logo
A pro-Israel group says it gave US list of protesters to deport, drawing alarm from students' supporters

A pro-Israel group says it gave US list of protesters to deport, drawing alarm from students' supporters

CNN02-04-2025

Not long after the October 2023 Hamas attacks in Israel and subsequent war in Gaza, Ross Glick's inbox flooded with tips, photos, video and information about students and faculty members participating in pro-Palestinian protests on US college campuses.
As many protesters rallied against Israel's military response and demanded a ceasefire, Glick – a pro-Israel activist – focused on the emails and would temporarily join New York-based Betar USA, a self-described Zionist advocacy group with a motto of 'Jews fight back.' The tips would become part of Betar's effort to compile information and expose certain protesters that Glick claims wanted not just to support Palestinians but also to incite violence and hatred toward Jews.
Now, as the Trump administration has begun arresting and trying to deport several noncitizen students and academics – some of whom were pro-Palestinian protesters – Betar says it's been telling the administration whom to look for.
Betar says it shared with the government a list of noncitizen protesters and activists it believes should be deported. It says the effort is in response to President Donald Trump's January executive order, which promised to 'combat antisemitism' on college campuses. An accompanying administration fact sheet said the government could seek to deport noncitizen 'Hamas sympathizers,' participants of 'pro-jihadist protests' and people accused of antisemitic acts.
'Our research, our information, the massive amount of video and photos that we have gathered – we create our dossiers and our reports. We hand them over, we make recommendations,' Glick, who left his executive director post at Betar about a month ago after helping establish its research operation, told CNN in a recent interview.
Betar – which the Jewish civil rights group Anti-Defamation League put on a list of groups that it says promote extremist or hateful ideologies, an action Betar calls a baseless smear campaign – has been open about flagging noncitizen protesters for possible deportation.
'We submitted the names of hundreds of protesters and activists to the Trump administration/DHS urging ICE to deport them under the executive orders,' Daniel Levy, a spokesperson for Betar, told CNN in March.
Besides claiming to give this information to the government, Betar – and other pro-Jewish groups – have posted online the names, pictures and other information of noncitizen pro-Palestinian protesters who they allege expressed Hamas support or Jewish hate.
Whether the government is using that information is unclear. Meanwhile, the tactics of Betar and other groups, including Canary Mission, have drawn various concerns.
Supporters of recently detained academics decry the groups' efforts as inappropriate harassment and a disinformation campaign. Privacy experts with whom CNN spoke say the documentation exposes tensions between the chilling of free speech and minimal expectations of privacy in public places, and it raises concerns about the extent to which a government should use information distributed by outside groups. And a student profiled by one of the groups – while not among the detained – says the profile inaccurately describes her and caused her to endure death threats, anxiety and depression.
A number of academics detained this year to await deportation proceedings were profiled online by at least one of these groups, including Mahmoud Khalil, a prominent figure in last year's protests at Columbia University, and Rumeysa Ozturk, a Tufts University doctoral student taken away by immigration officers outside her Massachusetts apartment last week. Neither has been criminally charged, and their supporters have argued they've been falsely portrayed and that the administration has no basis for deporting them.
The State Department declined to answer CNN's question about whether it has used information from Betar or any similar group. Secretary of State Marco Rubio last week said: 'We're not going to talk about the process by which we're identifying' deportation targets 'because obviously we're looking for more people.'
A State Department spokesperson told CNN the agency uses 'all available technology' in visa screenings and vetting. 'No matter how information comes to our attention, every visa decision is made by trained consular staff who review the information to ascertain whether a visa revocation is supported by the facts and law,' the spokesperson said.
The White House press secretary has said the Department of Homeland Security used 'intelligence' to identify international student protesters who it thinks might have engaged in deportable offenses, but did not offer details.
'US Immigration and Customs Enforcement is not working with or received any tips through the ICE Tip Line from the groups identified as Betar and Canary Mission,' a DHS spokesperson told CNN.
According to Glick, when tipsters have flagged unidentified students and faculty, Betar has used facial recognition technology, artificial intelligence and open-source information such as social media postings and media appearances to help put names to the subjects.
'Once it became known through our circles that we were undertaking this process, and before I even got involved with Betar, I had people contacting me from all over the country,' said Glick, who said he left his Betar role to pursue other projects.
Glick's X profile boasts photos and videos of a recent visit to Capitol Hill, and videos in which he appears to confront people at pro-Palestinian rallies. Even after leaving Betar, he wants to expose what he describes as an 'organized effort' against the Jewish community, he says.
Betar also recently took credit for a pair of incendiary stickers that appeared on a pole on Harvard Law School's campus last week. The school sent a letter to students condemning the stickers, saying they were 'posted in violation of campus policies.'
One of the stickers read, 'Don't be Mahmood Khalil. Be a racist if you want, just keep it to yourself #JFB (Jews fight back),' according to a Harvard University employee familiar with the incident. A different sticker read, 'I am a green card holder who loves America. I will never be deported. Are You?' the Harvard Crimson reported.
Glick and Betar are not alone.
The anonymously run Canary Mission website says it 'documents individuals and organizations that promote hatred of the USA, Israel and Jews on North American campuses and beyond.' It also says it will profile people who support efforts to boycott, divest from or sanction Israel or companies associating with Israel – which were among the demands of some campus pro-Palestinian protests last school year.
The site, which says it gathers content from publicly available sources and invites tips, contains purported bios of students and others. Bio pages have subjects' photos, social media posts, media appearances and writings.
