Feds investigate Tesla over inaccurate autopilot and FSD crash reports
The NHTSA requires automakers to report crashes involving autonomous and driver assistance systems within five days of being notified of them. The agency claims that Tesla has sometimes waited months to report these crashes. It's worth remembering that the company's vehicles are outfitted with technology that automatically records and sends out data regarding a collision within minutes of an accident.
Tesla has acknowledged the issue but says this is all due to an error in its systems, which has since been fixed. However, the agency will continue the investigation, citing that it will "assess whether any reports of prior incidents remain outstanding and whether the reports that were submitted include all of the required and available data."
The NHTSA has good reason to not accept Tesla's explanation at face value. It currently has other open investigations into the company. There's one involving its remote parking feature that has allegedly caused a number of crashes and another looking into the efficacy of a recent software fix that followed a massive recall.
Tesla also recently lost a wrongful death case involving an Autopilot crash in which it was revealed in testimony that the company lied and misled police and plaintiffs to hide pertinent data. The company leads other auto manufacturers by a country mile when it comes to crashes involving driver assistance systems. Tesla vehicles were involved in the vast majority of total incidents reported to the NHTSA from 2021 to 2024. That translates to over 2,300 crashes, compared to 55 for second-place GM.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Miami Herald
34 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
Tesla FSD faces more trouble as government opens investigation
There are seemingly two versions of Tesla's (TSLA) Full Self-Driving and Autopilot advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS). There's the version that Tesla uses to sell the system to the public, and there's the reality of what the system can do that was laid bare during the company's recent lawsuit. In March, Tesla CEO Elon Musk tweeted: "FSD beta build V8.1 normally drives me around with no interventions. Next version is a big step change beyond that. Tesla is solving a major part of real world AI. This is not widely known." Related: $243 million Tesla Autopilot lawsuit lawyer has message for Elon Musk But in court, Tesla sang a different, less confident tune. "Tesla in the showroom tells you that they've invented the greatest full self-driving car the world has ever seen. Mr. Musk has been peddling to consumers and investors for more than a decade that the cars are fully self driving and that the hardware is capable of full autonomy. And those statements were as untrue the day he said them as they remain untrue today," said Brett Schreiber, litigator for the plaintiffs in the recent $243 million jury verdict against Tesla over a 2019 fatal crash in Key Largo, Florida. "But then they showed up in a courtroom and they say, 'No, no, no, this is nothing but a driver assistance feature.'" Earlier this month, a group of Tesla shareholders sued the company and CEO Elon Musk because the company wasn't completely honest about the problems with Robotaxi. The class action suit covers investors who purchased Tesla shares between April 19, 2023, and June 22, 2025. The class action is seeking damages for broken promises. The lawsuit alleges "Tesla overstated the effectiveness of its autonomous driving technology; there was thus a significant risk that the company's autonomous driving vehicles, including the Robotaxi, would operate dangerously and/or in violation of traffic laws." Related: GM's tech czar has a novel view of what AI can do This gap between promises and deliverability leaves the company open to litigation and "heightened regulatory scrutiny." This week, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) added to Tesla's regulatory burden. The agency already has numerous investigations into Tesla's ADAS system, but on Aug. 21, it revealed another one. This time, the issue is the timeliness of Tesla's reports on crashes that involve Full Set-Driving and Autopilot. Electrek reported on the Office of Defects Investigation resume from August 19, showing that the agency is investigating "numerous incident reports submitted by Tesla in response to Standing General Order 2021-01, in which the reported crashes occurred several months or more before the dates of the reports." The official notice makes it clear that the opening of this audit query "is a standard process for reviewing compliance