
Latest 4-Day Workweek Study Shows Mental Health Benefits, But Will It Catch On Where You Work?
The concept of a 4-day workweek isn't new, but with the increasing trend of 'liquid working,' and the push for more work-life balance and flexibility, four-day workweeks are growing in popularity. And so is the scientific study. Up until this week, there were very few large-scale trials to measure its success. Now, the largest-scale research to date reports groundbreaking findings that corroborate the previous smaller studies.
Research Shows Benefits Of The 4-Day Workweek
Around 27 to 30 companies—like Kickstarter, Panasonic, Awin and Digible—have already implemented the four-day week in a variety of different ways, and the number of other companies jumping onboard is rising. In many instances, employees say that the shorter workweek leads to better productivity and less employee turnover.
Co-founder and CEO of Monograph, Robert Yuen told me in 2023 that hands-down employees need more time, which is why his company operates on a four-day workweek schedule. 'A four-day workweek gives employees the space to take care of themselves, providing them space for personal development,' he argues. 'Since this tech startup launched a four-day workweek in 2019, employee satisfaction has reached an all-time high.'
In March of 2024, Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders gave momentum to the four-day workweek movement in Congress when he introduced legislation reducing the workweek from 40 to 32 hours without a pay cut. But impressions are one thing and objective science is another.
So what does the science show? One study in the Academy of Management Journal found that the four-day workweek does not reduce labor productivity and may in fact increase it. A larger study in the United Kingdom in June of 2022 launched the largest four-day workweek pilot at that time, including more than 3,300 workers and 70 British companies.
Overall, the trial found no productivity loss associated with a four-day work week pilot program with some companies reporting significant improvements. The U.K. study found that the four-day week frees up employee personal time, boosts their well-being and makes them more productive during working hours. Around 46% of respondents say their business productivity has 'maintained around the same level,' while 34% report that it has 'improved slightly' and 15% say it has 'improved significantly.'
A new study published this week in Nature Human Behaviour is the biggest trial of four-day a workweek, with participants from nearly 3,000 employees at 141 companies and six countries over a six-month period. Results show that workers are happier, have less burnout, increased job satisfaction and improved mental and physical health. The findings also reveal that employees are just as productive working a four-day workweek.
On July 23rd of this year, Pipedrive released its Annual State of Sales & Marketing Report, based on responses from 1,000 professionals across 85 countries. Findings showed 4-day workweeks are linked to better sales results and higher satisfaction. Sales professionals on 4-day workweeks are eight percent more likely to hit quotas and report the highest satisfaction with work-life balance. Those logging overtime (over 75% of respondents) see worse performance, showing that more hours don't equal better results.
Critics Question The Latest 4-Day Workweek Study
I imagine many of you reading this good news are excited about the possibility of enjoying a four-day workweek where you work. I hate to burst your bubble, but the truth is, there are methodological issues with the earlier studies. It's encouraging to see the positive findings but also important to point out that the earlier studies are mostly self-reports with an absence of objective measures.
Isaac Kohen, founder and CPO at Teramind, a leading provider of workforce analytics for insider risk and productivity, questions the validity of the latest study. Kohen told me by email that the absence of an objective productivity measurement is a critical gap in the study and could mislead organizations into making costly operational decisions based on incomplete data.
'Employee self-reporting on productivity is valuable for understanding sentiment, but it can't provide the granular insights businesses need to justify such significant changes to stakeholders and boards.' Kohen explains. 'When 90% of companies chose to continue their four-day schedules, were they making this decision based on hard metrics or just improved morale? Real productivity measurement requires analyzing actual work patterns like application usage, task completion rates, and workflow efficiency.'
So what needs to be fixed so we have more reliable data that increase your chances of a shorter workweek? Kohen weighs in on that issue. 'Organizations, in order to properly evaluate productivity of 5-day vs 4-day weeks, need to establish baseline metrics during traditional five-day schedules, then continuously monitor and compare performance throughout four-day implementations,' he advises. 'According to a 2023 survey conducted by Zippia, a good productivity percentage is somewhere between 70-75% and the average worker only spends 4 hours and 12 minutes actively working during an 8-hour shift.'
He notes that without objective data, organizations risk implementing compressed schedules based on optimism rather than evidence. "Feeling more productive and being more productive aren't always the same thing, and only comprehensive measurement can bridge that perception gap to determine whether four-day work weeks truly serve both employee well-being and business objectives," Kohen concludes.
Sofia Passova, former rocket scientist and founder and CEO of StereoLOGIC, also cautions the importance of testing business processes before making the switch to a shortened workweek. 'The goal of a shortened workweek is to find ways to help employees work smarter, not harder,' Passova asserts. 'And the best way to do that is to identify ways to improve, streamline and maximize the value of their output through data-enabled analysis of the processes and tasks that determine their day-to-day activities.'
A Final Wrap On Your Chances Of A 4-Day Workweek
Many workers believe shorter workweeks create greater structure around work and add a free weekday to relax, handle life matters and enjoy work-life balance. A 4-day workweek where you work could be a favorable response to the employee burnout dilemma that continues to grow, that is, if the shorter week can prioritize downtime without sacrificing performance and costly operational decisions.
The answer is a large-scale study (compressing five days of work into four) that employs more objective measurements in addition to self-reports and shows results that satisfy both worker well-being and business objectives. Clearly, with more science backing up the efficacy of the 4-day workweek and legislation introduced in congress, the concept of an abbreviated workweek will catch on in the United States and could become a permanent fixture where you work sooner than you think—if not in 2025, perhaps in the not-too-distant future.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Wall Street Journal
13 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
UBS to Pay $300 Million to Settle Credit Suisse Obligations Under DOJ Dea
UBS Group said it reached an agreement with the U.S. Justice Department to pay $300 million to resolve outstanding consumer-relief obligations Credit Suisse committed to. Swiss bank UBS, which in 2023 acquired Credit Suisse, said Monday that its Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC subsidiary entered into an agreement with the DOJ to resolve all outstanding obligations under a previous settlement. The obligations stem from a 2017 agreement between Credit Suisse and the DOJ related to the bank's legacy residential mortgage-backed securities business.