A Canary Mission spokesperson told CNN by email the group is apolitical and does not have any contact with the Trump administration. The group said its research is posted publicly for anyone to see following what it describes as careful vetting and fact checking, and did not respond to a question about who operates Canary Mission.
'When people view the profiles on our site, we hope they understand that hateful actions and words do carry consequences,' the Canary Mission spokesperson told CNN. 'We believe sunlight is the best disinfectant, and by highlighting these behaviors, we encourage accountability and raise awareness of the widespread impact that antisemitic and hateful speech can have — both within and beyond campus communities.'
Khalil, a legal permanent US resident, participated in pro-Palestinian protests at Columbia last year before finishing his work on a master's degree there in December.Khalil was arrested outside his New York apartment March 8 after the Trump administration alleged, without providing evidence, that Khalil 'led activities aligned to Hamas.' His attorneys have denied he has any ties to Hamas.
The Trump administration has argued, in part, Khalil is a threat to US security, citing a law that allows noncitizens to be deported if their presence has 'potentially serious adverse foreign policy consequences for the United States.'
In a filing against this detention, Khalil's lawyers noted Betar's claim it had submitted to the government the names of hundreds of activists it wanted deported. His lawyers also highlighted a January 29 X post from Betar that said Khalil was 'on our deport list.' His lawyers also asserted the post falsely accused him of making inflammatory statements against Zionists.
A day before he was arrested, Khalil emailed the university's interim president to ask for legal support and other protections, his lawyers said in a court document. In the email, Khalil cited what his lawyers called a 'dehumanizing doxing campaign against him,' according to the document.
'I haven't been able to sleep, fearing that ICE or a dangerous individual might come to my home,' Khalil wrote, according to a court document.
After Khalil's detention, more arrests came.
Ozturk, the Tufts doctoral student, was arrested March 24 near the Massachusetts school's Somerville campus. A Turkish national on a student visa, she is accused of having 'engaged in activities in support of Hamas,' a DHS spokesperson said, without specifying those activities. Her lawyers say she is unfairly being punished for speaking out for Palestinian rights.
Canary Mission had profiled her, calling her a supporter of the movement to boycott, divest from and sanction Israel. It links out to a March 2024 opinion piece that Ozturk co-wrote in the school's newspaper in which she criticized Tufts' response to a student government group's call for the university to divest.
Ozturk's brother issued a statement accusing Canary Mission of targeting Ozturk strictly for her political views. 'Canary Mission terrorizes supporters of Palestine by equating the Palestinian issue with terrorism and encourages the restriction of basic rights and freedoms,' Asim Ozturk wrote.
Lawyers for other students detained or sought for deportation proceedings, including Momodou Taal and Yunseo Chung, also noted groups' efforts to identify the students, court documents show.
Sara Rasikh, a University of Toronto graduate student who was born and raised in Pakistan and moved to Canada in 2013, learned Canary Mission had published information about her. Then she began receiving harassing messages and death threats on social media.
The Canary Mission profile was created after she took a forward-facing role in pro-Palestinian protests on her college campus last year, acting as a spokesperson for an encampment on school grounds, Rasikh said.
'Many students avoid engaging in Palestine solidarity organizing out of fear for their future career, their immigration status, and that is no way for a society to be functioning,' Rasikh said.
'Doxing is not new – racialized movements have long faced surveillance, harassment, repression, all the different tactics, and Canary Mission is part of this legacy,' she said.
Rasikh's Canary Mission profile shows screenshots of her social media activity, photos and video of her at protests, along with a biography describing her as a supporter of Hamas.
'I've never spoken to or about Hamas, but my headline says that I support Hamas, which isn't true,' she said.
Rasikh said the online profile has resulted in harassment, impacted her mental health and professional prospects, and caused her to fear for her safety and suffer from anxiety and depression.
'They are creating these profiles and these personalities for us that are so distant from reality, taking what we're saying and twisting it to serve their narrative to incite fear and harm and violence,' Rasikh said.
Privacy experts say while the groups' activities raise serious concerns that exposure could prevent people from demonstrating, their actions may be within legal limits because they rely on publicly available information.
Groups like Betar and Canary Mission take information that is available across a range of disparate sources –- including social media feeds, pictures, school affiliations, LinkedIn profiles and even home addresses.
But using publicly available information to compile a list of deportation targets – and sharing with government officials who may use it to direct law enforcement action solely on the basis of their political opinions – raises concerns that people's right to free speech and privacy is being infringed upon, said Megan Iorio, senior counsel and amicus director at the Electronic Privacy Information Center, a nonprofit research and advocacy group in Washington, DC.
'Even if people don't like what they're saying, they have the right to say it,' Iorio said.
'On top of that, what they're doing is then labeling these people as antisemites,' Iorio said. 'So, this label that carries with it a lot of weight that can have implications for their reputation, and now also their ability to either stay in the country or to avoid criminal penalties for just speaking is enormous.'
Defamation, if something incorrect is published, could be the clearest available cause of legal action because of the potential reputational harm caused to the person whose photo is published, Iorio said. Protesters also could pursue legal remedies if they can show they were harmed, such as through harassment or violence, Iorio said.
Sophia Cope, a senior staff attorney on the Electronic Frontier Foundation's civil liberties team, says a main problem would be if the government is using the groups' information to punish legally protected speech.
'People who go to protest should understand that they are exposing themselves to other people's cell phone videos, to media that's there,' Cope said.
But 'if the government acts on information to punish the targets for what appears to be legal activity, that's the real problem,' she said.
CNN's Jennifer Hansler and Sarah Boxer contributed to this report.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Diplomatic win for UK hosting US-China trade talks
Diplomatic win for UK hosting US-China trade talks

