logo
Texas considers banning products infused with THC derived from hemp, and retailers are worried

Texas considers banning products infused with THC derived from hemp, and retailers are worried

Yahoo2 days ago

AUSTIN, Texas (AP) — Walk into enough gas stations and they're likely easy to find: gummies, drinks and vapes infused with THC, the compound that gives marijuana its psychoactive properties.
That's given lawmakers across the U.S. headaches over how to regulate the booming market, and it's a conflict now taking hold in Texas, where a proposed ban passed by the Legislature poses another major battle for the industry.
Texas has some of the nation's most restrictive marijuana laws, but thousands of retailers in the state sell THC consumables, underscoring states' struggle to set rules around the products that generate millions in tax revenue.
Republican Gov. Greg Abbott has not indicated whether he will sign the ban. Other states, including California, have imposed restrictions in recent years that include banning underage use and limits on the potency of the products, which are often marketed as legal even in states where marijuana is not.
'Governor Abbott will thoughtfully review any legislation sent to his desk,' spokesperson Andrew Mahaleris said when asked for comment on the bill.
Texas tries to crack down
The Texas bill would make it a misdemeanor to sell, possess or manufacture consumable products with tetrahydrocannabinol, or THC. The proposal shadows several other state efforts to crack down on a market that has exploded since a 2018 federal law allowed states to regulate hemp, which can be synthetically processed to create THC.
Hemp is a plant that is grown to make textiles, plastics, food and several other products. It is related to marijuana and must contain less than 0.3% THC to still be classified as hemp under federal law.
The proliferating market has given residents in states with strict marijuana laws such as Texas a legal way to access products that can give them a similar high.
Nationwide, the substances are often sold through legal loopholes, despite concerns about potential health risks and a lack of oversight of how they're produced.
Republican Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick laid out bags of THC snacks on a table in front of a group of reporters last week to reiterate his determination for Texas to ban the products. He said he wasn't worried about Abbott when asked about the possibility of a veto.
'This is serious business,' Patrick said.
If enacted into law, Texas would have one of the most restrictive bans in the country, according to Katharine Neil Harris, a researcher in drug policy at the Baker Institute for Public Policy at Rice University.
'I'm not aware of any other states without recreational marijuana markets that also prohibit consumable hemp products from having any THC,' Harris said.
A jumbled legal landscape
States that prohibit recreational marijuana have also made efforts to regulate the THC market, including Alabama, Kentucky and Tennessee.
In Florida, Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis vetoed a bill last year that would have put in place age restrictions and banned marketing directed toward children, stating that it would hurt small businesses.
'There's such a variety in how states have responded to this," Harris said.
Texas has one of the most restrictive medical marijuana programs in the country, only allowing three licensed dispensaries to operate in the state to sell low-potency marijuana to residents with PTSD, cancer or other conditions. Proposals to expand the state's medical program are a sticking point for some Republican lawmakers.
A total of 38 states and the District of Columbia have laws that allow the medical use of marijuana. About 6 in 10 voters across the country said they favor legalizing recreational use nationwide, according to AP VoteCast, in a 2024 survey of more than 120,000 U.S. voters.
Retailers push back on ban
Kyle Bingham, a farmer in the Texas Panhandle, said he doesn't plan on growing hemp anymore if there's a ban. He has grown the plant on a family farm with his dad for four years and said it is one of many crops they grow, including cotton.
'We've never planted more than 5% of our acres in hemp, and that's part of the business plan," said Bingham, who is also vice president of the National Hemp Growers Association. 'So for us, it's definitely hard to walk away from as an investment.'
Because of a lack of federal oversight into manufacturing processes and a lack of uniform labeling requirements, it's hard to know what exactly is in THC products sold in stores.
Many dispensaries, worried about their future, have urged the governor to veto the legislation. They have defended their industry as providing medical relief to people who cannot access medical marijuana through the state's restrictive program.
'It's absurd they think they can sign away 50,000 jobs,' Savannah Gavlik, an employee at Austin-based dispensary Dope Daughters, said. The store will likely have to close if the ban takes place, but the anxiety has not yet set in, she said.
'One of the biggest things we provide is self care,' Gavlik said. 'It's people genuinely wanting medical relief.'
___
Lathan is a corps member for the Associated Press/Report for America Statehouse News Initiative. Report for America is a nonprofit national service program that places journalists in local newsrooms to report on undercovered issues.
Nadia Lathan, The Associated Press

