King's Birthday Honours list celebrates Kiwi achievers
Their achievements are elevated and are on par with sporting heroes and politicians, sometimes more deservedly.
For some, the honours are less about keeping in step with British tradition and more about giving Kiwis the recognition they deserve.
The debate goes back and forth over the honours system, with knight and damehoods having been famously scrapped in 2000 by Helen Clark's Labour Government, then reintroduced as the New Zealand honours system nine years later by Sir John Key.
Next door, Australia's knight and damehoods became almost a tug of war within the Liberal Party. Prime Minister Tony Abbott reintroduced them in 2014, puzzlingly knighted Prince Philip, and they were removed again just over a year and a half later by the next Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull, and have been absent ever since.
It's noted that both Clark's and Turnbull's decisions were approved by the Queen, who rarely got involved with government policy.
More recently, the New Zealand Republicans have called for honours to be announced at Matariki, saying that recognising the King's birthday (which is not his real birthday) was not a relevant public holiday for the country.
This year, however, it's status quo and today's list of recipients are all nominated by their communities and recommended to the King by the Government.
Ranjna Patel, a prominent figure in the Auckland community, receives the New Zealand Order of Merit and becomes a Dame for services to ethnic communities, health and family violence prevention.
Patel's CV reads like a veritable alphabet soup: ONZM, QSM and now DNZM. Her contributions to the Auckland health community are far too great to list.
Millennials will recognise Suzy Cato on today's list. She is being made an Officer of the New Zealand Order of Merit for her services to music, television and education.
Cato's melodic voice coached children through the Covid-19 lockdowns, producing online content such as storytelling, science experiments and musical activities for children.
Cato's show You And Me was staple children's TV viewing in many Kiwi households. She was known by her trademark blonde hair and colourful selection of jumpers.
No doubt her grown-up fans can still sing the theme tune It's Our Time by heart.
BMX champion Sarah Walker, comedian Dai Henwood, TV personality and historian Jude Dobson, Louise Wallace, Black Fern Portia Woodman-Wickliffe and former All Black and rugby commentator Murray Mexted are other recognisable names on the list.
But whether they have name recognition or not, we must take the time to honour and thank our high achievers for their invaluable contributions to society and their local communities – however we choose to celebrate them.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scoop
2 hours ago
- Scoop
High Court Judge Urged To Consider Public Trust In McSkimming Case ‘Superinjunction' Decision
Press Release – Free Speech Union Even if a powerful individual is not charged or is found not guilty, the public should still have access to the facts in order to make their own informed judgments about his character. The High Court judge has reserved her decision on whether to maintain the 'superinjunction' in Jevon McSkimming's case, which currently disables the media and public from discussing the details. The Free Speech Union urges the Court to consider the damage to public trust caused by excessive secrecy, says Stephen Franks, Free Speech Union Council Member. 'The Court should uphold the speech rights of all New Zealanders by allowing the media, and therefore the public, to scrutinise matters of genuine public interest. The public should be free to discuss the conduct of their officials and form their own opinions on matters. 'The media play a crucial role in enabling Kiwis to seek and receive information. The High Court set a dangerous precedent by limiting this freedom. The public's ability to discuss cases should be prioritised in court decisions. 'Even if a powerful individual is not charged or is found not guilty, the public should still have access to the facts in order to make their own informed judgments about his character. 'We urge the judge to consider the full weight of the damage done to public trust in courts, lawyers, and judges when they act as if only they can be trusted, while the 'little people' are kept in the dark. 'Suppression is bad, whatever the outcome.'
