
Invasion of the red tide
A toxic algae bloom is creeping up Otago Harbour, smothering everything in its path.
Do you race down to the harbour to see it for yourself or shrug it off as just one of those things?
Kerikeri writer Dr Octavia Cade is fascinated by the ways people could react to the scenario and interact with the environment.
"So there's this plethora of strange and fascinating possible reactions."
So much so the scenario forms the basis for a science fiction novel and a research paper she is writing this year while the Robert Burns Fellow at the University of Otago.
"They've all gone a bit barmy, my characters. But it's fun. If you're into science fiction as I am, and you've been reading New Zealand science fiction from when you were a kid, there's a surprising amount of it that really looks at what do we do with an invasive species once it gets to New Zealand."
Algae blooms are becoming more common in New Zealand summers with warming waters and nitrate run-off impacting waterways. It makes the perfect villain for Cade's preferred "near-future" writing style.
"There are some really strange and interesting side effects [from it]."
Even Under the Mountain by Cade's favourite author from childhood, Maurice Gee, has its invasive species.
"The invasive species there was obviously the Wilberforces. They horrified me as a child, but as I grew up, and I keep reading it, because I do read it on a fairly regular basis, the solution to it is pretty damn horrifying, if you think about it. The solution to ecological invasion in the Wilberforces is for children to commit genocide."
Cade grew up in Nelson and used to live across the road from the botanical gardens where Gee's The World Around the Corner is set.
"So I would run up, well, I would play on the mountain pretending to be Caroline, who was the hero of that book."
Her love of science fiction developed in childhood thanks to her mother who made sure she and her sister watched Star Trek .
"So we're both sci-fi fans from way back so when I started writing, it was going to be science ficition rather than anything else."
But it took time before Cade embraced writing as she planned to be a scientist. She came to Dunedin to study botany but soon discovered she "really hated" the way scientists were trained to write and the language of scientific papers.
"The idea behind this is that the writing is as efficient as possible and can be read by other scientists working in your field. The downside of that is that it blocks everyone else out."
As she was finishing her scientific studies, the Centre for Scientific Communication was starting up and gave her hope of another way.
"That was the genesis for the shift, the sheer disgust of the scientific paper. I think at the time I remember there was a bit of a kerfuffle, it was one of the national journals in sciences, and it was supposed to be revolutionary that they were moving in their methods from third person to first person. I thought, God, do I really want to be reading and writing this for the rest of my professional life?"
The move to science communication (the programme has since been cut) was an excellent move for Cade who has since completed her PhD in science communication and discovered she could turn her "fun" short-story writing hobby into something more.
Back then she was writing more generic science fiction featuring vampires and other more usual genre characters.
"But I wasn't very good at writing them. It turned out what I was quite good at writing about was plants and animals and how people react with nature and how we talk about science. And so once I started writing, they say write what you know, and eventually I started listening."
It turned out to be good advice and her stories began to do well.
"So I started writing science fiction as a way to communicate science, basically. And it sort of took off from there. So yes, the scientific paper is responsible for my career writing novels about algal blooms."
After helping her marine biologist father as a child she knew marine biology was not as glamorous as it sounded.
"It was standing in freezing cold warehouses holding clipboards while he dissected fish. And so I thought, I don't want anything to do with marine biology on any level."
But a compulsory marine botany paper turned out to be more interesting than she expected. And down the line it has ended up producing a story about algae blooms. She has discovered a real fascination for the blooms, imagining a bright red harbour and people going slowly "doolally" around it after injesting food affected by it.
"With algae, the colour and how toxic it is, how poisonous, how it smothers everything in the harbour. I mean, imagine an albatross trying to float in that or a seal. It sort of kills everything and you can't go swimming. It affects all the water sources, it sort of spreads. It's like this little contagion.
"And the fascinating thing about algae blooms is really we have a decent idea how to stop them. You know, we've got to control runoff and all sorts of things, but we often don't."
So while she no longer writes purely scientific papers, she continues to read a lot of them — for inspiration.
"When I see something particularly weird or disgusting happening in the animal world, I "favourite" the page and then shove it in my story ideas file."
Her first novel The Stone Wētā , published in 2020 and expanded from a short story written in 2016, came about after she read how scientists during Donald Trump's first term as United States president were working across borders to store climate data and information as they were concerned about censorship. The short story had been picked up by one of the top international science fiction publications Clarkesworld Magazine .
"I was thinking, well, this sounds like something people should be talking about more than they are. And so that's where a lot of my stories come from, actual interesting bits of science. And I was able to include a lot of weird stuff in that book."