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump-Musk Alliance Unravels Over ‘Big Beautiful Bill'
Trump-Musk Alliance Unravels Over ‘Big Beautiful Bill'

Yahoo

time20 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump-Musk Alliance Unravels Over ‘Big Beautiful Bill'

(Bloomberg) -- From the moment Donald Trump and Elon Musk joined forces, betting in Washington held that the president's bond with the First Buddy who bankrolled his comeback election win wouldn't last. ICE Moves to DNA-Test Families Targeted for Deportation with New Contract Next Stop: Rancho Cucamonga! US Housing Agency Vulnerable to Fraud After DOGE Cuts, Documents Warn Where Public Transit Systems Are Bouncing Back Around the World The Global Struggle to Build Safer Cars The breakup finally arrived this week, an escalating tit-for-tat between the world's richest man and the president of the US, who spent much of Thursday sniping at one another via social media posts and cameras in the Oval Office. Speaking to reporters, Trump pronounced himself 'very disappointed' in Musk over the billionaire's harsh criticism of a Republican tax and spending bill. Posting on X, his social media platform, Musk declared that Trump wouldn't have won a second term without his help. 'Such ingratitude,' the Tesla Inc. and SpaceX CEO declared. For a rift that had seemed inevitable, the descent into public recrimination was startling, even by Trump's volatile standard, which often sees former allies and underlings cast aside without fanfare. Musk spent the early months of Trump's second term offering obsequious praise and absorbing some of the political backlash of the slashing budget cuts and employee firings that have been a pillar of Trump's agenda. Trump, meanwhile, had elevated Musk, a government novice in a temporary role, to a position of unprecedented breadth to reshape and unmake the entire federal bureaucracy, with only occasional checks from the agency heads actually confirmed by the Senate. But on Thursday, their blow-up found Trump accusing Musk of trying to tank the spending bill because its elimination of electric vehicle credits hurt Tesla's bottom line, while Musk took to social media posts to deny Trump's Oval Office comments and taunt the president with his own past postings. 'Where is this guy today??' Musk wrote. Musk went so far as to poll his social media followers about whether he should 'create a new political party in America that actually represents the 80% in the middle?' Their relationship first blossomed at the height of the 2024 presidential campaign and deepened as Musk joined the new administration to slash the federal bureaucracy — a role that aligned with the tech titan's commercial interests and his politics with the philosophy of others in the incoming administration, like Russ Vought, the director of the Office and Management and Budget. But it unraveled this week over the unavoidable task of putting the administration's rhetoric about spending into practice, via a tax bill that's the centerpiece of Trump's domestic agenda. With posts on social media urging lawmakers to reject Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill,' Musk exposed a rupture that had been growing between him and the president for weeks, fueled at first by clashes with cabinet members over agency cuts and differences with the administration's sweeping tariff plans. Musk's public break with Trump threatens further fallout for the allies he helped to install in key positions across federal agencies during his time overseeing the Department of Government Efficiency that he prodded Trump to create. It also raises questions about whether the biggest billionaire spender of the 2024 election will remain a reliable source of campaign funding to sustain Republican control of the House in the midterm elections and to make permanent Trump's political movement. Steve Bannon, the former White House chief strategist who was deputized in 2017 to confront Musk about his demands for EV and battery mandates, said he cautioned Trump and his inner circle about the entrepreneur after the 2024 election. 'I warned people in the transition, this guy is unpredictable, immature and a narcissist, and he'd turn on anybody — including the president — when it suited him,' says Bannon, who has frequently criticized Musk on his 'War Room' podcast. Bannon says Musk's downfall from his status as 'Chief Buddy' was inevitable, because he could not produce the $1 trillion in budget cuts he claimed he could during the transition. 