logo
The mystery of the princes in the tower: murdid Richard III really murder his nephews or did they survive?

The mystery of the princes in the tower: murdid Richard III really murder his nephews or did they survive?

Malay Mail18-07-2025
LONDON, July 19 — It is one of history's most intriguing 'murders' — the mysterious disappearance over five centuries ago of two young princes from the Tower of London.
Nearly 200 years after they disappeared, two small skeletons were found in a wooden box at the historic tower and reburied at Westminster Abbey.
The remains were believed, but never proved, to be those of the two brothers — heir to the throne Edward, 12, and Richard, nine, the sons of King Edward IV of England, who were reputedly murdered at the behest of their uncle, Richard Duke of Gloucester.
William Shakespeare later immortalised him in Richard III as a scheming hunchback who did away with his royal nephews so he could take the crown himself, sealing his reputation as a child killer.
Now British author Philippa Langley, who helped unearth Richard's body from a central England carpark in 2012, has claimed that the princes — far from being killed — actually survived.
The elder prince, Edward, was heir to the throne at the time of his disappearance and would have ruled as King Edward V of England.
Langley decided to delve into the mystery after coming to believe that the conventional narrative in which Richard had the young princes killed smacked of 'history being written by the victors'.
She was finally spurred into action after reading an article about Richard's reburial at Leicester Cathedral in 2015 which questioned whether the nation should honour a 'child killer'.
'I think I'd always realised that the story sort of developed during the reign of the Tudors,' she said, adding that it was then 'repeated and repeated over time' until it became 'truth and fact'.
Tudor mud
The last English king to die in battle, Richard ruled from 1483 until his brutal death at the Battle of Bosworth near Leicester in 1485, aged 32.
Bosworth was the last major conflict in the Wars of the Roses and changed the course of English history because the Tudor dynasty of Henry VII captured the crown from Richard's Plantagenets.
Langley attributes the accepted story that Richard had the boys murdered to King Henry VII, a 'very, very intelligent individual, but suspicious and highly paranoid'.
'He had a massive spy network working for him. And he was able to completely control the narrative,' she said, adding that Richard ended up 'covered in Tudor mud'.
An undated handout picture released on February 4, 2013 from the University of Leicester shows the skeleton of king Richard III found at the Grey Friars Church excavation site in Leicester. — AFP pic
Taking a cold case review approach to the historical 'whodunnit', Langley says she assembled a group of investigative specialists, including police and lawyers, to advise her.
'They said: 'Look, if you haven't got any confirmed, identified bodies, then it has to be a missing persons investigation and you have to follow that methodology'.
'They said: 'You have to actively look for evidence'. That's when it really started to get interesting.'
Langley put out an appeal for volunteers to scour archives, only to be inundated with offers of help from people ranging from ordinary citizens to medieval historians.
The result was the decade-long Missing Princes Project which she says unearthed a significant amount of information pointing to the survival of both young princes.
Survival theory
Langley now believes that it is up to Richard's detractors to disprove the survival thesis, which she outlines in the new book 'The Princes in the Tower: Solving History's Greatest Cold Case'.
'The onus is now on them to find the evidence that the boys died.
'They cannot say Richard III murdered the princes in the tower any more because we found numerous proofs of life everywhere,' she said.
Key to Langley's conviction that both boys survived are documents discovered supporting a rebellion by 'Edward IV's son'.
During the rebellion in 1487, Lambert Simnel, a pretender to the throne who came forward after Richard's death, was crowned in Dublin.
According to fresh references found by the project, the boy was 'called' or said to be 'a son of King Edward', which she believes points to Simnel being the elder prince, son of Edward IV.
The reaction to Langley's research has been mixed.
Michael Dobson, director and a professor of Shakespeare studies at the University of Birmingham's Shakespeare Institute, expressed scepticism.
'Given the ways of dynastic monarchy, I think Richard would have been taking a very big risk in leaving those princes alive,' he said.
'The chances of their having accidentally gone missing while incarcerated on his orders in the Tower of London seem pretty remote.' — AFP
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

One year after Southport, Epping protests spark fears of new summer riots in UK amid migrant anger
One year after Southport, Epping protests spark fears of new summer riots in UK amid migrant anger

Malay Mail

time11 hours ago

  • Malay Mail

One year after Southport, Epping protests spark fears of new summer riots in UK amid migrant anger