Still really liking the concept, Cade developed it into an adult novel and it won the Sir Julius Vogel Award for best novel.
Another news article she has bookmarked is of the fishscale gecko, which sheds its scales and "skitters off looking like raw chicken breast".
"The pictures of this thing are revolting and fascinating. And I just love that anything weird and disgusting that can be used as colour."
Cade believes each writer has their own natural length. Hers is short stories — she has had about 70 published to date around the world — so writing a novel is more of a challenge.
"It's one of the advantages of the Burns. You get space to upskill in your creative practice."
She sees her short stories as being part of a long historical and cultural tradition of short story writing in New Zealand with New Zealand children growing up on authors like Katherine Mansfield, Janet Frame, Patricia Grace and Owen Marshall's work.
"I just love them. I love how short stories require different things from readers and writers. You cannot, because you've got such a limited word count, you can't go explaining everything. You can't really go down sidetracks and wander. You've got to be very economical with your storytelling. And you have to trust that the reader can follow along. And I quite like that.
"Whenever I try to write a novel, I often feel like I'm putting in all this waffle. But you can't write a novel like you're writing a short story."
Cade remembers her first day in the Robert Burns fellow's office sitting staring at her computer.
"For nearly the entire day, I stared sort of frozen in terror at this blank screen because they'd given me the opportunity and I'd been expected to produce something, something good."
She gave herself a good talking to that night and the next day began to write. But she still feels slightly intimiated by the list of top New Zealand writers that have gone before her.
"I have a bucket list, you see, of writing opportunities that I would like to apply for. And I've been quite lucky in getting them, but it is a luck that has been very much underpinned by a lot of hard work."
She has applied for the Burns fellowship and others many times before, seeing each application as practise developing her application skills and learning from the rejections and comments she receives.
"I mean, if you are in the creative sector, you have to have a very thick skin when it comes to rejection. A lot of it is luck, but a lot of it is hard work and not taking yourself too seriously. It's never nice having a story rejection or a novel rejection or a residency rejection. But if you are going to work in this industry, you need to learn to suck it up. And it's all part of the learning process, I suppose, in the end."
These days her other "hobby", academic writing, has also become more of a focus as she became aware that it is an advantage to have a list of academic papers to her name when applying for residencies.
"I don't get paid for academic writing but there is a cachet there and it is an investment."
But it is also an excuse for her to indulge some of her passions such as a love of horror movies — a side effect of growing up on science fiction and her love of Under the Mountain .
"The terror I spent lying awake at night thinking about the Wilberforces, you know, sludging at the window the way they did to the twins. There was something fascinating about that. So that was my gateway drug for horror."
So writing papers about something she has seen in a horror film gives her an excuse to watch more of them. One of the papers she is working on is an academic collection coming out called "Sharksploitation, Shark Horror Films in the 21st Century". She is writing a chapter looking at urban shark films, things like "Under Paris" and "Bait", when sharks come into the cities.
She finds urban ecology very interesting, especially the way people react to it when they see wildlife in places they do not expect to see it.
"Because these are issues that are happening all around the world. I mean, in Colorado, I've written papers before on animal horror films, you know, giant sharks and crocodiles and so on. And they're kind of problems in wildlife management.
"I think there's something very interesting that horror films are contributing to this sort of ongoing discussion. Because they remind us that, you know, we're not just existing outside of a food web."
Cade is enjoying being back in Dunedin and revisiting all the places she remembers from her university days.
"It's a great place if you want to write books or learn about nature, because you have the albatross and the sea lions and the penguins and Orokonui's just over there. There's so much scope for creativity."
