King tells of ‘profound sadness' in letter to Trump after Texas floods
'Following the devastating flooding in Texas, His Majesty King Charles has written to President Trump to express his profound sadness at the tragic loss of life,' the embassy said.
Following the devastating flooding in Texas, His Majesty King Charles has written to President Trump to express his profound sadness at the tragic loss of life.
He offered his deepest sympathy to all families who have lost loved ones and paid tribute to courage and selflessness… pic.twitter.com/jdP01kANGK
— British Embassy Washington (@UKinUSA) July 7, 2025
'He offered his deepest sympathy to all families who have lost loved ones and paid tribute to courage and selflessness of the emergency service and volunteers.'
Operators of Camp Mystic, a century-old summer camp in the Texas Hill Country, said they lost 27 campers and counsellors, confirming their worst fears after a wall of water slammed into cabins built along the edge of the Guadalupe River.
With additional rain on the way, more flooding remains a threat in saturated parts of the US state.
Authorities said the death toll was sure to rise as crews looked for many people who were missing.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Herald Scotland
25 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
Polls show Trump's approval rating after tax bill passes
Gallup polling shows that Trump's approval ratings at the six-month mark in both of his terms are lower than any other modern president at the same time in their administrations, at 38% and 40% for each term respectively. The average since John F. Kennedy in 1961 is 52%, according to the polling firm. Here's a look at the polls and averages released since the passage of Trump's bill. Trump favorability polls The Economist The most recent poll by YouGov for The Economist taken July 4 through July 7 has Trump's approval rating at: Favorable: 42% 42% Unfavorable: 53% 53% Not sure: 5% The poll included 1,528 adults. The survey also found a dip in support among Black voters for Trump. It found that 15% of Black voters approve of the way Trump is handling his job as president, compared to 20% of Black voters who approved of his job handling in a June survey. Morning Consult The most recent poll taken by Morning Consult July 3 through July 6 has Trump's approval rating at: Approve: 45% 45% Disapprove: 52% The poll included 2,203 registered voters. Rasmussen The most recent poll from polling firm Rasmussen released July 9 has Trump's approval rating at: Approve: 49% 49% Disapprove: 49% The poll included 1,500 likely voters. Silver Bulletin The latest average released by Nate Silver's "Silver Bulletin" newsletter on July 9 has Trump's approval rating at: Approve: 44.9% 44.9% Disapprove: 51.6% The average included 10 polls. Contributing: Sudiksha Kochi, USA TODAY
The Herald Scotland
25 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
Trump impressed by Liberia president's English, the nation's language
"Well, thank you, and such good English," Trump replied. "That's beautiful. Where did you learn to speak so beautifully? Where were you educated? Where? In Liberia?" "In Liberia?" Trump asked. "Yes, sir," Boakai said. "That's very interesting," Trump said. "I have people at this table who can't speak nearly as well." Following Boakai's visit to the White House, several people, including at least one elected official, took to social media to express their dissatisfaction with Trump's comments, calling them inappropriate. "Trump never misses an opportunity to be racist and wrong, and every day he finds a new way to be embarrassing," Rep. Jasmine Crockett of Texas posted on X, formerly Twitter. "Asking the President of Liberia where he learned English when it's literally the official language is peak ignorance. I'm pretty sure being blatantly offensive is not how you go about conducting diplomacy..." "This is an example of microaggression, highlighting Trump's view of Africans," one X post reads. "Many Africans, who were born, raised, and educated in Africa, communicate in 'beautiful English.'" USA TODAY has reached out to the White House for comment on the interaction. When did Liberia make English its national language? English has been Liberia's national language since 1847, alongside 27 indigenous languages that are also spoken. Liberia was founded in 1822 as the United States wanted to relocate freed Black men and women after the Northern states had either abolished slavery or made plans for gradual emancipation by 1804. The settlers declared their independence from the United States in 1847, writing their own constitution and becoming Africa's oldest modern republic as well as the second-oldest Black-led republic in the world, following Haiti. Though President Abraham Lincoln signed the Emancipation Proclamation in 1863, declaring enslaved people in Confederate territory were to be free, it wasn't until the ratification of the 13th Amendment in 1865 that slavery was formally abolished in the United States. Reuters contributed to the reporting of this story.
