USA Today says this beach bar is top 3 in the US. And it's just 1 hour from Savannah
Looking for the best beach bar experience near Savannah? Well, you won't have to go far.
USA Today has released its Readers' Choice Awards 2025 for the 10 best beach bars in the country, and one standout just a short drive away has made an appearance.
This bar, located at the Beach House resort on Hilton Head Island, South Carolina, has been ranked the No. 3 beach bar in the entire U.S.
According to USA Today, the best beach bar just 40 miles from Savannah, is Tiki Hut. Besides its prime oceanfront location, it's the only live-music venue directly on the beach.
Open daily from 10 a.m. to 10 p.m., Tiki Hut offers everything from laid-back beach vibes to lively evenings with dancing, food, drinks, and unforgettable views.
For more about this bar, visit tikihuthhi.com/hilton-head-bars.
Ocean Deck Restaurant and Beach Bar (Daytona Beach, Florida)
Flora-Bama (Pensacola, Florida)
Tiki Hut at Beach House (Hilton Head Island, South Carolina)
Reunion Kitchen + Drink (Santa Barbara, California)
Copper Bar at Mauna Kea Beach Hotel (Waimea, Hawaii)
Mai Tai Bar at The Royal Hawaiian (Honolulu, Hawaii)
Sloppy Joe's on the Beach at Bilmar Beach Resort (Treasure Island, Florida)
The Crow's Nest (Santa Cruz, California)
House Without A Key at Halekulani Hotel (Honolulu, Hawaii)
Edge of Waikiki at Sheraton Waikiki Beach Resort (Honolulu, Hawaii)
Vanessa Countryman is the Trending Topics Reporter for the Deep South Connect Team Georgia. Email her at Vcountryman@gannett.com.
This article originally appeared on Savannah Morning News: Best beach near Savannah. USA Today names this one Top 3 in America
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNN
15 minutes ago
- CNN
Estimated 2,000 gallons of diesel fuel spill into Baltimore's Inner Harbor, officials say
FacebookTweetLink Follow Emergency crews from a host of government agencies were working through the night to clean up an estimated 2,000-gallon diesel spill along part of Baltimore's waterfront that started on Wednesday. The spill originated at a Johns Hopkins Hospital facility in East Baltimore, according to a news release from Maryland Governor Wes Moore and Baltimore Mayor Brandon M. Scott. Johns Hopkins first reported the spill around 11:00 a.m. and initially estimated it at 100 gallons. Seven hours later Hopkins updated their report to reflect a 2,000-gallon uncontained spill. The fuel contains a red dye and has stained a section of the water roughly 100 by 250 yards near the South Central Avenue Bridge, the release said. 'The water is red due to dye in the diesel fuel. There is no impact to drinking water in the area,' the release from the governor and the mayor said. Moore said on social media that he was at the scene of the spill near Fells Point, a historic waterfront in Baltimore and a popular tourist destination. The US Coast Guard is leading the clean-up effort, which involves nearly a dozen state and city agencies. The Coast Guard is working with crews using oil absorbent materials and skimmers to remove fuel from the water. 'Containment and cleanup efforts will continue through the night,' officials said. CNN has reached out to John Hopkins and the Coast Guard for further details about the status and scope of the spill.