with legal requirements" and that Tesla says the issue is data collection and has already been fixed. But Electrek points out that Tesla received data about the Key Largo crash immediately after it happened. It was an important sticking point in the trial, as the Tesla computer was shown to delete the local file of the crash, while immediately uploading the incident to Tesla's servers. Tesla shareholders say that Elon Musk's public declarations about ADAS tech don't match reality, and they're relying on public social posts to make their point. A June 22 post on X (the former Twitter) by @BradMunchen says: "Watch the Tesla try to turn where it's not supposed to at around 18 seconds into the video." The lawsuit quotes a Bloomberg report: "Tesla Inc.'s self-driving taxis appeared to violate traffic laws during the company's first day offering paid rides, with one customer capturing footage of a left turn gone wrong and others traveling in cars that exceeded posted speed limits." More Tesla lawsuits: Tesla lands in more hot water over Elon Musk's Full Self Driving claimsTesla's history of settling Autopilot claims before $243 million lawsuitTesla faces another lawsuit after $323 million autopilot verdict Following that first weekend, Tesla's share price fell 6% over the subsequent two sessions, costing shareholders money. The lawsuit also references another recent nine-figure court judgment against the company. Morand v. Tesla Inc. is being litigated in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas. Related: Elon Musk abandons political project before it gets off the ground The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Tesla is facing a new federal investigation into its autonomous driving features
Tesla is facing an investigation from federal safety regulators into whether it delayed notifying the government about crashes involving its driver assistance technology. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) is looking into whether or not the company is complying with regulations requiring it to report data about crashes involving its cars when they are using certain driver assistance features. In a federal filing released Wednesday, NHTSA said that 'reported crashes occurred several months or more before the dates of the reports. The majority of these reports involved crashes in which … the time required a report to be submitted within one or five days of Tesla receiving notice of the crash.' Many Tesla vehicles come equipped with Autopilot, a system designed to help drivers on limited access highways, and the company's so-called 'Full Self Driving' feature, which is supposed to be able to guide cars on both city streets and highways. Both features are only supposed to be used with a person in the driver's seat who is paying attention and can take control of the car. While NHTSA has numerous ongoing investigations into Tesla and the safety of its autonomous vehicle efforts, the latest investigation is the first probe launched since President Donald Trump returned to office. It also could be seen as another blow to Tesla's bet that its autonomous vehicle technology will be central to its future growth and profitability. Investors had believed that the Trump administration would be advantageous for Tesla CEO Elon Musk's self-driving ambitions, possibly even spelling the end of existing safety investigations into the company. Musk devoted hundreds of millions of dollars to Trump's election and served as a significant advisor to Trump after his inauguration. The two have since had a falling out, however. NHTSA said Tesla has indicated it has fixed past problems collecting and reporting the required data. The agency said it plans to audit Tesla data to find out if that is true. Secretary of Transportation Sean Duffy said in April that his department would be changing the reporting requirements, however, as part of efforts to promote autonomous vehicles. 'We've heard from industry partners that crash reporting requirements for automated vehicles is way too expensive,' he said in announcing the department's AV program. 'But these reports help DOT monitor road safety. So to balance these concerns, we've streamlined the process.' Tesla was found liable earlier this month in a fatal 2019 crash of an Autopilot-equipped Model S that hit a parked car, resulting in the death of one of its occupants. The company was ordered to pay $329 million in damages. Tesla has announced plans to appeal. Tesla did not respond to a request for comment. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
The ‘Tesla of China' Defies All Odds to Rise 93% in 2025: Is It Too Late to Buy the Stock Now?
