Harris reiterates support for Omagh public inquiry in Benn meeting
Ireland's deputy premier Simon Harris has reiterated his Government's commitment to support the Omagh Bombing Inquiry during a meeting with Northern Ireland Secretary Hilary Benn in Dublin.
The meeting, their first to be held in person, featured discussions on political stability in Northern Ireland and the UK Government's controversial Legacy Act.
Mr Harris said their conversation was 'warm and constructive'.
The Tanaiste said: 'We welcomed the ongoing political stability in Northern Ireland and agreed on the need for Northern Ireland's devolved institutions to ensure that they deliver for the people of this island.'
He added: 'A priority for both governments in the period ahead is removing the influence of paramilitaries on society in Northern Ireland.
'We discussed the report of the Independent Reporting Commission, and our joint announcement that we will proceed with the appointment of an independent expert to carry out a short scoping and engagement exercise to assess whether there is merit in, and support for, a formal process of engagement to bring about paramilitary group transition to disbandment.
'We stressed our common understanding that there is no predetermined outcome to this work, that the process is in no way about providing funding to paramilitary groups, and that policing and criminal justice efforts to tackle paramilitary and organised crime of course need to be maintained in full.'
The Tanaiste said there had been a 'substantive and forward‑looking exchange' on legacy issues.
He said: 'I reiterated the Government's commitment to play our full part in legacy processes, including facilitating and supporting the Omagh Inquiry, and updated the Secretary of State on our engagement with the inquiry to date.'
Elsewhere on Wednesday, the Irish Justice Minister said he had 'concerns' about establishing a separate inquiry into the Omagh bombing in the Republic of Ireland.
However, Jim O'Callaghan said the Irish Government would co-operate with the UK inquiry.
'What happened in Omagh was horrific,' he said. 'My department is co-operating with the Omagh Inquiry. We're finalising a memorandum of understanding in respect of ensuring that any relevant evidence that we have in the South is provided to the inquiry.
'I have concerns about establishing a separate inquiry down here. There's one inquiry which has been conducted at present, the Irish Government is going to co-operate with it, we are co-operating with it. I think that's where all our focus should be.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Press and Journal
an hour ago
- Press and Journal
'Stop passing the buck and help Aberdeen Raac families'
A campaigner fighting for Aberdonians caught up in the Raac housing crisis is pleading with politicians to stop passing the buck over responsibility days before another UK spending review. Torry Raac campaign supporter Raymond Davidson reacted to the blame-game between political leaders in the week the UK Chancellor is under more pressure from the Scottish Government to find funds at Westminster. In the run up to the spending review on Wednesday, SNP and Labour leaders again kept the row going in a series of letters and statements shared with the P&J. Meanwhile in Aberdeen, Balnagask homeowners are trying to convince the city council it already has the money to meet everyone's needs. Mr Davidson said the constant back-and-forth between London and Edinburgh is a distraction. 'It's like a game of pass the parcel to them,' he said. 'No one wants the music to stop and take responsibility, it just keeps going round and round. 'It's as though people don't matter in this. Politicians are playing party-political games.' One of the big problems is what happens to homeowners who bought properties with Raac which is now posing a risk. The council has a 'voluntary acquisition proposal' which would cost more than £12 million to take the homes and demolish them. For those who want to stay, a massive repair bill would fall to them personally. The share could be between £20,000 and £44,000 depending on the size of property. 'Why can't the council provide the lot?' asked Mr Davidson. 'They can spend now whatever Holyrood and Westminster are saying. 'If there's extra money down the line, fine. But that shouldn't stop them now.' A proposal from residents would see people relocated to a cluster of homes which would then be repaired at what campaigners say is a reduced cost to the taxpayer. Councillor Allard, the SNP co-leader in Aberdeen, said the local authority is already getting on with helping Raac residents – but is under no obligation to fully fund private owners. 'By law we don't need to give them anything,' he said. 'Morally, we are helping.' The full cost, regardless of what happens, should involve government help, he added. 'I don't understand why the UK Government will not pay more. It should be like the Grenfell cladding crisis and a UK-wide issue.' In the UK's Scotland Office, Labour MP Ian Murray agreed the council's voluntary purchase scheme must give homeowners 'fair compensation.' But in a letter copied to residents and the P&J, he wrote: 'While I have the utmost sympathy with what you and your neighbours are going through, our powers are limited, given this is an issue devolved to the Scottish Government, which received a record £50bn funding settlement at the Autumn Budget. 'Some of that could – and I believe should – be used to tackle this problem.' Meanwhile, the housing minister in the UK Government said Raac is 'low' in English housing so there will be no additional extra government scheme. This is crucial because if Westminster does spend extra on English housing on Wednesday, it would generate a compensating figure for use in Scotland. In a letter to his Scottish counterpart, Mr Norris said building safety and local government finance are Holyrood's responsibility. 'Any decisions on funding to support building owners to manage Raac are for the Scottish Government and impacted local authorities,' he wrote. The P&J put the UK Government position to the SNP Government. Scottish housing minister Paul McLennan said: 'Raac is a cross-UK problem, and we have been clear from the beginning that it requires a cross-UK solution. 'We have repeatedly called on the UK Government to make available a dedicated Raac remediation fund, which they have unfortunately failed to do. 'We are continuing to call on them to take action – and at next week's spending review the Chancellor has the opportunity to take action to support people affected by Raac, including those in Aberdeen. We will keep up the pressure on the UK Government on behalf of homeowners in Aberdeen and across Scotland.' The P&J asked a spokesman for the prime minister in the Commons last week if any money can be expected on Wednesday. But the spokesman would not disclose any details ahead of the statement.