News24
20 minutes ago
- News24
‘Sometimes I scream in my sleep': Witness claims Diddy dangled her from 17th-story balcony
Bryana Bongolan testified that Sean 'Diddy' Combs dangled her over a 17th-story balcony before throwing her onto furniture, leaving her traumatised. Bongolan claimed she witnessed Combs throwing a knife at ex-partner Cassie Ventura amidst allegations of abuse. Combs, facing life imprisonment if convicted, denies charges of sex trafficking and racketeering linked to his alleged criminal enterprise. A woman told US jurors Wednesday that hip-hop mogul Sean 'Diddy' Combs dangled her over a 17th-story balcony before throwing her onto furniture in an attack that left her traumatised and bruised. Bryana Bongolan testified in the music icon's ongoing federal criminal trial in New York that she was staying over with her friend Casandra 'Cassie' Ventura - Combs' ex and a key trial witness who recently delivered searing testimony of abuse and coercion. While she was at Ventura's place, Combs burst into the apartment and seized Bongolan on the balcony. Bongolan, a designer, said Combs repeatedly shouted with expletives, 'You know what you did,' and she said she repeatedly told him she did not. The witness also recounted an incident when she saw Combs hurl a knife at Ventura, which Bongolan said Ventura then threw back at him. Bongolan told prosecutors she did not go to the police out of fear: 'I was just scared of Puff,' she told the court, using another nickname for Combs. But a defence lawyer for the musician, who faces racketeering and sex trafficking charges, cast Bongolan as a drug abuser and unreliable witness whose story was shifting. Bongolan is among dozens of people who have filed civil suits against Combs in recent years, legal action she told jurors she took 'because I wanted to seek justice for what happened to me on the balcony.' Bongolan, who remains friends with Ventura, says the incident left her with post-traumatic stress, including recurring night terrors and paranoia. She told jurors: 'Sometimes I scream in my sleep' Defence attorney Nicole Westmoreland bluntly indicated that Bongolan was lying and implied that the witness had compared notes with Ventura to get their stories straight as the two filed separate civil suits against Combs. Ventura alleged that she suffered harrowing abuse under Combs, her former on-and-off partner of more than a decade, opening the floodgates against the one-time music powerhouse when she first filed suit against him in November 2023. That suit was settled out of court in less than 24 hours. Westmoreland on Wednesday pushed the narrative that Bongolan's heavy drug use, including with Ventura, clouded her memories of the alleged events. Bongolan was testifying under an immunity order that protects her from incrimination if she speaks truthfully. She frequently responded to Westmoreland by saying she could not remember every detail - and the occasionally brusque defence questioning of her will continue Thursday morning. Afterwards, the prosecution is expected to call Jane - long-anticipated testimony from a woman who will speak under a pseudonym in relation to one of the sex trafficking charges against Combs. $100 000 in a paper bag Combs, 55, faces upwards of life in prison if convicted of crimes of sex trafficking and racketeering. Prosecutors say he ran a criminal enterprise of high-ranking employees and bodyguards who enforced his power with illicit acts, including kidnapping, bribery and arson. On Tuesday, a hotel security guard said he received $100 000 in a brown paper bag from Combs in exchange for now-infamous surveillance footage that showed the artist-entrepreneur violently kicking and dragging Ventura in a hotel. Jurors have repeatedly been shown the disturbing clip in open court. The security officer, Eddy Garcia, said he initially rebuffed an attempt by a Combs employee—Kristina Khorram, who has been described as the music heavyweight's 'right hand'—to obtain the video. After repeated calls, including from Combs himself, Garcia eventually agreed to sell the tape, with permission from his supervisor, who got a cut. ''Eddy, my angel, I knew you could help. I knew you could do it,'' Garcia recounted Combs telling him. Garcia - who was also speaking under an immunity order - testified that he signed a non-disclosure agreement. Last week, a former assistant speaking under the pseudonym Mia described violent acts Combs committed against her and also recalled many times that she saw him beat Ventura. Now in its fourth week of testimony, witnesses have included alleged victims, former high-ranking employees, as well as assistants and law enforcement officials. The trial in Manhattan is expected to last well into the summer.
Forbes
24 minutes ago
- Forbes
Future Forecasting The Yearly Path That Will Advance AI To Reach AGI By 2040
Future forecasting the yearly path of advancing todays to AGI by 2040. In today's column, I am continuing my special series on the likely pathways that will get us from conventional AI to the avidly sought attainment of AGI (artificial general intelligence). AGI would be a type of AI that is fully on par with human intellect in all respects. I've previously outlined seven major paths that seem to be the most probable routes of advancing AI to reach AGI (see the link here). Here, I undertake an analytically speculative deep dive into one of those paths, namely I explore the year-by-year aspects of the considered most-expected route, the linear path. Other upcoming postings will cover each of the other remaining paths. The linear path consists of AI being advanced incrementally, one step at a time until we arrive at AGI. Let's talk about it. This analysis of an innovative AI breakthrough is part of my ongoing