Beach hut owners at war with 'greedy' council after rent rockets by £200 despite being flooded HALF the year, the sea being too dirty to swim in... and a seawall blocking their view
But the seaside village of Heacham in west Norfolk is now the scene of rising tensions between its beach hut owners and the local council.
The owners claim their huts are furious at 'outrageous' annual ground rents that have soared 37 per cent in three years to £730.
This is despite them being advised not to swim in the sea because of the appalling water quality, according to the Environment Agency, while flooding means the huts also can't be used for six months of the year.
The increases have left many deciding to sell up with 11 of the village's 100 huts on the market, priced from £8,950 to £25,000, according to Rightmove.
But West Norfolk Council's policy of charging a £2,000 transfer fee on each beach hut sale to fund the drawing up of a new lease - in addition to the soaring costs and limitations on use - is also putting off buyers.
This, the owners say, left them stuck in a 'vicious circle' of having to pay the high rents or give up their plot and hut entirely, with little chance of selling.
Some plots, including those that have been passed down by families for generations, are even said to have been returned to the council due to people being unable to afford them and also failing to find a new owner.
The huts are a popular spot to sit and watch the view across the Wash - but they can only be used for six months of the year due to flooding and people are advised against swimming because of pollution in the sea
Wine bar owner Steve Scott, 57, from Leicestershire who bought his hut for £6,500 in 2019 described the ground rent as 'extortionate'.
He said: 'I have just paid the rent this year and it is outrageous. The only thing we get for our money is a couple of water taps either end of the beach.
'You never see anyone from the council turn up with a strimmer to cut back the vegetation.
'All the beach huts are beneath the sea wall so we do not even get to look at the beach unless we set up some chairs at the top.
'As far as I am concerned it is money for old rope for the council because they do absolutely bugger all.
'There are about 100 huts so that is more than £70,000 that they are raking in for doing sweet FA.
'We are not even allowed to use out huts between October and March and we certainly are not allowed to spend the night in them.
'It is nothing short of scandalous that they are also fleecing new owners for £2,000 just to draw up new bog-standard leases for what are basically glorified garden sheds.
'I did try and suggest that they could spread out the cost of ground rent over a whole year and pay once a month but before they responded they deducted the whole amount by direct debit as usual.'
Mr Scott admitted that he and his wife had bought their hut at the right time for 'a decent amount' before prices rocketed over Covid due to the increased demand for staycation holidays.
He added: 'It is certainly the case that there are loads of them on the market. It could be that prices will come down which will leave some owners disappointed.'
Mr Scott's anger at the council has been further exacerbated by their new policy of doubling council tax on holiday homes - including his two-bedroom bolthole in the nearby village of Snettisham, meaning he now pays £4,000 in council tax instead of £2,000.
'It is a lovely area here – but they are taking advantage,' he said. 'They just see second home owners as cash cows and beach hut owners are treated the same way.'
Jan Wildman, 64, who has owned a hut for six years, complained: 'We are the only beach in Norfolk with a brown flag award.
'The other thing about being in Heacham is we are further into the estuary area, so for half the day we have no water at all because it's over at Skegness.
'We are considered at risk of flooding for six months each year but in Old Hunstanton they pay £288 [annual ground rent] and can use them for 12 months.'
The retired teacher added the council treated hut owners as 'cash cows', saying: 'If you walk from the village to the beach you can access the public loos, just like we can, and you can get cold water from the stand pipe, just like we can.
'We are not getting anything for that huge sum of money that people can just get for nothing. So it's just greed and intransigence [by the council]. They've realised they can get the money, so why should they back down?'
Miss Wildman also pointed out transfer fees have increase from £1,500 when she bought hers in 2019 to £2,000 now – an increase of 33 per cent.
Gary Hall, who has visited his family's hut in Heacham since the 1980s, said: 'They [the council] have destroyed something special through their greed.'
Turning to sluggish sales, he added: People I have spoken to have said they would not touch them with a barge pole due to the high costs.'
Pam Slote, a retiree from Wisbech, Cambridgeshire, with a hut in the town, added: 'We feel incandescent and very cross.'
David French, 78, revealed he was considering giving up his hut. He said: 'They are killing the goose that laid the golden egg.'