BreakingNews.ie
an hour ago
- BreakingNews.ie
Rent pressure zones: What are they and why are there calls for reform?
The Government is examining whether to abolish Ireland's current system of rent caps. Rent pressure zones (RPZ) were introduced in 2016 to help control spiralling costs for tenants. Advertisement The regulations, which apply to certain areas of high demand for housing, are due to expire on December 31st. Here is everything you need to know about RPZs, and what the Government might do next. What are rent pressure zones? The RPZ system was introduced in 2016 to cap rent increases in areas where there is high demand for housing and rental homes. An area designated as an RPZ has annual rent increases capped at 2 per cent or at the rate of inflation, whichever is lower, even if there is a change of tenant. Advertisement However, not all rented properties in RPZs are subject to rent caps. Landlords can be exempt from the rent caps if the property has not been rented for a period of two years or if it has undergone a "substantial change in the nature of the accommodation". Where are rent pressure zones? RPZs now cover most of the country – 111 of the State's 166 local electoral areas are under the rent cap system. Many of the major towns and cities in the Republic are RPZs, along with touristic areas such as Killarney, Westport and Connemara. Castlebar in Co Mayo and Tullow in Co Carlow are the latest areas to become RPZs. Advertisement Why would the Government want to scrap rent pressure zones? There is concern within the Government that RPZs have negatively impacted the level of private investment in housing developments, amid increasing pressure to meet new-build targets. Fianna Fáil and Fine Gael are under increasing pressure to tackle the State's housing crisis after it emerged that 30,330 homes were built last year, far short of the projected 40,000 new builds put forward by the parties. The debate over RPZs also stems from a report by the Housing Commission that recommended a new form of rent control. The report published in May last year said landlords had been constrained by the RPZ regime and reported a lack of policy certainty and diminished net rental returns. Advertisement It also highlighted that tenants were still experiencing affordability challenges due to historically high rents, while those seeking to find rental accommodation were met with low availability. The commission said the evidence for the effectiveness of the RPZ system was "mixed", and suggested that rent regulation needs to be made fit for purpose for the longer term. The report said the Government should regulate market rents fairly and effectively by reforming current regulations and establishing 'reference rents'. This would replace RPZs with a system that pegs rent to local dwellings of a similar quality. Advertisement In the proposed new system, the reference rent rate would be reviewed at regular intervals and rent would not rise more than a certain percentage above this reference rent over a specific period. This rent regulation would continue to transfer between tenancies, so that if a tenancy ends the same regulations apply to the subsequent tenancy, discouraging the termination of tenancies purely to increase rental income. This new form of rent control would apply across the country, not just in specific zones. What proposals are the Government considering? The Government is now considering tying certain rents to the rate of inflation. Under the proposals, the current RPZ annual caps would not apply to new buildings constructed after a certain date and rents in the newbuilds would instead be linked to inflation. The proposal to get rid of the RPZ cap for newbuilds and tie the rent level to inflation is aimed at increasing private sector investment to deliver more housing. The current 2 per cent rent increase cap would remain in place for existing tenancies, though landlords would be able to change the rents between tenancies, which is currently not permitted. The changes to the RPZ system would be accompanied by enhanced protection for renters in relation to security of tenure amounting to a minimum of six years. There would be a restriction on no-fault evictions during this six-year period – a measure that will require legislation. The landlord would be allowed to reset the rent every six years to the market rate. When will the Government make its decision? Asked on Wednesday when a decision on the future of RPZs would be made, Taoiseach Micheál Martin told reporters: 'I would expect sometime in the next week.' The Taoiseach said the decision will be part of a number of steps towards increasing housing supply, including attracting institutional investors to the sector. 'There'll be further measures taken next week in relation to housing,' he said. 'It's not any one measure that is a silver bullet. It's the cumulative impact of all of them that will lead to an increase and an acceleration of timelines around getting housing units complete.' Coalition leaders are expected to consider the proposals for reforming the RPZ system when they meet on Monday in advance of a final decision on the plans due to be brought to Cabinet by Minister for Housing James Browne on Tuesday. What is the reaction from politicians, experts and industry? Opposition parties have widely criticised any proposals to phase out RPZs. Sinn Féin's housing spokesman Eoin Ó Broin said said any move by the Government "to allow landlords to increase the rent burden on tenants – a rent burden that is already far too high – will be strongly resisted." He said the proposed changes Sinn Féin would create a 'four-tier rental market', with different rent-setting and eviction rules for four types of tenants depending on whether or not they live in RPZs, when their tenancies begin, and when their homes were built. Social Democrats TD Rory Hearne said the housing crisis had deepened into a 'social catastrophe' and disaster'. He said