She was gutted to learn recently that the Frances Hodgkins and Mozart fellowships had been put on hold for a year given the benefits the fellowships have for creatives of all types.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Newsroom
15 hours ago
- Newsroom
Swabs, scans and Star Trek: How healthcare is getting personal
Personalised medicine is moving beyond one-size-fits-all treatments, using genetic, clinical, demographic and lifestyle data to tailor care to the individual. In cancer, for example, some therapies now target mutations unique to a patient's DNA, improving outcomes and reducing side effects. But that's only the beginning. Genome sequencing of some of our sickest Kiwi newborns – and their parents – is already helping guide diagnosis and treatment of children with rare diseases. Meanwhile New Zealand is at the forefront of global research into the human digital twin. This field is about creating virtual replicas of patients built from their health data, including DNA profiles, medical history, imaging and biomarkers. Digital twins could allow doctors to test treatment scenarios, including surgery or medication, in a risk-free environment, predicting how a patient might respond before starting therapy. This year's free Raising the Bar event – where a selection of the University of Auckland's most interesting (and entertaining) academics talk about their research in some of the city's best watering holes – features two top researchers in the field of personalised medicine. Professor Justin O'Sullivan's talk, 'Swab, sequence, surprise! How science is personalising your health' explores cutting-edge science around gut bugs, DNA and metabolic fingerprints. O'Sullivan is director of the world-leading Liggins Institute, focusing on health research, and an expert in gut bugs and in DNA sequencing. Meanwhile Professor Merryn Tawhai, director of the Auckland Bioengineering Institute, is 'reimagining healthcare with human digital twins'. As well as heading the lung team of the institute's human digital twin project, Tawhai sits on the board of directors for Cure Kids and was recently appointed to the Prime Minister's Science, Innovation and Technology Advisory Council. Oh, and she's a committed Star Trek fan. 'Swab, sequence, surprise': What's that all about? Justin O'Sullivan: So you can swab different areas of your body, right? You can get cells from your mouth and that can tell you about your genetics and that's really important for predicting disease risk. But you can also swab your butt and find out about gut bacteria. And having healthy colonies of bacteria are really important because they modify how our bodies are working, and they are our interface with our environment. Science is personalising our health not just looking at our electronic records but looking at our body as a walking ecosystem. Sure, you're affected by your environment, but other factors, particularly your DNA and the organisms you carry with you, are working along with the environmental factors to determine your health. When we bring everything together we can ensure diagnosis and treatments are personal to you. How do you feel about talking in a bar environment? It's a bit of a thrill, to be honest. At an academic conference, you look around and a lot of people are on their phones, their laptops; they're not interested in the talk. At Raising the Bar, you are talking to a group of people who have gone there specifically to listen to you. They're engaged. And that engagement is a really important thing. Professor Justin O'Sullivan is talking at 6pm August 26 at Wynyard Pavilion, 17 Jellicoe Street, Auckland tickets here. I hear you'll be talking about Star Trek and digital twins at Raising the Bar. Sneak preview? Remember in Star Trek when somebody got ill there was that little handheld device that just scanned over them and they miraculously knew what was wrong with them and how to treat them? Okay, we're not quite there yet but we're surprisingly far along that pathway. The human digital twin project is about doctors being able to predict how your body would respond to surgery without ever touching you. Or being able to see exactly how you would react to new medication before you take it. As a Trekkie myself, I like to imagine bringing the Star Trek tricorder to life. In a few years' time, if you get sick we will have a digital twin of you, and we will be able to scan part of you and get new information that tells us about your current condition, and that is linked to the digital twin. And that will allow us to make more rapid diagnosis and determine a personalised treatment plan for you. Professor Merryn Tawhai is talking at 6pm August 26 at Good George, 1 Jellicoe Street, North Wharf, Auckland tickets here.


Otago Daily Times
2 days ago
- Otago Daily Times
Analysing past pandemics to inform future responses
About 9000 people died in six weeks when the 1918 influenza pandemic swept through New Zealand, making it the largest natural disaster in the country's history. Now University of Otago researchers have joined forces with researchers at Durham University (United Kingdom) and the University of Tubingen (Germany) to complete the first digital analysis of the pandemic, in a bid to provide insights for managing future infectious disease emergencies. Also known as the Great Influenza Epidemic and the Spanish flu, the deadly global pandemic lasted from 1918-20, and was caused by the H1N1 subtype of the influenza A virus. The earliest documented case was in March 1918, in Kansas, United States, and a month later there were cases in France, Germany and the UK. It was quickly spread around the globe by troops during World War 1. Between 1918 and 1920, nearly a third of the global population (an estimated 500 million people) had been infected, and up to 50 million people are estimated to have died from the virus, making it the deadliest pandemic in history. Project co-leader and University of Otago Health Protection Aotearoa Research Centre director Prof Michael Baker said the pandemic was still the largest natural disaster in New Zealand's history, killing about 0.8% of the population — the equivalent of about 40,000 people today. "While the social history of this pandemic has been comprehensively described by historians, notably Prof Geoff Rice, there has not been a full epidemiological analysis using case data. "This project will fill that gap and provide insights into how a poorly controlled modern influenza pandemic could affect the country." The researchers now had a digital database that showed who got infected and when in 1918, and who died, which would allow them to see how the virus moved through New Zealand. "This is why influenza is actually quite worrying, because it has a very short incubation period, and it would sweep through the country very rapidly. "If we had a comparable influenza virus arriving in New Zealand tomorrow, it would probably infect most of the country within a few weeks, it would absolutely overwhelm the health system, and we would not be using an elimination approach at that stage — it would be a mitigation approach, where we just try to dampen it down. "It would put massive strain on our ability to manage people with ventilators and so on, so it could cause 40,000 deaths in that period of time if it behaved the same way." Project leader and Durham University bioarchaeologist Prof Rebecca Gowland said the project was the first step towards a more comprehensive programme aimed at better understanding past global pandemics, including the Black Death in 1348, the 6th century Justinian plague in Europe and the Tudor-era English Sweating Sickness. The aim was to better understand how social connections and differences influenced the spread of pandemics through the centuries, and how individuals and societies responded to the threat they pose.


