logo
'Stuck in limbo': Over 90% of X's Community Notes unpublished, study says

'Stuck in limbo': Over 90% of X's Community Notes unpublished, study says

France 2410-07-2025
The study by the Digital Democracy Institute of the Americas (DDIA), which analyzed the entire public dataset of 1.76 million notes published by X between January 2021 and March 2025, comes as the platform's CEO Linda Yaccarino resigned after two years at the helm.
The community-driven moderation model -- now embraced by major tech platforms including Facebook-owner Meta and TikTok -- allows volunteers to contribute notes that add context or corrections to posts.
Other users then rate the proposed notes as "helpful" or "not helpful." If the notes get "helpful" ratings from enough users with diverse perspectives, they are published on X, appearing right below the challenged posts.
"The vast majority of submitted notes -- more than 90 percent -- never reach the public," DDIA's study said.
"For a program marketed as fast, scalable, and transparent, these figures should raise serious concerns."
Among English notes, the publication rate dropped from 9.5 percent in 2023 to just 4.9 percent in early 2025, the study said.
Spanish-language notes, however, showed some growth, with the publication rate rising from 3.6 percent to 7.1 percent over the same period, it added.
A vast number of notes remain unpublished due to lack of consensus among users during rating.
Thousands of notes also go unrated, possibly never seen and never assessed, according to the report.
"As the volume of notes submitted grows, the system's internal visibility bottleneck becomes more apparent –- especially in English," the study said.
"Despite a rising number of contributors submitting notes, many notes remain stuck in limbo, unseen and unevaluated by fellow contributors, a crucial step for notes to be published."
'Viral misinformation'
In a separate finding, DDIA's researchers identified not a human but a bot-like account -- dedicated to flagging crypto scams –- as the most prolific contributor to the program in English, submitting more than 43,000 notes between 2021 and March 2025.
However, only 3.1 percent of those notes went live, suggesting most went unseen or failed to gain consensus, the report said.
The study also noted that the time it takes for a note to go live had improved over the years, dropping from an average of more than 100 days in 2022 to 14 days in 2025.
"Even this faster timeline is far too slow for the reality of viral misinformation, timely toxic content, or simply errors about real-time events, which spread within hours, not weeks," DDIA's report said.
The findings are significant as tech platforms increasingly view the community-driven model as an alternative to professional fact-checking, which conservative advocates in countries such as the United States have long accused of a liberal bias.
Studies have shown Community Notes can work to dispel some falsehoods such as vaccine misinformation, but researchers have long cautioned that it works best for topics where there is broad consensus.
Some researchers have also cautioned that Community Notes users can be motivated by partisan motives and tend to target their political opponents.
X introduced Community Notes during the tenure of Yaccarino, who said on Wednesday that she had decided to step down after leading the company through a major transformation.
No reason was given for her exit, but the resignation came as Musk's artificial intelligence chatbot Grok triggered an online firestorm over its anti-Semitic comments that praised Adolf Hitler and insulted Islam in separate posts on X.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Musk's X denies French allegations of algorithm manipulation
Musk's X denies French allegations of algorithm manipulation

