India and Pakistan ceasefire shaken by clashes in disputed Kashmir
People on both sides of the line of control, which divides the territory, reported heavy exchanges of fire between Indian and Pakistani troops, though the fighting subsided by Sunday morning.
The two countries agreed to a truce on Saturday after talks to defuse the most serious military confrontation between them in decades, which was sparked by a gun massacre of tourists that India blames on Pakistan, which denies the charge.
As part of the ceasefire, the nuclear-armed neighbours agreed to immediately stop all firing and military action on land, in the air and at sea. They accused each other of repeatedly violating the deal just hours later.
Red projectiles are seen on the horizon in Srinagar, in Indian-controlled Kashmir, on Saturday (Mukhtar Khan/AP)
Drones were spotted on Saturday night over Indian-controlled Kashmir and the western state of Gujarat, according to Indian officials.
In the Poonch area of Indian-controlled Kashmir, people said the intense shelling from the past few days had left them traumatised.
'Most people ran as shells were being fired,' said student Sosan Zehra, who returned home on Sunday. 'It was completely chaotic.'
In Pakistan-controlled Kashmir's Neelum Valley, which is three kilometres from the line of control, people said there were exchanges of fire and heavy shelling after the ceasefire began.
Resident Mohammad Zahid said: 'We were happy about the announcement but, once again, the situation feels uncertain.'
Residents had earlier celebrated following news that India and Pakistan had reached a ceasefire deal (Pervez Masih/AP)
US President Donald Trump was the first to post about the deal, announcing it on his Truth Social platform. Indian and Pakistani officials confirmed the news shortly after.
Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi chaired a high-level meeting on Sunday with top government and military officials.
India, unlike Pakistan, has not said anything about Mr Trump or the US since the deal was announced. Nor has India acknowledged anyone beyond its military contact with the Pakistanis.
Both armies have engaged in daily fighting since Wednesday along the rugged and mountainous line of control, which is marked by razor wire coils, watchtowers and bunkers that snake across foothills populated by villages, tangled bushes and forests.
They have routinely blamed the other for starting the skirmishes while insisting they were only retaliating.
Pakistan has thanked the US and especially Mr Trump several times for facilitating the ceasefire.
On Sunday, UN spokesman Stephane Dujarric said secretary-general Antonio Guterres welcomed the deal as a positive step towards ending current hostilities and easing tensions.
'He hopes the agreement will contribute to lasting peace and foster an environment conducive to addressing broader, longstanding issues between the two countries,' added Mr Dujarric.
India and Pakistan's two top military officials are due to speak again on Monday.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
8 minutes ago
- Telegraph
California is losing the court of public opinion
In the on-going Battle of Los Angeles, California governor Gavin Newsom may have the law on his side – but his adversary president Donald Trump has the most powerful imagery. The conflict began in Los Angeles on Friday, when mobs of protestors attacked agents of the US Immigrations and Customs Enforcement (ICE), who were trying to serve warrants on specific illegal immigrants at a Home Depot and also at a clothing store. On Saturday, during a protest in front of a nearby Department of Homeland Security (DHS) office, members of the crowd lit fires and threw rocks at federal officers, who defended themselves with tear gas and non-lethal ammunition. Later that day, president Trump authorised the deployment of 2000 members of the National Guard to protect the federal ICE agents; since then 700 American Marines have been added to the federal force. Governor Newsom and other leaders of the Democratic-dominated California have claimed that Trump's actions were not needed because local and state authorities had the situation under control. And yet on Sunday, following three days of violence and arrests, the Los Angeles Police Department declared downtown Los Angeles an 'unlawful assembly' area. And on Monday the state of California sued the Trump administration, claiming that Trump 'illegally acted to federalise the National Guard,' in the words of Newsom. Typically a governor requests a president to federalise and mobilise the National Guard to deal with riots or natural disasters. For example, consider the Los Angeles riots of 1992. It was sparked by the acquittal of four white police officers who beat a black motorist named Rodney King and it led to more than fifty deaths and a billion dollars of damage; in response a Republican California governor Pete Wilson asked a Republican president George HW Bush to federalise the National Guard. Not since 1965, when president Lyndon B. Johnson sent the National Guard to Alabama to protect civil rights demonstrators, has a president sent troops without a governor's request. While California officials might be able to make a legal case against the Trump administration, the state and the Democratic party risk losing in the court of public opinion. Viral photographs show masked rioters waving Mexican flags in front of burning cars and debris, supporting the Trump White House's inflammatory claims about an immigrant invasion. In a shrewd public relations move, the federal Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has released mug shots under the heading: 'ICE Captures Worst of the Worst Illegal Alien Criminals in Los Angeles Including Murderers, Sex Offenders, and Other Violent Criminals.' The rogues' gallery contains illegal immigrants from a number of countries including Vietnam, the Philippines, and Mexico, charged with offenses including attempted rape, assault with a deadly weapon, grand theft larceny, distribution of heroin and cocaine, wilful cruelty to a child and other serious crimes. Democrats recently succeeded in reversing the allegedly unlawful deportation to El Salvador of Kilmar Abrego Garcia, an illegal immigrant from El Salvador who was granted the right to remain in the US by a federal immigration judge. But on his return he was indicted by a federal grand jury on charges of being an MS-13 gang member who has smuggled thousands of illegal immigrants, drugs, and firearms in the US. Democratic strategists might ask whether someone like Abrego Garcia should be the face of the Democratic party. At least, unlike some of the rioters cavorting in front of burning wreckage in LA, he does not wear a mask.
