50 Safest, Most Affordable Cities for a Family of Four
Americans seeking safe, affordable cities to raise kids will find the most cities with modest cost-of-living expenses are based in Southern and Midwest states. Texas is home to 19 cities that check off these boxes, the most out of any state, according to a new GOBankingRates study.
Learn More:
See Next:
GOBankingRates analyzed cities with populations of at least 100,000 to determine which are the safest and most affordable for a family of four. Families of four are defined as a married couple with children: the oldest child age 6 to 17, per the Bureau of Labor Statistics Consumer Expenditure Survey. Key factors sourced and calculated include each city's household median income, the property and violent crime rates per 1,000 residents, the average value of a single-family home and the annual cost of living. Calculations for the leftover savings after the cost of living were determined using the median household income and the total cost of living.
Fishers, Indiana, ranked as the safest and most affordable city for a family of four. The annual cost of living is $64,924, with a property crime rate of 6.09 and a 0.99 violent crime rate per 1,000 residents.
Nineteen Texas cities ranked in the top 50, the most out of any state. These cities include Sugar Land (#2), League City (#3), Allen (#6), McKinney (#7), Frisco (#8), Pearland (#13), Carrollton (#20), Grand Prairie (#24), Round Rock (#25), Richardson (#26), Plano (#29), Midland (#34), College Station (#35), Odessa (#36), Lewisville (#41), Laredo (#43), Garland (#46), Denton (#49) and Edinburg (#50).
The greatest number of safe and affordable cities is in the South, where 23 cities total, nearly half of the rankings. The second-highest region to rank is the Midwest, with 13 cities altogether.
Surprisingly, no cities in Florida cracked the top 50 for affordability and safety.
Ranked from first to 50th, here are the safest, most affordable cities for a family of four.
See More:
Explore Next:
Household median income: $128,141
Single family home average value: $444,417
Average annual cost of living: $64,924
Property crime rate (per 1,000): 6.09
Violent crime rate (per 1,000): 0.99
Leftover savings after cost of living: $63,217
Discover More:
Household median income: $137,511
Single family home average value: $449,949
Average annual cost of living: $64,633
Property crime rate (per 1,000): 12.88
Violent crime rate (per 1,000): 0.73
Leftover savings after cost of living: $72,878
Household median income: $119,870
Single family home average value: $373,532
Average annual cost of living: $57,131
Property crime rate (per 1,000): 12.19
Violent crime rate (per 1,000): 1.14
Leftover savings after cost of living: $62,739
Household median income: $150,937
Single family home average value: $610,926
Average annual cost of living: $79,991
Property crime rate (per 1,000): 8.58
Violent crime rate (per 1,000): 0.64
Leftover savings after cost of living: $70,946
Household median income: $134,602
Single family home average value: $560,332
Average annual cost of living: $72,855
Property crime rate (per 1,000): 8.35
Violent crime rate (per 1,000): 0.58
Leftover savings after cost of living: $61,747
Household median income: $129,130
Single family home average value: $517,824
Average annual cost of living: $68,647
Property crime rate (per 1,000): 8.23
Violent crime rate (per 1,000): 1.12
Leftover savings after cost of living: $60,483
For You:
Household median income: $120,273
Single family home average value: $515,466
Average annual cost of living: $69,009
Property crime rate (per 1,000): 9.07
Violent crime rate (per 1,000): 1.05
Leftover savings after cost of living: $51,264
Household median income: $146,158
Single family home average value: $684,708
Average annual cost of living: $83,717
Property crime rate (per 1,000): 13.57
Violent crime rate (per 1,000): 0.86
Leftover savings after cost of living: $62,441
Household median income: $70,778
Single family home average value: $276,735
Average annual cost of living: $52,894
Property crime rate (per 1,000): 7.05
Violent crime rate (per 1,000): 1.30
Leftover savings after cost of living: $17,884
Household median income: $112,232
Single family home average value: $407,368
Average annual cost of living: $62,234
Property crime rate (per 1,000): 11.47
Violent crime rate (per 1,000): 2.34
Leftover savings after cost of living: $49,998
Household median income: $88,316
Single family home average value: $321,374
Average annual cost of living: $55,726
Property crime rate (per 1,000): 8.83
Violent crime rate (per 1,000): 2.24
Leftover savings after cost of living: $32,590
Trending Now:
Household median income: $84,752
Single family home average value: $380,202
Average annual cost of living: $59,241
Property crime rate (per 1,000): 9.79
Violent crime rate (per 1,000): 1.12
Leftover savings after cost of living: $25,511
Household median income: $112,470
Single family home average value: $383,029
Average annual cost of living: $66,446
Property crime rate (per 1,000): 16.69
Violent crime rate (per 1,000): 1.06
Leftover savings after cost of living: $46,024
Household median income: $98,686
