Social housing wait list grows despite Tasmanian government's build pledge
"I was on a Centrelink budget at the time. I had nothing to my name," he said.
"
So, I applied for housing and from there on, there's nothing supportive, there's no communication — it's just a wait for two years.
"
For those two years, Mr Davey and his two children lived out of a motel room while he waited for social housing.
Mr Davey says the wait for housing was tough, with "nothing supportive" and "no communication" from agencies.
(
ABC News: Ebony ten Broeke
)
Without a home to provide security or stability, he — with support from the children's mum — was left to face the challenge's of raising his family day-by-day.
"That hyper vigilance is really stressful and takes a lot of energy away from trying to move forward," he said.
Now in a steady home, Mr Davey has become an advocate for secure housing.
He wants a more robust support system for people left on housing waitlists to provide advice and assist with planning.
"People don't know. On a wait list, there was nothing,"
he said.
Tasmania's social housing waitlist is the longest it's ever been, and the second longest wait-time for a jurisdiction after the Northern Territory.
According to Homes Tasmania data, there are currently over 5,000 applicants, with an average wait of 82 weeks.
Between 2020 and 2024, the wait time increased 33 per cent.
TasCOSS, the peak body for community services in Tasmania, has launched a
"This is a story of Tasmania," TasCOSS chief executive Adrienne Picone said.
"This is our fellow Tasmanians who aren't able to afford a safe and comfortable home, a secure home, and put a roof over their heads."
The online dashboard tracks wait times, and presents the progress being made.
(
ABC News: Ebony ten Broeke
)
Housing goals challenged
The increase in social housing wait times comes despite the Tasmanian government's goal of providing 10,000 new social and affordable homes by 2032.
Photo shows
An aerial shot of two wooden house frames. Piles of red bricks are scattered around.
Homes Tasmania planning documents show how the agency plans to meet a target of 10,000 new homes by 2032, with the largest proportion to be made up of helping households into "affordable home ownership" through the MyHome program.
The target was originally announced in 2022 by then-premier Peter Gutwein.
Just under one third of the 10,000 total homes will be social homes and supported accommodation, with 119 crisis accommodation spots.
And to meet that goal, more than 1,000 parcels of vacant land
By the end of last year, over 3,000 homes had been completed, with funding locked in for another 809.
Adrienne Picone says Tasmania needs to double the number of social homes" being built to address the crisis effectively.
(
ABC News: Ebony ten Broeke
)
Ms Picone said the state government's housing strategy was "a great aspiration", but a growing social housing waitlist suggested it was not working.
"How can we be 40 per cent towards our target, and yet the wait list continues to grow,"
she said.
"We probably need to double the number of social homes that we're trying to build and decrease our reliance on affordable rentals and home purchases."
Photo shows
Mountain and houses
Homes Tasmania was established in 2022 to deliver housing, and homelessness and crisis accommodation. Just two years later, an interstate auditor will conduct a review to determine if the new entity is meeting its targets.
Despite her grievances, Ms Picone has not hitched what she deems an unsuccessful strategy solely to the Tasmanian government.
She said te state's well-documented housing crisis can only be solved through collaboration at every level of government with community services and housing providers.
Tasmania's Minister for Housing, Planning, and Consumer Affairs, Felix Ellis, said the government was taking "strong action to deliver supply across the housing spectrum" and was "working tirelessly" to address the needs of those waiting for a house.
"Our government is full steam ahead on delivering on our ambitious commitment of 10,000 social and affordable homes by 2032, with more than 40 per cent delivered ahead of schedule," Mr Ellis said.
'Hidden side of homelessness'
Ewan Higgs says on "any given night, we might be turning away 10 or 15 people".
(
ABC News: Ebony ten Broeke
)
As a housing service program manager at Hobart City Mission, Ewan Higgs has seen the demand grow first-hand.
Each night, the charity and community service provider accommodates 35 people in an old church.
Mr Higgs said he believed it was "a drop in the ocean".
"We're full every night,"
he said.
"On any given night, we might be turning away 10 or 15 people. We are seeing upwards of 180 people accessing our services."
Temporary sleeping arrangements at Hobart City Mission's Safe Night Space in Hobart.
(
ABC News: Ebony ten Broeke
)
As a crisis and emergency accommodation service provider with limited beds, Mr Higgs said it was common for people in need of a bed to continue camping or couch surfing while they waited.
