Fines for pavement parking will start in August, Falkirk councillors agree
The council is considering options for 21 of more than 2000 streets in the Falkirk area
A national ban on parking on pavements and across dropped kerbs will be enforced in Falkirk through fines of £100, starting on Monday, August 18, councillors agreed today (Thursday).
Members of Falkirk Council 's executive, across the political spectrum, agreed that the fines should be enforced in a bid to make it easier for people in wheelchairs, parents with prams and the visually impaired to get about.
All Scottish councils were given the power to fine drivers for pavement parking, double parking and dropped kerb parking in December 2023, and Falkirk initially adopted a 'soft approach' to enforcement, issuing reminders rather than fines.
The penalty charge of £100, discounted to £50 if paid within 14 days, has been set nationally for all local authorities.
If payment is not made within 28 days, a Charge Certificate is issued to the vehicle owner, and the penalty will increased to £150.
The legislation allows for local authorities to some areas exempt and all 2,366 streets in the Falkirk area were assessed for this purpose, with 21 streets now being considered for exemption or mitigations.
Where there are exemptions, these will be clearly signed.
Engineering design manager Gary McGregor said officers are still happy to look at requests for exemptions and he believed it would be "a moveable feast" as areas and streets will change in the years ahead.
Two new members of staff will be recruited to the council's team of traffic wardens, taking the total to eight.
The new roles will also allow the council to introduce a back shift, as most pavement parking occurs in the evenings at the end of the traditional working day.
Introducing the report, SNP councillor Paul Garner said Falkirk had looked at the 16 other authorities that have already implemented the legislation and learned from that.
He said: "This is something we've been pushing for for some time and I'm happy to see it now being implemented.
"I think the approach is the right approach and hopefully residents will appreciate what we are trying to do."
Several councillors said they are aware of areas where the new legislation will make parking much more difficult for residents and they were assured that the council will work with communities to find ways to mitigate the issues.
Labour councillor Siobhan Paterson said that while most of her constituents welcome the change, she said it would make parking very difficult for some residents and asked if the council could look at creating extra car parks that could be used by residents.
Mr McGregor said it was something that could be looked at as part of the parking strategy that is currently being devised by Falkirk Council.
But he assured members that over the past few months they have seen a change in behaviour from people who have been warned, before any fines have been issued.
Members agreed that clear communication with residents will be essential to the success of the scheme.
Emergency vehicles and waste lorries will not be affected and delivery drivers will also be exempt, as long as deliveries take less than 20 minutes.
Baillie James Kerr also welcomed the report although he added it was important to remember that in some cases "without people parking on the pavement our bin lorries and our emergency services", so he was glad to hear that consideration has been given to mitigations.
Members heard that the income expected from the scheme was not yet clear, although Councillor Robert Spears said he hoped any income would go to "fixing potholes and repairing pavements".
Independent councillor Laura Murtagh added her support but said that she hoped the council would not make any revenue at all as it will "just change behaviour".
She said: "It's selfish, it's wrong, it's always been wrong - the legislation is there now and we should all be getting behind it."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Record
30 minutes ago
- Daily Record
NHS Dumfries and Galloway predicts budget burst of £28 million in 2025/26 financial year
The overspend is down from the £33.6 million previously expected and includes £21.7 million of cuts. The financial picture of Dumfries and Galloway's healthboard is improving ... but not enough to win approval from the Scottish Government. A report for Monday's board meeting of NHS Dumfries and Galloway revealed an overspend of £28 million is expected in the current financial year. That's down from the £33.6 million prediction at the last meeting. However, the Scottish Government has set a target of a £25 million overspend. Finance boss Katy Kerr's report states the previous draft plan, submitted at the end of March, was not approved. And while 'additional Scottish Government funding' and 'local improvements' have led to the expected overspend being brought down, it still does not meet the requirements of Scottish Ministers. The previous meeting was told that, as things stood, NHS Dumfries and Galloway was due to overspend by £95 million over the next three years. That position has been improved, with the budget burst now expected to be around £87.5 million. That includes £66.7 million worth of savings over the same period. Ms Kerr reported that more than 50 savings schemes worth around £15 million have been found for the current financial year. The savings target is £21.6 million – more than the record £20.1 million the health board saved last year. Members approved the financial recovery plan on Monday and chief executive, Julie White, said: 'This past year's savings have been hard-won, delivered through changes to financial controls, service reviews and transformation which have impacted the way we work right across oursystem. 'But we're now in a position where we have to go further, and faster. 'The next phase of recovery will be even more difficult, and it will require difficult decisions. 'To deliver the level of savings required, we will have to become more efficient and consider further changes to the way in which we deliverservices. 'We will, however, continue to focus on delivering improvements to our performance, particularly our waiting times for planned and unscheduled care. 'We've shown this year that progress is possible. But we need to be honest about what comes next. 'Recovery at this scale means changing how we deliver care. 'Our focus will be on protecting what matters most — that is the delivery of front line core NHS services to the highest possible standards within our available resources, but we need to be clear this requires us to modernise our provision through areas such as a greater use of technology and digital innovation.'