Spectator
25 minutes ago
- Spectator
France can't solve Britain's reliance on America and China
When President Emmanuel Macron of France addressed the British parliament this week, he emphasised the need for both countries to reduce the risk from their 'excessive dependencies on both the US and China'. This reliance on the Great Powers, Macron suggested, was a threat for Europe to be able 'to invest in key technologies of the future' and 'avoid strategic dependencies and disengagement that would put us at risk of a slow death'. In many ways President Macron is right. The UK and Europe are absolutely dependent on America and China for critical technologies and industrial inputs. As noted by the EU in various recent reports, China dominates in rare earth elements and critical minerals, supplying nearly all of Europe's needs: 98 per cent of the rare earth magnets, 100 per cent of the heavy rare earths, and 97 per cent of the magnesium used in sectors from aerospace to defence are supplied by Beijing. Europe is also reliant on China for lithium and cobalt processing, as well as solar panels and EV batteries, of which the vast majority originate from Chinese supply chains. Macron envisages Europe coming together to compete against the US and China On the digital side, the US giants Amazon, Microsoft, and Google control about 65 per cent of Europe's cloud computing market, while American firms supply nearly all data centre chips and enterprise software. Europe's semiconductor industry covers only a small share of global production, and cutting-edge chip manufacturing remains centred in Asia and the US, leaving the continent technologically dependent. The Artificial Intelligence (AI) revolution in the UK and Europe, which is central to future economic and military effectiveness, is being led by American firms like OpenAI and Google. This might sound like it's just globalisation in action. After all, why would we want to invest in industrial and technological inputs if someone else has the ability and desire to do so? For decades, this 'comparative advantage' has been at the centre of British and European government thinking, and the mantra behind deindustrialisation. Yet this technological and industrial dependence has real-world consequences as we move into a more nationalistic era. For a start, it severely constrains Europe's ability to rearm in response to Russian aggression. High-end defence systems rely on supply chains outside Europe – minerals and components from China, chips from Asia and the US, and cloud infrastructure and AI from American firms. In effect, the ability for the UK and Europe to rearm depends on the acquiescence and support of the US and China. Industrial and technological dependency is mirrored in defence capabilities. Europe's strategic airlift depends on US-made aircraft like the C-17 Globemaster, and nuclear deterrents such as the UK's Trident system are integrated with American technology. Although programmes like the EU's Chips Act and joint fighter jet projects (Europe's future combat air system, and the UK-led Tempest programme) aim to rebuild sovereignty, analysts agree that Europe remains years away from autonomy. Without a secure and sovereign technological industrial base, European nations face structural limitations on their ability to scale up defence production independently. To answer the question of self-reliance, Macron envisages Europe coming together to compete against the US and China. At first glance, this would be a step in the right direction for the UK, coming as it does when even the 'special relationship' with the US is under pressure. However, the reality is somewhat different and prompts some suspicion of Macron's proposal. For a start, France has not been overly supportive of British involvement in Europe's defence in recent years. For example, under French pressure, Britain was locked out of a €150 billion (£129 billion) EU defence fund until it signed up to a wider defence pact. Critics said this held the risk of both undermining Nato and rolling back on Brexit. (Naturally, the British government rejected both these claims.) And while it is true that France has created a defence industry that is less dependent on the US than Britain's, this does not necessarily lead to an advantage on the battlefield. That Pakistan-operated Chinese jets were able to destroy at least one French Rafaele fighter plane operated by the Indian Air Force in their recent clash shows that France's military technology isn't perhaps as cutting-edge as Paris would have the world believe. Military capabilities aside, the fact is that Europe, even with the UK, does not have the technological and industrial base to wean us off the US and China. What could work, however, is adopting a global approach. Countries like Japan, South Korea, Australia, and Canada have immense resources and technological competencies that can – and should – be brought into the UK and Europe's resilience plans. All of these are allies: Canada is in Nato already, and the other three (plus New Zealand) are in the so-called 'Indo-Pacific four', a group of countries that are officially partnered with the alliance because of fears of Chinese and Russian aggression. Furthermore, these countries are increasingly involved in Europe's defence posture. Japan is part of Britain's Tempest programme; South Korea is providing arms to Poland, Romania, and Norway amongst others; Australia and Canada are buying British naval vessels, including submarines and destroyers. Japan, Canada, and Australia are already part of the Starmer government's 'coalition of the willing' in support of Ukraine, a group assembled to provide more resilience against a US withdrawal of military backing to Kyiv in the conflict. This is a good platform for wider collaboration. As the AUKUS programme between Australia, the UK and US has shown, it is feasible to turn a military-specific initiative into a broader technological and industrial one. AUKUS was originally designed as a way to provide new submarines for Australia, the UK and US; it is now exploring partnerships on quantum, hypersonic missiles, and AI. As is normal with French efforts to bring Europe together on joint initiatives, Macron's vision for European self-reliance would almost certainly entail building this around France. This would not be in the interests of either Britain or the EU. Instead, the only realistic approach to decreasing reliance on the US and China is a global one. The threat from Russia and China is not confined to Europe. Our response should not be either.
