Copilot For Your PCs: Microsoft Will Soon Bring AI Features For Desktop Users
Microsoft is going big on AI for Copilot laptops and soon we will see these features coming to desktop PCs thanks to Intel and other chip giants.
The Windows AI ambitions could get a big push later this year as Microsoft plans to bring Copilot features to the desktop PC range. The company has worked hard to make AI laptops available in the market over the last few years and with the Windows 10 support deadline nearing, it needs more hardware to tempt people to invest and upgrade to the latest versions.
We have seen the Snapdragon X and AMD processors offering AI Copilot features to a more manageable range of around Rs 65,000 but desktop upgrades will undoubtedly give more people to improve their systems with AI and not invest really big.
Intel already has launched new processors with NPU but their limitations mean you cannot run Copilot AI features on the desktop. But new reports suggest the chip maker is readying a new version of the Arrow Lake processor that will support advanced NPU to make it compatible for Copilot Plus features. It might be important for Intel and Microsoft to diversify its AI offerings, and eventually make it available on gaming-powered machines, the ZDNet Korea edition has been quoted saying.
Speaking of which, the AI laptop models are lacking the power that heavy users demand, and the price tag of the AI laptops/PC and mini PCs have to come down, if the industry wants to push the growth levels beyond the meager single digit figures in the next few years.
We have tested a few of these AI laptops and seen its obvious benefits, at least with longer battery life than the previous versions. But desktops don't need those improvements, so it will be interesting to see how Intel plans to make it worthwhile for people to invest in the Core Ultra processor with a dose of Copilot Plus AI features on the big machines.
view comments
First Published:
July 15, 2025, 13:01 IST
Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Economic Times
an hour ago
- Economic Times
AI stocks in bubble trouble - are Nvidia, Microsoft in danger? Economist says it's worse than the Dot-Com crash of 1999
Are we heading toward another tech market crash, one that is even bigger than the dot-com collapse of the late '90s? According to Torsten Sløk, chief economist at Apollo Global Management, we might be, and this time, the bubble is being driven by artificial intelligence, as per a a recent research note, Sløk warned that stocks like Nvidia, Microsoft, and Apple, along with seven other companies, have soared so high on AI enthusiasm that their prices are now dangerously detached from reality, as per a Fortune report. Sløk wrote in his research note that, 'The difference between the IT bubble in the 1990s and the AI bubble today is that the top 10 companies in the S&P 500 today are more overvalued than they were in the 1990s,' as quoted by Fortune in its to the report, currently investors are betting so heavily on AI that the stock price of companies like Nvidia, Microsoft, Apple and others have become detached from their earnings. ALSO READ: Why can't this Wells Fargo banker leave China? The Chenyue Mao case everyone's talking about Sløk even included a chart to explain his analysis, as per Fortune. In the chart, he compared the 12-month forward price-to-earnings (P/E) ratios of the S&P's top 10 companies to the rest of the index and the S&P 500 as a whole, which shows that today's bubble is even bigger than the one that marked the end of the dot-com era, as reported by to the Fortune report, although most of those top companies are profitable, compared to the losses of many dot-com darlings before the market crash at that time, the fundamentals do not justify the READ: OpenAI unveils ChatGPT Agent: Too tired to plan your date, shop online, or create a slide deck? This new AI tool has you covered Even though the S&P has hit new records recently and is currently close to an all-time high, Sløk pointed out that the performance boost is mainly because of the rise of the Top 10 stocks, according to the Fortune is concerned that investors are buying the hype and paying prices as if the promises and boasts of these firms, like claims of trillion-dollar savings and world-changing breakthroughs, are already a certainty, as per the report. The Fortune report highlighted that the 1990s were a lesson that not every promise would or could actually become a reality. Sløk's not the only warning sounding the alarm, even Alibaba Group Chair Joe Tsai has warned that US AI stocks are in a bubble, as has long-time tech exec Tom Siebel, as reported by Fortune. ALSO READ: Biggest piece of Mars on Earth sells for $5.3 million — meet the meteorite that shocked Sotheby's Why are people investing so heavily in AI?Because AI is seen as the next big revolution, capable of saving companies money, transforming industries, and driving future growth, as per the Fortune report. Are companies like Nvidia and Microsoft really in danger? They're strong businesses, but if their stock prices are built on unrealistic expectations, any disappointment could cause a sharp drop, as per Torsten Sløk's analysis.