And some of the people requiring assistance will use the service for years.
"It's the reality where we are working with that really pointy end of homelessness," Mr Higgs said.
"
We're working with people who are sleeping rough, the people who are really struggling with mental health, drug and alcohol addiction.
"
Ewan Higgs says the services are "full every night".
(
ABC News: Ebony ten Broeke
)
More and more, those on the "hidden side of homelessness" — such as people on disability support or aged care pensions who can no longer afford rent — were seeking help through the charity, he said.
Like Ms Picone, Mr Higgs said a response to address the growing crisis required collaboration across all levels of society.
"It shouldn't just be on one or the other — we need to collaborate and bring the community and government and the not-for-profits together,"
he said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

ABC News
2 hours ago
- ABC News
Why do we need to boost productivity?
INGA TING, ABC DATA JOURNALIST: For those of us toiling five full days a week, the idea of a working four days a week – at 100 per cent of pay – sounds almost too good to be true. But at the upcoming economic roundtable, Australia's unions will cite research showing it not only boosts living standards, but also productivity. To understand how that might work, we first need to understand what productivity is, what it measures and what it doesn't. Put simply, productivity measures how much we output compared to how much we input. It's about quantity, not cost or profit. Today, the average Australian worker takes just one hour to produce the same amount produced over an entire day in 1901. That's thanks to a bunch of factors like economies of scale, higher skilled and educated workers, better management practices and - the single biggest factor historically – technology. A series of reports from the Productivity Commission have highlighted a long-standing productivity problem, showing Australians are working record-long hours and yet productivity growth is at its slowest in 60 years. And that trend is across most industrialised countries, not just Australia. So how does that work? Labour productivity typically measures the number of hours it takes to produce a good or service. This is fairly straightforward when you're looking at manufacturing or agriculture, and measuring, say, the number of cars or tonnes of wheat produced per worker. But it gets trickier when applied to sectors like care services, health or education, where the maths might tell you that bigger class sizes mean more productive teachers while the reality for students suggests the opposite. Bear in mind that nearly 90 per cent of Australians now work in the service industry, and we start to see how the way we typically measure productivity is starting to unravel. The picture gets muddier still, when we consider that labour isn't the only driver of productivity. Physical capital – like buildings, machines and equipment – as well as intangible capital like intellectual property, also have big impacts. This chart compares labour productivity to multifactor productivity, which measures the combined input from both labour and capital. It shows both types of productivity have been declining but capital productivity has lagged labour productivity for the best part of 30 years. The Productivity Commission has made the same point; that the added hours workers are putting in have not been matched by business investment in the systems and technologies that would allow workers to use those hours more efficiently. So, can we actually work less but produce more? The data suggests, yes especially if investments in better management and new technology are matched with less burnout, better staff retention and more motivated employees. Work smarter, not longer - that's the challenge for next week's roundtable.

News.com.au
3 hours ago
- News.com.au
Secret Deloitte review into automated JobSeeker system warns of 'instability,' 'unintended impacts'
A $439,000 report kept under wraps by the government has issued urgent warnings over the system responsible for managing vulnerable Australians on JobSeeker, with fears the program punishes those struggling and is prone to error. The damning report comes after the Department of Employment and Workplace Relations (DEWR) and Services Australia were found to have illegally cancelled the JobSeeker payments of 964 recipients between April 2022 and July 2024. A review completed by Deloitte, which was received by DEWR on June 18 and remained unpublished until inquiries from NewsWire on Thursday, said repeated modifications and updates of the system had created at 'excessively convoluted' code base which 'lacks architectural integrity' had become 'difficult to manage. Commonwealth Ombudsman Iain Anderson said he feared it would have likely resulted in 'profound if not catastrophic' effects on Australians struggling financially. The mistaken terminations, which have been likened to robodebt 2.0, occurred after the controversial automated Targeted Compliance Framework (TCF) responsible for ensuring JobSeeker recipients met their mutual obligations repeatedly malfunctioned. A lack of a 'comprehensive design register' also meant any changes require 'extensive manual intervention across multiple databases and workflows,' resulting in a high 'likelihood of system instability and unintended impacts on participant case outcomes'. Additionally the Statement of Assurance said the TCF has 'not