Pakistani Analyst Admits India's Defence Dominance, Says, ‘We're No Match Without S-400'
Pakistan, in the aftermath of 'Operation Sindoor', finds itself confronting harsh realities about its air defence and drone warfare capabilities. Recent Indian drone and missile strikes, which devastated key military sites across the border, have laid bare serious weaknesses in Pakistan's defence setup – prompting calls from within to urgently modernise and rethink its strategic posture.
Well-known Pakistani strategic analyst Dr. Qamar Cheema bluntly described Pakistan's predicament, 'Our current defence systems are not equipped to handle the new generation of warfare. We desperately need advanced models like S-400. Without them, we remain vulnerable to Indian aerial dominance.'
His observations highlight how Indian forces reportedly breezed past Pakistan's Chinese-made air defence systems, causing confusion and panic.
The Indian Air Force's rapid and precise strikes targeted radar installations, command centres and ammunition depots at multiple locations including Lahore, Chaklala and Bholari.
These strikes neutralised Pakistan's Pechora and OSA-AK missile systems and even destroyed Chinese-supplied air defence units in Lahore and Chaklala. The use of India's indigenous Akash missile system, equipped with sophisticated electronic counter-countermeasures, further demonstrated New Delhi's growing technological edge.
Pakistan's own military leadership has acknowledged the damage inflicted. Retired Air Marshal Masood Akhtar confirmed the loss of a vital AWACS aircraft at Bholari airbase. He emphasised the severity of the strikes and the challenges faced by Pakistani pilots under missile attack.
Cheema warned that future conflicts will heavily rely on technology – drones, electronic warfare and cutting-edge air defence systems. 'This is not just a conventional war. It is a battle for technological superiority. Pakistan must urgently develop indigenous capabilities and invest in drone countermeasures before it is too late,' he said.
Operation Sindoor has thus served as a reminder for Pakistan: adapting to modern warfare demands far more than traditional weaponry. India currently holds a clear advantage in the modern warfare.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
12 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Lawyers don't need to wear black coats in summer: Delhi Bar Association
In a major relief to lawyers practising in the Capital amidst the scorching heat, the Delhi Bar Association (DBA) has decided that advocates will be exempt from wearing black coats, their usual dress code, from May 16 to September 30. Rules framed under Section 49(1)(gg) of the Advocates Act, 1961, prescribe a dress code for all practising advocates. This comprises a black buttoned-up coat, chapkan, achkan (a knee-length upper garment with long sleeves, side slits and a standing collar), black sherwani and white bands with advocate's gown for men advocates. Women advocates have to wear a black and full or half-sleeve jacket or blouse, white collar, stiff or soft, and white bands with advocates' gowns or sarees and long skirts (white or black without any design). 'All the members are hereby informed that advocates are exempted from wearing a black coat during summer (from May 16 to September 30) as per amendment in rules under Section 49(1)(gg) of the Advocates Act,1961,' DBA said in a circular dated May 24. 'Therefore, the members are at liberty to appear in the Courts subordinate to the Delhi High Court without wearing a black coat… The members are, however, advised to adhere to other rules of the dress code…,' the circular issued by Vikas Goyal, Secretary, DBA, said. DBA also said the district and sessions judges of various court complexes across Delhi have been informed of this decision. 'This is a very good step. The weather is very erratic and humid. In June, the heat will be way worse. This should be done by all Bar Associations and Councils across North India,' said Advocate Dhir Singh Kasana, former Saket Bar Association secretary. 'Indian district courts lack proper infrastructure in terms of fans, air conditioners, unhygienic washrooms, and sitting rooms, coupled with rising temperatures, it has become a daily physical and mental challenge for the advocates to wear black coats during court hours, especially in summer…This move is a welcome step towards the welfare of the advocates practising at district courts,' Advocate Paras Jain, who practices in Delhi, said. On February 27 this year, the Bar Council of Maharashtra and Goa (BCMG) issued a circular stating that advocates need not wear black coats from March 1 to June 30 every year. Similarly, Bhopal's Bar Council gave a similar exemption to lawyers from April 15 to July 15, 2025.