The Chinese electric vehicle (EV) industry is plagued by a price war, which is especially taking a toll on startup names in the sector. Xpeng Motors (XPEV), however, stands out among startup Chinese EV companies this year with YTD gains of 93%. The company has impressed with strong deliveries, which rose to a record high last month, as well as an improvement in its financial performance. The company's Q2 2025 earnings, released earlier this week, were also better-than-expected and helped justify its YTD outperformance over peers like Nio (NIO) and Li Auto (LI) as well as U.S.-based rival Tesla (TSLA). More News from Barchart Warren Buffett Says Don't Invest in Berkshire Hathaway Unless You 'Understand Our Operations, Attitudes and Expectations' The Quantum Computing Race Is On: These 2 Stocks Appear Poised to Lead Should You Buy the Pullback in Palantir Stock Today? Get exclusive insights with the FREE Barchart Brief newsletter. Subscribe now for quick, incisive midday market analysis you won't find anywhere else. In this article, we'll examine why XPEV might continue its rally in 2025 and beyond. Will XPEV Stock Rise More in 2025? I have been bullish on XPEV for some time now, and the stock hasn't disappointed me. Here are the five reasons I believe Xpeng Motors might continue its rally. 1. Delivery Ramp Up with New Models The company's new models have been quite successful, and it is looking to launch several new models beginning with the refresh of the P7, for which it has received the highest preorders in its history. During the Q2 earnings call, Xpeng Motors' CEO He Xiaopeng expressed optimism that the P7 would be among the top three selling models in the RMB 300,000 segment. He predicted that the company's monthly deliveries, currently in the 30,000s, will surpass 40,000 beginning in September as it starts delivering the refreshed P7. Switch Auto Insurance and Save Today! Affordable Auto Insurance, Customized for You The Insurance Savings You Expect Great Rates and Award-Winning Service In December, Xpeng will introduce its X9 Kunpeng Super Electric Edition, its first extended-range electric vehicle (EREV) with an electric range of 450 kilometers and a combined range of 1,500 kilometers. EREVs are quite popular in China, and Xpeng Motors intends to launch more of these in the coming years. EREVs would help Xpeng Motors expand its total addressable market and would eventually lead to higher deliveries. 2. International Expansion Despite tariffs in several regions, including Europe, Xpeng Motors' overseas sales more than tripled in the first half of the year to 18,000 units, and it is now the top-selling Chinese startup EV brand in 10 markets, including Norway and France. Notably, Chinese automakers are gaining traction in Europe even as Tesla (TSLA) continues to lose market share there, in part due to CEO Elon Musk's political entanglements. 3. Strategic Partnerships Xpeng Motors has expanded its partnership with Volkswagen (VWAGY) and expects the IP licensing revenues from the partnership to increase in the second half of 2025. The company is also open to global partnerships for its Turing artificial intelligence (AI) chip. The Volkswagen partnership and any further such deals would help buoy XPEV's margins and cash flows. 4. A Clear Path Toward Profitability Xpeng Motors' vehicle gross margins were 14.3% in Q2, 3.8 percentage points higher than the previous quarter. It marked the eighth consecutive quarter of an increase in margins, which is no small feat considering the price war in China. The company reiterated its guidance of achieving profitability in the final quarter of this year. 5. Advancements in Autonomous Driving and Humanoids While currently none of the players in the EV race, including Tesla, have full L4 autonomous driving capabilities, Xpeng Motors is hopeful of mass-producing L4-capable vehicles in 2026. It also plans to launch pilot robotaxi services in some regions. During the Q2 earnings call, Xiaopeng said the company is 'actively preparing for mass production' of its humanoid in the back half of next year. At the AI Tech Day later this year, Xpeng will unveil its next generation of humanoids. Xpeng Motors' stock could see further rerating as it advances its autonomous driving and humanoid business. Xpeng Motors' Stock Forecast Sell-side analysts have also been warming up to Xpeng Motors, and it now has a 'Strong Buy' rating from 53% of analysts as tracked by Barchart, while the corresponding number three months back was under 44%. Xpeng Motors' mean target price of $23.38 is 14.8% higher than the Aug. 20 closing price, while the Street-high target price of $30 is 47% higher. Xpeng Motors trades at a forward enterprise value-to-sales multiple of 1.27x, which is higher than Chinese peers like Nio, Li Auto, and Zeekr (ZK). However, I believe Xpeng Motors has earned the right to trade at premium valuations due to its strong execution. Also, its progress in autonomous driving and robotics – which apparently are the key drivers of Tesla's valuations – warrant a higher multiple. While not an apples-to-apples comparison, the corresponding multiple for Tesla is 10.19x. I believe Xpeng Motors (XPEV) is one Chinese company that comes quite close to Tesla in strategy as well as ambitions and has the potential to become the 'Tesla of China' - a classification once reserved for Nio. Overall, I find Xpeng Motors as one of the best ways to play the EV, autonomous driving, and humanoid story in China and see the stock rising higher from these levels. On the date of publication, Mohit Oberoi had a position in: XPEV, LI, NIO, TSLA. All information and data in this article is solely for informational purposes. This article was originally published on