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
How an off-the-books Microsoft programme gave China a glimpse into Pentagon's digital nerve centre
Microsoft has been quietly allowing engineers in China to provide support for US Defence Department cloud systems, according to a detailed investigation by ProPublica . For nearly ten years, this arrangement has involved American employees acting as 'digital escorts' to input instructions from foreign tech workers into military networks. These escorts, though cleared for access to government systems, often lack the expertise to detect whether the code they're running could be malicious. Explore courses from Top Institutes in Select a Course Category MCA Finance Data Science CXO Healthcare Others Cybersecurity Operations Management Data Science Management Project Management Digital Marketing Degree Data Analytics Design Thinking others Product Management Public Policy Leadership MBA PGDM Artificial Intelligence Skills you'll gain: Programming Proficiency Data Handling & Analysis Cybersecurity Awareness & Skills Artificial Intelligence & Machine Learning Duration: 24 Months Vellore Institute of Technology VIT Master of Computer Applications Starts on Aug 14, 2024 Get Details 'We're trusting that what they're doing isn't malicious, but we really can't tell,' one current escort told ProPublica, speaking anonymously to avoid professional consequences. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Summer Clearance Sale Is Live Now Luxury Watches Buy Now Undo ET has not been able to independently verify this information. Sensitive military data in foreign hands The escorts work with data labelled 'Impact Level 4 and 5' — information considered highly sensitive but not officially classified. It includes content directly supporting military operations, along with other data whose compromise, according to Pentagon guidelines, 'could be expected to have a severe or catastrophic adverse effect' on national security. Live Events Despite the risk, Microsoft has relied on foreign engineers — including those based in China — to handle support tasks for these systems. Under the digital escort framework, foreign engineers submit instructions, and US citizens input them into the government systems. Many of these escorts are former military personnel hired primarily for their security clearances, not their technical skill. 'If someone ran a script called 'fix_servers.sh' but it actually did something malicious then [escorts] would have no idea,' said Matthew Erickson, a former Microsoft engineer who worked on the programme. Lawmakers and intelligence veterans demand answers The programme has now drawn sharp criticism from Capitol Hill. Senator Tom Cotton, who chairs the Senate Intelligence Committee , has formally asked Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth for a full list of contractors using foreign personnel, along with information on how digital escorts are trained. John Sherman, the former Chief Information Officer for the Defence Department, admitted he was unaware of the escort model until reporters contacted him. 'I probably should have known about this,' Sherman told ProPublica, adding that the situation warrants 'a thorough review by [the Defence Information Systems Agency], Cyber Command and other stakeholders.' According to the ProPublica report, Harry Coker, former senior executive at the CIA and NSA, described the escort setup bluntly: 'If I were an operative, I would look at that as an avenue for extremely valuable access. We need to be very concerned about that.' A workaround for US restrictions The escort system exists to satisfy federal rules requiring only US citizens or permanent residents to access sensitive defence data. Microsoft, which has large engineering operations in China, India and Europe, set up the escort model to navigate this restriction while scaling up its government cloud business. Digital escorts have been used since at least 2016, when Microsoft launched its programme for handling Pentagon cloud contracts. According to those familiar with its development, early concerns were raised. One former Microsoft cybersecurity strategist said they opposed the idea from the beginning, warning that the approach was too risky. Recruitment was handled in part by Lockheed Martin. At the time, one project manager said they told Microsoft that the escorts being hired 'would not have the right eyes' for the job due to low pay and lack of specialised experience. Microsoft defends the system Microsoft insists that the escort model meets government standards. A company spokesperson told Fox News Digital, 'For some technical requests, Microsoft engages our team of global subject matter experts to provide support through authorised U.S. personnel, consistent with U.S. government requirements and processes.' 'All personnel and contractors with privileged access must pass federally approved background checks,' the spokesperson said. 'Global support personnel have no direct access to customer data or customer systems.' Microsoft also claims to use multiple layers of security, including approval workflows and automated code reviews, to prevent threats. 'This production system support model is approved and regularly audited by the US government,' the company added. Insight Global, a contractor that provides Microsoft with digital escorts, said it screens candidates to ensure they have the technical capabilities and provides additional training. Disconnect between Microsoft and the defence department Despite Microsoft's claims, several officials within the US government said they were unaware of the escort system. When ProPublica contacted the Defence Information Systems Agency (DISA), even its public information office had not heard of the model. Later, DISA confirmed the escorts are used 'in select unclassified environments' and emphasised that experts under escort 'have no direct, hands-on access to government systems,' but instead 'offer guidance and recommendations.' Former Microsoft executive Pradeep Nair , who said he helped design the escort framework, argued that audit trails and other controls keep the system secure. 