Overworked, underpaid Malaysians want time-off to chill with PMX-given Sept 15 public holiday
Henceforth, the very least they deserve is to enjoy a long weekend courtesy of a public holiday announced by Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim.
Sept 15 (Monday) was declared a public holiday to allow everyone to enjoy an extended Malaysia Day break (which falls the following day) as part of the goodies doled out in PMX's much awaited 'extraordinary tribute for Malaysians' package.
This was the certainly the tone for the majority of responses to a post by fin-influencer Emir | The Millennial Finance (@the millenialf_) on X. It was posited that PMX's announcement of yet another rest day was unwelcome as the country already had too many public holidays.
Honestly Malaysia needs to chill with these random public holidays
We already have so many https://t.co/3qyc770pDJ
— Emir | The Millennial Finance (@themillennialf_) July 23, 2025
The post has gone viral by having generated 3.1M views with many vehemently disagreeing with the poster's viewpoint.
Many Malaysians have greeted the news of an extra rest day positively for it would allow them to take the foot off the pedal. One commenter claimed that many citizens needed the public holiday just to stay sane.
Another chided the poster for trying to emulate billionaire Tesla and X owner Elon Musk with his 'work harder' pronouncements by wondering if he also supported '996' and 5.5 working days in a week.
The '996' is a reference to the extreme work culture in China that Musk had previously praised.
A sarcastic remark perhaps encapsulated what many Malaysians thought of the post, claiming how he can make shareholders more money was the primary motivation he got out of bed daily.
The post was also picked up by self-confessed hiking enthusiast and part-time salesman, Abah (@chairmanGLC) who shared a report from The Smart Local.
Kuala Lumpur was said to be the fourth most overworked city in the world, taking top spot for longest working hours as well as time spent commuting. Its working force also had the least access to mental health care, the report claimed.
Abah further contended that he was sick of the 'Malaysians enjoy too many public holidays' complaint, citing the leave entitlement workers in other countries enjoyed (ie European workers enjoy 35 paid time-off annually compared to Malaysians' 22 days).
Honestly I'm sick of reading the notion of 'Malaysia banyak sangat public holidays'. Tengok comparison between Malaysia and European countries. A Malaysian entry level worker will only have 22 days of PTO compared to 35 days for Europeans. And look at the last column. https://t.co/fIeg6Ff5ri pic.twitter.com/n0ZubRat1w
— Abah (@chairmanGLC) July 23, 2025
One commenter who put on an ultra-competitive 'Tiger Mom' persona sarcastically asked 'why didn't (Malaysia) get first place'?
It was argued that cheap labour was why many companies have factories in Malaysia. However, this is at the expense of an overworked citizenry.
The economic reality that drove many employees to work long hours 'with two to three jobs' was also highlighted.
One commenter compared the scenario to India where hybrid-working policies have been implemented to combat worsening traffic and pollution problems, hinting perhaps that this would be a welcome move in Malaysia.
However, there were some who concurred with the original poster, contending that such random public holidays were counter-productive. One even argued that the typical working day became long due to the numerous breaks Malaysian employees would take.
Another claimed what works elsewhere does not necessarily work in Malaysia.
But it could be surmised that the majority of comments welcomed the announcement of the Sept 15 public holiday while highlighting that Malaysian workers are an overworked lot.