EPPING, July 25 — Concern is mounting that recent violent anti-immigrant protests could herald a new summer of unrest, a year after the UK was rocked by its worst riots in decades. Police have arrested 16 people since protests flared last week outside a hotel housing asylum seekers in the town of Epping, northeast of London. In one demonstration, eight police officers were injured. The unrest was 'not just a troubling one-off', said the chairwoman of the Police Federation, Tiff Lynch. 'It was a signal flare. A reminder of how little it takes for tensions to erupt and how ill-prepared we remain to deal with it,' she wrote in the Daily Telegraph. Protestors shouted 'save our children' and 'send them home', while banners called for the expulsion of 'foreign criminals'. Cabinet minister Jonathan Reynolds on Thursday urged people not to speculate or exaggerate the situation, saying 'the government, all the key agencies, the police, they prepare for all situations. 'I understand the frustrations people have,' he told Sky News. The government was trying to fix the problem and that the number of hotels occupied by asylum seekers had dropped from 400 to 200, he added. The issue of thousands of irregular migrants arriving in small boats across the Channel, coupled with the UK's worsening economy, has triggered rising anger among some Britons. Such sentiments have been amplified by inflammatory messaging on social networks, fuelled by far-right activists. Almost exactly a year ago on July 29, 2024, three young girls were stabbed to death in a frenzied attack in northwestern Southport. The shocking killings stoked days of riots across the country after false reports that the killer — a UK-born teenager whose family came to the country from Rwanda after the 1994 genocide — was a migrant. Nearly 24,000 migrants have made the perilous journey across the Channel so far in 2025, the highest-ever tally at this point in a year. The issue has become politically perilous, putting pressure on Labour Prime Minister Keir Starmer's centre-left government, as the anti-immigrant, far-right Reform UK party rises in the polls. 'More unrest likely' The Epping protests were stirred after a 38-year-old asylum seeker, who only arrived in Britain in late June, was arrested and charged with three counts of sexual assault. Images from the protests have gone viral on social networks, mirroring what happened last July. But Epping residents have maintained that the protests are being fuelled by people from outside the community. 'These violent scenes ... are not Epping, and they are not what we stand for,' the Conservative MP for Epping, Neil Hudson, told parliament Monday. While calm was restored to Epping, a middle-class suburban town with a population of 12,000, tensions remain palpable. 'This is the first time something like this has happened,' one local who lives close to the Bell Hotel told AFP, asking not to be named. 'The issue is not the hotel, but extremists applying a political ideology,' he added. Late on Thursday, the hotel, cordoned off behind barriers, was again the centre of a protest involving dozens of people, with police making one arrest. With another protest expected on Sunday, the local council voted through a motion to demand the government no longer house asylum seekers at the hotel. The UK is 'likely to see more racist riots take place this summer', said Aurelien Mondon, politics professor and expert on far-right and reactionary discourse at Bath University. Anti-immigrant protests have already erupted elsewhere, with demonstrations in the southeastern town of Diss in Norfolk outside a similar hotel on Monday. Last month, clashes flared for several days in the town of Ballymena in Northern Ireland after two teenagers with Romanian roots were arrested for the alleged attempted rape of a young girl. 'Civil disobedience' 'It is well documented that many of the protests we are witnessing are not the result of grassroots, local movements,' Mondon said. 'Social media plays a role and facilitates coordination amongst extreme-right groups,' but it is 'also crucial not to exaggerate' its power, he added. High-profile far-right activist Tommy Robinson, who was blamed for stoking the Southport unrest, announced he would be in Epping on Sunday, before later seeming to scrap the plan. The firebrand anti-Islam campaigner has just been freed from jail after spreading fake news about a Syrian immigrant, but faces trial on a separate issue in 2026. 'I don't think anybody in London even understands just how close we are to civil disobedience on a vast scale,' said Reform leader Nigel Farage. 'Most of the people outside that hotel in Epping weren't far right or far left,' he said, they 'were just genuinely concerned families'. — AFP

Soccer-England's Walsh hope Spain can enjoy Euro final after Rubiales controversy
Soccer-England's Walsh hope Spain can enjoy Euro final after Rubiales controversy

The Star

timea day ago

  • The Star

Soccer-England's Walsh hope Spain can enjoy Euro final after Rubiales controversy

