Full text of Hiroshima Governor's Peace Message on 80th anniversary of atomic bombing
****
On this day, which marks the 80th year after the atomic bombing of Hiroshima, on behalf of all people of Hiroshima Prefecture, I wish to offer my humble and sincere prayers for the souls of those who lost their lives in the atomic bombing. I would also like to extend my deepest condolences to the bereaved families and express my heartfelt sympathies to the hibakusha, the atomic bomb survivors, who are suffering even today.
Shortly after the atomic bombing, it was said that not a single grass or tree would grow in Hiroshima for 75 years. Five years have already passed since that milestone, and Hiroshima has undergone dramatic transformation, marked by the opening of a new station building -- now the third generation since the bombing. Many tourists are visiting the city from around the world, and we see Hiroshima has become a peaceful, thriving city. At the same time, however, we are aware that the prosperity we are enjoying today is fragile, as the international situation shifts from one based on the rule of law and diplomacy to a world ruled by overt violence.
Given this situation, some people argue that the importance of nuclear deterrence is growing. Is this really so? Certainly, the concept of deterrence may be necessary to prevent the outbreak of wars but there are limitations. Since the Peloponnesian War in ancient Greece, deterrence supported by the balance of power has been broken repeatedly. This is because it is ultimately a psychological construct or an idea that exists only in our minds. Unlike universal laws such as the law of universal gravitation, deterrence is not an undeniable truth but a fiction.
Deterrence has been broken by over-confident leaders, extreme egoism, pressure from an agitated populace, and widespread misunderstandings or misconceptions. As Japan started the Pacific War despite its overwhelming disadvantage in the balance of power, human beings do not always make rational decisions, which is a fundamental assumption of deterrence theory, especially nuclear deterrence theory.
In fact, nuclear deterrence has not been safely sustained over the past 80 years, but has, at times, been on the brink of collapse. Historical records reveal several instances where the risk of nuclear catastrophe was averted only because of intentional breaches of protocol and the refusal to launch a nuclear missile.
An ancient Chinese poet once wrote, "Ruined is the nation; remain the mountains and rivers." In the past, the foundation for reconstruction remained even after a nation was ruined by the breakdown of deterrence.
"Remains the nation; ruined are the mountains and rivers."
Should nuclear deterrence fail someday, as suggested by historical evidence, and should nuclear war occur, it would be impossible to save the human race and the Earth from unrecoverable devastation.
What is the meaning of national security if it protects only the concept of a nation but has the possibility to lead unrecoverable end for its land and people?
Deterrence does not simply refer to a balance of military power, but it also encompasses broader elements such as soft power and diplomacy. To ensure the sustainability of humanity even if deterrence fails, we must eliminate nuclear weapons as a component of deterrence. Reportedly, more than 14 trillion yen (about $84.76 billion) is spent annually to maintain nuclear deterrence. What we must do now is to invest just one tenth of this amount into resources and knowledge to build a new security system without nuclear weapons.
Nuclear abolition is not a far-off lodestar shining in the sky. As a hibakusha, who was pinned under a collapsed building, crawled towards a ray of light little by little in the darkness and ultimately escaped the rubble with her life, we must pursue the abolition of nuclear weapons. It is a tangible, realistic goal within our reach, the failure of which could mean death.
"Don't give up! Keep pushing! See the light? Crawl towards it." *
Many hibakusha who were unable to escape the rubble died in darkness and agony. To honor their memory, we must never give up, and continue to crawl persistently toward the light of nuclear abolition, ensuring the lives and security of the human race and the earth.
Lastly, Hiroshima Prefecture will never stop its efforts toward nuclear abolition. With this vow, I would like to conclude my message of peace.
The part marked with an asterisk (*) in the governor's speech is a quotation from the speech delivered by Ms. Setsuko Thurlow at the Nobel Peace Prize Award Ceremony on Dec. 10, 2017. (Copyright: The Nobel Foundation, Stockholm, 2017)
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Mainichi
3 hours ago
- The Mainichi
US eyes high-level trade talks with China in fall: Treasury chief
WASHINGTON (Kyodo) -- The United States is eyeing high-level trade talks with China "within the next two or three months," Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said on a television program aired Tuesday. "China is like a multilevel chess game," the point man on tariff issues in President Donald Trump's administration said on the Fox Business channel, adding the United States is trying to deal with "several variables" because China is "our biggest economic rival, and our biggest military rival." "What we are trying to do is to get to more balanced trade," he said. On Monday, Trump signed an executive order extending a tariff truce with China for 90 days, until Nov. 10, with the Chinese government also announcing the extension. In the order, the president said that through discussions with the United States, China "continues to take significant steps toward remedying non-reciprocal trade arrangements," among other things. Without the extension, an additional tariff rate of 24 percent on Chinese goods imported to the United States would have taken effect early Tuesday, renewing trade tensions between the world's two largest economies. In May, the United States and China backed away from their respective triple-digit tariff rates imposed during a trade war launched by Trump. Since then, the truce, agreed to by both countries in Geneva during their first round of trade talks, has remained in place. The United States and China have held two more rounds of high-level trade talks, the most recent in Stockholm in July. Trump has suggested an in-person meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping could take place by the end of this year if an agreement on trade issues can be reached.