Forbes column coverage on the latest in AI, including identifying and explaining various impactful AI complexities (see the link here). First, some fundamentals are required to set the stage for this weighty discussion. There is a great deal of research going on to further advance AI. The general goal is to either reach artificial general intelligence (AGI) or maybe even the outstretched possibility of achieving artificial superintelligence (ASI). AGI is AI that is considered on par with human intellect and can seemingly match our intelligence. ASI is AI that has gone beyond human intellect and would be superior in many if not all feasible ways. The idea is that ASI would be able to run circles around humans by outthinking us at every turn. For more details on the nature of conventional AI versus AGI and ASI, see my analysis at the link here. We have not yet attained AGI. In fact, it is unknown as to whether we will reach AGI, or that maybe AGI will be achievable in decades or perhaps centuries from now. The AGI attainment dates that are floating around are wildly varying and wildly unsubstantiated by any credible evidence or ironclad logic. ASI is even more beyond the pale when it comes to where we are currently with conventional AI. Right now, efforts to forecast when AGI is going to be attained consist principally of two paths. First, there are highly vocal AI luminaires making individualized brazen predictions. Their headiness makes outsized media headlines. Those prophecies seem to be coalescing toward the year 2030 as a targeted date for AGI. A somewhat quieter path is the advent of periodic surveys or polls of AI experts. This wisdom of the crowd approach is a form of scientific consensus. As I discuss at the link here, the latest polls seem to suggest that AI experts generally believe that we will reach AGI by the year 2040. Should you be swayed by the AI luminaries or more so by the AI experts and their scientific consensus? Historically, the use of scientific consensus as a method of understanding scientific postures has been relatively popular and construed as the standard way of doing things. If you rely on an individual scientist, they might have their own quirky view of the matter. The beauty of consensus is that a majority or more of those in a given realm are putting their collective weight behind whatever position is being espoused. The old adage is that two heads are better than one. In the case of scientific consensus, it might be dozens, hundreds, or thousands of heads that are better than one. For this discussion on the various pathways to AGI, I am going to proceed with the year 2040 as the consensus anticipated target date. Besides the scientific consensus of AI experts, another newer and more expansive approach to gauging when AGI will be achieved is known as AGI convergence-of-evidence or AGI consilience, which I discuss at the link here. As mentioned, in a previous posting I identified seven major pathways that AI is going to advance to become AGI (see the link here). The most often presumed path is the incremental progression trail. The AI industry tends to refer to this as the linear path. It is essentially slow and steady. Each of the other remaining major routes involves various twists and turns. Here's my list of all seven major pathways getting us from contemporary AI to the treasured AGI: You can apply those seven possible pathways to whatever AGI timeline that you want to come up with. Let's undertake a handy divide-and-conquer approach to identify what must presumably happen on a year-by-year basis to get from current AI to AGI. Here's how that goes. We are living in 2025 and somehow are supposed to arrive at AGI by the year 2040. That's essentially 15 years of elapsed time. In the particular case of the linear path, the key assumption is that AI is advancing in a stepwise fashion each year. There aren't any sudden breakthroughs or miracles that perchance arise. It is steady work and requires earnestly keeping our nose to the grind and getting the job done in those fifteen years ahead. The idea is to map out the next fifteen years and speculate what will happen with AI in each respective year. This can be done in a forward-looking mode and also a backward-looking mode. The forward-looking entails thinking about the progress of AI on a year-by-year basis, starting now and culminating in arriving at AGI in 2040. The backward-looking mode involves starting with 2040 as the deadline for AGI and then working back from that achievement on a year-by-year basis to arrive at the year 2025 (matching AI presently). This combination of forward and backward envisioning is a typical hallmark of futurecasting. Is this kind of a forecast of the future ironclad? Nope. If anyone could precisely lay out the next fifteen years of what will happen in AI, they probably would be as clairvoyant as Warren Buffett when it comes to predicting the stock market. Such a person could easily be awarded a Nobel Prize and ought to be one of the richest people ever. All in all, this strawman that I show here is primarily meant to get the juices flowing on how we can be future forecasting the state of AI. It is a conjecture. It is speculative. But at least it has a reasonable basis and is not entirely arbitrary or totally artificial. I went ahead and used the fifteen years of reaching AGI in 2040 as an illustrative example. It could be that 2050 is the date for AGI instead, and thus this journey will play out over 25 years. The timeline and mapping would then have 25 years to deal with rather than fifteen. If 2030 is going to be the AGI arrival year, the pathway would need to be markedly compressed. I opted to identify AI technological advancements for each of the years and added some brief