France 24

time4 hours ago

  • France 24

Musk's X denies French allegations of algorithm manipulation

Elon Musk's social media platform X said on Monday it denied all allegations made by French authorities over manipulation of its algorithm and "fraudulent data extraction", adding that it has not acceded to the demands made in a French criminal investigation. "French authorities have requested access to X's recommendation algorithm and real-time data about all user posts on the platform in order for several 'experts' to analyze the data and purportedly 'uncover the truth' about the operation of the X platform," X said, adding that they denied the demands since they "have a legal right to do." Earlier this year, the Paris public prosecutor's office opened an investigation into the X social media platform after receiving two complaints. The first was filed by centrist parliamentarian Eric Bothorel, a member of President Emmanuel Macron 's party, who has looked into cybersecurity. The second was from a "senior official of a French public institution", the prosecutor's office said in a statement. The investigation was handed over to the French police in early July on charges of "altering the functioning of an automated data processing system as part of an organised criminal enterprise" and "fraudulent extraction of data from an automated data processing system as part of an organised criminal enterprise". The French authorities, according to X, requested access to its recommendation algorithm and real-time data on all posts by users of the platform as part of the investigation, which the group refused. In its statement posted on X, the social media firm accused the investigation of "distorting French law in order to serve a political agenda and, ultimately, restrict free speech. Elon Musk The EU's former digital affairs commissioner, French politician Thierry Breton has described some of his pro-AfD comments as "foreign interference". The commission opened a probe against X in December 2023 and accused it in July 2024 of breaching its digital services regulations. The network risks being ordered to pay a fine of billions of euros.

Meta rebuffs EU's AI Code of Practice
Meta rebuffs EU's AI Code of Practice

Euronews

time3 days ago

  • Euronews

Meta rebuffs EU's AI Code of Practice

US social media company Meta will not sign the EU's AI Code of Practice on General Purpose AI (GPAI), the company's Chief Global Affairs Officer Joel Kaplan said in a statement on Friday. 'Europe is heading down the wrong path on AI. We have carefully reviewed the European Commission's Code of Practice for GPAI models and Meta won't be signing it,' he said, adding that the Code 'introduces a number of legal uncertainties for model developers, as well as measures which go far beyond the scope of the AI Act.' The Commission last week released the Code, a voluntary set of rules that touches on transparency, copyright, and safety and security issues, aiming to help providers of AI models such as ChatGPT and Gemini comply with the AI Act. Companies that sign up are expected to be compliant with the Act and can anticipate more legal certainty, others will face more inspections. The AI Act's provisions affecting GPAI systems enter into force on 2 August. It will take another two years before the AI Act, which regulates AI systems according to the risk they pose to society, will become fully applicable. OpenAI, the parent company of ChatGPT, has said it will sign up to the Code once its ready. Criticism from tech giants The drafting process of the Code was criticised by Big Tech companies as well as CEOs of European companies, claiming they need more time to comply with the rules. 'We share concerns raised by these businesses that this over-reach will throttle the development and deployment of frontier AI models in Europe, and stunt European companies looking to build businesses on top of them,' Kaplan said. The Code requires sign off by EU member states, which are represented in a subgroup of the AI Board, as well as by the Commission's own AI Office. The member states are expected to give a green light as early as 22 July. The EU executive said it will publish the list of signatories on 1 August. On Friday the Commission published further guidance to help companies comply with the GPAI rules.

'They Just Flew It in Broad Daylight': China's Secret 6th-Gen Fighter Jet Stuns Drivers as It Soars Over Crowded Highway
'They Just Flew It in Broad Daylight': China's Secret 6th-Gen Fighter Jet Stuns Drivers as It Soars Over Crowded Highway

Sustainability Times

time4 days ago

  • Sustainability Times

'They Just Flew It in Broad Daylight': China's Secret 6th-Gen Fighter Jet Stuns Drivers as It Soars Over Crowded Highway