'He was too incompetent and lied about being able to find a trillion dollars of cuts in waste, fraud and abuse,' says Bannon. 'He misled everybody, including the president.' Trump's Orbit Administration officials who have bristled at Musk's power and bedside manner have been moving to reassert their influence in the executive branch since he announced his departure from DOGE, people familiar with the matter said. That includes the installation of a close associate of White House Chief of Staff Susie Wiles as chief of staff at NASA – an agency that is crucial to SpaceX, a company that makes up a third of his net worth. People familiar with the matter said the withdrawal of the nomination of Jared Isaacman, a Musk ally who was poised to run the space agency, was driven by Sergio Gor – the director of the Presidential Personnel Office, with whom Musk had sparred during his DOGE tenure. 'A lot of Musk's power stemmed from the fact that he was seen as an extension of Trump,' said Stephen Myrow, who runs Beacon Policy Advisers. 'But now that there's distance between them, that power might be waning.' 'I always talk about the 'evolving orbit' around Trump – people are always drifting in and out,' Myrow added. 'I wouldn't say Musk's relationship with Trump is severed. But between Isaacman's nomination being pulled and his public criticisms of the tax bill, he looks to be in the waning phase of his orbit.' Earlier: Former NASA Nominee Suggests Ties to Musk Caused His Ouster A White House official in an email pointed to multiple past donations that Isaacman had made to Democrats, suggesting that was the reason his nomination was nixed. In a podcast interview Wednesday, Isaacman said he didn't believe that was the reason, given the information had long been publicly available. 'President Trump is the ultimate decision maker on who has the privilege of serving in his historic administration,' White House spokesperson Liz Huston said. 'Any claims to the contrary are completely false.' Musk didn't respond to a message seeking comment. On X, his social media platform, one user said Isaacman's removal was a 'gut punch for the space agency,' to which Musk responded with a '100' emoji, indicating he agreed 100%. 'At Great Personal Cost' The fissure caps a roller-coaster 11 months from Musk's endorsement of Trump in July of 2024. Musk spent hundreds of millions of dollars to elect Trump and Republicans in 2024, and when the once and future president defeated Kamala Harris in November's election, he turned to Musk to lead an effort to slash the size and scope of government. Musk scythed through the federal bureaucracy while Trump unleashed a flurry of executive actions, each seeking to dismantle the administrative state at what the White House came to call 'Trump speed.' Yet swift progress on conservative priorities came with a price tag for Musk, who has seen his own net worth plummet in part because of reputational tarnish at home and abroad from his political actions and affiliation with Trump. Musk's net worth — much of it tied to the performance of Tesla — has dropped an estimated $64.1 billion so far this year, according to data compiled by Bloomberg Billionaires Index. It's the largest on-paper loss of any of the world's 500 richest people. And now, on his top political focus point of deficit reduction, any success Musk can claim — achieved, in his own words, 'at great personal cost and risk' — may be drowned out by the president's own signature legislation. The Congressional Budget Office projected that the House-passed tax and spending bill at the center of Trump's legislative agenda would add more than $2.4 trillion to US budget deficits over the next 10 years, slashing revenues by $3.67 trillion while only cutting spending by $1.25 trillion. That's way above even DOGE's most optimistic savings estimates. Its government website listing estimated savings states that DOGE has saved taxpayers about $180 billion year-to-date. However its 'Wall of Receipts' — a line-by-line list of contracts, grants and leases canceled since Inauguration Day — only accounts for less than half of that number. Adding to the risk for Musk's bottom line, Trump's bill would wipe out some valuable tax incentives that bolster his own companies. Musk personally appealed to House Speaker Mike Johnson to save tax credits for electric vehicles, according to a person familiar with the matter, but ultimately lost that fight. In an interview with Bloomberg Television on Thursday, Johnson did not confirm whether Musk had approached him over the credits, but said the two would