Asahi Shimbun
3 hours ago
- Asahi Shimbun
Former prime minister says politicians must avoid wars
Former Prime Minister Yasuo Fukuda responds in an interview with The Asahi Shimbun. (Koichi Ueda) Despite indoctrination in militaristic education during World War II, Yasuo Fukuda would go on to value the importance of diplomacy when he served as chief Cabinet secretary and then prime minister. In an interview with The Asahi Shimbun, Fukuda, 89, said, 'The role of a politician is to make every effort to not create a situation in which a nation is forced to go to war.' Born in Tokyo in 1936, Fukuda is the oldest son of, Takeo, a wartime Finance Ministry official, who would later become prime minister. Ministry work took the Fukuda family to Nanjing, China, which was then under Japanese control. But the worsening war situation forced the family to return to Tokyo and later move to Gunma Prefecture, the elder Fukuda's ancestral home, because of the intense bombing of the capital. Because of the heavily militaristic nature of the education at the Gunma elementary school Fukuda attended, he recalled becoming very angry when adults told him Japan had lost the war. But other memories of the war have returned to haunt Fukuda. 'One thing I cannot forget is sending off local men to the warfront,' Fukuda said. 'One of my relatives went to war and what I remember about the send-off is how they all seemed to gaze off into the distance.' Fukuda added that as he grew older he began to recall those expressions of those going off to war and think about whether they left while knowing in their hearts that they would never return alive. 'I still recall those moments and am left with an incredibly helpless feeling,' Fukuda said. His father retired from the Finance Ministry after the war and entered politics. Takeo Fukuda as prime minister in 1977 announced what came to be known as the 'Fukuda Doctrine,' which pledged that Japan would not become a military power. Fukuda himself became prime minister in 2007 and along with Chinese President Hu Jintao released a joint statement that called for establishing a strategic and mutually beneficial relationship between their nations. 'Diplomacy is important for not entering into war,' Fukuda said, 'The foundation for diplomacy is a relationship of trust.' But he noted that various moves by China have made it difficult to hold meaningful summits over the past decade. While Fukuda said the confrontation with China over the Senkaku Islands in the East China Sea was the catalyst for the lack of meetings, he added, 'If we only view China as the enemy, it will be very difficult to make any move at all. Japan and China must not forget their special relationship based on a common culture and history.' Eighty years since the end of World War II, only about 1 percent of Diet members were born before Aug. 15, 1945. Fukuda said, 'It is easy to say we must not go to war. But what is important is using one's imagination to make that past history a core part of oneself and think about what it meant for the nation.' After serving as an aide to his father when he was prime minister between 1976 and 1978, Fukuda won his first term in the Lower House in 1990. He served as chief Cabinet secretary for about three and a half years under former Prime Ministers Junichiro Koizumi and Yoshiro Mori. Fukuda became prime minister in September 2007, marking the first time a father and son had served in that position. He would serve in that post for a year before resigning in September 2008.
Asahi Shimbun
3 hours ago
- Asahi Shimbun
Vietnam wants to be the next Asian tiger and it's overhauling its economy to make it happen.