Forbes
13 minutes ago
- Forbes
No Friends In The Pipeline: Why 300,000 Black Women Were Pushed Out Of The Workforce
A recently published MSNBC article made headlines for a shocking stat: nearly 300,000 Black women have exited the American labor force in the last three months. The article attributes the mass exodus to reasons like federal job cuts and the dismantling of DEI programs, with issues like inflation, student loan debt, automation, and underrepresentation in growing tech sectors creating a compounded economic risk for Black women. This phenomenon not only hurts Black women but has a ripple effect for the entire U.S. economy, resulting in a loss in the country's gross domestic product (GDP). A less-discussed issue that must be considered is how what is happening is also the cause of a widening network gap faced by Black women. A 2019 article from LinkedIn's Vice President of Social Impact, Meg Garlinghouse, explored the network gap: the unequal access a person has to opportunities based on who they know. Garlinghouse's article cited research that indicates that 70% of professionals get hired at jobs where they know someone who works there. A 2020 study by Chika O. Okafor indicated that non-white job candidates get fewer jobs through referrals because their social network is smaller. With the anti-DEI legislation and a wave of corporate DEI rollbacks, many companies have deprioritized DEI, dismantling programs and initiatives like employee resource groups (ERGs), which provide key opportunities to boost one's professional network. According to Catalyst, ERGs can be thought of as 'voluntary, employee-led groups that foster inclusive work environments aligned with business values, goals, and objectives.' Often ERGs focus on a shared identity (race, religion, being a parent, LGBTQIA+ status, etc.). ERGs provide employees with pathways to network, connect across departments, find mentors, and build relationships but many organizations are quietly shuttering their ERGs amid growing anti-DEI sentiments. Having less opportunities to be in community with employees at different levels in an organization can exacerbate the network gap that Black women face. Mentorship and sponsorship programs, which are often perceived to be DEI or DEI-adjacent, may be halted in the current climate, even though these programs can play an instrumental role in employees' careers, and Black women's career advancement. A wealth of research indicates that Black women leading Fortune 500 companies, as well as those in education, medicine, and tech, routinely report feelings of both hypervisibility and invisibility. Organizational psychologist Dr. Kecia M. Thomas has highlighted the pet to threat concept in her research: the phenomenon in Black women's career trajectories where they go from being the 'pet,' where they are well-liked and celebrated but exploited, to being the 'threat,' where they are seen as posing a risk to the status quo. A 2023 report from Exhale indicated that 36% of Black women have exited a job because they felt unsafe. Black women face a slew of inequities in the workplace and must deal with issues of gendered racism and the angry Black woman stereotype. A 2024 Harvard study also found evidence that when Black women have a higher percentage of white team members, they are more likely to leave their job and less likely to be promoted, revealing the systemic inequities that are entrenched in the workplace. The rise of AI may be making the problem worse. Many of the AI tools that companies lean on to help with hiring decisions may exacerbate existing biases, contributing to hiring gaps when it comes to Black women. Black women are overrepresented in jobs roles that are vulnerable to AI and automation, explained executive leadership coach Margaret Spence in a LinkedIn article. These factors in conjunction with the dismantling of corporate DEI programs makes building and sustaining professional networks for Black women more challenging. What can organizations do to address this issue? First off, workplaces should be intentional about providing employees with opportunities to network with each other. Do you have active mentorship and sponsorship programs in place? If not, how can you get them started? Ensure that equity is foundational in your workplace; frequently audit company policies and practices to ensure fairness and disaggregate employee feedback from anonymous channels, focus groups, and surveys to better understand Black women's experiences. What are Black women saying when they leave your organization? Assess exit interview data to see if patterns are emerging from the Black women who have left. The current anti-DEI legislation was implemented to sow fear and confusion in the workplace. Be aware of the ever-changing laws and stay up to date on local legislation. Consult with legal counsel to better understand what DEI practices are legal. Despite popular misconceptions, there are still many ways to drive fairness and equity while complying with state and federal laws. For Black women, there are some ways to address the network gap. Building community intentionally is vital. Consider joining different community groups, whether in-person or virtually, that align with your goals. This could be an online community for Black women in law, for example, or a meetup group for Black women in cybersecurity. If the community you are seeking doesn't exist, think about ways to create it. Also consider intentional networking on LinkedIn. Many see the platform as a place to go only when job searching but it can also be a great place to build networks, find your people and directly engage with community members. Black women's mass exodus from the U.S. labor market is caused by several different factors. While some reasons, like the DEI rollbacks and federal job cuts, are more obvious, there are issues that are more insidious at play. It's important that we understand what the antecedents are and put measures in place to ensure that Black women are given the support that is needed to thrive. When Black women are given the tools to succeed, everyone across the board will benefit.


Bloomberg
13 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
UBS Settles Credit Suisse Mortgage-Bond Case for $300 Million
UBS Group AG said it has reached an agreement with the US Department of Justice to resolve a legacy Credit Suisse matter related to the former bank's role in selling residential mortgage-backed securities in the US. 'On 1 August 2025, Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC entered into an agreement with the DOJ to resolve all of Credit Suisse's outstanding Consumer Relief Obligations under the 2017 settlement by paying $300 million,' the bank said in a statement on Monday.