'Because these controls are stringent, residual risk is minimal,' he said. Broader concerns about Chinese cyber access Critics point to broader issues beyond Microsoft's processes. Chinese law gives authorities sweeping powers to compel companies and individuals to cooperate with state data collection. 'It would be difficult for any Chinese citizen or company to meaningfully resist a direct request from security forces or law enforcement,' said Jeremy Daum, a senior research fellow at Yale Law School . Michael Sobolik, a senior fellow at the Hudson Institute , was blunt: 'This is like asking the fox to guard the henhouse and arming the chickens with sticks in case the fox gets mad. It beggars belief.' And Michael Lucci, CEO of State Armor Action , said, 'If ProPublica's report turns out to be true, Microsoft has created a national embarrassment that endangers our soldiers, sailors, airmen and marines. Heads should roll, those responsible should go to prison and Congress should hold extensive investigations to uncover the full extent of potential compromise.' He added, 'Microsoft or any vendor providing China with access to Pentagon secrets verges on treasonous behaviour and should be treated as such.' Past breaches and unanswered questions The digital escort model has not been directly linked to any breaches. But in 2023, Chinese hackers broke into Microsoft's cloud servers and stole thousands of emails from senior US officials, including the commerce secretary and the US ambassador to China. A government review by the now-disbanded Cyber Safety Review Board blamed Microsoft's security failures, but made no mention of the escort system. Still, critics say the bigger issue is trust. 'If these [ProPublica] allegations are credible, the federal government should never again rely on Microsoft to protect the data that keeps our men and women in uniform safe,' said Lucci. 'Our military cannot operate in security and secrecy if a vendor repeatedly and intentionally invites the enemy into the camp.' ProPublica reached out to other major cloud providers to ask whether they use similar escort models. Amazon Web Services and Google Cloud declined to comment. Oracle did not respond. That silence has raised further questions about industry-wide practices and transparency in how foreign tech expertise is used in sensitive government work. As scrutiny intensifies, one thing is clear: what began as a workaround is now at the centre of a growing national security debate.
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
AI stocks in bubble trouble - are Nvidia, Microsoft in danger? Economist says it's worse than the Dot-Com crash of 1999
Are we heading toward another tech market crash , one that is even bigger than the dot-com collapse of the late '90s? According to Torsten Sløk, chief economist at Apollo Global Management, we might be, and this time, the bubble is being driven by artificial intelligence, as per a report. What's sparking fears of an AI-driven crash? In a recent research note, Sløk warned that stocks like Nvidia, Microsoft, and Apple, along with seven other companies, have soared so high on AI enthusiasm that their prices are now dangerously detached from reality, as per a Fortune report. Sløk wrote in his research note that, 'The difference between the IT bubble in the 1990s and the AI bubble today is that the top 10 companies in the S&P 500 today are more overvalued than they were in the 1990s,' as quoted by Fortune in its report. According to the report, currently investors are betting so heavily on AI that the stock price of companies like Nvidia, Microsoft, Apple and others have become detached from their earnings. ALSO READ: Why can't this Wells Fargo banker leave China? The Chenyue Mao case everyone's talking about Live Events How does this compare to the dot-com bubble of the 1990s? Sløk even included a chart to explain his analysis, as per Fortune. In the chart, he compared the 12-month forward price-to-earnings (P/E) ratios of the S&P's top 10 companies to the rest of the index and the S&P 500 as a whole, which shows that today's bubble is even bigger than the one that marked the end of the dot-com era, as reported by Fortune. According to the Fortune report, although most of those top companies are profitable, compared to the losses of many dot-com darlings before the market crash at that time, the fundamentals do not justify the multiples. ALSO READ: OpenAI unveils ChatGPT Agent: Too tired to plan your date, shop online, or create a slide deck? This new AI tool has you covered Are investors putting too much faith in AI hype? Even though the S&P has hit new records recently and is currently close to an all-time high, Sløk pointed out that the performance boost is mainly because of the rise of the Top 10 stocks, according to the Fortune report. He is concerned that investors are buying the hype and paying prices as if the promises and boasts of these firms, like claims of trillion-dollar savings and world-changing breakthroughs, are already a certainty, as per the report. The Fortune report highlighted that the 1990s were a lesson that not every promise would or could actually become a reality. Sløk's not the only warning sounding the alarm, even Alibaba Group Chair Joe Tsai has warned that US AI stocks are in a bubble, as has long-time tech exec Tom Siebel, as reported by Fortune. ALSO READ: Biggest piece of Mars on Earth sells for $5.3 million — meet the meteorite that shocked Sotheby's FAQs Why are people investing so heavily in AI? Because AI is seen as the next big revolution, capable of saving companies money, transforming industries, and driving future growth, as per the Fortune report. Are companies like Nvidia and Microsoft really in danger? They're strong businesses, but if their stock prices are built on unrealistic expectations, any disappointment could cause a sharp drop, as per Torsten Sløk's analysis.