IN A NUTSHELL 🚀 The sighting of a mysterious fighter jet, believed to be China's J-36 , has sparked global intrigue and speculation. , has sparked global intrigue and speculation. 🛡️ The jet's unique design features three engines and a tailless airframe, suggesting advanced stealth capabilities. features three engines and a tailless airframe, suggesting advanced stealth capabilities. 🌍 Analysts suggest China may be leading or at least on par with the U.S. in developing 6th-generation fighters. or at least on par with the U.S. in developing 6th-generation fighters. 🤔 The emergence of the J-36 raises questions about future air power dynamics and strategic military preparedness. The sighting of a mysterious, futuristic fighter jet soaring over a busy highway in China has captured the attention of both social media users and defense experts worldwide. This six-second video, though blurry and brief, has spurred speculation and concern about the advancements in Chinese military technology, particularly regarding its air combat capabilities. The aircraft is believed to be a prototype of what could be China's next-generation stealth fighter, tentatively dubbed the J-36. This revelation has reignited discussions about the strategic balance of air power and the evolving dynamics of military technology in the 21st century. A Radical New Design The aircraft spotted in the video represents a significant departure from traditional fighter jet designs. It boasts a unique configuration with three engines, a tailless design, and an ultra-smooth airframe—features that suggest cutting-edge stealth technology. This design choice is telling, as the absence of vertical stabilizers indicates a high priority on radar evasion, making it difficult for conventional radar systems to detect the jet. Defense analysts have noted that the aircraft's silhouette and propulsion system differ markedly from existing fifth-generation fighters such as the U.S. F-22 Raptor and F-35 Lightning II, as well as China's own J-20 stealth jet. David Cenciotti, an aviation expert, describes the triple-engine layout as 'highly unconventional,' with potential benefits in thrust and long-range missile storage. The radical design not only underscores China's ambition in aircraft innovation but also highlights its commitment to developing next-generation military technology. 'These Images Will Keep You Awake at Night': China's Colossal Military Mega-Project Exposed as Satellite Photos Reveal a 1,200-Acre Fortress in the Making Is China Pulling Ahead in 6th-Generation Development? The emergence of the J-36 video adds momentum to the theory that China may be leading the race in 6th-generation fighter development. Even though the Chinese government has not officially commented on this aircraft, the evidence suggests a dual-track development strategy by the People's Liberation Army Air Force (PLAAF). This strategy aims to advance their air dominance capabilities for future scenarios in the Indo-Pacific region. While the U.S. has also been making strides in this field, with President Trump announcing Boeing's contract for the F-47—America's own 6th-generation fighter—the details of these advancements remain largely undisclosed. This raises questions about whether the U.S. will be able to maintain its air dominance in the face of such rapid technological evolution from China. The competitive development of these aircraft is not just about technological advancement but also about maintaining strategic superiority. 'China Shatters Global Energy Records': Historic Surge in Solar and Wind Power Redefines the Future of Clean Electricity What Makes a 6th-Generation Fighter? 6th-generation fighters are expected to surpass their predecessors through several key capabilities. These include advanced stealth and electronic warfare capabilities, artificial intelligence-assisted piloting and decision-making, and the ability for optional manned/unmanned operation. Additionally, network-centric warfare integration, directed energy weapons, and extended range and endurance are anticipated features. The J-36's unique design appears to reflect many of these ambitions, particularly regarding stealth, propulsion power, and internal weapons capacity. These advancements are not just about enhancing performance but also about ensuring dominance in increasingly contested airspaces. The development of such aircraft reflects a broader strategy to achieve superiority in future combat scenarios. 'We've Crushed the Range Barrier': Japanese Electric SUV Stuns Industry With 807-Mile Performance Using Only an LFP Battery Strategic Implications The potential operational readiness of the J-36 could signify a major leap in Chinese air power, challenging U.S. and allied air superiority in the Indo-Pacific. This development illustrates China's commitment to advancing its military capabilities and challenging the traditional technological cycles dominated by Western countries. As one Western defense analyst noted, even a prototype's flight is an indication that China is serious about contesting the skies in the coming decades. The sighting of the J-36 raises critical questions about the timeline for deploying such advanced fighters and whether the U.S. will be prepared to counter them with its own innovations. The ongoing developments in military aviation technology are not just about who can build the most advanced fighter, but about who can strategically deploy them in real-world scenarios to maintain air superiority. The emergence of next-generation fighters like the J-36 in China highlights a significant shift in the balance of military technology. As the veil of secrecy around these developments gradually lifts, the world is left wondering how these advancements will reshape global air power dynamics. How will these new capabilities impact future military strategies, and what will it take for other nations to keep pace with these rapid advancements in aerospace technology? This article is based on verified sources and supported by editorial technologies. Did you like it? 4.5/5 (25)

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store