speak later in the day, adding that Musk seems 'pretty dug in right now, and I can't quite understand the motivation behind it.' Musk's criticism of the spending package built slowly. On Tuesday, however, Musk lashed out, posting on his social media platform, X, that the bill was 'pork-filled' and 'a disgusting abomination.' Adding insult to injury for the White House, Musk has embraced the very argument that the administration has been trying to combat, noting the bill would significantly widen the federal budget deficit. By Wednesday afternoon, Musk was posting about 'debt slavery' and sharing an image of Uma Thurman holding a samurai sword — the poster for the film 'Kill Bill.' Widening Rift The rift between the two billionaire showmen — each renowned for seeking out the spotlight, and not for sharing it — had seemed to be widening for a while. Even as Musk embraced his DOGE role and continued making periodic appearances at the White House, he broke with some of Trump's policies. Musk has criticized tariffs, the primary tool in Trump's economic agenda, but one that has shown the potential for massive disruption in markets Musk moves in, including those for batteries critical to the fate of Tesla's automotive and energy units. An outside Trump adviser said the president remained furious about an incident, reported by The New York Times, in which Musk angled to obtain a classified briefing from the Pentagon about the upshot of a war with China, where Musk has extensive economic interests, especially via Tesla. As public furor grew over DOGE's unilateral cuts to federal agencies, Trump publicly reined Musk in, asserting that cabinet officials would have final say over proposed reductions. In a May 20 appearance at the Qatar Economic Forum, Musk told Bloomberg's Mishal Husain he intended to pull back from political giving, only months after spending nearly $300 million to boost Trump's successful campaign for the White House. Sour Taste Behind the scenes, Musk's sojourn through the West Wing left a sour taste for some officials, according to the outside adviser and one person within the administration. The outside adviser particularly noted Musk's brusque treatment of Wiles, who managed Trump's victorious campaign before joining the administration. It was a longtime Wiles ally, Brian Hughes, who was sent to serve as NASA chief of staff, a position from which he could serve as a check in an agency that is central to SpaceX's fortunes. A senior White House official said Wiles and Musk had a cordial and collaborative relationship, and that the chief of staff met weekly with the tech entrepreneuer as he led DOGE. The official said Hughes had long wanted to work at NASA, and that his placement there was not an effort to keep tabs on Musk and SpaceX. A person familiar with SpaceX discounted the chance that bad blood between Musk and Trump would have an immediate negative effect on the company, because it has carved out such a dominant position in the launch business even as corporate rivals have struggled. But the person said there is frustration that the company's brand has been damaged, first with Democrats who were appalled by Musk's embrace of Trump and DOGE's tactics, and now with Trump supporters in Washington, who will likely side with the president over Musk. But Musk's time with Trump has already yielded benefits in other ways, said Myrow, especially in areas where the administration or DOGE pulled the plug on aspects of the regulatory state that had previously tangled with his companies. 'For Musk personally, the SEC stuff went away,' Myrow said, referring to Securities and Exchange Commission investigations. 'And he's long wanted to turn X into an 'everything app,' and now a lot of the regulations that would have inhibited that are going away.' --With assistance from Nancy Cook, Erik Wasson, Annmarie Hordern, Lisa Abramowicz, Michael Shepard and Derek Wallbank. (Updates with Musk, Trump remarks in paragraphs 3, 6; Bannon remarks in paragraphs 12-14) Cavs Owner Dan Gilbert Wants to Donate His Billions—and Walk Again YouTube Is Swallowing TV Whole, and It's Coming for the Sitcom Millions of Americans Are Obsessed With This Japanese Barbecue Sauce Is Elon Musk's Political Capital Spent? Trump Considers Deporting Migrants to Rwanda After the UK Decides Not To ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Former FCC Commissioner Warns Paramount Will Be ‘Melting Ice Cube' if Skydance Deal Collapses
Former FCC Commissioner Warns Paramount Will Be ‘Melting Ice Cube' if Skydance Deal Collapses

