
J&K seeks stake, revenue share in NHPC's ₹22,700 crore Sawalkot hydro project
New Delhi: Jammu & Kashmir is negotiating for a stake and revenue share in the 1,856 MW Sawalkot hydroelectric project on the Chenab river, currently with state-run NHPC Ltd, as it seeks to secure a direct income stream, according to three people familiar with the matter.
NHPC estimates the project will require an investment of ₹22,700 crore, with the state-run major having already spent ₹973 crore on a detailed project report (DPR).
The project is expected to generate an annual revenue of approximately ₹4,024 crore at a projected tariff of ₹5.5 per unit and a plant load factor of around 45%, according to industry estimates.
The Jammu & Kashmir (J&K) government is in talks with the union power ministry to either develop the Sawalkot project independently through Jammu Kashmir Power Development Corp. (JKPDC), a state-owned entity, or through the joint venture (JV) Chenab Valley Power Projects (CVPP), where JKPDC holds a 44.71% stake, the people said.
Read this | India to fast-track hydropower plans on Pakistan-bound rivers after treaty suspension
If JKPDC secures a stake and a share of revenue, it could earn around ₹1,800 crore annually, according to one of the three people. 'The decision is yet to be made on whether NHPC, JKPDC, or the JV will undertake the project."
NHPC, meanwhile, has sought concessions on state GST and water cess to keep the tariffs viable, a second person said, adding that if a decision is taken swiftly and the project receives central clearance, Sawalkot could be completed and commissioned by October 2033.
"Jammu & Kashmir government may look at offering some concessions in case, if its is given stake in the project in the form of the joint venture and Centre provides incentives for equity stake by the state," a third person said.
Queries sent to NHPC and the union power ministry remained unanswered at the time of publishing. JKPDC officials could not be reached immediately.
An NHPC official, requesting anonymity, said the state department may find it challenging to undertake the project independently given the high capital requirement. 'They may push more for the JV route, as they have in other projects," the official said.
If the state government takes over the project, it would need to reimburse NHPC for the amount spent on the DPR, plus interest. In the case of a joint venture, it would be required to pay a proportional share of the DPR costs, the NHPC official said.
States often prefer ownership stakes in hydropower projects for assured long-term revenue, given these projects' high capital expenditure but low operating costs, water being the primary 'fuel." Control also provides a say in operations, crucial where large-scale land use, water resources, and population displacement are involved, industry experts said.
The Centre has historically incentivized state equity in hydropower projects to fast-track development, a policy paused for some projects in FY26 but expected to resume, making joint ventures attractive, the third person said.
Indus Water Treaty suspension and hydropower push
India's hydropower push in J&K has gained new momentum after the Centre suspended the 1960 Indus Waters Treaty with Pakistan following a terrorist attack in Pahalgam in April that claimed 26 lives. The treaty, signed under World Bank mediation, had capped India's storage capacity on rivers flowing into Pakistan at 3.6 million acre feet (maf).
With the treaty now in abeyance, India is exploring dams and reservoirs for flood control on the Indus, Jhelum, and Chenab rivers, which have a combined average annual runoff of 136 maf, 40% of which originates in India. In other words, approximately 54.4 maf of water comes from Indian territory.
Read this | Mint Explainer: India puts Indus Waters Treaty on ice—what's at stake for both sides
On the hydropower front, the Centre is also pushing to complete and expand projects, with Sawalkot identified as a potential storage site given its early-stage status.
'Projects on these key rivers do not have large storage capacities. As the government looks at creating reservoirs to store water, Sawalkot could be a key project where storage can be incorporated as construction is yet to begin. However, it would require a fresh DPR, new investments, and extended timelines," said the second person.
J&K's current installed hydropower capacity stands at just over 3 GW, far below its estimated potential of 18,000 MW.
JKPDC, with an annual turnover exceeding $150 million, operates the 900 MW Baglihar project, which is governed by the Indus Water Treaty. It also manages 175 MW of gas turbine power at Pampore near Srinagar.
In a March address to the J&K assembly, Jal Shakti minister Javed Ahmad Rana highlighted the region's untapped hydropower reserves, noting that the Chenab basin alone could support 11,283 MW, with another 3,084 MW in the Jhelum basin and 500 MW in the Ravi basin.
J&K's infra push
India, meanwhile, is ramping up infrastructure development to bolster both civilian life and military readiness in the sensitive region. From critical mineral extraction and railway links to waterways and fortified highways, an array of projects is being fast-tracked.