evolved or matured' since it was introduced under the Coalition government in 2018, and 'lacks the risk-based proportionality and participant centred design' found in similar programs used by the ATO, Australian Border Force and the NDIS. In another scathing finding, Deloitte, who were paid $439,142 to undertake the review, said other large government IT systems which weren't used by vulnerable Australians placed 'greater emphasis on human case management to respond to complex participant needs'. Criticisms were also made of the TCF's technical makeup. The report said the volatility of the program had been 'exacerbated by the widespread use of unconventional technical practices', like hard-coded fixes. However, the two out of three of the glitches which resulted in the nearly 1000 JobSeeker payment terminations were 'embedded during the original 2018 system'. Despite amendments passed in 2022, which called for greater discretion to be used before the cancelling of payments, Deloitte said there was 'no evidence' that the 'capacity for discretionary decision-making functionality was embedded in the system' ever. The review called on DEWR to limit or suspend further modifications to the system to 'constrain the risk of further disruptions,' and limit the introduction of new defects. If necessary, changes to comply with legislative updates should be 'thoroughly assessed by policy, legal and technical authorities to ensure legislative and policy compliance and anticipated outcomes are maintained'. DEWR must also urgently strengthen its current internal review processes to ensure negative case determinations are 'supported by appropriate evidence' and lawful under current legislation. Welfare advocates, like the Anti-Poverty Centre, the Australian Council of Social Services (ACOSS), and Economic Justice Australia have repeatedly criticised the use of the TCF, calling for the punitive measure to be removed. Mr Anderson, the Commonwealth Ombudsman also singled out DEWR secretary Natalie James had been so slow to act, taking 10 months April 2022 to September 2023 to pause the automated cancellations after it was raised by external legal advisers. As of March 21 this year, reductions and cancellations in income support payments have been paused pending ongoing legal and IT reviews, however suspensions have remained. The department has also yet to implement the Digital Protections Framework, despite legislative requirements passed in 2022, with Mr Anderson writing: 'We do not consider a delay of over three years, coupled with an indefinite commitment to future action, is reasonable'.

ABC News
3 hours ago
- ABC News
Pro-AUKUS Republicans and Democrats stress Albanese must secure sit-down with Trump
Members of a visiting delegation of US Congress members from both sides of politics have stressed the importance of a face-to-face meeting between President Donald Trump and Prime Minister Anthony Albanese. The delegation has been in Adelaide for the Australia America Leadership Dialogue, where the current state of the alliance has been under the microscope. The Republican and Democrat members have expressed their strong support for the AUKUS deal to go ahead and praised progress being made at the Osborne Shipyard in South Australia, where nuclear-powered submarines will ultimately be built. The agreement is currently the subject of a Pentagon review, which is due to conclude in the coming months. Democrat senator Chris Coons, who sits on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee has suggested President Trump make a trip to Australia to visit the prime minister. "When you're sitting in the same room as someone you have a better conversation," he told reporters. Mike Turner, a former chair of the House Intelligence Committee agreed an in-person meeting would be "helpful". Opposition Leader Sussan Ley has dialled up pressure on the prime minister to secure a meeting. "The relationship between Australia and the US feels as if it is drifting, and that Australia is indeed a bystander in that relationship," Ms Ley told reporters in Adelaide, where she also attended the Dialogue. On defence spending, members of the Congressional delegation have backed Australia's right to make its own sovereign decision, but have urged all US allies to lift military budgets. The Albanese government has pushed back on demands from US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth to lift Australia's defence spending to 3.5 per cent of GDP. But Joe Courtney — a Democrat congressman and strong AUKUS backer — says it's a crude measure because different countries calculate defence spending in different ways. For example, America counts all capital expenditure at its military bases towards its overall defence spend, while Australia does not, he said. "You really need to get an apples-to-apples sort of metric of what is defence spending, before you're going to challenge other countries' efforts," he said. "If we're going to have a real discussion about this, then we really should have an accurate metric in terms of what each country is doing." Mr Courtney's comments could give the prime minister cover to argue Australia is pulling its weight when it comes to defence spending. The Democrat members of the delegation said they disagreed with President Trump's use of tariffs against Australia and other allies. Senator Coons also suggested differences over whether to recognise a Palestinian state would not create further difficulties in the US-Australia relationship.