Yahoo

time25 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Diplomatic win for UK hosting US-China trade talks

Sky News understands that the Trump administration approached the UK government to ask if it would host round two of the US-China trade talks. This is a useful 'diplo-win' for the UK. The first round was held in Geneva last month. News of that happening came as a surprise. The Chinese and the Americans were in the midst of a Trump-instigated trade war. President Trump was en route to Saudi Arabia and suddenly we got word of talks in Switzerland. They went surprisingly well. US treasury secretary Scott Bessent and his Chinese counterpart He Lifeng, met face-to-face and agreed to suspend most tariffs for 90 days. But two weeks later, the Trump administration accused Beijing of breaking the agreements reached in Geneva. Beijing threw the blame back at Washington. On Wednesday, Donald Trump and Xi Jinping spoke by phone. The Chinese claimed this call was at the Americans' request. Either way, the consequence was that the talks were back on track. "I just concluded a very good phone call with President Xi of China, discussing some of the intricacies of our recently made, and agreed to, trade deal," President Trump said this week. From that call came the impetus for a second round of talks. A venue was needed. In stepped the UK at short notice. Beyond being geographically convenient, UK government sources suggest that Britain is geopolitically in the right place right now to act as this bridge and facilitator. The UK-China relationship is in the process of a "reset". Other locations, like Brussels or other EU capitals, would have been less workable. Crucially too, for the UK, this is also potentially advantageous as it seeks to get its own UK-US trade agreement, to eliminate or massively reduce tariffs, over the line. Talks on reaching the "implementation phase" have been near-continuous since the announcement last month, but having the American principals in London is a plus. Sideline talks are possible, but even the presence of the US team in the UK is helpful. Read more from Sky News:Man wrongly deported from US to El Salvador has been returned to face criminal chargesMore than 40 'narco-boat' drug smugglers arrested in major police sting For all the chaos that President Trump is causing with his tariffs, he has instigated face-to-face conversations as he seeks resets. Key players are sitting down around tables - yes, to untangle the trade knots which Trump tied, but this whole episode has pulled foes together around the same table; it has forced relationships and maybe mutual understanding. That's useful. And for this next round, between superpowers, the UK is the host. Also useful.