1News
2 hours ago
- 1News
Poll: NZ First keep rising as National and Labour fall
Both National and Labour have slid in the latest 1News/Verian poll, while New Zealand First have moved to their strongest position in eight years. If an election were to be held today the right bloc of National, ACT and New Zealand First would have 63 seats — enough to form a coalition, while the left bloc of Labour, the Greens and Te Pāti Māori would have 58 seats. This is a small change from the last Verian poll in April, where the coalition had 64 seats. Winston Peters' party moves up to 8%, according to the survey of 1002 eligible voters from May 24 to May 28. National has fallen by 2%, down to 34%. That ties with their worst result since they were elected, matching February's result. ADVERTISEMENT The poll was taken just after Finance Minister Nicola Willis announced her second Budget, which included Kiwisaver changes and used savings from stopping pay equity negotiations to help balance the books. Labour is also going backwards with the party dropping by 3% since April, down to 29%. (Source: 1News) This is their worst result since December — the party had been as high as 33% at one stage this year. The biggest risers in the poll are the Greens, who are up by 2% to 12%. New Zealand First is up by 1% to 8%, its highest result since September 2017. ACT has fallen by 1%, down to 8%, and is now level with New Zealand First. ADVERTISEMENT Te Pāti Māori have regained 1% to move back to 4%. They were as high as 7% in December. Few sweet moments for political parties to relish from the latest polling of public opinion. (Source: 1News) Meanwhile, the public's positive perception of the economy is growing. Economic optimism is up by 2% to 41% on the last poll, while economic pessimism has remained steady on 21%. Today's numbers mean National would have 43 seats in Parliament, down 6 on their current allocation, Labour would have 37, up 3. The Greens would have 15 the same number as at present, while ACT would have 10 down by 1. (Source: 1News) New Zealand First would have 10, up 2, and Te Pāti Māori would also have 6, as they do at present. There would be an extra seat in a 121 seat Parliament as a result of an overhang — assuming that Te Pāti Māori held on to their six electorate seats. ADVERTISEMENT 'Elected to do a job' NZ First leader Peters said, despite his party's strong showing: "We've never believed in the polls in this country." Asked why Labour and National had a drop-in support, Peters said: "I know why it is, but I think I should keep it to myself." Prime Minister Christopher Luxon said: "There's lots of different polls doing lots of different things. I am focused on delivering for New Zealanders and that means making sure we drive more economic growth into this country." When asked why his popularity hasn't shifted in the polls, he said: "I was elected in 2023 to do a job." He added: "I have three years, I have 12 quarters to get things done for New Zealanders. They'll make that decision at the next election, that's all I care about." Labour leader Chris Hipkins said: 'We expect the polls to bounce around a bit at this point in the electoral cycle. We're focused on making sure we're building our support as we head towards next year's election." Preferred for the top job ADVERTISEMENT In the preferred prime minister stakes, neither Christopher Luxon or Chris Hipkins are proving particularly popular. Luxon is steady on 23%, while Hipkins has fallen by 1% to 19%. Winston Peters is the third preferred option, falling by 1% to 6%. Chlöe Swarbrick moves up slightly by 1% to 5% and David Seymour is also up 1% to 4%. Rounding out the honourable mentions on 1% are former PM Jacinda Ardern, Te Pāti Māori's Hana Rawhiti Maipi-Clarke, Finance Minister Nicola Willis, and two new entrants – Greens Co-Leader Marama Davidson and Housing Minister Chris Bishop. (Source: 1News) The poll comes after Nicola Willis revealed the Government's budget. It included changes such as the investment boost, cuts to Kiwisaver contributions and the tightening of jobseeker for 18- and 19-year-olds who can get assistance from their parents. ADVERTISEMENT But the most significant change was the scrapping of 33 pay equity claims under urgency to save $12.8 billion dollars. The changes resulted in protests outside Parliament and MPs' electorate offices. It also comes after the privileges committee's recommended suspending Te Pāti Māori co-leaders Rawiri Waititi and Debbie Ngarewa-Packer from Parliament for 21 days and Hana-Rawhiti Maipi-Clarke for seven days for performing a haka in the House last year. The poll was taken just days before David Seymour took over the Deputy Prime Minister reins from Winston Peters. Party vote National – 34% (down 2% since April) Labour – 29% (down 3%) Green – 12% (up 2%) ADVERTISEMENT ACT – 8% (down 1%) New Zealand