Among these, hydropower and water transport are gaining renewed focus. On 12 May, the Inland Waterways Authority of India (IWAI) opened its office in Srinagar, marking the launch of a series of river navigation projects in J&K. This includes developing infrastructure on three national waterways—Chenab (NW-26), Jhelum (NW-49), and Ravi (NW-84).
Also read | Broken dams, crippled plants: Climate calamities hike insurance costs for hydropower firms
The plan involves setting up floating jetties at ten locations, dredging key stretches for navigability, installing night navigation aids, and conducting regular hydrographic surveys to ensure safe passage of vessels.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

The Hindu
an hour ago
- The Hindu
US with India in fight against terrorism: Deputy Secretary of State tells Indian delegation
The U.S. stands strong with India in the fight against terrorism, U.S. Deputy Secretary of State Christopher Landau told Congress MP Shashi Tharoor-led all-party delegation in Washington to convey India's stance on the Pahalgam terror attack and Operation Sindoor. The Indian delegation met Mr. Landau in Washington on Friday (June 6, 2025) as it wrapped up the crucial U.S. leg of its multi-nation tour, briefing key interlocutors about Operation Sindoor targeting terror infrastructure in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir following the April 22 Pahalgam terror attack that claimed 26 lives. 'The all-party parliamentary delegation led by Dr. @ShashiTharoor had a warm and candid conversation with U.S. Deputy Secretary of State Landau. The Indian delegation briefed him on the atrocities of the Pahalgam terror attack and Operation Sindoor,' the Indian Embassy said on X. Mr. Landau, in a post on X, said it was a 'GREAT' meeting with the Indian parliamentary representatives. 'I reaffirmed that the U.S. stands strong with India in the fight against terrorism. We discussed the U.S.-India strategic relationship, including expanding trade and commercial ties to foster growth and prosperity for both countries,' he said. A statement issued by State Department Spokesperson Tammy Bruce said Mr. Landau 'reaffirmed the United States' strong support of India in the fight against terrorism and the strategic partnership between the two countries'. The delegation discussed with Mr. Landau the importance of advancing key areas of the bilateral relationship, including expanding trade and commercial ties to foster economic growth and prosperity in both countries, according to the statement. The embassy in a statement said that during the meeting with Mr. Landau, the delegation briefed him on the heinous terrorist attack in Pahalgam, discussed India's subsequent Operation Sindoor, and put forth India's firm resolve to counter cross-border terrorism in all its forms. 'The Deputy Secretary reaffirmed the United States' strong support for India in the fight against terrorism. The two sides also had a wide-ranging conversation on the importance of strengthening bilateral relationships through advancing cooperation in areas of mutual interest,' it said. The delegation also had a 'productive meeting' with Senator Chris Van Hollen, a member of the U.S. Senate Foreign Relations Committee. The delegation briefed him on the heinous terrorist attack in Pahalgam, discussed India's subsequent Operation Sindoor, and put forth India's firm resolve to counter cross-border terrorism in all its forms, the embassy said on X. The senator sympathised with the victims of repeated terror attacks in India, saying the U.S. stood with India in the fight against terrorism, and expressed support for New Delhi's right to defend itself. Mr. Tharoor also spoke over the phone with Senator Cory Booker, a member of the U.S. Senate Foreign Relations Committee, and described the conversation as 'warm and productive'. He briefed Booker on the 'monstrous' terror attack in Pahalgam and outlined the repeated provocations of terrorism emanating from across the border, laid out the details of Operation Sindoor, and emphasised India's firm resolve in countering any future acts of terrorism. 'Senator Booker unequivocally condemned terrorism and expressed sympathies with the victims. The conversation also touched upon broader themes in the India-U.S. strategic partnership, which enjoys robust support,' Mr. Tharoor said, adding that he hopes to meet Booker 'Next time in person'. Apart from Mr. Tharoor, the delegation comprises MPs Sarfaraz Ahmad, Ganti Harish Madhur Balayogi, Shashank Mani Tripathi, Bhubaneswar Kalita, Milind Deora, Tejasvi Surya, and India's former Ambassador to the U.S. Taranjit Sandhu. Several prominent American lawmakers and congressmen, as well as policy experts, attended a special reception hosted by the Indian Embassy on Thursday (June 5) night and interacted with the delegation.