The Guardian
16 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Los Angeles protests: Donald Trump deploys more National Guard troops and marines as disorder goes into fourth day
Update: Date: 2025-06-10T06:36:35.000Z Title: Trump deploys more National Guard troops and Marines to LA protests Content: Good morning, Donald Trump has deployed more National Guard troops and marines to Los Angeles as protests in the city go into their fourth day. Here is what has happened overnight: California said the deployment of the National Guard by Republican President Trump's administration was illegal and violated the state's sovereignty and federal law, according to a court filing of its lawsuit against the US government. The US military is to temporarily deploy about 700 Marines to LA until more National Guard troops can arrive, marking another escalation in Trump's response to street protests over his aggressive immigration policies. Marines were expected to reach Los Angeles on Monday night (LA time) or Tuesday morning. Even as protests against raids by US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) stretched into a fourth day Monday in LA, city workers began a cleanup of graffiti and other weekend damage across the city. The Trump administration vowed to intensify migrant raids, with US Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem pledging to carry out even more operations to round up suspected immigration violators, extending a crackdown that provoked the protests.
Daily Mail
17 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
EXCLUSIVE Outrage as Trump's Education Department forced to pay $7 million per MONTH to 'idle employees'
The Department of Education is reportedly spending $7 million a month on employees who are not even working according to a shocking new report. The department has spent over $21 million on idle employees over the last three months per calculations made by the American Federation of Government Employees (AFGE) Local 252. Part of the employees collecting checks include those that accepted the Trump 'buyout' at the start of his second term. The Trump administration offered federal workers a chance to voluntarily vacate their government posts while remaining on the payroll for months, with many opting to get checks through September 2025. Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene, chair of the Subcommittee on Delivering on Government Efficiency (DOGE) a subcommittee of the House Committee on Oversight and Accountability told the Daily Mail in that 'President Trump gave federal workers an incredible offer—8 months of pay to walk away. Hardly anyone gets that kind of deal.' 'But now, thanks to the courts, $7 million a month is being wasted on idle employees at the Department of Education. If the courts had respected the will of the American people when they voted for DOGE, we wouldn't be in this mess,' Greene continued. 'President Trump ran on cutting waste, fraud, and abuse from the federal government, which included defunding the Department of Education, and that's exactly what Americans voted for.' 'The people want DOGE cuts. The courts are forcing wasteful spending,' Greene concluded. Senator Joni Ernst (R-Iowa), who heads up DOGE government slashing efforts in the Senate told the Daily Mail in a statement that federal employees wasting taxpayer funds in such a manner is a 'complete slap in the face to the hardworking Americans footing the bill.' 'From attending Mardi Gras to engaging in union activities and even appealing creepy personal misconduct violations, federal employees have long abused paid administration leave to escape work,' Ernst stated. 'For years, I have exposed how do-nothing bureaucrats cost taxpayers millions every year. It is a complete slap in the face to the hardworking Americans footing the bill.' 'I am working with the Trump administration to undo the years of backwards bureaucratic policy in Washington to ensure that anyone collecting a taxpayer-funded paycheck is spending their day serving the American people,' Ernst added. Senator Ernst has worked to expose the billion dollar cost of do-nothing bureaucrats in her $2 trillion roadmap for the Trump administration to eliminate waste, fraud and abuse. Trump's education secretary Linda McMahon pushed during her confirmation hearing earlier this year for her Department to be completely shut down, a move in line with promises made by the president on the campaign trail last year. At her February confirmation hearing, McMahon noted that 'in conjunction with [Trump's] fervor to shut down the bureaucracy of the Department of Education, he has also stated that he will work with Congress to make that happen.' Back in February, the Trump administration also moved to decrease the size of the federal government by announcing a voluntary deferred resignation program for federal employees. An estimated 75,000 federal employees across agencies took the differed resignation offer under which they were promised to be paid and provided with benefits until September 30th, 2025 or until they accepted a new job. In March, the Department of Education cut nearly half of its workforce, a total of nearly 1,300 employees. After the reduction in DOE staffing levels was announced, Democrats on the House Committee on Oversight Government Reform and House Committee on Education and Workforce sent a letter to McMahon expressing their disapproval with the move. 'The approximately 1,300 employees who you wish to leave the Department are dedicated public servants who have devoted their careers to serving their country and ensuring that all students are able to learn and to thrive, regardless of race, gender, disability, or zip code,' the Democrats noted. 'Discarding thousands of civil servants without regard for their job performance is an attack on those hardworking and passionate individuals as well as our government and the critical services it provides,' they continued.