Fibre2Fashion
13 minutes ago
- Fibre2Fashion
Economists see global growth coming under strain amid uncertainty: WEF
Uncertainty is the defining theme of the global economic environment, according to the World Economic Forum's (WEF) latest Chief Economists Outlook, which said 82 per cent consider it very high now, while 56 per cent anticipate easing over the next year. Ninety-seven per cent placed trade policy among the areas of highest uncertainty, followed by monetary policy (49 per cent) and fiscal policy (35 per cent). Uncertainty defines the global economic environment, the WEF's latest Chief Economists Outlook noted; 82 per cent see it as very high now. The growth outlook is divided, with weak prospects in North America, APAC resilience and cautious optimism in Europe. The most optimism about a strong economic expansion in South Asia, with India set to be the primary engine of growth this year and the next. Eighty-seven per cent anticipated that businesses will respond to uncertainty by delaying strategic decisions, increasing recession risks. The growth outlook is divided, with weak prospects in North America, resilience in the Asia-Pacific and cautious optimism in Europe. In Europe, while growth remains subdued, respondents pointed to emerging signs of improvement, driven by expansionary fiscal policy and continued monetary easing. The respondents were largely aligned in their assessment that higher tariffs and persistent trade tensions would fuel inflation and suppress trade volumes, and persistent uncertainty would inflict significant economic damage on the global economy, including through paralysed decision-making and heightened risks of policy mis-coordination, the report's executive summary said. Artificial intelligence (AI) is expected to drive growth, but 47 per cent anticipate related net job losses. The economists were the most optimistic about a strong economic expansion in South Asia, with India set to be the primary engine of growth this year and the next. They, however, warned of the overall global growth coming under strain from trade policy shocks and AI disruption. Respondents were clear that overall growth prospects were weakening, with the shift in trajectory being most pronounced in the United States, where the majority of respondents expected weak or very weak growth for the remainder of 2025, alongside rising inflation and a weakening dollar. China is also pursuing fiscal expansion in an effort to bolster growth, but the chief economists were divided on whether it would reach its target of 5-per cent gross domestic product (GDP) growth this year, given a range of both external and domestic economic challenges. A majority of surveyed economists saw the current US economic policy as having a lasting global impact, with 87 per cent expecting it to delay strategic business decisions and heighten recession risks. Although the rerouting of Chinese exports is casting a shadow over the South Asian region's economic prospects, a recently concluded trade deal between India and the United Kingdom was another source of optimism, the report said. Globally, public debt concerns were seen mounting as defence spending rises, with 86 per cent of chief economists expecting increased government borrowing. Seventy-nine per cent of respondents viewed the current geo-economic developments as signs of a significant structural shift for the global economy rather than a temporary disruption. Other key risks included rising concentration of market power (47 per cent) and disruption of existing business models (44 per cent). Fibre2Fashion News Desk (DS)
Hans India
19 minutes ago
- Hans India
Op Sindoor should not be used to derive political mileage
The political class will do better if it stops desisting from trying to derive electoral mileage from the highly successful Operation Sindoor that was executed recently. The military aspects of the operation have been largely praised (even by objective western experts), but the political aftermath has proven far more complex. The ruling party has come under scrutiny for allegedly using the operation's success to enhance its nationalistic image ostensibly for electoral gains. On its part, the Opposition has done little better. Congress president Mallikarjun Kharge called for a special parliamentary session to discuss the operation in detail. He raised concerns about inconsistencies in official narratives, particularly surrounding reports regarding the number of Indian aircraft lost during the strikes. He also accused the government of 'misleading the nation.' His statement came after the Chief of Defence Staff Gen Anil Chauhan acknowledged the loss of some Indian aircraft but emphasised that the armed forces had adapted quickly to changing tactical scenarios, ultimately achieving the mission objectives. Chauhan categorically refuted Pakistan's assertions of shooting down multiple Indian jets, labelling them as propaganda meant to distort facts. His remarks highlighted the critical role of clear and truthful communication in sustaining public trust and countering misinformation. The political discourse triggered by Operation Sindoor reflects a broader tension between safeguarding national security and navigating partisan interests. While it is natural for political parties to discuss significant national developments, it is imperative that such dialogues remain constructive and rooted in the national interest. Exploiting military operations for electoral advantage not only undermines the integrity of the armed forces but also erodes public confidence in the nation's democratic institutions. As India continues to assess the long-term implications of Operation Sindoor, there is a pressing need for political maturity and a unified stance on issues of national security. Recognising and honouring the courage and competence of the armed forces should transcend political divides. National security must remain above the realm of party politics, treated with the seriousness and dignity it deserves. Also, our political leaders must come to terms with a sobering reality: Operation Sindoor, while tactically successful and symbolically significant, was not a war that we won—nor even a full-scale battle. At best, it was a well-executed skirmish, a calibrated military response to the horrifying Pahalgam terror attack that claimed 26 innocent lives. Its importance lies not in territorial gains or dramatic military victories, but in the message it has sent loud and clear-Pakistan will have to pay a heavy price for supporting and harbouring terrorist outfits. Precision strikes on terrorist camps disrupted their operations and showcased India's strategic capabilities. However, this operation must not be mistaken for closure. The war on terror is a long and evolving struggle, requiring constant vigilance, strategic foresight, and, above all, national unity. True victory will come not with a single strike, but through sustained efforts to dismantle the networks of extremism to be assured of lasting peace and security. Operation Sindoor stands as a testament to India's strategic capability and resolve in the face of terrorism. However, its legacy will be defined not just by military precision but by the manner the nation's political leadership chooses to engage with it. By fostering transparency, encouraging responsible dialogue, and prioritising unity, India can ensure that such operations serve their true purpose—protection and security of all its citizens.
