1 in 4 job seekers in Hawaiʻi lie to gain employment: New report
HONOLULU (KHON2) — A new report has found that one in four job seekers admits to lying on their resume, in their cover letter and during the interview process.
The lies range from inflated skills to fabricated experience. Some even stretch the truth about who they are, including disability status and ethnicity, to try to get hired.
Hawaiʻi's highest paid college majors, jobs for recent graduates
For some, it works. Four out of 10 say they got a job by being dishonest, and two-thirds believe the lie helped them succeed. But there is a cost. Once a lie is uncovered, trust erodes, and that's not something that's easy to rebuild.
'Lying during the hiring process can create long-term trust issues and damage one's professional reputation,' said Stacie Haller, an advisor on the survey. 'Once a lie is uncovered, it is not easily forgotten, and trust is difficult to rebuild.'
Hawaiʻi's highest paying careers, professions
Lying is more common than many people think. The survey found that 44% of Americans say they've lied in the hiring process. That includes 24% on resumes, 19% in interviews and 6% on cover letters. The most frequent lies are about years of experience, skills and job responsibilities.
Here's what job seekers in Hawaiʻi need to know now:
8 takeaways from Hawaiʻi's top ranking for school lunches
Amongst job seekers, around 24% have lied on their resume, which was identified by the study as making it the most common place for dishonesty. The most frequent resume lies the study found include:
Years of experience (38%).
Skills and abilities (34%).
Lengths of positions held (32%).The survey found that Millennials are the most likely to lie on their resumes, with 29% reporting that they had lied in order to gain employment. Meanwhile, 20% of Gen Z'ers were found to have lied along with 27% of Gen Xers and 13% of Baby Boomers.
Additionally, men were found to be more likely than women using lies on their resumes at a rate of 30% v. 20%.
Lying in interviews is also widespread. The report found that 19% of job seekers admitted to dishonesty during an interview. The most common interview lies include:
Skills and abilities (41%).
Responsibilities at previous jobs (32%).
Years of experience (31%).
Once again, Millennials topped the lying pile with 24% of them saying they lie during the interview process. Baby Boomers were the least likely at 8%; and again, more men (23%) than women (16%) lie at the interview stage.
Cover letters were found to have fewer lies with 6% of job seekers saying they have lied in their cover letters. And when they did, they most often misrepresented:
Skills and abilities (45%).
Responsibilities at previous jobs (38%).
Years of experience (37%).
You can click to read the full report.
'Dishonesty harms a worker's reputation, even if the consequences aren't immediately apparent,' explained Haller. 'If a candidate doesn't meet all the requirements for a specific position, honesty is still always the best approach. They should highlight their genuine strengths, the skills they bring, and why they are uniquely suited to succeed in the role.'
Haller went on to explain further.
Get news on the go with KHON 2GO, KHON's morning podcast, every morning at 8
'By presenting their qualifications truthfully, they demonstrate integrity and professionalism, qualities often as important as technical skills,' concluded Haller.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
37 minutes ago
- Yahoo
This week in Trumponomics: Good news that doesn't matter
President Trump has gotten some good economic news recently. It's already largely forgotten. Inflation continues to cool, and consumers are feeling a bit cheerier. The year-over-year inflation rate for May came in at a tame 2.4%, lower than economists expected. There were few signs of price hikes caused by Trump's new import taxes. Consumer confidence picked up, according to a monthly University of Michigan survey that has mostly shown gathering gloom since Trump took office. The sentiment index improved for the first time since December, with Americans less worried about runaway inflation than they have been in recent months. Those modest improvements follow a nice gain in the stock market during the last few weeks. It all ties together: Trump rattled investors and consumers in March and April with tariffs that were far more severe than most expected. He has since dialed back the steepest tariffs and relented in other ways. Trump is doing damage control, and the tariff shock is wearing off. This is a fleeting respite, however, because the sudden escalation of the war between Israel and Iran will bum everybody out anew. The war will bring some sticker shock, even for Americans thousands of miles away. Oil prices have jumped 20% in two weeks, to $74 per barrel, as traders first anticipated some kind of an Israeli attack, then bid prices higher still after Israel bombarded Iran's nuclear weapons facilities and other targets on June 12. That price jump is just a fear premium — there hasn't been any actual disruption to oil supplies. If either combatant does target Middle East energy infrastructure, prices could easily top $100, at least for a while. Israel is now determined to destroy Iran's nuclear weapons program, which means the fighting could go