At the end of the day, one commenter had some simple advice for the poster – 'if you want to work, please be my guest'. – July 25, 2025
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Straits Times
9 minutes ago
- New Straits Times
AI will not replace jobs, but redefine them
GEORGE TOWN: Artificial Intelligence (AI) is not the threat to employment it is often made out to be, instead, it is rapidly transforming Malaysia's job landscape — not by replacing human workers, but by creating new roles and redefining existing ones. Human Resources Minister Steven Sim Chee Keong said that as Malaysia accelerates its transition into a digital economy, the public must shed the fear that AI will lead to widespread job losses. "We must move away from the fear that AI is here to take away jobs. "The evidence shows that AI is transforming jobs, not eliminating them. Those who adapt and upskill will find more opportunities, not fewer," he told newsmen here after the launch of the 52nd ARTDO International Conference. Elaborating, Sim said a national labour market study commissioned by his ministry late last year revealed that up to 60 per cent of employers across 10 key economic sectors expected AI to lead to job creation, particularly in areas requiring advanced digital skills. The study, which included extensive inputs from industry stakeholders, is now informing national policy on workforce readiness. "AI is changing how we work, not eliminating the need for work itself. "The question is not whether AI will take over, but whether we are preparing Malaysians to work with AI," he added. Sim said the ministry was actively responding to these changes by expanding training and upskilling initiatives through platforms such as MyMahir, a national skills-matching portal. He said under the ministry's initiative, over 33 government-run industrial training institutes and various private providers were now offering AI and digital literacy courses. He said these courses are aimed at equipping the workforce with relevant competencies in an increasingly automated landscape. "With the right upskilling, workers can transition into higher-value roles rather than being displaced. "AI literacy must become mainstream. Not everyone will become an AI engineer, but basic familiarity with how AI works will soon be essential across nearly every profession," he said. He also said that his ministry was working to integrate AI ethics and governance into public awareness, recognising that responsible deployment was just as important as technical know-how. During the recent National Training Week, between 40 and 50 per cent of offerings had AI components, including modules on ethical usage, data protection and digital responsibility. "We want Malaysians to not only use AI but to use it responsibly. "Understanding the social, legal and moral implications of AI is a national priority. We are building not just a skilled workforce, but a trusted digital society," he said.
The Sun
9 minutes ago
- The Sun
US tariff negotiations update as August 1 deadline looms
WASHINGTON: US tariff negotiations with major trading partners are reaching a critical phase as the August 1 deadline approaches. The twice-delayed deadline could see higher duties imposed on economies with significant trade surpluses with the US, unless last-minute agreements are reached. The Biden administration has already secured deals with the European Union, Britain, Vietnam, Japan, Indonesia, and the Philippines. The EU agreement, announced Sunday, reduces tariffs on European exports to the US from a threatened 30 percent to 15 percent. South Korea faces heightened pressure as it races to finalize a deal. A government source told AFP that Tokyo's successful agreement has increased urgency for Seoul. Reports suggest South Korea may propose over $100 billion in investments, with major firms like Samsung and Hyundai Motor involved. National Security Advisor Wi Sung-lak confirmed negotiations are in their 'final and most crucial phase' to avoid a 25 percent tariff. India remains cautiously optimistic. Commerce Minister Piyush Goyal expressed confidence in reaching a deal, dismissing concerns over sticking points. However, local reports indicate chances of an interim agreement before August 1 are fading. Taiwan is working hard to secure favorable terms, with Premier Cho Jung-tai stating officials are negotiating around the clock. Vice President Hsiao Bi-khim emphasized efforts to protect Taiwan's industrial interests and deepen US cooperation. Canada and Mexico face uncertainty. While spared from initial 'reciprocal' tariffs, both nations could see duties rise—30 percent for Mexico and 35 percent for Canada—if no deal is reached. Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum vowed to do 'everything' possible to avoid the hike. Brazil braces for political fallout. A 50 percent tariff on Brazilian exports, set for August 1, appears unlikely to be averted. The move is seen as politically motivated, with Trump citing Brazil's treatment of his ally, former president Jair Bolsonaro. With just days left, negotiations remain fluid. The outcome will shape global trade dynamics in the coming months. - AFP
The Star
39 minutes ago
- The Star
Regulating online fraud: Malaysia's OSB vs China's approach