Time of India
3 hours ago
- Time of India
‘No longer any question..': Donald Trump says China's Xi Jinping has agreed to let rare earth minerals flow to US; sign of thawing tensions
China has issued temporary export permits to rare-earth suppliers serving the three largest US automobile manufacturers. (AI image) Are the US and China finally moving towards some trade agreement? Chinese President Xi Jinping has consented to permit the export of rare earth minerals and magnets to the United States, according to US President Donald Trump 's statement on Friday. This decision could potentially ease tensions between the two largest global economies. When questioned by a reporter on Air Force One about Xi's agreement, Trump confirmed: "Yes, he did." According to a Reuters report, this development follows a rare telephone conversation between Trump and Xi the previous day, which addressed ongoing trade disagreements regarding this subject. Trump indicated the discussion had reached "a very positive conclusion" and stated that "there should no longer be any questions respecting the complexity of Rare Earth products." Further indicating an improvement in relations, China has issued temporary export permits to rare-earth suppliers serving the three largest US automobile manufacturers, according to two sources with knowledge of the situation quoted in the report. Also Read | Donald Trump vs Elon Musk: Who has more to lose - US President or world's richest man? Stakes are high for both! Senior officials from both nations are scheduled to meet in London on Monday for additional discussions. Trump informed reporters on Friday about significant progress in negotiations with China. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 임플란트 최대 할인 지원해드려요 임플란터 더 알아보기 Undo Following discussions in Geneva, Switzerland on May 12, both nations agreed to a 90-day suspension of their reciprocal high-percentage tariffs, which had been implemented by Trump. The announcement positively influenced financial markets, which had been concerned about trade interruptions. However, China's April suspension of exports for essential minerals and magnets continues to affect global supply chains, impacting automakers, semiconductor producers and defence contractors. Trump alleged Chinese breaches of the Geneva accord and implemented restrictions on chip-design software and other Chinese-bound exports. Beijing dismissed these accusations and warned of retaliatory actions. Also Read | 'Give your best offers by…': Donald Trump administration pushes countries to urgently finalise trade deals as tariff deadline looms China maintains strategic control over rare earths and critical minerals, potentially affecting Trump's position as domestic economic performance could decline if manufacturers lack access to these mineral-dependent components. Trump's erratic policy decisions on international trade since his White House return in January have created uncertainty amongst global leaders and the business community. His pattern of announcing strict trade penalties against various nations, followed by sudden withdrawals of these threats, has left both international counterparts and corporate executives perplexed about the administration's actual stance. Stay informed with the latest business news, updates on bank holidays and public holidays . AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now


Time of India
4 hours ago
- Time of India
'It could have gone nuclear': Trump again claims he 'stopped India-Pakistan war'; doubles down on trade angle
US President Donald Trump (PTI photo) US President Donald Trump on Friday once again claimed that he played a key role in stopping a possible war between India and Pakistan - a conflict he said might have gone nuclear if not for his intervention. Speaking to reports on Air Force One, Trump said he used trade as a tool to get both sides to halt hostilities immediately. "You know, I did something that people don't talk about, and I don't talk about very much, but we solved a big problem, a nuclear problem potentially with India and with Pakistan. I spoke to Pakistan, I spoke to India, they have really great leaders, but they were going at it, and they could have gone at it nuclear," US President said. He explained that both countries stopped their attacks after he warned them the US would suspend trade if the fighting continued. "Both nuclear countries, strong nuclear countries, and I talked about trade and said, 'We're not doing trade if you guys are going to be throwing bombs at each other.' They both stopped, and I stopped that war immediately. It was going much further, and hopefully, it would not go to nuclear, but it might have gone to nuclear. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Secure Your Child's Future with Strong English Fluency Planet Spark Learn More Undo In fact, it might have gone to nuclear in the next round, but we stopped it, and I'd like to commend the leaders of both countries, Pakistan and India. " Trump's version of events got a rare endorsement from Moscow. Russian President Vladimir Putin 's aide Yury Ushakov backed Trump's claim, saying his direct involvement helped end the conflict - something that even came up in a phone call between Trump and Putin. "The Middle East was discussed, as well as the armed conflict between India and Pakistan, which has been halted with the personal involvement of President Trump," Ushakov said. The US president's comments, however, stirred diplomatic pushback. Congress MP Shashi Tharoor , who is leading an all-party delegation to the US, said they addressed Trump's mediation claims directly with US Vice President JD Vance. "The meeting with Vice President Vance was outstanding, very good, very clear. I think we made our position amply clear on this question of mediation, and Vice President Vance fully understood our points," Tharoor said. Trump has made similar claims in the past, especially after India carried out Operation Sindoor -- precision strike on terror infrastructure in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Jammu & Kashmir (PoJK) on May 7, in retaliation for the Pahalgam terror attack. India later responded to Pakistani military aggression with airbase strikes. Eventually, tensions eased after Pakistan's Director General of Military Operations (DGMO) contacted his Indian counterpart and agreed to stop further action.