his party would be 'actively and vociferously' opposing any attempt to remove rent caps. Lorcan Sirr, a housing lecturer at Technological University Dublin, criticised the suggested change to rental controls, telling The Irish Times that if stability was what the market needed, this in itself was 'policy flip-flopping'. Meanwhile, Eddie Byrne, chief executive of Irish Residential Properties REIT (IRES), which owns about 4,000 homes in Dublin and Cork, welcomed the Government's efforts for reforms that could boost the supply of rental properties while also protecting renters. Michelle Norris, director of the Geary Institute for Public Policy at UCD and member of the Housing Commission, said the majority of members in the commission agreed Government should regulate rents but that the RPZ system needed to be reformed so that there was stability in regulation and a move away from constant change. Ireland Rent pressure zones decision due within a week, sa... Read More The enforcement of any regulation was a key concern of the commission, Prof Norris told The Irish Times, as well as a move away from a 'flat' rate regulation of rent. 'Other European countries have rent regulations that are linked to a reference rent being charged for similar properties in that location that are of a similar quality and size.' John Mark McCafferty of housing charity Threshold said that without RPZs tenants would likely face substantial rent increases, pushing them into financial distress and 'even possible homelessness'. Irish Property Owners' Association chairwoman Mary Conway expressed concern at the potential for a 'two-tier market' with 'old rents versus new rents coming in'.
New Statesman
2 hours ago
- New Statesman
What Rachel Reeves can learn from Donald Trump
Photo byNext week, Rachel Reeves will publish the Government's Spending Review, outlining the financial settlement for the coming three years. As she makes her final decisions (they always go to the wire) she might consider lessons from an unlikely source: the US President. In recent months, Donald Trump has taken to trashing areas of deep US strength that were taken for granted so completely that they were invisible to most. Trump has done Reeves a favour, by paving paradise and putting up a parking lot. His actions are a reminder of the importance of investing in the unseen infrastructures that enable prosperity. The British Academy has just published a series of papers exploring what might pull the UK out of its long period of low productivity. The UK has powerful legal, financial, cultural and scientific institutions, but we're not good at organising the economy around our greatest strengths. We have a large population of skilled workers, for example, but they are unevenly spread and mismatched across regions. We do not make the most of our institutional, human and physical capital. Reeves has an opportunity to invest in these strengths and to make the UK more prosperous over the long term. In the US, the government is currently experimenting with the opposite approach. Trump has taken an axe to America's historic strength in research by attacking universities including Harvard, and cutting or freezing research funding. R&D is one of the drivers of long-term prosperity, and the US will be poorer as a result in the medium term. By many measures the UK already punches above its weight when it comes to R&D, particularly in universities. Reeves needs to continue investing in this long-term source of growth, and also find a model for the universities where much of this research is conducted to be financially stable. The Government has recently focused on heavy investment in advanced or 'frontier' technology but a significant share of innovation in the UK's services-dominated economy is not especially high-tech. We innovate well through the humanities, social sciences and the arts, in processes and services, as well as we do in cutting-edge technology. Trump has also reminded us of the dangers of unpredictability. A country whose word cannot be relied upon will suffer economically – even if it is currently the dominant power. The UK faces rather different challenges to the US on the global stage, in that we are not large enough to act unilaterally or bilaterally, nor are we still a member of a major economic bloc. But our deep roots in multilateralism mean we have an opportunity to become the world's most dependable broker. We have an historic role in shaping the major international organisations and we have substantial knowledge of global institutions and international legal norms and practices. In turbulent times this institutional infrastructure is something in which we should invest, with a strategic narrative that the UK economy remains open to the world. Our relatively stable political landscape, strong institutions and low levels of corruption are not just part of the furniture – they are a source of comparative advantage in an increasingly turbulent world. The openness of our economy is an opportunity to attract and develop human capital. We have a valuable infrastructure of knowledge and finance that is well equipped to support and commercialise innovation. The UK government has struggled in its first year to find a positive narrative, to move beyond dealing with a difficult economic inheritance. The public knows we have an economy that has suffered long-term stagnation and that we face mounting geopolitical uncertainty. The Spending Review should be couched in a narrative of investing in the UK's comparative strengths and its deep assets, in the infrastructure that is needed to help secure longer-term growth and resilience. If she can do this, the Chancellor might be even able to say that despite the tight economic circumstances, it is the Biggest, the Best, and the most Beautiful spending review ever. Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month Subscribe [See also: Rachel Reeves should fear the bond market vigilantes] Related