First – 8% (up 1%) Te Pāti Māori – 4% (up 1%) The Opportunities Party (TOP) – 1% (down 1%) New Zeal - 1% (up 1%) NZ Outdoor and Freedoms Party – 1% (steady) Aotearoa Legalise Cannabis Party - 1% - (up 1%) ADVERTISEMENT Don't know / refused to say – 11% (down 1%) Seats in the House National – 43 Labour – 37 Green – 15 ACT – 10 New Zealand First – 10 ADVERTISEMENT Te Pāti Māori – 6 Preferred prime minister Christopher Luxon – 23% (steady) Chris Hipkins – 19% (down 1%) Winston Peters – 6% (down 1%) Chlöe Swarbrick – 5% (up 1%) David Seymour – 4% (up 1%) See the full results and methodology here Between May 24 and May 28 2025, 1002 eligible voters were polled by mobile phone (500) and online, using online panels (502). The maximum sampling error is approximately ±3.1%-points at the 95% confidence level. Party support percentages have been rounded up or down to whole numbers, except those less than 4.5%, which are reported to one decimal place. The data has been weighted to align with Stats NZ population counts for age, gender, region, ethnic identification and education level. The sample for mobile phones is selected by random dialling using probability sampling, and the online sample is collected using an online panel. Undecided voters, non-voters and those who refused to answer are excluded from the data on party support. The results are a snapshot in time of party support, and not a prediction.
Scoop
4 hours ago
- Scoop
In Her Memoir, Jacinda Ardern Shows A ‘Different Kind Of Power' Is Possible – But Also Has Its Limits
Imagine getting a positive pregnancy test and then – just a few days later – learning you'll be prime minister. In hindsight, being willing and able to deal with the unexpected would become the hallmark of former New Zealand prime minister Jacinda Ardern's political career. She had always stood out as a leader, but her tumultuous political journey followed none of the predictable pathways. Readers of her memoir will relive what this was like, from her feelings about motherhood through to meeting world leaders. Review: A Different Kind of Power – Jacinda Ardern (Penguin Random House) The title of her book promises more than just that, however. Many people hope for a different kind of leader, but what personal qualities or strengths do such leaders need? More generally, can the personal qualities that contribute to great leadership be learned and applied by others? The answer seems to be a qualified yes. Since leaving office, Ardern has become something of a global influencer. But as her career pivots towards celebrity appearances and international agencies, her memoir also serves as a leadership manifesto – especially for women, or aspirants of any gender, who suffer self-doubt. The limits of empathy In her formative years, working as an assistant to Labour leader Helen Clark, Ardern relates how she let political opponents get under her skin. Was she 'too thin-skinned' for politics? She soon learned 'you could be sensitive and survive'. Better still, she could use her sensitivity as a strength. But 'it is different for women in the public eye', she writes. Derogatory terms were used against her, such as the ' show pony ' epithet coined by a senior woman journalist. There were questions about whether she had 'substance'. These things could undermine people's belief in her competence – perhaps even her own self-belief. What she did about this is instructive. Lashing out at jibes and cartoon images would make her look 'humourless and too sensitive'. The 'trick' was to respond in a way that would 'take the story nowhere'. She became adept at that, deflecting comments aimed at putting her down. This also meant being a feminist but not using feminism as her ideological platform. Other than admonishing a TV presenter that it was 'unacceptable' for him to ask whether a sitting prime minister could take maternity leave, she generally let others do the outrage and avoided becoming an even bigger target for culture warriors. But A Different Kind of Power asks the question: different from what? Ardern's political career has been a challenge, if not a rebuke, to leaders who indulge in egotistical, competitive, always-be-winning behaviour. Need one even mention Donald Trump? Instead, Ardern offers kindness and empathy. The approach showed its true strength in the days following the terrorist atrocity in Christchurch in 2019. At a time when anti-immigrant and Islamophobic sentiments were growing, Ardern embraced the victims. 