Single family home average value: $532,485
Average annual cost of living: $69,631
Property crime rate (per 1,000): 4.95
Violent crime rate (per 1,000): 1.65
Leftover savings after cost of living: $29,055
Household median income: $85,220
Single family home average value: $278,843
Average annual cost of living: $53,037
Property crime rate (per 1,000): 13.55
Violent crime rate (per 1,000): 2.05
Leftover savings after cost of living: $32,183
Household median income: $87,767
Single family home average value: $335,990
Average annual cost of living: $55,228
Property crime rate (per 1,000): 15.92
Violent crime rate (per 1,000): 1.62
Leftover savings after cost of living: $32,539
Explore More:
Household median income: $90,109
Single family home average value: $309,099
Average annual cost of living: $54,759
Property crime rate (per 1,000): 10.94
Violent crime rate (per 1,000): 3.11
Leftover savings after cost of living: $35,350
Household median income: $78,429
Single family home average value: $311,142
Average annual cost of living: $57,496
Property crime rate (per 1,000): 11.11
Violent crime rate (per 1,000): 1.68
Leftover savings after cost of living: $20,933
Household median income: $88,026
Single family home average value: $251,139
Average annual cost of living: $51,099
Property crime rate (per 1,000): 10.02
Violent crime rate (per 1,000): 4.06
Leftover savings after cost of living: $36,927
Household median income: $99,115
Single family home average value: $424,195
Average annual cost of living: $64,947
Property crime rate (per 1,000): 15.05
Violent crime rate (per 1,000): 1.69
Leftover savings after cost of living: $34,168
Household median income: $122,229
Single family home average value: $657,469
Average annual cost of living: $79,258
Property crime rate (per 1,000): 12.03
Violent crime rate (per 1,000): 1.87
Leftover savings after cost of living: $42,971
Read Next:
Household median income: $59,480
Single family home average value: $198,416
Average annual cost of living: $47,387
Property crime rate (per 1,000): 13.27
Violent crime rate (per 1,000): 2.01
Leftover savings after cost of living: $12,093
Household median income: $90,685
Single family home average value: $422,360
Average annual cost of living: $64,775
Property crime rate (per 1,000): 16.56
Violent crime rate (per 1,000): 0.95
Leftover savings after cost of living: $25,910
Household median income: $78,889
Single family home average value: $322,783
Average annual cost of living: $55,548
Property crime rate (per 1,000): 16.03
Violent crime rate (per 1,000): 1.88
Leftover savings after cost of living: $23,341
Household median income: $97,187
Single family home average value: $436,850
Average annual cost of living: $61,848
Property crime rate (per 1,000): 21.56
Violent crime rate (per 1,000): 1.38
Leftover savings after cost of living: $35,339
Household median income: $96,257
Single family home average value: $458,869
Average annual cost of living: $64,106
Property crime rate (per 1,000): 20.21
Violent crime rate (per 1,000): 1.25
Leftover savings after cost of living: $32,151
That's Interesting:
Household median income: $101,814
Single family home average value: $479,790
Average annual cost of living: $69,309
Property crime rate (per 1,000): 16.39
Violent crime rate (per 1,000): 1.59
Leftover savings after cost of living: $32,505
Household median income: $103,691
Single family home average value: $540,275
Average annual cost of living: $72,598
Property crime rate (per 1,000): 14.44
Violent crime rate (per 1,000): 1.74
Leftover savings after cost of living: $31,093
Household median income: $108,649
Single family home average value: $524,436
Average annual cost of living: $74,397
Property crime rate (per 1,000): 16.63
Violent crime rate (per 1,000): 1.61
Leftover savings after cost of living: $34,252
Household median income: $100,360
Single family home average value: $522,467
Average annual cost of living: $65,719
Property crime rate (per 1,000): 17.68
Violent crime rate (per 1,000): 2.33
Leftover savings after cost of living: $34,641
Household median income: $93,371
Single family home average value: $433,856
Average annual cost of living: $76,329
Property crime rate (per 1,000): 12.49
Violent crime rate (per 1,000): 1.00
Leftover savings after cost of living: $17,042
Find Out:
Household median income: $109,780
Single family home average value: $702,517
Average annual cost of living: $81,385
Property crime rate (per 1,000): 12.20
Violent crime rate (per 1,000): 1.66
Leftover savings after cost of living: $28,395
Household median income: $103,838
Single family home average value: $456,137
Average annual cost of living: $65,782
Property crime rate (per 1,000): 22.47
Violent crime rate (per 1,000): 2.03
Leftover savings after cost of living: $38,056
Household median income: $91,169
Single family home average value: $319,514
Average annual cost of living: $52,969
Property crime rate (per 1000): 18.91
Violent crime rate (per 1000): 4.30
Leftover savings after cost of living: $38,200
Household median income: $51,776
Single family home average value: $358,185
Average annual cost of living: $56,138
Property crime rate (per 1,000): 13.35
