UN urges UK to negotiate new Chagos deal that allows islanders to return
The deal, agreed last month after long-running negotiations, returns sovereignty of the islands to Mauritius, but will see the UK lease back a military base on Diego Garcia, the largest of the islands.
But a panel of experts appointed by the UN Human Rights Council said retaining the base and continuing to bar Chagossians from Diego Garcia 'appears to be at variance with the Chagossians' right to return'.
The Chagossians were expelled from the islands between 1965 and 1973 to make way for the joint UK-US base and have not been allowed to return.
Although the UK-Mauritius deal includes a £40 million trust fund for the benefit of the Chagossians, the UN experts expressed concern that this would not provide an 'effective remedy' for the islanders.
They also criticised an apparent lack of consultation of the islanders prior to the deal, saying: 'We are gravely concerned about the lack of meaningful participation of Chagossians in processes that have led to the agreement.'
The experts added: 'In light of these significant concerns, we call for the ratification of the agreement to be suspended and for a new agreement to be negotiated that fully guarantees the rights of the Chagossian people to return to all islands of the Chagos Archipelago, including Diego Garcia.'
Conservative shadow foreign secretary Dame Priti Patel urged the Government to 'do the right thing (and) stop this'.
She said: 'We have been warning from the start that this deal is bad for British taxpayers and bad for the Chagossian people.
'Now even the United Nations is saying the very same.
'Labour has completely ignored this community from the get-go, and failed to consult with them at every step of the way.
'It is why I have introduced a Bill in Parliament that would block the (agreement) and force the Government to speak to the people at the heart of their surrender plans.'
The deal follows a 2019 advisory opinion from the International Court of Justice saying the islands should be handed over to Mauritius.
As well as the fund for Chagossians, the UK has agreed to pay at least £120 million a year for 99 years in order to lease back the Diego Garcia base – a total cost of at least £13 billion in cash terms.
The deal also includes provisions preventing development on the rest of the archipelago without the UK's consent, which the Government has argued will prevent countries such as China setting up their own facilities.
The agreement has also been backed by the United States.
The Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office has been contacted for comment.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Record
16 minutes ago
- Daily Record
New call for full State Pension for half a million older people after Winter Fuel Payment U-turn
Around 453,000 pensioners are living in a country which does not have a reciprocal agreement with the UK Government. Pension Credit – Could you or someone you know be eligible? Earlier this week the UK Government announced Winter Fuel Payments will be reinstated for over 9 million pensioners later this year. The U-turn and Chancellor Rachel Reeves Spending Review on Wednesday have prompted calls from the 'End Frozen Pensions Campaign' for the annual State Pension uprating to be reinstated for around 453,000 retirees living in countries which do not have a reciprocal agreement with the UK Government. The campaign said it would cost the UK Government just under £60 million per year to end this 'historic wrong'. The policy, which prevents State Pensions from being increased annually - to counteract the impact of inflation for UK pensioners living in certain countries - means some are receiving as little as £60 per week, far below the current £176.45 rate for the Basic State Pension for those living in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. John Duguid, Chair of the End Frozen Pensions Campaign, said: "The Government's U-turn on Winter Fuel Payments shows there is a common consensus that the most vulnerable in our society rely on such payments as essential lifelines during times of need. 'Victims of the Frozen Pensions scandal, who receive only a fraction of their full UK State Pension because they live in some countries overseas, should not be excluded from this rationale. Yet the Government's continued refusal to address this longstanding discrimination means they continue to suffer from often negligible levels of state support. 'These British pensioners, many of whom spent their working lives in the UK, receive on average just £60 per week compared to the more than £170 per week they would be entitled to in the UK, or a non-frozen country.' He added: 'Ending this historic wrong would cost just under £60 million per year. This would barely register in the overall State Pension budget. But this isn't only about cost, it is about the principle of treating British state pensioners fairly and equally. 