HANOI--Beneath red banners and a gold bust of revolutionary leader Ho Chi Minh in Hanoi's central party school, Communist Party chief To Lam declared the arrival of 'a new era of development' late last year. The speech was more than symbolic— it signaled the launch of what could be Vietnam's most ambitious economic overhaul in decades. Vietnam aims to get rich by 2045 and become Asia's next 'tiger economy' — a term used to describe the earlier ascent of countries like South Korea and Taiwan. The challenge ahead is steep: Reconciling growth with overdue reforms, an aging population, climate risks and creaking institutions. There's added pressure from President Donald Trump over Vietnam's trade surplus with the U.S., a reflection of its astounding economic trajectory. In 1990, the average Vietnamese could afford about $1,200 worth of goods and services a year, adjusted for local prices. Today, that figure has risen by more than 13 times to $16,385. Vietnam's transformation into a global manufacturing hub with shiny new highways, high-rise skylines and a booming middle class has lifted millions of its people from poverty, similar to China. But its low-cost, export-led boom is slowing, while the proposed reforms — expanding private industries, strengthening social protections, and investing in tech, green energy. It faces a growing obstacle in climate change. 'It's all hands on can't waste time anymore,' said Mimi Vu of the consultancy Raise Partners. Investment has soared, driven partly by U.S.-China trade tensions, and the U.S. is now Vietnam's biggest export market. Once-quiet suburbs have been replaced with industrial parks where trucks rumble through sprawling logistics hubs that serve global brands. Vietnam ran a $123.5 billion trade surplus with the U.S. trade in 2024, angering Trump, who threatened a 46% U.S. import tax on Vietnamese goods. The two sides appear to have settled on a 20% levy, and twice that for goods suspected of being transshipped, or routed through Vietnam to avoid U.S. trade restrictions. During negotiations with the Trump administration, Vietnam's focus was on its tariffs compared to those of its neighbors and competitors, said Daniel Kritenbrink, a former U.S. ambassador to Vietnam. 'As long as they're in the same zone, in the same ballpark, I think Vietnam can live with that outcome,' he said. But he added questions remain over how much Chinese content in those exports might be too much and how such goods will be taxed. Vietnam was preparing to shift its economic policies even before Trump's tariffs threatened its model of churning out low-cost exports for the world, aware of what economists call the 'middle-income trap,' when economies tend to plateau without major reforms. To move beyond that, South Korea bet on electronics, Taiwan on semiconductors, and Singapore on finance, said Richard McClellan, founder of the consultancy RMAC Advisory. But Vietnam's economy today is more diverse and complex than those countries were at the time and it can't rely on just one winning sector to drive long-term growth and stay competitive as wages rise and cheap labor is no longer its main advantage. It needs to make 'multiple big bets,' McClellan said. Following China's lead, Vietnam is counting on high-tech sectors like computer chips, artificial intelligence and renewable energy, providing strategic tax breaks and research support in cities like Hanoi, Ho Chi Minh City, and Danang. It's also investing heavily in infrastructure, including civilian nuclear plants and a $67 billion North–South high-speed railway, that will cut travel time from Hanoi to Ho Chi Minh City to eight hours. Vietnam also aspires to become a global financial center. The government plans two special financial centers, in bustling Ho Chi Minh City and in the seaside resort city of Danang, with simplified rules to attract foreign investors, tax breaks, support for financial tech startups, and easier ways to settle business disputes. Underpinning all of this is institutional reform. Ministries are being merged, low-level bureaucracies have been eliminated and Vietnam's 63 provinces will be consolidated into 34 to build regional centers with deeper talent pools. Vietnam is counting on private businesses to lead its new economic push — a seismic shift from the past. In May, the Communist Party passed Resolution 68. It calls private businesses the 'most important force' in the economy, pledging to break away from domination by state-owned and foreign companies. So far, large multinationals have powered Vietnam's exports, using imported materials and parts and low-cost local labor. Local companies are stuck at the low-end of supply chains, struggling to access loans and markets that favored the 700-odd state-owned giants, from colonial-era beer factories with arched windows to unfashionable state-run shops that few customers bother to enter. 'The private sector remains heavily constrained,' said Nguyen Khac Giang of Singapore's ISEAS–Yusof Ishak Institute. Again emulating China, Vietnam wants 'national champions' to drive innovation and compete globally, not by picking winners, but by letting markets decide. The policy includes easier loans for companies investing in new technology, priority in government contracts for those meeting innovation goals, and help for firms looking to expand overseas. Even mega-projects like the North-South High-Speed Rail, once reserved for state-run giants, are now open to private bidding. By 2030, Vietnam hopes to elevate at least 20 private firms to a global scale. But Giang warned that there will be pushback from conservatives in the Communist Party and from those who benefit from state-owned firms. Even as political resistance threatens to stall reforms, climate threats require urgent action. After losing a major investor over flood risks, Bruno Jaspaert knew something had to change. His firm, DEEP C Industrial Zones, houses more than 150 factories across northern Vietnam. So it hired a consultancy to redesign flood resilience plans. Climate risk is becoming its own kind of market regulation, forcing businesses to plan better, build smarter, and adapt faster. 'If the whole world will decide it's a can go very fast,' said Jaspaert. When Typhoon Yagi hit last year, causing $1.6 billion in damage, knocking 0.15% off Vietnam's GDP and battering factories that produce nearly half the country's economic output, roads in DEEP C industrial parks stayed dry. Climate risks are no longer theoretical: If Vietnam doesn't take strong action to adapt to and reduce climate change, the country could lose 12–14.5% of its GDP each year by 2050, and up to one million people could fall into extreme poverty by 2030, according to the World Bank. Meanwhile, Vietnam is growing old before it gets rich. The country's 'golden population' window — when working-age people outnumber dependents — will close by 2039 and the labor force is projected to peak just three years later. That could shrink productivity and strain social services, especially since families — and women in particular — are the default caregivers, said Teerawichitchainan Bussarawan of the Center for Family and Population Research at the National University of Singapore. Vietnam is racing to pre-empt the fallout by expanding access to preventive healthcare so older adults remain healthier and more independent. Gradually raising the retirement age and drawing more women into the formal workforce would help offset labor gaps and promote 'healthy aging,' Bussarawan said.