INITIATED in the 2010s, China's Digital Silk Road (DSR) aims to enhance digital connectivity across nations through infrastructure, trade, finance, people-to-people exchanges and policy coordination. It presents new commercial opportunities for Malaysia by fostering collaboration between Chinese and Malaysian businesses, strengthening Malaysia's digital economy ecosystem. The convergence of China's DSR, the Covid-19 pandemic, and the rapid rise in artificial intelligence (AI) have significantly accelerated the adoption of digital technologies in business processes and operations within Malaysia. However, while digitalisation offers numerous benefits, it has unfortunately also led to a significant surge in online criminal activity. A recent report by The Star revealed that nearly RM600mil was lost to online fraud from January to March, according to the Bukit Aman Commercial Crime Investigation Department. The report highlighted that criminals are exploiting technological advancements and modern lifestyles, using fake digital identities, fraudulent websites, chatbots and deepfakes to deceive victims. Recognising the escalating threat posed by these sophisticated methods, regulatory interventions focused on online content have become a prevailing trend. Malaysia, in line with this trend, passed the Online Safety Bill (OSB) 2024 in December. It is awaiting official gazettement, and its effective date will be determined by Communications Minister Datuk Fahmi Fadzil. The new law aims to enhance online safety in Malaysia by regulating harmful content and establishing duties and obligations for application service providers (those who provide network services such as Internet access), content application service providers (those who provide content such as broadcasting and video streaming), and network service providers (those providing cellular mobile services and bandwidth services) operating within and outside Malaysia. According to Minister in the Prime Minister's Department (Law and Institutional Reforms) Datuk Seri Azalina Othman Said, it applies to licensed application and content service providers such as Instagram, WhatsApp, TikTok and YouTube. The Bill regulates two categories of content: 'harmful content' and 'priority harmful content'. Its First Schedule defines the scope of harmful content, which includes content on financial fraud, excluding content that promotes awareness or education related to financial fraud. The content on financial fraud listed in the First Schedule is also classified as 'priority harmful content' in the Second Schedule. Key duties imposed on service providers include the obligation to implement measures to detect and mitigate harmful content (Section 13), issue user guidelines (Section 14), establish mechanisms for handling user reports of potentially harmful content (Sections 16 and 17), and prepare an Online Safety Plan (Section 20). For priority harmful content, such as financial fraud, service providers must take steps to prevent user access (Section 19). Despite Fahmi's assurance that the government's intention in introducing the OSB is to serve as a measure to combat crime, such as financial fraud, and not to restrict freedom of expression, critics remain concerned about its potential to restrict freedom of expression and be used as a censorship tool by the government. These are valid concerns, particularly considering the vague definition of harmful content in the OSB and the vast powers conferred on a commission reporting to the Communications Ministry. This commentary limits its discussion to the Bill's role concerning content on financial fraud. It is undeniable that unregulated content involving financial fraud, such as online scams, can damage business reputations and cause financial losses. Deputy Communications Minister Teo Nie Ching reported that RM1.224bil was lost to online crimes and scams in Malaysia within the first 10 months of last year, with many victims falling prey to sponsored advertisements on social media platforms. Indeed, a duty should be imposed on service providers to prevent these platforms from profiting from sponsored advertisements involving financial scams, for which they receive payment to promote products or services. Nevertheless, the provisions in the OSB are still lacking when viewed from the perspective of curbing online fraud. In China, the government passed the Anti-Telecom and Online Fraud Law ('ATOF Law') in September 2022. This law is more specific, aiming to prevent, deter and punish telecommunications and online fraud, strengthen efforts against such fraud, and protect the rights and interests of citizens and organisations. It imposes responsibilities on key businesses in the telecommunications, financial, and Internet sectors to prevent fraud risks. Among these requirements, the law requires service providers to verify users' identities before providing a range of services, such as web hosting, content and software distribution, livestreaming and advertising (Article 21). The law also imposes a duty of reasonable care on service providers to monitor, identify, and address the use of their services to commit fraud (Article 25). The ATOF Law provides a model regulation for targeted fraud prevention. While Malaysia and China operate within different legal and cultural frameworks, there are valuable lessons to be learned from China's experience in addressing online fraud. China's preventive measures have contributed to a more secure digital environment for businesses and consumers, minimising the impact of online fraud. While the Malaysian government's efforts to ensure a secure online environment and build trust in the digital ecosystem are laudable, more targeted provisions focused on the specific mechanics of online fraud would be more efficient, like China's ATOF Law, instead of a broad content regulation approach. China's ATOF Law, which emphasises user verification and platform monitoring for fraudulent activities, would allow for a more focused approach to content regulation. It is imperative that the Malaysian government review the adequacy of the OSB in achieving its intended purpose of curbing online crime. To enhance its efficacy, the government could consider incorporating more granular provisions that mandate specific actions from service providers and establish clear and enforceable guidelines and penalties. A well-regulated online environment, one that builds trust and security, can attract foreign investment and facilitate DSR-related collaborations, shaping the long-term trajectory of Malaysia's digital economy. Lai Chooi Ling is a lecturer at Tunku Abdul Rahman University of Management and Technology (TAR UMT). The views expressed here are entirely the writer's own. The SEARCH Scholar Series is a social responsibility programme jointly organised by the South-East Asia Research Centre for Humanities (SEARCH) and TAR UMT.