'Similar to the Government's decision to reinstate Winter Fuel Payments, ending this scandal is the correct and morally just action to take. The Government should do right by those who paid fairly into the system, and ensure they have dignity in their retirement.' Last month, cross-party MPs united to intensify pressure on the UK Government over its refusal to reform the so-called 'frozen pensions' policy. Only British overseas pensioners living in specific countries - mostly within the Commonwealth - are impacted, in what Rebecca Smith MP described as "the ultimate postcode lottery'. Those in the USA see the same annual increase as British pensioners living in the UK or France, while those in Australia or Canada, see their State Pension remain 'frozen' and effectively fall in value. For example, 100-year-old Second World War veteran Anne Puckridge, who lived and worked in the UK until the age of 76 and served in all three of the RAF, Navy and the Army, has received just £72.50 per week since 2001, the year she moved to Canada to be nearer her daughter. Jim Shannon MP similarly questioned the logic of the policy applying in only some countries and not others, arguing 'the arbitrary distinction between countries with and without an operating agreement lacks logic and smacks of red tape and bureaucracy gone mad." The Minister for Pensions, Torsten Bell MP, was mostly notably challenged on the estimated cost of ending the policy, which is estimated at £60m per year - 0.04 per cent of the annual State Pension budget - rather than the £950m per year quoted by the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP). The difference explained by the fact the DWP are quoting for uprating and backdating payments to account for the years affected pensioners have been frozen. However, campaigners are instead asking to receive the annual increase from this point onwards. Douglas McAllister MP stressed that campaigners and supportive MPs are 'not seeking a full backdating, but for the Government to introduce some form of yearly indexing to answer that injustice'. Longterm critic of the policy Sir Roger Gale MP argued the policy is 'not a matter of cost. It is a matter of moral responsibility and duty.' The Minister was also reminded by a number of MPs that 'the vast majority of impacted pensioners still report having no knowledge of the policy's existence prior to moving overseas'. State Pension payments 2025/26 Full New State Pension Weekly payment: £230.25 Fortnightly payment: £460.50 Four-weekly payment: £921 Annual amount: £11,973 Full Basic State Pension Weekly payment: £176.45 Fortnightly payment: £352.90 Four-weekly payment: £705.80 Annual amount: £9,175 Future State Pension increases The Labour Government has pledged to honour the Triple Lock or the duration of its term and the latest predictions show the following projected annual increases: 2025/26 - 4.1% (the forecast was 4%) 2026/27 - 2.5% 2027/28 - 2.5% 2028/29 - 2.5% 2029/30 - 2.5% Article continues below Recent analysis released by Royal London revealed only around half of people receiving the New State Pension last year were getting the full weekly amount - and around 150,000 were on less than £100 per week.
Scottish Sun
38 minutes ago
- Scottish Sun
Israel ‘fully ready' to strike Iran as Trump warns Middle East about to get ‘dangerous' & US withdraws embassy staff
ISRAEL is reportedly "fully ready" to launch a military strike against Iran within days - and without the backing of the United States. It comes amid the Trump administration's efforts to secure a deal with Tehran aimed at curbing Iran's nuclear programme. 7 Iranian troops firing a missile in the Makran sea, south of Iran Credit: Rex 7 Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's government is reportedly ready to blitz Iran Credit: Reuters 7 Israeli soldiers on the frontline of ground operation in northern Gaza Strip Credit: Rex 7 Donald Trump is said to be in advanced talks with Iran over a preliminary agreement that could include provisions on uranium enrichment - terms Israel finds unacceptable. A Capitol Hill aide and other insiders told NBC News that Benjamin Netanyahu's government is "fully ready" to act unilaterally as hopes of influencing the US-Iran negotiations diminish. Such a strike would represent a serious rupture in US-Israel coordination and carries the risk of igniting a broader conflict in the already volatile region. One senior diplomat in the Middle East told The Washington Post: "We are watching and worried. Read more world news MACHINE OF DEATH Putin's Ukraine toll tops 1M Russians dead & wounded 40 months into war "We think it's more serious than any other time in the past." In anticipation of potential retaliation by Iran, the US has moved to scale back its presence in the Middle East. The State Department has ordered the departure of non-essential staff from its embassy in Baghdad and authorised voluntary departures of personnel and military dependents from Bahrain and Kuwait. White House spokeswoman Anna Kelly said: "The State Department regularly reviews American personnel abroad, and this decision was made as a result of a recent review." President Trump, speaking to reporters on Wednesday, confirmed the move: "They are being moved out because it could be a dangerous place and we'll see what happens." How Iran's Trump assassination plot would