US Presidential election: Steve Bannon dismisses reports of 2028 run; gives two-word reply
Bannon is seeking political advice for a potential run, and it also claimed that he had privately disparaged Vice President JD Vance, who has been considered the top contender to run for the presidency on the GOP's ticket in 2028, as per reports.
According to Daily Mail, citing a source within Bannon's circle, he expressed doubts about Vance's resilience for a 2028 campaign.
In response to Daily Mail's report, the former Trump chief strategist provided a concise reply: "Trump 2028," Fox News reported.
President Trump recently endorsed JD Vance as his likely successor, suggesting a potential ticket with state secretary Marco Rubio, while acknowledging the premature nature of such discussions. Rubio expressed support for Vance during an interview with Lara Trump, stating, "I think JD Vance would be a great nominee if he decides he wants to do that".
The National Pulse criticised the Daily Mail's article as poorly sourced, suggesting it aimed to create discord within Republican ranks.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Salma Hayek, 58,Shows Her Huge Size In New Photos
Boite A Scoop
Undo
In March, Bannon told Politico he solely supports President Trump and the America First agenda, dismissing presidential ambitions as "absurd". However, in April, he discussed with News Nation possible ways to circumvent presidential term limits.
Following Trump's 2025 inauguration, Representative Andy Ogles introduced a constitutional amendment for a potential third presidential term. The proposal remains under consideration by the House Judiciary Committee.
The Trump Store currently offers "TRUMP 2028" merchandise, including a £50 hat, fuelling speculation about a possible third term campaign.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
30 minutes ago
- Time of India
Breaking News Live Updates: Fed's Lisa Cook says 'no intention of being bullied to step down' after Trump's pressure
21 Aug 2025 | 06:25:47 AM IST Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook said on Wednesday she had "no intention of being bullied to step down" from her role at the central bank, amid calls from U.S. President Donald Trump to do so, according to a statement a Fox Business reporter shared on X. President Donald Trump ramped up pressure on the US central bank Wednesday with a call for Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook to step down, as he repeatedly criticizes Fed Chair Jerome Powell for not lowering interest rates."Cook must resign, now!!!" Trump wrote on his Truth Social platform, sharing a Bloomberg news report on how the Federal Housing Finance Agency's director has called for greater scrutiny of Cook over a pair of director Bill Pulte -- a staunch ally of Trump -- had reportedly written a letter to the US attorney general calling for an investigation of Cook while suggesting that she might have committed a criminal said she had learned about it in a post on social media, and that the mortgage application took place "before I joined the Federal Reserve.""I have no intention of being bullied to step down from my position because of some questions raised in a tweet," she said in a statement to she said she would take questions about her financial history "seriously" and was "gathering the accurate information to answer any legitimate questions and provide the facts."The Trump administration has pursued allegations of mortgage fraud against high-profile Democrats who are seen as political adversaries of the was not immediately clear if such a probe will take place targeting Cook, the first Black woman to serve on the central bank's president is also limited in his ability to remove officials from the central bank.A Supreme Court order recently suggested that Fed officials cannot be taken out of their jobs over policy disagreements, meaning they have to be removed for "cause," which could be interpreted to mean wrongdoing. Show more
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
30 minutes ago
- Business Standard
US court halts protections for migrants from Central America, Nepal
The Trump administration has aggressively sought to remove the protection, thus making more people eligible for removal AP Washington A federal appeals court on Wednesday sided with the Trump administration and stayed a lower court's order keeping in place temporary protections for 60,000 migrants from Central America and Nepal. The 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco granted the emergency stay pending an appeal as immigrants rights advocates allege that the administration acted unlawfully in ending Temporary Protected Status designations for people from Honduras, Nicaragua and Nepal. Temporary Protected Status is a designation that can be granted by the Homeland Security secretary, preventing migrants from being deported and allowing them to work. The Trump administration has aggressively sought to remove the protection, thus making more people eligible for removal. It's part of a wider effort by the administration to carry out mass deportations of immigrants. (Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