on for a while and possibly intensify. This is no one-and-done face slap. Gas prices are down from last summer to a national average of about $3.10 per gallon. That's obviously a relief to drivers who were paying $4 and even $5 per gallon just a couple of years ago. Gas prices have an outsized effect on consumer psyches, so that's one important problem Trump hasn't had to deal with. Pump prices will undoubtedly drift up in proportion to rising oil prices. It could be temporary. But that will be happening as Trump's self-imposed trade deadline of July 9 approaches. That's the date by which Trump says he wants trade deals with dozens of countries, or else he'll reimpose 'reciprocal' tariffs that caused a big market sell-off when he first announced them on April 2. Trump halted those tariffs on April 9, but the threat of reimposing them is supposedly the leverage he's using now to hammer out trade have been girding for more tariff announcements and other trade friction around the July 9 deadline. Now they have the new variable of a Middle East war to factor in. There was a modest stock sell-off after Israel launched its first attack on Iran, but not panic. The market seems to be saying the economic damage will be contained. Yet Middle East wars are obviously unpredictable, and this one comes with a sizable list of things that could go wrong. One of the thorniest developments for Trump would be US involvement that puts American troops at risk. The Israelis would welcome US involvement, because American weapons have more punch than Israeli bombs and could readily wreck deeply buried nuclear facilities in Iran that Israel may struggle to destroy on its own. But US involvement would put American ships and bases on Iran's target list. Iran can't beat the United States in a war, but it could kill and injure American service members. Trump campaigned for president last year as the 'peace candidate' who would resolve foreign conflicts, not get America deeper into them. It's all kind of depressing. And that's before Trump's tariffs actually do start to push up prices for clothing, electronics, appliances, and many other everyday things. If you were feeling good a few days ago, try to bottle those good vibes. Rick Newman is a senior columnist for Yahoo Finance. Follow him on Bluesky and X: @rickjnewman. Click here for political news related to business and money policies that will shape tomorrow's stock prices. Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
An Open Letter to the President: Addressing our Debt
Donald J. TrumpThe Mar-a-Lago Club1100 South Ocean BoulevardPalm Beach, Florida Dear President Trump: I voted for you in all three of your presidential campaigns. The first time, I cast my vote with cautious optimism. The third time, with enthusiasm. And I contributed financially to your campaign. You have achieved what few thought possible - a triumphant return, driven by a deep-seated belief among millions of Americans that only you can effectively challenge the entrenched political establishment. Your first 100 days were extraordinary, but if your presidency is to be remembered not just as bold but also historic, one challenge must rise above all others: - the national debt. The national debt, currently $37 trillion, is the result of pervasive fiscal irresponsibility, accumulated over many decades. Our annual interest payments now exceed $1trillion - more than we spend on our national defense. This is not just a financial burden. It is a threat to the survival of our country as a democratic republic. Without immediate, decisive action, the consequences are predictable: more credit downgrades, more increases in interest rates, and crippling obligations to service the debt. What would happen to our great country if annual interest payments exceeded not just our defense budget but also Social Security, Medicaid, and Medicare? Mr. President, if we are to remain a vibrant nation, this exploding national debt has to be attacked immediately and significantly. That will not happen without your leadership. Sadly, the Republican Party has shown that it is not a reliable ally. Even before Republicans regained control of the House, they held a secret vote. By a margin of 158 to 2 they brought back earmarks - the very same pork barrel spending practices that Speaker John Boehner put to bed. Since then, the Democratic Congress never dared to bring back earmarks. House Republicans did. The results were predictable, and immediate: $16 billion in earmarks. More than 7,500 pet projects. In the Senate, eight of the 12 largest earmarkers are Republicans. In the House, 48 of the top earmarkers are Republicans. Here are the largest earmarkers: Sen. Susan Collins of Maine (population 1.4 million) secured $870 million in earmarks. Sen. Lisa Murkowski grabbed $851.1 million in earmarks. Sen. Mitch McConnell took nearly $500 million in earmarks. My own congressman, Brian Mast, walked away with $437 million in earmarks. Obviously, eliminating pork barrel spending wont, by itself, address the structural problems in Washingtons budget process - or make the "big, beautiful bill" currently being debated in Congress deficit-neutral. But if members of Congress cant even control themselves, what kind of example do they set for the American people? How can politicians ask their fellow Americans