Heacham's huts could still be viewed as a bargain compared to others in Norfolk, particularly at Wells-next-the-Sea a short distance away around the coast where they are priced at around £100,000 each.
And North Norfolk District Council charges more than £900 a year for a five-year lease for its huts in Sheringham, Cromer, Overstrand and Mundesley, while in Great Yarmouth and nearby Gorleston-on-Sea, the annual rent demanded is between £2,260 and £2,690.
But Heacham's hut owners argue that they are still not getting value for money as they can only use them for half the year due to the flooding risks.
The water pollution problems mean it is one of about 40 beaches in England where annual tests by the Environment Agency have rated the water quality as 'poor'.
Warning signs dotted around what has been dubbed 'Norfolk's most noxious beach' warn people to avoid the temptation to swim because of the high levels of bacteria and other pollutants that can make people ill if sea water is ingested.
Last week its beach was given a Brown Flag Award by UK travel website Holiday Park Guru, in a parody of the coveted Blue Flag Awards Signs awarded to the most coveted beaches.
The problem has been blamed on sea birds feeding on the mudflats of the Wash - although many local people suspect overflowing human sewage is at least partly to blame.
Hut owner Mr Hall added: 'The council has said the prices are competitive with North Norfolk District Council.
'But they have blue flag beaches, you can use them year-round and they have much better facilities, whereas we have to travel to Hunstanton to even go swimming.
'When I raised this with the council, they said "At least we have nice sunsets".'
Retired care worker Barbara Jackson of Peterborough, Cambridgeshire, who has a holiday mobile home in the village, said: 'I have got lots of sympathy with the beach hut owners.
'The huts add to the attraction of the place and are a lovely backdrop to the beach. If you buy a hut, you should be able to use the beach, yet people cannot go in the water.'
A 65-year-old dog walker, who gave her name as Claire, said: 'The state of the sea is beyond a joke. I can understand why the hut owners get upset when they pay so much.
'The other day, the water was like a millpond and my friend was out kayaking and she saw sewage just bobbing up and down.
'When I see kids in the water, I think "Oh my God". At low tide, past the breakwaters, it is all dark sand. If you see people after they have been in the water, they are minging. It is such a shame.
'The huts are quite well used in the summer months and some of them are really smart. But others have got vandalised and are in a poor state of repair.'
The frustrated hut owners have complained frequently to West Norfolk Council and have met up with officers and councillors.
A council spokeswoman said there fees for huts might be reviewed in the future but nothing has been confirmed.
She added: 'While it is important to note that these are the conditions that all parties signed up to, we acknowledge that, during the ten-year period of the leases, changing market circumstances mean that some of these conditions may not be as suitable as they were when agreed in 2016.
'We are sympathetic to the position of the owners and intend to address these issues during renewal discussions, in time for the leases to be renewed early next year.'
In January, the council announced it had turned around a £4m forecast budget gap and now had a balanced financial position for 2025/26 – without using financial reserves.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
3 hours ago
- Telegraph
‘Eco-hypocrite' Miliband refuses to reveal his number of domestic flights
Ed Miliband has been branded an eco 'hypocrite' after refusing to reveal how many domestic flights he has taken. Ministers insisted the Energy Secretary would not disclose any details about his air travel within the UK since he entered office last July. Claire Coutinho, shadow energy secretary, said the refusal represented 'one rule for him and another for everyone else' given that the Left-wing frontbencher has been a vociferous opponent of domestic air travel. Labour has also forced through significant increases to air passenger duty that have added hundreds of pounds to some family holidays. The accusation came after a Conservative MP challenged the Energy Secretary to publish details of the internal UK flights he has taken since the last election. Answering on Mr Miliband's behalf, Michael Shanks, the energy minister, replied: 'Details of internal domestic flights are not published.' Claire Coutinho, the Tory shadow energy secretary, said: 'As Ed Miliband sticks a holiday tax of up to £400 on a family of four, it does seem the height of hypocrisy that he won't reveal his own flights, which are funded by the taxpayer. 