Violent crime rate (per 1,000): 1.59
Leftover savings after cost of living: ($4,362)
Household median income: $73,030
Single family home average value: $241,720
Average annual cost of living: $48,341
Property crime rate (per 1,000): 17.83
Violent crime rate (per 1,000): 3.94
Leftover savings after cost of living: $24,689
Check Out:
Household median income: $72,122
Single family home average value: $408,137
Average annual cost of living: $60,312
Property crime rate (per 1,000): 8.53
Violent crime rate (per 1,000): 3.65
Leftover savings after cost of living: $11,810
Household median income: $85,755
Single family home average value: $355,693
Average annual cost of living: $57,380
Property crime rate (per 1,000): 14.90
Violent crime rate (per 1,000): 4.12
Leftover savings after cost of living: $28,375
Household median income: $93,403
Single family home average value: $498,304
Average annual cost of living: $73,975
Property crime rate (per 1,000): 12.93
Violent crime rate (per 1,000): 2.12
Leftover savings after cost of living: $19,428
Household median income: $128,167
Single family home average value: $683,685
Average annual cost of living: $83,560
Property crime rate (per 1,000): 19.49
Violent crime rate (per 1,000): 2.13
Leftover savings after cost of living: $44,607
Household median income: $85,002
Single family home average value: $408,339
Average annual cost of living: $63,535
Property crime rate (per 1,000): 18.11
Violent crime rate (per 1,000): 2.26
Leftover savings after cost of living: $21,467
Discover More:
Household median income: $117,703
Single family home average value: $875,320
Average annual cost of living: $95,187
Property crime rate (per 1,000): 9.70
Violent crime rate (per 1,000): 1.22
Leftover savings after cost of living: $22,516
Household median income: $63,264
Single family home average value: $214,370
Average annual cost of living: $47,904
Property crime rate (per 1,000): 13.67
Violent crime rate (per 1,000): 4.26
Leftover savings after cost of living: $15,360
Household median income: $62,546
Single family home average value: $263,178
Average annual cost of living: $49,528
Property crime rate (per 1,000): 15.29
Violent crime rate (per 1,000): 3.87
Leftover savings after cost of living: $13,018
Household median income: $89,183
Single family home average value: $589,971
Average annual cost of living: $76,631
Property crime rate (per 1,000): 11.69
Violent crime rate (per 1,000): 1.94
Leftover savings after cost of living: $12,552
Household median income: $74,717
Single family home average value: $300,610
Average annual cost of living: $54,516
Property crime rate (per 1,000): 23.87
Violent crime rate (per 1,000): 2.29
Leftover savings after cost of living: $20,201
View More:
Household median income: $119,926
Single family home average value: $860,702
Average annual cost of living: $92,722
Property crime rate (per 1,000): 12.23
Violent crime rate (per 1,000): 1.78
Leftover savings after cost of living: $27,204
Household median income: $60,293
Single family home average value: $235,184
Average annual cost of living: $47,357
Property crime rate (per 1,000): 23.52
Violent crime rate (per 1,000): 2.71
Leftover savings after cost of living: $12,936
Household median income: $73,719
Single family home average value: $366,076
Average annual cost of living: $56,847
Property crime rate (per 1,000): 21.87
Violent crime rate (per 1,000): 2.47
Leftover savings after cost of living: $16,872
Household median income: $57,789
Single family home average value: $212,303
Average annual cost of living: $47,036
Property crime rate (per 1,000): 21.81
Violent crime rate (per 1,000): 2.99
Leftover savings after cost of living: $10,753
Methodology: For this study, GOBankingRates analyzed cities with at least 100,000 population to find the safest and most affordable places for a family of four. For each city, the household median income was sourced from the U.S. Census American Community Survey. Using the total population as well as the number of property crimes and violent crimes reported by city, as sourced from the FBI's 2023 Crime in the U.S. report, the [1] property crime rate per 1,000 residents and the [2] violent crime rate per 1,000 residents was calculated. Cost of living was sourced from Sperling's BestPlaces, expenditure costs for a family of four (oldest child 6 to 17) were sourced from the Bureau of Labor Statistics Consumer Expenditure Survey, average home value was sourced from Zillow Home Value Index for March 2025 and the average mortgage was calculated using the Federal Reserve Economic Data. Using the median household income and the total cost of living, the [4] leftover savings for a median household income was calculated. The [1] property crime rate per 1,000 was scored and weighted at 1.00, the [2] violent crime rate per 1,000 was scored and weighted at 1.00, the [3] total cost of living was scored and weighted at 1.00, and the [4] leftover savings from median household income was scored and weighted at 1.00. All the scores were summed and sorted to show the safest and most affordable city for a family of four. All data was collected on and is up to date as of April 29, 2025.