FILE PHOTO: Soccer Football - UEFA Women's Euro 2025 - Semi Final - England v Italy - Stade de Geneve, Lancy, Switzerland - July 22, 2025 England's Keira Walsh in action with Italy's Manuela Giugliano REUTERS/Denis Balibouse/File Photo ZURICH (Reuters) -England and former Barcelona midfielder Keira Walsh hopes that Spain are able to enjoy the Euro 2025 final on Sunday after the controversy that clouded their 2023 World Cup triumph. Defending champions England meet Spain in Basel on Sunday, two years on from a World Cup final that was overshadowed by then Spanish football federation chief Luis Rubiales kissing striker Jenni Hermoso on the lips after the game. "There's a lot of respect between both the teams and, I think the most important thing for them as a footballer, is that they can enjoy this final – that there's not the controversy surrounding it," Walsh said from England's base camp on Thursday. "The girls deserve to be there to play incredible football. The way our league jumped after we won the (2022) Euros, if you compare it to Spain it probably wasn't the same and they won the World Cup," said Walsh, who played 64 games for Barcelona before joining Chelsea. "After the final there was a lot of controversy and I don't think, for them, there was enough spotlight on how incredible they played. It was all about the other stuff. "As a professional, that was disappointing to see. I have a lot of friends in that team and I think they probably deserved a little bit more than what they got." Rubiales was found guilty of sexual assault for the unsolicited kiss during the World Cup medal ceremony, and fined over 10,000 euros ($12,000). The incident sparked widespread debate about sexism in Spanish society and women's football, fuelling momentum for the "Me Too" movement in the country. ($1 = 0.8500 euros) (Reporting by Lori Ewing)

Court affirms trio's 35-year jail term for kidnap, murder 10 years ago
Court affirms trio's 35-year jail term for kidnap, murder 10 years ago

Free Malaysia Today

time2 days ago

  • Free Malaysia Today

Court affirms trio's 35-year jail term for kidnap, murder 10 years ago

The Federal Court today upheld the conviction and sentence imposed on A Malarvili, J Sunil Singh, and C Kavin Mukilan for the kidnapping and murder of Balveer Kaur in 2015. PUTRAJAYA : The Federal Court has upheld the 35-year prison sentence against a former clerk and two others for the kidnapping and murder of businesswoman Balveer Kaur, whose body was dumped from the Second Penang Bridge 10 years ago. A three-member bench chaired by acting Chief Justice Hasnah Hashim dismissed the appeals by A Malarvili, 33, J Sunil Singh, 38, and C Kavin Mukilan, 31, against their conviction and sentence. Hasnah said the apex court had no reason to disturb the concurrent findings of facts made by the courts below. 'We are also satisfied that the trial judge did not commit any error, nor was there a miscarriage of justice,' she said. The bench dismissed the prosecution's cross-appeal to restore the death sentence imposed by the High Court on the three appellants. 'We have no hesitation in dismissing the appeals before us. We hereby confirm the conviction and sentence,' she said. Also on the panel hearing the appeal were Justices Abu Bakar Jais and Hanipah Farikullah. Sunil, a former employee of Balveer, and Kavin were also sentenced to be whipped 12 times as they were below 50 years of age. The trio were sentenced to another 35 years for kidnapping to obtain a ransom from Balveer's family, with Sunil and Kavin sentenced to an additional three lashes of the rotan. Malarvili was spared a whipping as the law prohibits such punishments on female offenders. The jail terms were ordered to commence from the date of their arrest, and will run concurrently, meaning that the trio will serve 35 years calculated from Feb 15, 2015. On Dec 27, 2018, trial judge Zulkifli Bakar convicted the three accused and sentenced them to death for both offences. On March 5 last year, the Court of Appeal upheld the conviction but substituted the capital punishment with jail time following a plea by their lawyers. Lawyers Amer Hamzah Arshad represented Sunil, Jasmine Cheong appeared for Malarvili, and M Visvanathan acted for Kavin. Deputy public prosecutor How May Ling and Iznina Hanim Hashim appeared for the prosecution. The trio were jointly charged with the common intention of kidnapping Balveer at a construction site near Sunway Pyramid in Petaling Jaya, Selangor, on Feb 13, 2015. They were also charged with murdering her at about 3.55am the following day. Balveer, who was 60 at the time of the incident, was involved in a marble and granite business with her husband, Amarjit Singh. Evidence was led during trial that the trio had intentionally caused her death by suffocating her before throwing her body into the sea. A pathologist confirmed that Balveer died of suffocation and not drowning as claimed by the defence.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store