Otago Daily Times
2 days ago
- Otago Daily Times
‘De-extinction' criticism sparks smear campaign
University of Otago paleogeneticist Associate Prof Nic Rawlence holds a moa bone extracted from a site in Central Otago. PHOTO: STEPHEN JAQUIERY An Otago paleogenetics researcher who has been critical of Colossal Biosciences' plan to "de-extinct" the giant moa has been targeted by online "smear" articles aimed at discrediting him. University of Otago paleogeneticist Associate Prof Nic Rawlence has publicly said there was no such thing as de-extinction, and the American company's plan was "a pipe dream that will likely never take flight". "Once something is extinct, it is gone." He said Colossal would be creating a genetically engineered emu or some other genetically engineered ratite that may look like a moa, but was unlikely to function or sound like a moa. Colossal also claimed to have iwi engagement in the project, but Prof Rawlence said based on his experience working with Ngāi Tahu, there was no appetite for de-extinction among many of the individual rūnanga. Now, supporters of Colossal have launched a "smear campaign" on him and other top scientists around the globe who have publicly criticised the de-extinction project. He said there had been three AI-generated articles published in media around the world attacking his professional credibility. One called him a "hypocrite" because he also uses fragmentary ancient DNA to reconstruct lost ecosystems — the same technique Colossal will use to bring back the giant moa. The article said he could not criticise Colossal without criticising his own work. "That's complete rubbish because we're very conscious of the limitations of the data that we use, and we don't over-extrapolate and over-extend our conclusions. "Colossal are selling that they're de-extincting things when they're not. I'm not selling my work as de-extinction." The second "hit piece" accused Prof Rawlence of being more concerned about being a media fixture than actually doing research. "It said I should go focus on improving my mediocre publication record. "My publication record — well that speaks for itself." The third one that came out earlier this week said he was "misappropriating and misrepresenting the Maori voice" around the extinction. "All the engagement work I have done around sequencing moa genomes or looking at New Zealand's taonga species with iwi, hapu, runanga and trusts around the country, means we know the feelings of mana whenua and they are against de-extinction." Colossal chief executive Ben Lamm has told media the company had no involvement in the AI-generated articles. However, Prof Rawlence said it was clear the company did not like the critical commentary. He published a comment piece on The Conversation website about de-extinction, topped with a "tongue-in-cheek headline" saying: "First the dire wolf, now NZ's giant moa: why real 'de-extinction' is unlikely to fly". On July 12, Mr Lamm posted on X about the article, saying: "There are sometimes crazy, weird conspiracy articles about @colossal which make us laugh — But the dumbest headline of all time goes to this article whose author doesn't even know moas couldn't fly. "If the moas [sic] fly, we really up. LOL. I wish people did more research. DUMB — LOLOLOLOLOL." Prof Rawlence said there was also a YouTube video from Colossal about de-extinction science that called its detractors "armchair critics". "Colossal may not be behind the AI-generated smear campaign, but they definitely are wanting to smear and take down critical commentary." Prof Rawlence said he was not concerned about the campaign to discredit his work. "It's water off a moa's back for me. "Under the Education Act, universities have a critic and conscience role enshrined in the legislation, so we can speak out within our area of expertise — which is exactly what we have done. "We provided critical scientific commentary that we did not support de-extinction and that there were serious scientific, ethical, ecological and indigenous engagement concerns. "If the supporters of Colossal had any substantial critique to counter our scientific commentary, they would have used it. "Instead, they're resorting to this — low blows and personal attacks. So to me, it just means our messages are actually hitting home." He believed Colossal's actions were very "Trump-ish". "If a CEO or a director of a museum or the boss of a university put this tweet out, he would be called up in front of his board, reprimanded, or even worse. "But this is Trump's America, and everything is upside down. "So I wouldn't call it very inspiring behaviour at all."