Russia launches one of war's largest air attacks days after Ukraine's bomber raid
Russia launches one of war's largest air attacks days after Ukraine's bomber raid

Yahoo

time25 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Russia launches one of war's largest air attacks days after Ukraine's bomber raid

Russia launched a barrage of drones and ballistic missiles across broad swaths of Ukraine early Friday, killing at least six people and injuring dozens of others, days after Kyiv launched a daring raid on Moscow's fleet of strategic bombers. For residents of Kyiv, the night's soundtrack was familiar: the shrieking whir of drones, air raid sirens and large explosions overhead – whether from air defenses successfully downing missiles, or projectiles puncturing the capital. Three firefighters were killed in Kyiv, two civilians were killed in Lutsk, and another person was killed in Chernihiv, according to the Ukrainian State Emergency Service. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky said Russia had used more than 400 drones and 40 missiles in the overnight attack, putting it among the war's largest. He said Moscow's attack injured 80 and targeted 'almost all' of Ukraine, listing nine regions, from Lviv in the west to Sumy in the northeast. Although Russia has pummeled Ukraine almost daily over three years of full-scale war, Ukrainians had been bracing for retaliation since Sunday, when Kyiv launched an audacious operation that struck more than a third of Russia's strategic cruise missile carriers. In a call with his US counterpart Donald Trump on Wednesday, Russian President Vladimir Putin said that Moscow would have to respond to Kyiv's assault. Speaking aboard Air Force One on Friday, Trump told reporters Ukraine 'gave Putin a reason to go in and bomb the hell out of them last night.' Russia's Ministry of Defense said its strikes were in response to what it called Kyiv's 'terrorist acts.' It was not immediately clear if the attack was the extent of Russia's pledged retaliation, or if Putin intends to escalate further. After the embarrassment of Kyiv's operation, there was a chorus of bellicose calls from pro-Kremlin pundits for a severe – potentially nuclear – response. Although Ukrainians had been buoyed last weekend by the news of Kyiv's successful operation, many were wary of how Russia might strike back. But after Friday's strikes, Kyiv residents told CNN they supported Ukraine's strikes against the aircraft Moscow has used to bomb Ukraine for more than three years. 'It didn't break us at all. The morale is as high as it was. We strongly believe in our armed forces,' said Olha, a 39-year-old from the capital who did not wish to give her last name. She said the apparent 'retaliation' from Russia was not so different to countless other nights of the war. 'Maybe (this was the retaliation), but maybe the retaliation is yet to come. Either way, it doesn't change our attitude towards the enemy or towards our country.' Meanwhile, Ukraine's general staff on Friday said it launched overnight strikes on two Russian airfields, where it said Moscow had concentrated many of the aircraft that had not been damaged in Kyiv's 'Spiderweb' operation last weekend. Ukraine stressed that the operation, which blindsided the Kremlin, had targeted the planes that Russia uses to launch missile strikes on Ukrainian cities and kill civilians. After Russia's large-scale attack Friday, Ukraine's Foreign Minister Andrii Sybiha said Moscow had 'responded' to its destroyed aircraft by once again 'attacking civilians in Ukraine.' As daylight broke, images from Kyiv showed flames rising over apartment buildings and firefighting crews at work, with residents picking through the debris of damaged apartments. Several cars parked in the streets below were covered with shards of glass and slabs of masonry torn from the walls of residential buildings. Ukraine's air force said Russia's barrage comprised 407 drones, six ballistic missiles, 38 cruise missiles and an anti-radar missile. Of those 452 projectiles, the air force said it had downed 406, including 32 of the cruise missiles and four of the ballistic missiles. The other two ballistic missiles did not reach their targets, it added. The strikes also hit Chernihiv, near the border with Belarus, which was rocked by 14 explosions from drones and ballistic missiles, including cruise missiles and Iskander-M missiles, local officials said. Five others were wounded in strikes in the northwestern city of Lutsk, near the border with Poland. Footage geolocated by CNN showed at least four missiles slamming into the city, kicking up fiery explosions on impact. The Russian Ministry of Defense said it had also intercepted and destroyed 174 Ukrainian drones from Thursday evening to early Friday morning and had destroyed three Ukrainian Neptune-MD guided missiles over the Black Sea. All week, Ukrainians have been bracing for Russia's retaliation to last weekend's drone attack, which struck 34% of Moscow's nuclear-capable bombers stationed at airfields as far away as Siberia. On Tuesday, Ukraine also launched an attack on the Kerch Bridge, the only direct connection point between Russia and the annexed Crimean Peninsula, with 1,100 kilograms of explosives that had been planted underwater. After Trump's call with Putin on Wednesday, the US president said his Russian counterpart had told him that Moscow would have to respond to Ukraine's assaults. Trump's account of the call gave no indication that he had urged Putin to temper his response, to the dismay of many in Ukraine. 'When Putin mentioned he is going to avenge or deliver a new strike against Ukraine, we know what it means. It's about civilians,' Ukrainian lawmaker Oleksandr Merezhko told CNN earlier this week. 'And President Trump didn't say, 'Vladimir, stop.'' Despite Trump's support for recent peace talks in Istanbul between Ukraine and Russia, on Thursday he signaled that he may be adopting a more hands-off approach, likening the war to a brawl between children. 'Sometimes you see two young children fighting like crazy,' Trump said in the Oval Office, while German Chancellor Friedrich Merz looked on silently. 'They hate each other, and they're fighting in a park, and you try and pull them apart. They don't want to be pulled. Sometimes you're better off letting them fight for a while and then pulling them apart.'

