logo
US Supreme Court hits out at Donald Trump, puts Florida law jailing undocumented immigrants on the backburner for now

US Supreme Court hits out at Donald Trump, puts Florida law jailing undocumented immigrants on the backburner for now

Time of India10-07-2025
Donald Trump's harsh immigration agenda faced some pushback from the United States Supreme Court, which ruled against a contentious Florida law passed by Governor Ron DeSantis that attempted to outright criminalize undocumented immigrants who set foot in the state.
Ron DeSantis had passed the law earlier in the year, which instituted a mandatory minimum nine-year sentence if an undocumented immigrant committed the misdemeanor offense of entering the state for the first time. Repeated re-entry into the state would be treated as felony offenses that would mandate escalating prison sentences.
This law was legally challenged by two individual immigrants, as well as two immigrant advocacy groups. As a result, its enforcement was blocked by Judge Kathleen Williams of the Federal District Court in Miami.
When Florida's Government attempted to appeal this block by escalating things to the Supreme Court, their efforts ultimately failed, with Supreme Court responding: "The application for stay presented to Justice [Clarence] Thomas and by him referred to the Court is denied."
The Supreme Court refuses to revive Florida immigration law
By refusing to stay the Federal District Court order blocking the Florida law's enforcement, the Supreme Court has dealt a blow to Donald Trump's ambitions of instituting the largest immigration crackdown in American history.
As a consequence of this decision, Florida currently will not be able to bring up state charges against undocumented immigrants who enter the state, resulting in immigration enforcement remaining strictly under federal jurisdiction.
Supreme Court declines to let Florida enforce its new immigration law https://t.co/cJjAVXfC9Z pic.twitter.com/LuuZQHDVhf
Donald Trump has been heavily pushing for states to comply with his anti-immigration platform, to the point of deploying the National Guard and United States Marines to California in response to protests against Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) raids. As this Supreme Court decision shows, however, even states willing to cooperate with President Trump's agenda will have legal hurdles to face.
The Supreme Court has a mixed record on Donald Trump's policies
While the Supreme Court has hindered Trump's agenda with its recent ruling, it has also enabled it on other occasions. On June 23, the Supreme Court stayed a federal judge's order that blocked the Trump administration from deporting immigrants to South Sudan.
BREAKINGThe Supreme Court green lights the Trump admin sending immigrants to war-torn and human-rights abusing South Sudan without process, even though most aren't from there. Doc https://t.co/nppiU8szPC Background https://t.co/yXpttVdxtC pic.twitter.com/um18z2rUjU
While the Supreme Court's recent decision will be taken as a victory by immigration advocates and Donald Trump's opponents, the long-term legal ramifications of these immigration cases remain unclear.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump, Putin Ally Exchange Turns To Nuclear Rhetoric Amid Tariff Tensions  Firstpost America
Trump, Putin Ally Exchange Turns To Nuclear Rhetoric Amid Tariff Tensions  Firstpost America

First Post

time9 minutes ago

  • First Post

Trump, Putin Ally Exchange Turns To Nuclear Rhetoric Amid Tariff Tensions Firstpost America

Trump, Putin Ally Exchange Turns To Nuclear Rhetoric Amid Tariff Tensions | Firstpost America | N18G A tense standoff unfolds as US President Donald Trump and Russia's Dmitry Medvedev clash over the Ukraine war. Trump issued a stark 10-day ultimatum demanding a Russian ceasefire, or face sweeping tariffs, though he admitted these might or might not impact Russia. In response, Medvedev, now a top Kremlin official, mocked Trump's deadline and revived chilling Cold War imagery by referencing the infamous "Dead Hand" nuclear system. The fiery exchange quickly escalated, with Trump labeling Medvedev a "failed former president" and Medvedev taunting US lawmakers, including Senator Lindsey Graham. Beyond words, Trump's tariff threats on Russian oil buyers and allied countries like India could disrupt global trade and deepen geopolitical rifts. See More

Trump Imposes 25% Tariff on "Friend" India, Slaps 35% Tariffs on Canada  Firstpost America
Trump Imposes 25% Tariff on "Friend" India, Slaps 35% Tariffs on Canada  Firstpost America

First Post

time9 minutes ago

  • First Post

Trump Imposes 25% Tariff on "Friend" India, Slaps 35% Tariffs on Canada Firstpost America

Trump Imposes 25% Tariff on "Friend" India, Slaps 35% Tariffs on Canada | Firstpost America | N18G US President Donald Trump has signed a sweeping executive order imposing reciprocal tariffs ranging from 10% to 41% on over 70 countries, including India, Canada, Brazil and Taiwan. India faces a steep 25% tariff following stalled trade talks and tensions over its agriculture sector and Russian oil imports. Canada was hit with an immediate 35% tariff over fentanyl concerns, while Mexico received a 90-day reprieve. Trump invoked emergency powers to justify the tariffs, citing national security and unfair trade practices. The new rates take effect seven days from signing, with some exemptions. The move has triggered price hikes and legal challenges, as China faces an August 12 deadline for a separate deal. See More