trigger full-scale invasion by the US and topple Ayatollah's evil regime He reiterated the administration's red line: "They can't have a nuclear weapon, very simple, they can't have a nuclear weapon, we're not going to allow that." Posting a video of US military in action, Trump wrote on Truth Social on Wednesday: "I am more confident than ever that in the days ahead and every generation to come, the U.S. Army will heap glory upon glory. "You will summon inexhaustible courage. You will protect every inch of U.S. soil—and you will defend America to the ends of the earth!" The heightened alert stems not just from fears of Iranian retaliation, but also from growing intelligence assessments that Israel may be preparing for a direct strike on Iran's nuclear facilities - bypassing Washington's diplomat track. 7 Israel's reported military strike on Tehran would be done without the backing of its closest ally, the United States Credit: Reuters 7 President Trump told reporters the US are removing staff form its Baghdad embassy as he attended the opening night of 'Les Misérables' in Washington DC Credit: Getty Iran, meanwhile, has warned of severe consequences if it is attacked. Defence Minister Aziz Nasirzadeh said Iran would respond by targeting American bases in the region. Iran's mission to the UN added: "Threats of 'overwhelming force' won't change facts: Iran is not seeking a nuclear weapon and U.S. militarism only fuels instability." US negotiator Steve Witkoff is still set to meet Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi in Muscat, Oman on Sunday for what would be the sixth round of nuclear talks. But sources caution that the meeting may not go ahead if the situation worsens. A senior Iranian official told Reuters: "Any military action against Iran, whether by the US or Israel, will have serious consequences." 7 Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei speaks during a meeting in Tehran Credit: Shutterstock Editorial
Telegraph
39 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Five dead and aid staff feared kidnapped in Gaza ambush
Hamas has killed five staff belonging to a new US aid delivery company in Gaza and may also have taken hostages, the organisation said. In a statement early on Thursday, the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) team said the terror group attacked a bus carrying more than two-dozen of its team at around 10pm on Wednesday. GHF said Palestinians working 'side-by-side with the US' to deliver critical aid were 'brutally attacked by Hamas' late on Wednesday night. A statement said: 'At the time of the attack, our team was en route to one of our distribution centres in the area west of Khan Younis. 'We are still gathering facts, but what we know is devastating: there are at least five fatalities, multiple injuries, and fear that some of our team members may have been taken hostage.' The spokesman said both Americans and Palestinians were on the bus, and talked about staff being 'unaccounted for'. Americans are not believed to be among those missing. Any taking of hostages would be likely to complicate the ceasefire negotiations between Israel and Hamas. The group is believed to still hold 20 living Israelis somewhere in the strip from the October 7 raids. However, GHF has released statements in the past that turned out to be misleading and the IDF has yet to comment officially. The US-firm has been mired in controversy since it took over aid in Gaza as part of a US and Israeli plan to prevent humanitarian aid from falling into the hands of Hamas. The plan has been opposed by the UN and much of the international community. A number of mass-casualty events have taken place near its distribution sites in the last two weeks, with eye-witnesses blaming Israeli troops, who provide an outer ring of security. Twenty-five were killed near a site early on Wednesday, according to local hospitals, which fall under the authority of Hamas. However, the Israeli government has consistently claimed that Hamas is trying to undermine the new system, and in recent days the sites temporarily closed, with GHF citing threats from the terror group. The GHF spokesman added: 'This attack did not happen in a vacuum. For days, Hamas has openly threatened our team, our aid workers, and the civilians who receive aid from us. These threats were met with silence.' 'The GHF holds Hamas fully responsible for taking the lives of our dedicated workers who have been distributing humanitarian aid to the Palestinian people at the foundation's sites in central and southern Gaza. 'Tonight, the world must see this for what it is: an attack on humanity.' NGOs and the UN argue that the system forces Palestinians, many of whom are on the brink of starvation, to walk large distances through dangerous areas to collect food, which itself is unsuitable because much of it needs cooking at a time of acute fuel shortage. Israel said that, under the old system, which shipped humanitarian aid directly into Palestinian communities in Gaza, Hamas routinely purloined the aid, selling it back to the population at inflated prices as a means of keeping control and bolstering its coffers.