More From GOBankingRates
6 Used Luxury SUVs That Are a Good Investment for Retirees
4 Affordable Car Brands You Won't Regret Buying in 2025
7 Overpriced Grocery Items Frugal People Should Quit Buying in 2025
25 Places To Buy a Home If You Want It To Gain Value
This article originally appeared on GOBankingRates.com: 50 Safest, Most Affordable Cities for a Family of Four
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
40 minutes ago
- Yahoo
1 in 4 job seekers in Hawaiʻi lie to gain employment: New report
HONOLULU (KHON2) — A new report has found that one in four job seekers admits to lying on their resume, in their cover letter and during the interview process. The lies range from inflated skills to fabricated experience. Some even stretch the truth about who they are, including disability status and ethnicity, to try to get hired. Hawaiʻi's highest paid college majors, jobs for recent graduates For some, it works. Four out of 10 say they got a job by being dishonest, and two-thirds believe the lie helped them succeed. But there is a cost. Once a lie is uncovered, trust erodes, and that's not something that's easy to rebuild. 'Lying during the hiring process can create long-term trust issues and damage one's professional reputation,' said Stacie Haller, an advisor on the survey. 'Once a lie is uncovered, it is not easily forgotten, and trust is difficult to rebuild.' Hawaiʻi's highest paying careers, professions Lying is more common than many people think. The survey found that 44% of Americans say they've lied in the hiring process. That includes 24% on resumes, 19% in interviews and 6% on cover letters. The most frequent lies are about years of experience, skills and job responsibilities. Here's what job seekers in Hawaiʻi need to know now: 8 takeaways from Hawaiʻi's top ranking for school lunches Amongst job seekers, around 24% have lied on their resume, which was identified by the study as making it the most common place for dishonesty. The most frequent resume lies the study found include: Years of experience (38%). Skills and abilities (34%). Lengths of positions held (32%).The survey found that Millennials are the most likely to lie on their resumes, with 29% reporting that they had lied in order to gain employment. Meanwhile, 20% of Gen Z'ers were found to have lied along with 27% of Gen Xers and 13% of Baby Boomers. Additionally, men were found to be more likely than women using lies on their resumes at a rate of 30% v. 20%. Lying in interviews is also widespread. The report found that 19% of job seekers admitted to dishonesty during an interview. The most common interview lies include: Skills and abilities (41%). Responsibilities at previous jobs (32%). Years of experience (31%). Once again, Millennials topped the lying pile with 24% of them saying they lie during the interview process. Baby Boomers were the least likely at 8%; and again, more men (23%) than women (16%) lie at the interview stage. Cover letters were found to have fewer lies with 6% of job seekers saying they have lied in their cover letters. And when they did, they most often misrepresented: Skills and abilities (45%). Responsibilities at previous jobs (38%). Years of experience (37%). You can click to read the full report. 'Dishonesty harms a worker's reputation, even if the consequences aren't immediately apparent,' explained Haller. 'If a candidate doesn't meet all the requirements for a specific position, honesty is still always the best approach. They should highlight their genuine strengths, the skills they bring, and why they are uniquely suited to succeed in the role.' Haller went on to explain further. Get news on the go with KHON 2GO, KHON's morning podcast, every morning at 8 'By presenting their qualifications truthfully, they demonstrate integrity and professionalism, qualities often as important as technical skills,' concluded Haller. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
Trump clears path for Nippon Steel investment in US Steel, so long as it fits the government's terms
WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump on Friday signed an executive order paving the way for a Nippon Steel investment in U.S. Steel, so long as the Japanese company complies with a 'national security agreement' submitted by the federal government. Trump's order didn't detail the terms of the national security agreement. But U.S. Steel and Nippon Steel said in a joint statement that the agreement stipulates that approximately $11 billion in new investments will be made by 2028 and includes giving the U.S. government a 'golden share' — essentially veto power to ensure the country's national security interests are protected. 'We thank President Trump and his Administration for their bold leadership and strong support for our historic partnership,' the two companies said. 'This partnership will bring a massive investment that will support our communities and families for generations to come. We look forward to putting our commitments into action to make American steelmaking and manufacturing great again.' The companies have completed a U.S. Department of Justice review and received all necessary regulatory approvals, the statement said. 'The partnership is expected to be finalized promptly,' the statement said. The companies offered few details on how the golden share would work and what investments would be made. Trump said Thursday that he would as president have 'total control' of what U.S. Steel did as part of the investment. Trump said then that the deal would preserve '51% ownership by Americans.' The Japan-based steelmaker had been offering nearly $15 billion to purchase the Pittsburgh-based U.S. Steel in a merger that had been delayed on national security concerns starting during Joe Biden's presidency. Trump opposed the purchase while campaigning for the White House, yet he expressed optimism in working out an arrangement once in office. 