30 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Judge denies DOJ request to unseal Epstein grand jury transcripts
A federal judge on Wednesday rejected the Trump administration's request to unseal grand jury transcripts from Jeffrey Epstein's sex trafficking case, joining two other judges who declined to release similar records from investigations into the late financier's sexual abuse of young women and girls. Judge Richard Berman, who presided over the 2019 case, ruled a week after another Manhattan federal judge turned down the government's request to release transcripts from the grand jury that indicted Epstein's longtime confidante Ghislaine Maxwell. Barring reversal on appeal, Berman's decision appears to foreclose the possibility of federal courts releasing Epstein-related grand jury testimony. A federal judge in Florida declined to release grand jury documents from an investigation there in 2005 and 2007, though some material from a state case against Epstein was made public last year. The rulings were a resounding repudiation of the Justice Department's effort to unlock the records, a move the Republican administration undertook amid a fierce backlash over its refusal to release a massive trove of documents in its possession. Berman and the judge in Maxwell's case, Paul A Engelmayer, made clear in their rulings that the grand jury transcripts contain none of the answers likely to satisfy the immense public interest in the case, with Berman calling the request a diversion. President Donald Trump had called for the release of transcripts amid rumours and criticism about his long-ago involvement with Epstein. During last year's presidential campaign, Trump promised to release files related to Epstein, but he was met with criticism including from many of his own supporters when the small number of records released by his Justice Department lacked new revelations. A Justice Department spokesperson declined to comment on Wednesday. Each of the judges who declined to release transcripts cited longstanding grand jury secrecy rules and concluded that the government did not meet any of the extraordinary exceptions under federal law that could justify making them public. They also noted that the Justice Department has voluminous records related to Epstein that aren't covered by grand jury secrecy rules. Berman wrote that the scant information contained in around 70 pages of Epstein grand jury transcripts pales in comparison to the Epstein investigative information and materials in the hands of the Department of Justice," which he said totals around 100,000 pages. The Government is the logical party to make comprehensive disclosure to the public of the Epstein Files, Berman wrote in an apparent reference to the Justice Department's refusal to release additional records. He said the request to release grand jury records "appears to be a diversion' from the breadth and scope of the Epstein files in the Government's possession. The grand jury testimony is merely a hearsay snippet of Jeffrey Epstein's alleged conduct. The Justice Department had informed Berman that the only witness to testify before the Epstein grand jury in 2019 was an FBI agent who, the judge noted, "had no direct knowledge of the facts of the case and whose testimony was mostly hearsay. The rest of the grand jury presentation consisted of a PowerPoint slideshow and a call log. Last year, a judge in Florida unsealed around 150 pages of transcripts of the grand jury proceedings that led to Epstein's indictment on state charges there in 2006. Maxwell, a British socialite and publishing heir, is serving a 20-year prison sentence after her 2021 conviction on sex trafficking charges for helping Epstein sexually abuse underage girls. She was recently transferred from a prison in Florida to a prison camp in Texas. Epstein died in jail awaiting trial. Maxwell's case has been the subject of heightened public focus since an outcry over the Justice Department said last month that it would not release any additional documents from the Epstein sex trafficking investigation. The decision infuriated online sleuths, conspiracy theorists and elements of Trump's base who had hoped to see proof of a government cover-up. Since then, officials in Trump's Republican administration have tried to cast themselves as promoting transparency in the case, including by requesting the unsealing of grand jury transcripts. Meanwhile, Maxwell was interviewed at a Florida courthouse weeks ago by Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche. The House Oversight Committee also said it wanted to speak with Maxwell. Her lawyers said they would be open to an interview but only if the panel were to ensure immunity from prosecution. In a letter to Maxwell's lawyers, Rep James Comer, the committee chair, wrote that the committee was willing to delay the deposition until after the resolution of Maxwell's appeal to the Supreme Court. That appeal is expected to be resolved in late September. Comer wrote that while Maxwell's testimony was vital to the Republican-led investigation into Epstein, the committee would not provide immunity or any questions in advance of her testimony. (Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)