Yahoo

time21 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Former FCC Commissioner Warns Paramount Will Be ‘Melting Ice Cube' if Skydance Deal Collapses

Former FCC Commissioner and Cooley LLP Partner Rob McDowell warned on Thursday that Paramount Global will be a 'melting ice cube' if its pending $8 billion merger with Skydance Media fails to close. The media giant's executives have said that the deal, which is currently awaiting regulatory approval from the FCC due a required transfer of broadcast licenses, is expected to close in the first half of 2025. But LightShed Partners analyst Rich Greenfield recently said he is 'increasingly concerned' the deal could collapse as Paramount is 'paralyzed by legal fears' surrounding President Donald Trump's $20 billion lawsuit against CBS and '60 Minutes' over an Oct. 7 interview with former Vice President Kamala Harris. Settlement talks between Paramount and Trump have prompted warnings from both members of Congress and the California State Senate that doing so to secure regulatory approval of the Skydance deal could potentially constitute a violation of federal anti-bribery laws. The Wall Street Journal reported that Trump recently shot down Paramount's offer to settle the lawsuit for $15 million, with the president aiming to get at least $25 million and an apology. 'Obviously, as I read in the newspapers, there are some political elements surrounding that deal,' McDowell said during a session at Gabelli Funds' 17th Annual Media & Sports Symposium in New York. 'We'll see how all that plays out, and also the patience of Skydance. How patient are they going to be? If this is not the deal for Paramount, then it's a melting ice cube. What would be the next price? Who would be the next buyer?' The FCC typically approves or denies transactions within 180 days. However, Greenfield pointed out that it is a guide and not a rule in terms of decision-making and that there's no 'forcing function' for the agency to act. 'We believe it is unlikely the FCC will weigh in until the current Trump/CBS lawsuit is resolved,' he wrote on Tuesday. Though the five-member regulatory body will be down to just two members following the departures of Democratic member Geoffrey Starks and Republican member Nathan Simington, McDowell said that the Paramount-Skydance deal can still be approved as a 'bureau action.' 'The conventional thinking, which is inaccurate, is that you need commission votes for high-profile mergers. Only if there's something 'new or novel',' McDowell explained. 'The Skydance proposal is a simple transfer of control of licenses. They're not already a broadcaster, they aren't other issues at play. So, it should be approved on bureau action so that's something that you do not need an FCC vote of the commissioners to get done.' FCC chairman Brendan Carr has argued that the settlement talks with Trump are unrelated to the agency's review of the Skydance deal. But he has warned that 'all options remain on the table' in the agency's ongoing investigation into allegations of 'news distortion,' including potentially revoking CBS' broadcast license if the network is found to have violated the agency's public interest standard. As part of that investigation, CBS News turned over transcripts and video footage from the Harris interview. The Skydance deal recently triggered its first automatic 90-day extension after failing to close by April 7. If the deal is not closed by July 6, the deadline will be automatically pushed another 90 days to Oct. 4. After that, if the deal is still not closed, Skydance and Paramount will have the option of terminating the deal. Despite the uncertainty for Paramount, McDowell was optimistic that the FCC may be more favorable to M&A in the media sector and that there will be 'pent-up demand' in areas like local broadcasting. 'The Big X factor, just to talk about the elephant in the room, is the Trump factor,' he said. 'But I think as a general matter, especially with traditional media, I think the FCC is going to be a little bit more laissez-faire and allow different experimentation and combinations.' The post Former FCC Commissioner Warns Paramount Will Be 'Melting Ice Cube' if Skydance Deal Collapses appeared first on TheWrap. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store