'We have a golden share, which I control,' said Trump, although it was unclear what he meant by suggesting that the federal government would determine what U.S. Steel does as a company. Trump added that he was 'a little concerned' about what presidents other than him would do with their golden share, 'but that gives you total control.' Still, Nippon Steel has never said it was backing off its bid to buy and control U.S. Steel as a wholly owned subsidiary. The proposed merger had been under review by the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States, or CFIUS, during the Trump and Biden administrations. The order signed Friday by Trump said the CFIUS review provided 'credible evidence' that Nippon Steel 'might take action that threatens to impair the national security of the United States,' but such risks might be 'adequately mitigated' by approving the proposed national security agreement. The order doesn't detail the perceived national security risk and only provides a timeline for the national security agreement. The White House declined to provide details on the terms of the agreement. The order said the draft agreement was submitted to U.S. Steel and Nippon Steel on Friday. The two companies must successfully execute the agreement as decided by the Treasury Department and other federal agencies that are part CFIUS by the closing date of the transaction. Trump reserves the authority to issue further actions regarding the investment as part of the order he signed on Friday. ___ Associated Press writer Marc Levy in Harrisburg, Pa., contributed to this report.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Trump clears path for Nippon Steel investment in US Steel, so long as it fits the government's terms
WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump on Friday signed an executive order paving the way for a Nippon Steel investment in U.S. Steel, so long as the Japanese company complies with a 'national security agreement' submitted by the federal government. Trump's order didn't detail the terms of the national security agreement. But U.S. Steel and Nippon Steel said in a joint statement that the agreement stipulates that approximately $11 billion in new investments will be made by 2028 and includes giving the U.S. government a 'golden share" — essentially veto power to ensure the country's national security interests are protected. 'We thank President Trump and his Administration for their bold leadership and strong support for our historic partnership," the two companies said. "This partnership will bring a massive investment that will support our communities and families for generations to come. We look forward to putting our commitments into action to make American steelmaking and manufacturing great again.' The companies have completed a U.S. Department of Justice review and received all necessary regulatory approvals, the statement said. 'The partnership is expected to be finalized promptly,' the statement said. The companies offered few details on how the golden share would work and what investments would be made. Trump said Thursday that he would as president have 'total control' of what U.S. Steel did as part of the investment. Trump said then that the deal would preserve '51% ownership by Americans.' The Japan-based steelmaker had been offering nearly $15 billion to purchase the Pittsburgh-based U.S. Steel in a merger that had been delayed on national security concerns starting during Joe Biden's presidency. Trump opposed the purchase while campaigning for the White House, yet he expressed optimism in working out an arrangement once in office. 'We have a golden share, which I control,' said Trump, although it was unclear what he meant by suggesting that the federal government would determine what U.S. Steel does as a company. Trump added that he was 'a little concerned' about what presidents other than him would do with their golden share, 'but that gives you total control.' Still, Nippon Steel has never said it was backing off its bid to buy and control U.S. Steel as a wholly owned subsidiary. The proposed merger had been under review by the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States, or CFIUS, during the Trump and Biden administrations. The order signed Friday by Trump said the CFIUS review provided 'credible evidence' that Nippon Steel 'might take action that threatens to impair the national security of the United States,' but such risks might be 'adequately mitigated' by approving the proposed national security agreement. The order doesn't detail the perceived national security risk and only provides a timeline for the national security agreement. The White House declined to provide details on the terms of the agreement. The order said the draft agreement was submitted to U.S. Steel and Nippon Steel on Friday. The two companies must successfully execute the agreement as decided by the Treasury Department and other federal agencies that are part CFIUS by the closing date of the transaction. Trump reserves the authority to issue further actions regarding the investment as part of the order he signed on Friday. ___ Associated Press writer Marc Levy in Harrisburg, Pa., contributed to this report. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