The National
an hour ago
- The National
Blow for Rachel Reeves as UK economy sees biggest fall since late 2023
The Office for National Statistics (ONS) said that gross domestic product (GDP) fell by 0.3% in April, compared with growth of 0.2% the previous month. It marks the biggest contraction since October 2023. It was also worse than the 0.1% contraction expected by most economists. ONS director of economic statistics Liz McKeown said declining output in services and manufacturing sectors both dragged on overall GDP in April. READ MORE: Scottish Government 'short-changed by £1bn' by Rachel Reeves, Finance Secretary say She said: 'However, over the last three months as a whole GDP still grew, with signs that some activity may have been brought forward from April to earlier in the year.' She added: 'Both legal and real estate firms fared badly in April, following a sharp increase in house sales in March when buyers rushed to complete purchases ahead of changes to stamp duty.' Reeves acknowledged that the latest GDP figures were 'clearly disappointing' but insisted her spending review would help deliver growth. The Chancellor said: 'Our number one mission is delivering growth to put more money in people's pockets through our plan for change, and while these numbers are clearly disappointing, I'm determined to deliver on that mission.' Speaking to Sky News, Reeves said 'uncertainty about tariffs' had contributed to a fall in GDP in April, the month Donald Trump announced sweeping levies on imports to the US. She said: 'We know that April was a challenging month. 'There was a huge uncertainty about tariffs, and one of the things, if you dig into those GDP numbers today, is exports weakening and also production weakening because of that uncertainty in the world around tariffs.' She added that the figures for April were 'disappointing, but also perhaps not entirely unexpected, given the uncertainty that is out there in the world at the moment'. April was dubbed "awful April" as it saw bill rises across a huge range of services including broadband, council tax, and energy bills.
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
We should all hope Rachel Reeves delivers growth - or our taxes are going up: SIMON LAMBERT
Rachel Reeves faced a big challenge in her spending review. This is the event where she sets down a marker for what Labour plans to do under Sir Keir Starmer and herself as Chancellor. Funds are pledged to projects and government departments that fit with Labour's priorities – future Budgets should align with a plan to make this happen. Reeves faced a double challenge though, as she also needed to convince the country Labour can deliver growth and improve Britain, while balancing the books in a way that convinces markets the UK's finances are under control. The first element involves a commitment to spend, the second requires spending less or raising taxes. Clearly, this is a difficult balancing act to pull off at the best of times. But if you've promised not to raise taxes and many in your party are vehemently opposed to spending cuts to already threadbare public services, it's even harder. Add in the backdrop of a screeching U-turn on winter fuel payments, a rise in job losses blamed on the Autumn Budget 's employer national insurance rise, and a Spring Statement that regained a wafer-thin £9.9billion fiscal rule buffer only for this to be wiped out soon after by Donald Trump's tariff ructions, and you don't envy Reeves at all. As the old asking for directions joke punchline goes: 'Well, I wouldn't start from here'. There was more money for defence, schools and the NHS and less money for other public services deemed less important, or able to be brushed under the carpet for now. Ultimately though, the economic story remains the same as it was with Reeves' Tory predecessors: meet your targets by outlining plans that involve growth picking up, productivity improving and cutting spending in the future. Since Rishi Sunak there's also been some fiscal drag from frozen tax thresholds chucked in for good measure. Based on the OBR's five-year outlooks, this allows Chancellors to meet their fiscal rules. The fact that these forecasts inevitably turn out to be wrong, productivity doesn't improve, and things don't end up balancing is conveniently ignored. Yet, still we continue with the farce of policy by spreadsheet. As I've written before this fairytale economics is a terrible way to make decisions. Fortunately, the Chancellor had one card up her sleeve, the change to borrowing rules that allowed extra infrastructure investment. It freed her up to announce £113billion of plans to knock Britain into shape. These ranged from £39billion for affordable homes over a decade, to £30billion on nuclear power, £15billion on transport schemes. Among the beneficiaries will be rail and bus links in the North, the Oxford to Cambridge Arc, and the Sizewell C nuclear plant. Will these things deliver growth? Over time, they should do, but we will have to wait for that to arrive. In the meantime, we face a summer of speculation over tax rises in an Autumn Budget – and with the three big earners of income tax, national insurance and VAT off the table due to Labour's pre-election promise, that would mean more tinkering around the edges. The target of tax rises is likely to be wealth, and hitting the wealthy means potentially going after pensions, savings and investments – the OECD even called for a council tax hike on big homes last week. What if things can only get better? But there is an alternative scenario. Through a combination of bad luck and her own mistakes, such as the mystifying '£22billion black hole' gloomfest, Reeves has been caught out in her time as Chancellor. Government borrowing costs have risen, borrowing itself has come in higher than forecast, and growth has disappointed. Meanwhile, the second iteration of President Trump has proved even more erratic than the first. If things move in the opposite direction though, the UK's finances could improve, and Reeves would catch a lucky break and not have to raise taxes in autumn. This is not an entirely far-fetched scenario, GDP growth in early 2025 was better than expected, a calmer period could see government borrowing costs fall, and a pick-up in the economy would deliver extra tax revenue. Its doubtful that much benefit will be seen from the infrastructure splurge for a while, but the government's pledge to build homes and its threats against reluctant councils are already seeing more approved. I'm reading increasing reports of councils waving through schemes they would previously have said no to. Most likely as they are worried about appeals if they turn developers down and get over-ruled. This may come at a cost to the environment and local communities, while developers cash in, but if enough spades go in the ground, it will boost growth. Meanwhile, companies seem to have front-loaded job cuts, the UK stock market is on the up, and I feel that we may be past the moment of peak consumer gloom. All this could bring that much hoped for improvement in growth. I know this would mess with many of our readers' desire for schadenfreude over Labour, but to my mind, greater prosperity is definitely a better outcome. Otherwise, taxes will surely be going up again soon. How far would you go to avoid your personal tax raid? Tax is an increasingly taxing subject for many people who feel hard done by as Britain's complicated system catches them out. And, it's getting worse. So how far would you go to avoid your personal tax raid? And is it changing people's behaviour? On this podcast, Georgie Frost, Lee Boyce and Simon Lambert dive into how the British tax tail is wagging the dog - and what you can do to avoid infuriating tax traps.