to sacrifice when they wont do it themselves? Actions speak louder than words. Fiscal irresponsibility dominates the culture within Congress, within our government. That culture, obviously, will not change on its own. It can be changed. But only with your leadership. Mr. President, fortunately, today you have a tool to attack waste, fraud, duplication, and incompetence. Because of the cloud, Big Data, and the Freedom of Information Act, you can deliver every government expenditure to every citizens cell phone, iPad, and computer. You can bring a new era to government, i.e., transparency. Mr. President, you can be the launch pad for transparency. Imagine a government where every single taxpayer dollar that government spends is tracked and reported to the public. Imagine the cultural shift from secret votes, from wasteful spending to one where every government official knows their budgets will be scrutinized in detail. Mr. President, here are several all-encompassing, culture-changing, deficit-attacking actions you can announce tomorrow: Lead by example: Cut White House expenses by a defined percentage. Report the savings to the public every quarter. Challenge Congress: Ask every member to cut their office and committee budgets. Suggest at least 10%. Publish a quarterly report on every senator and representative. Eliminate pork-barrel projects: Call on Congress to abolish earmarks. Shine a light on every remaining earmarker until they fall in line. Mobilize the bureaucracy: Instruct all agencies to focus on rooting out waste, fraud, duplication, and incompetence, and report the progress quarterly. Say explicitly that you will monitor progress and report the bold and expose the complacent. Bringing transparency to government can do more than clean up wasted taxpayer dollars. It can rebuild trust. It can remind the American people that the government can still work for them. It will solidify your legacy as the chief executive who did not just talk about draining the swamp, you did it. Imagine our country if we did not have to spend $1 trillion each year on interest payments. That is the future Americans deserve. Mr. President, you have been given a historic mandate. You can leave office with a legacy as the president who did not just promise to "Make America Great Again," but who actually did it. America cannot be made great again without addressing the greatest threat to our countrys survival as a democratic republic - the exploding national debt. Respectfully, Thomas W. Smith Thomas W. Smith is the founder of Prescott Investors, Inc.
Los Angeles Times
an hour ago
- Los Angeles Times
Consumer sentiment rises for 1st time this year as inflation remains tame
WASHINGTON — Consumer sentiment increased in June for the first time in six months, the latest sign that Americans' views of the economy have improved as inflation has stayed tame and the Trump administration has reached a truce in its trade fight with China. The preliminary reading of the University of Michigan's closely watched consumer sentiment index, released Friday, jumped 16% from 52.2 to 60.5. The large increase followed steady drops that left the preliminary number last month at the second-lowest level in the nearly 75-year history of the survey. Consumer sentiment is still down 20% compared with December 2024. 'Consumers appear to have settled somewhat from the shock of the extremely high tariffs announced in April and the policy volatility seen in the weeks that followed,' Joanne Hsu, director of the survey, said in a written statement. 'However, consumers still perceive wide-ranging downside risks to the economy.' Americans have largely taken a darker view of the economy's future after President Donald Trump unleashed a wide-ranging trade war, imposing steep tariffs on China, the European Union, and dozens of other countries. Yet in April Trump postponed a set of sweeping tariffs on about 60 nations and last month reached a temporary truce with China, after both sides had sharply ratcheted up tariffs on each other. The Conference Board's consumer confidence index, released in late May, also increased after five straight declines that were linked to anxiety over tariffs. U.S. duties remain elevated compared with historical levels, but so far they have not worsened overall inflation. Prices rose just 2.4% in May compared with a year ago, up slightly from 2.3% in April. Still, most economists expect tariffs to hit harder in the coming months. Consumer confidence is sharply divided by political outlook, with Republicans feeling much better about the economy under Trump than Democrats. Democratic sentiment about the economy was much higher under Biden, while Republican views were low. This month, however, sentiment did improve among supporters of both parties and independents. Consumers' inflation expectations — basically a measure of how worried people are about future inflation — dropped this month, which will be welcomed by the inflation-fighters at the Federal Reserve. Inflation expectations can become self-fulfilling, because if people worry price increases will get worse, they can take steps — such as demanding higher pay — that push prices even higher. The Fed meets next week, and is expected to keep its key short-term interest rate unchanged at about 4.3%. Rugaber writes for the Associated Press.