'People expect transparency and fairness from their politicians, but when it comes to the most stringent net zero costs, it's one rule for him and another for everyone else.' Mr Miliband's stance is in line with other Whitehall departments, which also do not release details of ministers' domestic flights. The Government said it was 'the practice of successive administrations', including Tory ones, not to 'publish granular information' about their movements. Mr Miliband, who is in charge of net zero policies, has previously said Britons should cut down on such flights 'as much as we possibly can'. But he was embarrassed earlier this year when it emerged his department is spending more on internal flights under his watch than the Tories. Figures released in April revealed it spent £44,000 on domestic flights for ministers and officials between July and December last year. That was more than the £40,000 spent in the first half of 2024 by the Tories, when Ms Coutinho was in charge of the net zero ministry. Mr Miliband has previously suggested that the Government should encourage ordinary voters to take trains and buses rather than flying. Asked when he was shadow business secretary whether domestic flights should be banned, he said: 'Not completely, but as much as we possibly can.' Speaking to the BBC in 2021, he added: 'Fairness and giving people alternatives is an absolutely key part of making this transition happen.' Labour repeatedly criticised the Conservatives for taking flights and pledged before the election to clamp down on ministers' use of jets. But since taking office, Mr Miliband has been heavily criticised for jet-setting, which has seen him spend 10 times more on foreign trips than Ms Coutinho. The Energy Secretary spent £62,712 on overseas travel in his first six months in office, according to Taxpayers' Alliance analysis, In contrast, his Tory predecessor spent just £6,155 during her first half-year in the role.
Times
4 hours ago
- Times
This hotel is the UK's first luxury all-inclusive — is it any good?
In the 1990s Manchester United won every football trophy going, Pot Noodle was the UK's favourite food, only five-year-old girls thought Kylie Minogue was cool, and you wouldn't wish an all-inclusive holiday on your worst enemy. Times change. These days luxury all-inclusives are more popular than ever, with demand up 125 per cent since 2019, according to Expedia. While top resorts worldwide have embraced the all-in concept, one destination has remained a notable exception: the UK. Although we have some great mid-market options, our luxury hoteliers have resisted this style of holiday, until now. Foxhill Manor in the upmarket village of Broadway, Worcestershire, quietly introduced the 'Full Fox' last year, becoming the first luxury hotel with all-inclusive rates. From £920 per room (yes, that includes drinks) it's certainly not cheap, but that doesn't preclude it from also representing good value, given a night at many similar Cotswolds country house hotels costs north of £600, room-only, and Foxhill's B&B rate starts at £595. So I set out to discover if the extra outlay is worth it. Foxhill passes the poshness test with flying colours. It's a honey-stoned grade II listed Arts and Crafts manor house ensconced in 500 acres of the Farncombe Estate. Interiors eschew flashiness in favour of quiet quality. Its eight bedrooms are minimalist masterpieces, ranging from enormous to ginormous. Ours has side-by-side bath tubs positioned by the window for maximum bucolic impact. Its diminutive size also helps Foxhill achieve the holy grail of hospitality, a seductive home-from-home informality. There's no reception or formal check-in and no need for the dreaded plastic wristbands typical of all-ins. There are no staff uniforms either. Instead our casually dressed 'host' Matt ushers us into the drawing room, where the stylish furniture comes in the colours of the cognac and cream liqueurs on the elegant sideboard. Completing the cosy vibe, there is a huge stone fireplace with glowing logs and mullion windows filled with beguiling views across the Vale of Evesham to the Malvern Hills. • 25 of the best hotels in the Cotswolds for 2025 Matt has such a contagious jovial manner and easy confidence that we soon feel relaxed. He bounds over to the bottles and asks what we'd like. Apart from a generous array of spirits, there are soft drinks and champagne (Delamotte Brut). I'd be derelict in my duty to decline a glass of bubbly. Likewise, I diligently sample the chocolate cupcakes (delicious) and scones (feather-light). We pass on lunch but Matt emphasises we can change our minds whenever we like and help ourselves to drinks any time. We watch another couple do just that. Chilly after a walk with their dog, they nod a friendly hello, then pour themselves gin and tonics. The ambience is house-party conviviality so we get chatting. The