thoughts on the societal implications too. Here's why. AI ethics and AI law are bound to become increasingly vital and will to some degree foster AI advances and in other ways possibly dampen some AI advances, see my in-depth coverage of such tensions at the link here. Here then is a strawman futures forecast year-by-year roadmap from 2025 to 2040 of a linear path getting us to AGI: Year 2025: AI multi-modal models finally become robust and fully integrated into LLMs. Significant improvements in AI real-time reasoning, sensorimotor integration, and grounded language understanding occur. The use of AI in professional domains such as law, medicine, and the like rachet up. Regulatory frameworks remain sporadic and generally unadopted. Year 2026: Agentic AI starts to blossom and become practical and widespread. AI systems with memory and planning capabilities achieve competence in open-ended tasks in simulation environments. Public interest in governing AI increases. Year 2027: The use of AI large-scale world models spurs substantially improved AI capabilities. AI can now computationally improve from fewer examples via advancements in AI meta-learning. Some of these advances allow AI to be employed in white-collar jobs that have a mild displacement economically, but only to a minor degree. Year 2028: AI agents have gained wide acceptance and are capable of executing multi-step tasks semi-autonomously in digital and physical domains, including robotics. AI becomes a key element as taught in schools and as used in education, co-teaching jointly with human teachers. Year 2029: AI is advanced sufficiently to have a generalized understanding of physical causality and real-world constraints through embodied learning. Concerns about AI as a job displacer reach heightened attention. Year 2030: Self-improving AI systems begin modifying their own code under controlled conditions, improving efficiency without human input. This is an important underpinning. Some claim that AGI is now just a year or two away, but this is premature, and ten more years will first take place. Year 2031: Hybrid AI consisting of integrated cognitive architectures unifying symbolic reasoning, neural networks, and probabilistic models has become the new accepted approach to AI. Infighting among AI developers as to whether hybrid AI was the way to go has now evaporated. AI-based tutors fully surpass human teachers in personalization and subject mastery, putting human teachers at great job risk. Year 2032: AI agents achieve human-level performance across most cognitive benchmarks, including abstraction, theory of mind (ToM), and cross-domain learning. This immensely exceeds prior versions of AI that did well on those metrics but not nearly to this degree. Industries begin to radically restructure and rethink their businesses with an AI-first mindset. Year 2033: AI scalability alignment protocols improve in terms of human-AI values alignment. This opens the door to faster adoption of AI due to a belief that AI safety is getting stronger. Trust in AI grows. But so is societal dependence on AI. Year 2034: AI interaction appears to be indistinguishable from human-to-human interaction, even as tested by those who are versed in tricking AI into revealing itself. The role of non-human intelligence and how AI stretches our understanding of philosophy, religion, and human psychology has become a high priority. Year 2035: AI systems exhibit bona fide signs of self-reflection, not just routinized mimicry or parroting. Advances occur in having AI computationally learn from failure across domains and optimizing for long-term utility functions. Debates over some form of UBI (universal basic income) lead to various trials of the approach to aid human labor displacements due to AI. Year 2036: AI advancement has led to fluid generalization across a wide swath of domains. Heated arguments take place about whether AGI is emerging, some say it is, and others insist that a scaling wall is about to be hit and that this is the best that AI will be. Nations begin to covet their AI and set up barriers to prevent other nations from stealing or copying the early AGI systems. Year 2037: Advances in AI showcase human-like situational adaptability and innovation. New inventions and scientific discoveries are being led by AI. Questions arise about whether this pre-AGI has sufficient moral reasoning and human goal alignment. Year 2038: AI systems now embody persistent identities, seemingly able to reflect on experiences across time. Experts believe we are on the cusp of AI reaching cognitive coherence akin to humans. Worldwide discourse on the legal personhood and rights of AI intensifies. Year 2039: Some of the last barriers to acceptance of AI as nearing AGI are overcome when AI demonstrates creativity, emotional nuance, and abstract reasoning in diverse contexts. This was one of the last straws on the camel's back. Existential risks and utopian visions fully dominate public apprehensions. Year 2040: General agreement occurs that AGI has now been attained, though it is still early days of AGI and some are not yet convinced that AGI is truly achieved. Society enters a transitional phase: post-scarcity economics, redefinition of human purpose, and consideration of co-evolution with AGI. Mull over the strawman timeline and consider where you will be and what you will be doing during each of those fifteen years. One viewpoint is that we are all along for the ride and there isn't much that anyone can individually do. I don't agree with that sentiment. Any of us can make a difference in how AI plays out and what the trajectory and impact of reaching AGI is going to be. As per the famous words of Abraham Lincoln: 'The most reliable way to predict the future is to create it.'