'They are us', she declared. Emotions that could have generated a cycle of blame were guided by her towards sharing of grief and aroha. Like any political virtue, though, empathy has limitations: it touches those whose suffering commands our attention, but it is partial. Effective social policy also requires an impartial administration and redistribution of resources. Leaders must ensure public goods are delivered equitably to those in need, which calls for rational planning. And sometimes a national emergency may call for actions that feel unfair or insensitive to some. Pandemic politics COVID-19 was that emergency. It created deep uncertainty for governments, and there was no 'kind' pathway forward. The Ardern government did an exemplary job, saving many lives, and the Labour Party was rewarded at the 2020 election with an unprecedented 50% of the party vote. But Ardern's retelling of that time is surprisingly brief, especially given her pivotal role. She put herself daily at the centre of it all, patiently explaining the public health responses. During this battle with a virus, however, she couldn't inoculate against the political consequences and shifts in public opinion. As the pandemic wore on, many New Zealanders whose businesses had been shut down, who had been isolated in their homes, who had difficulty returning home from abroad or who'd been ostracised for not getting vaccinated, weren't feeling much empathy or kindness from their government. And they felt they were being silenced. This sentiment grew far beyond the activists who had made themselves heard on parliament grounds in early 2022. Ardern refused to meet with those protestors. 'How could I send a message that if you disagree with something, you can illegally occupy the grounds of parliament and then have your demands met?' But she (or a senior minister) could have heard their demands and explained why they couldn't be met. Her refusal to listen left the field open to veteran populist Winston Peters, who exploited the opportunity, launching his campaign to return to parliament – in which he now sits and Ardern doesn't. While vaccine mandates were a key concern for protestors, it's disappointing that, to this day, Ardern blames the dissenters, as if they were 'not us' – kicked out of the 'team of five million'. She attributes the dissent solely to their 'mistrust'. Refusing to listen – not just to protestors, but to deeper shifts in public opinion – would cost Labour dearly. Induced by the pandemic fiscal stimulus, inflation peaked at 7.3% in June 2022. By that time, two switches had occurred: the National Party was ahead in polls and a majority were saying the country was heading in the wrong direction. In January 2023, then, Ardern resigned as prime minister. She believed, probably correctly, that it would be 'good for my party and perhaps it would be good for the election'. The toll of leadership But she also reveals in her memoir that a cancer scare influenced the decision – a false alarm, but a sign perhaps that the job was taking its toll. Her leaving could 'take the heat out of the politics', she reasoned. And anyway, she was tired, stressed and losing her patience. The leadership change to Chris Hipkins – and a devastating cyclone – boosted Labour's polling for a while. But their 1,443,545 party votes in 2020 fell to 767,540 in the October 2023 election. Hundreds of thousands of voters had turned their backs on the Labour Party, and the COVID response wasn't solely to blame. There were also controversial or failed policies – such as restructuring water services, a proposed unemployment insurance scheme, and Māori co-governance initiatives – that were ruthlessly exploited by the political opposition. These were all initiated under Ardern, although unmentioned in her memoir. Her book is more about subjective self-doubt and empathy. She doesn't critically examine her own policies. Nor does she express empathy for those who felt disadvantaged or excluded by them – granting as always that emergency measures had been necessary. And, as she heads further into an international career, there's no expression of empathy for those who now need it most, be they children in Gaza or refugees in South Sudan. It's disappointing Ardern doesn't define key words: empathy, leadership or power, for example. There are different ways to understand them, and definitions carry assumptions. But she's not addressing academics or political analysts. Her audience is primarily American – a much larger and more lucrative market than her home country. With the Democrats struggling to find direction and leadership after last year's losses, Ardern – who poses no threat to anyone's political ambitions there – offers some inspiration. Some may fault it for avoiding those harder questions about her time at the top, but Ardern's memoir interweaves an authentically retold personal story with high political drama. It tells of one woman's struggle with morning sickness, childbirth, breastfeeding and motherhood, even while taking on extraordinary public responsibilities and media exposure. It's still amazing how she managed to do all that. Disclosure statement I was a personal acquaintance of Jacinda, when she was a list MP in Auckland Central.