Diplomacy over drama: India's ties with America go beyond Trump
Diplomacy over drama: India's ties with America go beyond Trump

First Post

time9 minutes ago

  • First Post

Diplomacy over drama: India's ties with America go beyond Trump

India and the United States are bound not merely by trade statistics or transient political postures. They are linked, at a deeper level, by a civilisational affinity that transcends regimes, rhetoric, and rogue leaders read more I am going to begin this column with a joke. A man was being beaten in the public square of a town, but the more he was beaten, the more he kept laughing. Finally, someone watching the proceedings asked him why he was laughing. The man answered: 'These people are beating me because they think I am Dhiru. But I am actually Viru.' The joke may sound facetious, but it is both an illustration of the essence of Vedantic wisdom—that you are not what you (or others) think you are, Tat tvam asi—and of the principle that it is futile to beat the wrong person! STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD My worry is that, in our reaction to Donald Trump's (DT) tantrums, we may lose sight of the fact that India has diplomatic relations with the United States of America, and not with a transient individual who will, within the next two years hopefully, become part of a short chapter of history that both Indians and Americans may wish to forget. I accept that it is tempting in today's age of 24-hour news cycles and Twitter-driven diplomacy to see history through the narrow prism of personality. But to reduce Indo-American ties to the temperament of one man is to profoundly misread both the long arc of history and the deeper convergences that bind the world's oldest democracy with its largest. India and the United States are bound not merely by trade statistics or transient political postures. They are linked, at a deeper level, by a civilisational affinity that transcends regimes, rhetoric, and rogue leaders. This is not to deny the reality of immediate irritants—especially around trade imbalances, technology transfer, and intellectual property disputes—but to place them in their proper context: as negotiable issues within a long-term, strategic relationship. Trump, in the grand sweep of India–US relations, is, in my view, a transient nuisance, a temporary disruptor, not a permanent roadblock; an aberration, not an irrevocable defining force for all time. His leadership style is at odds with the strategic patience that true diplomacy demands. He has reduced alliances to balance sheets, and friends to negotiable assets. Yet, despite his provocations, the structural foundations of the India–US partnership remain intact. Defence cooperation expanded, foundational agreements like BECA and COMCASA were signed, and strategic dialogues deepened. That such progress occurred even during Trump's erratic presidency is testimony to the resilience of the relationship. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The goal of our diplomacy then must be not to throw the baby—which is the long-term perspective of Indo–American relations—out with the bathwater of a notoriously eccentric and unstable individual. How we do this will be the real test of our diplomacy. There are two aspects to this. First, our reaction to his unpredictable and often obnoxious behaviour. This should be responded to not with emotionalism but with a firmness infused with dignity, self-esteem and strategic autonomy. Dignity, because that befits our civilisational ethos; self-esteem, because we are not a pushover, nor are we at his mercy; and, above all, strategic autonomy because, as a sovereign nation, we shall not be dictated to by anyone—however powerful he may think he is—in deciding how we conduct our foreign policy and the choices we make in our national interest. Second, we should, through this temporary squall, continue to focus on the long-term convergences and mutually beneficial dividends that are the foundation of Indo–American relations. A substantive India–US trade agreement has long been awaited. Both countries have much to gain. The US is India's largest trading partner in goods and services, and India is a rising economic power with a rapidly growing consumer base and a sophisticated IT and pharma sector. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD A comprehensive agreement could address tariff barriers, ease investment flows, unlock supply chains, and enhance collaboration in sectors such as defence, hi-tech, clean energy, digital services, and healthcare. There may be Trump-engineered setbacks to such an agreement—including news even as I write this of even higher tariffs—but the conclusion of a trade deal must remain one of our pivotal goals. We should also focus on our strengths within the US. In contemporary times, the Indian-American diaspora—now over 4.5 million strong—serves as a living bridge. It is a community that excels in business, medicine, technology, and politics. From Silicon Valley boardrooms to Capitol Hill chambers, the Indian-American presence affirms the compatibility—and complementarity—of our two democracies. There are geopolitical synergies as well, given the relentless Chinese pursuit of hegemony in the Pacific region and elsewhere. Perhaps the senseless arbitrariness of Trump should make us smell the coffee, and put our own house in order. We need to diversify our trade markets, negotiate new destinations for our goods, and reduce dependence on any one country for our critical needs. We also need to do far more on the Ease of Doing Business arena, and make our economy more competitive, while continuing to upgrade our military infrastructure. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Trump will come and go, but India must emerge stronger and more dynamic at the end of it. The writer is a former diplomat, an author, and a politician. Views expressed in the above piece are personal and solely those of the author. They do not necessarily reflect Firstpost's views.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store