerusalem remain fully staffed and continue to provide consular services to those who require assistance.' Downing Street would not say whether British nationals should attempt to leave the country. A Number 10 spokesman would only say that the Government's 'key message' was to 'follow the advice of local authorities on staying close to shelter'. Britons have already been advised against all travel to Israel, and those already in the country have been urged to register their presence with the embassy. The Foreign Office has also said land borders with Jordan and Egypt remain open, and consular teams are in position to provide assistance to British nationals who choose to leave Israel by land. The Number 10 spokesman added: 'This is a fast-moving situation. We are keeping all our advice under constant review and the FCDO (Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office) continues to plan for a variety of developments, as you would expect.' Sir Keir had earlier insisted that Mr Trump was interested in de-escalation in the Middle East, saying 'nothing' he had heard from the president suggested Washington was poised to get involved.
Telegraph
42 minutes ago
- Telegraph
SNP rebels do not have an alternative leader to John Swinney
Even the most assiduous of Nat-watchers would struggle to hazard a guess about how many times John Swinney has launched himself into a declaration that he'd fight to his last drop – or words to that effect – to achieve independence for Scotland. Being the relatively modest chap that he is, I doubt if even Mr Swinney would get close to naming the correct number of such speeches. And after all, given the paucity of other policies in the SNP playbook, independence obviously gets a lot of mentions. As a result, we've now had old 'Say-it-Again Swinney' returning again to his favourite theme, this time at a conference that rejoiced in the title of Scotland 2050. Now, I'm assuming that even a long marcher in the cause of independence, as he is, wasn't thinking of hanging around for another 25 years or so – but why return to that boring old tale? There have been suggestions that he's doing it because there are signs of a backbench plot to unseat him as leader following the humiliating SNP defeat in the Hamilton Larkhall and Stonehouse by-election. It's true that, for a seasoned warrior, Mr Swinney's campaign was a decidedly cack-handed affair, constantly warning about the danger posed by Nigel Farage's Reform UK. Needless to say, all that did was talk up Reform's chances – and so it proved. Labour reaped the benefit, the SNP was second, with Reform third, and almost immediately the know-nothings on the Nat backbenches rushed forward with audible mutterings that Swinney had to go. However, I can't really believe that the First Minister is losing a minute's sleep over these supposed threats. Like lemmings peering over the cliff edge, these heroes seem to be threatening rebellion but without the foggiest idea about how to go about it. And, most of all, who would lead them? That's the biggest gap in their prospectus because, while there may be a few suicide merchants in their ranks, I can't think of a single overly ambitious Nat candidate who stacks up as 'possible' leader. Kate Forbes is the current Deputy First Minister and just about everybody's choice as a possible successor – everybody, that is, except perhaps the lady herself. Widely seen as a clever politician with sensible economic views, she delivered a ringing denunciation this week of the 'destructive nature' of much of the content of social media, calling it 'totally misogynistic'. She did try to become SNP leader and first minister after Nicola Sturgeon's shock resignation but was beaten by Humza Yousaf, the man Ms Sturgeon wanted as her successor and campaigned for hard. If Mr Swinney were to resign, she might well have another try for the top job but very few expect her to try to force him out any time soon. Furthermore, there's very little chance of him resigning this side of next May's Scottish Parliament election. All of this means that there won't be much scope for plotting at this weekend's gathering of the SNP's national council … always assuming that the plotters turn up.
The National
an hour ago
- The National
Taynuilt battery storage site application set to go to public hearing
The proposal by Downing Renewable Developments, for a site west of the Taynuilt's substation, attracted 135 objections from the public, along with one expression of support and four neutral representations. Questions were raised about fire safety, and conditions of awarding planning permission, before the decision to stage a hearing was made. The discussion took place at a meeting of Argyll and Bute Council's planning, protective services and licensing committee on Wednesday, June 18. READ MORE: Student high-rise flats approved by council as objectors branded 'mental' Independent councillor Kieron Green asked about feedback from NatureScot, who are a statutory consultee in the planning process. Planning officer David Moore responded: 'There is a lot of land, and if you look at the red line boundary, you want to have as much planting as you can, because it is agricultural land. We will be looking for tree planting and there is ample opportunity. 'The NatureScot comment is the first time I am aware that they have got involved in fire matters. They have asked for a 10-metre break. 'There are not really any trees on that ground as it is open ground, but we can talk to them about it.' Green then said: 'Grid connections are virtually non-existent because it is right on the doorstep, so that minimises the impact, but there has been an issue raised in terms of the impact on neighbouring infrastructure. 'I am wondering, in terms of the local development plan and material considerations, what can be done in terms of this impact?' READ MORE: Scottish council says 'cyberattack' behind major drop in council tax collection Moore said: 'Concerns over an impact associated with the development can be material planning considerations, but the weight you should give to something as a determining factor should be based on some form of evidence. 'In terms of the occurrence that you are concerned about actually happening, from my point of view, we have addressed the matters and there is a condition in terms of a fire safety plan. 'It is a difficult area, and although I have not given substantive weight to the risk of fire and consequences, I can understand the degree of confusion and why residents are concerned. 'But we mainly deal with the operational characteristics of a development; not on what happens if it goes on fire.' Independent councillor Douglas Philand then asked: 'In the conditions you have 12 where further information is required before developments can progress, so I do not understand how there can be sufficient information.' Moore responded: 'A lot of conditions are standard conditions and we have to form a judgement on whether, in the absence of that, we do not feel we can put forward a competent recommendation. A lot of conditions are to provide reassurance.' Councillors then unanimously agreed that the application would be best to go to a public hearing, and the decision was confirmed. Clerk Shona Barton advised that the meeting could take place in Taynuilt Village Hall, but was unlikely to be until September at the earliest.