Healey touts state tuition savings, criticizes federal cuts to Pell Grants
Healey touts state tuition savings, criticizes federal cuts to Pell Grants

Boston Globe

time25 minutes ago

  • Boston Globe

Healey touts state tuition savings, criticizes federal cuts to Pell Grants

Overall, MASSGrant Plus Expansion program saved more than 34,000 Massachusetts students an estimated $110 million in the 2023-2024 academic year, the statement said. More than 7,730 middle income students saved an average of $3,856 each, according to data from the state Department of Higher Education, the statement said. Advertisement In the same statement, Healey urged the US Senate to reject Pell Grant cuts included in the federal budget reconciliation bill recently passed by Republicans in the U.S. House and supported by President Trump. The proposed cuts and eligibility restrictions would results in 42,000 Massachusetts students at public institutions losing $57 million in funding each year, according to Healey's statement said. 'Massachusetts is home to the best schools in the country, but we need to make sure that they are affordable for all of our students,' Healey's statement said. 'That's why I took action to increase financial aid at our public colleges and universities, which has already lowered costs for tens of thousands of students.' The drastic cuts proposed to the Pell Grant program would 'roll back the progress we have made and increase costs,' Healey said. Advertisement 'This is bad for our students and bad for our economy, as it would hold back our next generation of workers from being able to afford to go to school,' she said. Healey announced $62 million in new state funding to expand the MASSGrant program during a ceremony at Salem State University in November 2023. The new funding covered the full costs of tuition and mandatory instructional fees for Pell Grant-eligible students, and as much as half for middle-income students. Middle-income students are those whose families earn between $73,000 and $100,000 annually in adjusted gross income. The program was retroactive to the start of the fall 2023 semester for Massachusetts students at the states public institutions, including its 15 community colleges, nine state universities, and four University of Massachusetts undergraduate campuses. Funding for the expansion of the program also drew on $84 million Healey and the legislature had set earmarked for financial aid expansion in the FY24 budget, Healey's office said at the time. 'The dramatic enrollment increases our community colleges have seen over the last two years make it clear that free community college and expanded financial aid is a game changer for students in Massachusetts,' Luis Pedraja, chair of the Community College Council of Presidents, and president of Quinsigamond Community College said in the statement. 'The proposed Pell eligibility changes would be devastating to our students' ability to afford higher education and the community college presidents in Massachusetts urge the Senate to reject this ill-advised change,' Pedraja said. Education Secretary Patrick Tutwiler said he feared the impacts proposed cuts could have on students who struggle to afford college. Advertisement 'Low-income students deserve to go to college just as much as their higher income peers, and these changes are going to take us backwards – increasing dropout rates and leaving students saddled with more debt and no degree," Tutwiler said in the statement. Tonya Alanez can be reached at

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store