couple stay two or three times a year and are very happy with the conversion to all-inclusive. That reminds us, we're here for food and drink, not idle conversation, so we head off to the pantry. It's piled high with all sorts of snacks that would make Henry Dimbleby break down and cry: liquorice allsorts, jelly beans, lemon bonbons and every flavour of crisps and nuts. You'd have to eat Mr Creosote's body weight in Mr Filbert's Crunchy Corn nibbles to get a return on that room rate, though, so I decide to save myself for dinner. Dining is where Foxhill scores mega bonus points. With a maximum of 16 guests you really can eat and drink any time, any place, anywhere you like around the property. The drawing room or garden often win out over the pretty restaurant, as does the bay window on the landing (surprisingly intimate and with excellent views). You can also eat anything you like. Fillet steak? It's yours. Not even a hankering for foie gras followed by lobster thermidor will faze the chef. • 13 of the best all-inclusive resorts in the world The reason Foxhill's menu has a flexibility to rival the online yoga sensation Adriene is because the manor shares the glorious estate with its award-winning sister properties, Dormy House and the Fish, which have seven restaurants between them. That's a lot of larders for Foxhill's team to raid to meet awkward guests' demands. The managing director, Tom Aspey, explains, 'Foxhill should feel like home. You eat when and what you want. We accept there will be win and lose days if someone visits the bar repeatedly, but most people stay two nights, settle in and take their time.' Callum, the laid-back general manager, leads us to the kitchen to meet the chef James Sleep to discuss our perfect dinner. When anything is possible my mind tends to go blank, even if I haven't visited the bar repeatedly, so fortunately there's a chalkboard with suggested dishes to customise and seasonal ingredients for inspiration. Many people disregard both and opt for classics such as beef wellington, spotted dick and rum baba. I see Wiltshire truffle on the fresh-in list, which I ask to be served as a starter with some pasta and lots of parmesan. I'm intrigued by the chalkboard recommendation of cod kiev, so that's my main course sorted. My husband chooses hand-dived scallops followed by wild sea bass with crab tortellini and we ask for lots of greens. Next stop the wine cellar, where we select an organic Rhône white from Domaine des Hauts Chassis, which would probably sell for about £75 in a restaurant. • Read our full guide to the Cotswolds All that food-planning means we do finally succumb to those pantry nibbles. We could use the complimentary ebikes to work up an appetite. Instead we get a lift to the Dormy House spa (usually £110 for a non-resident day pass) and have a swim, sauna and snow shower. Matt encourages us to have a cocktail before dinner, of course. In the restaurant we spot a couple tucking into burgers and beer. Admittedly they are Jenga-stacked with fillings, but such modestly priced choices reminds me of the F Scott Fitzgerald quote that the very rich are different. We continue to get our money's worth, squeezing in a wickedly sticky toffee pudding and nightcaps. Breakfast is another no-judgement spread of generosity. We take our time, working through fruits, pastries, granola, yoghurt, green juices and avocado, and smoked salmon and eggs on sourdough. Newlyweds celebrating their nuptials sip champagne. Everyone else sticks to coffee. As fellow guests tell us repeatedly, knowing the cost upfront and being free to order what they like makes the experience feel more indulgent while, they argue, no more expensive. They are also enthusiastic about Broadway. Oscar Wilde and Mark Twain were fans of the town, which now sports a high street of independent shops, as well as having classic Cotswolds country walks and interesting places such as the National Trust's Snowshill Manor on the doorstep. Going all-inclusive is a bold move by Foxhill Manor but one that may well outfox the d'Arcy was a guest of Foxhill Manor, which has all-inclusive doubles from £920, including breakfast, lunch, afternoon tea and dinner, unlimited drinks and wine with meals, spa access, use of ebikes and chauffeur service to Broadway ( Would you book an all-inclusive in the UK? Share your thoughts in the comments
Daily Mail
5 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Britain's best BnBs revealed: They're stylish and have delicious food - this is the ultimate guide to the ones to stay at nationwide, by leading travel experts
There's a palpable air of alarm among some when you mention British B&Bs. Most of us have experienced the Nora Batty-esque landlady, freezing rooms, pitiful breakfasts in ridiculously narrow time slots and lists of 'rules' longer than a Salman Rushdie novel.
