This is how much super you really should have by now
ANALYSIS
Australians spend a lot of time worrying about their super.
I'm going to show you the average super balance for someone your age. Then I want you to forget it.
Here's the chart, it shows that the average 30 year old has well under $100,000, the average person in the early 40s has just over $100,000, the average person in their early 50s has a bit over $200,000 and the average person over 65 has over $400,000.
But this is kinda dumb. Averages are useful for understanding things like height where people are all pretty even.
Superannuation is not like height! Instead lots of people have no super, and some people have absolutely crazy amounts of it.
Let's check in on the 60-somethings. Remember we said the average amount of super was $400,000? Well here's the thing.
The average is not actually a common amount for 60-64 year olds to have. A lot of them have way less than that. But some have way more, as the next chart shows.
Each red bar is 5 per cent of taxpayers. So we have 20 groups of 60-64 year olds in the graph, ranked from least super at the left to most super at the right.
The top 5 per cent have more than a million dollars in super.
We can see the median, or the amount in the middle, where half have more and half have less. I gave that a gold-coloured label on the chart. If your super account contains $177,421 you're at the median.
Some important things to know here: this is the latest detailed data out of the ATO but it is not current, it's from 2022.
The shape of the balance distribution will be the same but the dollar values will have gone up. Height of red bar represents minimum threshold for entering that group. Which is perfect for understanding how the money is spread out, except for the top group.
Inside the top 5% all the balances are higher than $1.176 million, and sometimes far higher. In fact, the distribution inside the top 5% is similarly unequal to the distribution overall. One Australian famously has over $400 million in super!]
What's important about this way of laying out the data is it reveals how unequal super is.
Most articles about super just lay out the averages by age group and they don't reveal the secret truth: super is a form of wealth that is highly uneven.
That can leave people freaking out and worrying they don't have enough. They spend ages stuffing their super accounts when they might actually be better using that money in the here and now.
Certainly the superannuation industry would like people to put more and more money in their accounts, they want to create that FOMO feeling!
Here's the chart for people in their early 30s. if you've cracked $140,000, you're in the top 5 per cent (remember this data is from 2022, the figure is probably a touch higher now).
Many people go through their life feeling like being on the pension is a fate worse than death; they worry everyone else has so much super that the government might shut down the pension any old day now.
What these charts hopefully show you is … nah. The pension is going to be with us for a long time.
A huge number of Australians have an amount in super that means they will be using the pension at some point after retirement. And the pension is $1585 a fortnight for a couple, $792.50 for a single. If you own a house that's far from a poverty wage.
The pension age rose from 65 to 67, it is not scheduled to rise any more. And it is indexed to inflation so its value is maintained.
Too much super
Is it possible to have too much super? They say you can't be too rich!
But certainly some people have enough super that their balance goes up after they retire. Imagine your super makes $100,000 in investment returns every year. If you spend $50,000 a year on groceries and bills, you are spending only half of your earnings and your super balance will rise.
Let's see how that looks for groups over retirement age: Over 70, 65 to 69 and 60-64. The next chart is three charts put together. The important thing to notice is that low balances get lower after retirement and high balances get higher.
The panel in the left is the oldies – taxpayers over 70. There's loads of them with no super by the time they're over 70. And the median (gold label) is falling as people spend their super. But the super balances of the top 5 per cent are actually rising! Perhaps some are still making contributions but most are just making money faster than they can spend it.
This benefits their heirs, who are probably going to get this money in the next 20 years.
Most likely it arrives when the heirs are deep into their 50s, and barely moves the needle on their wealth – the sort of people whose parents have millions in super probably have a lot of assets themselves!
The last thing I want to do in this piece is share with you guys the whole picture of all the age ranges. The next few charts are like the one above, with three-in one.
They cover all the age groups and if you look closely you can figure out where your super balance sits.
For example, if you're 22-years-old, you're in the middle chart of this group of three, and if you have $20,000 in super, you're in the second red bar, putting you in the top 10 per cent.
But if you have the same amount at 27, that's only the median.
The point of this piece has been to hopefully put your mind at ease – the numbers we like to compare ourself to are very high!
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News.com.au
an hour ago
- News.com.au
Bank customers stung with loyalty tax
You'd be forgiven for thinking that your bank rewards you for your loyalty. And you wouldn't be alone. A survey of 1000 Australians has revealed that 70 per cent of people consider it important that lenders offer long-term customers the same rates or benefits as new customers. The survey also found that nine in 10 people would switch lenders if they found out they were paying a higher interest rate than new customers. 13 Aussie banks refusing rate cut However, if you've had your home loan with the same lender for a few years, you could be getting charged a 'loyalty tax' – this is the difference between the rates lenders charge new customers compared to existing customers. And over the life of your loan, this can make a huge difference in the total amount of interest you pay. Calculations from non-bank lender Athena Home Loans using data from the Reserve Bank show that keeping new customer rates for the life of a 25-year loan can mean significant savings for borrowers of up to $1428 per year, or as much as $35,713 across the life of the loan. This figure is based on a $600,000 loan and the average interest rate difference between new and existing loans since September 2019. This year, we've already seen the Reserve Bank deliver two cuts to the cash rate, and most lenders have responded by lowering their home loan interest rates. It's important to check what your bank has done, and to compare your interest rate against those being offered to new customers. The survey also revealed that 13 per cent of borrowers go more than two years without reviewing their home loan. It's good practice to review your home loan once a year but you don't necessarily have to refinance to access a better rate. You might be able to negotiate a better rate with your existing lender just by asking. If the thought of that fills you with dread, a mortgage broker can negotiate on your behalf. And if your existing lender isn't willing to offer you a more competitive rate, your broker can do the legwork to help you refinance to a lender that will. Anthony Waldron is Mortgage Choice CEO
Sky News AU
an hour ago
- Sky News AU
Labor is 'gaslighting the Australian people' on unrealised capital gains tax proposal, Geoff Wilson warns
Labor is 'gaslighting the Australian people' by claiming its proposed super tax will impact a small sliver of the population, a leading fund manager has warned as the government and the Greens close in on a deal. The Albanese government's controversial plan to double the tax rate on funds in super accounts above $3m and hit unrealised gains could soon be legislated. Labor has claimed the tax will hit just 80,000 super accounts, however, Wilson Asset Management founder Geoff Wilson, who has launched a petition opposing the plan, said by forcing Aussies to pay taxes on paper gains it will hinder investment in Australia. 'Both Anthony Albanese and Jim Chalmers - and probably most of the government - are gaslighting the Australian people by saying: 'Look, this will only impact a very small percentage of people that pay the additional tax',' Mr Wilson told Sky News. 'That's correct, but what it'll do is actually impact about how $4.2 trillion in superannuation is invested. 'We anticipate that the money will come out of self-managed super funds (SMSF), which is about $1.1 trillion, and billions of that will go into the housing market and push house prices up . ' He cautioned Aussies who use their SMSF as a low tax investment vehicle will be discouraged from funding projects and businesses in the Australian market. 'People won't want to take risk on their superannuation in in the self-managed super funds,' Mr Wilson said. 'The angel investors and the startups and the small companies in Australia that find it hard to raise capital, particularly at this point in time - that tap's going to be turned off.' He pointed to the taxing of unrealised gains in Norway that drove investment out of the country despite initial expectations it would bring in millions. 'It was only for the ultra-wealthy, they thought they were going to raise $150 million,' Mr Wilson said. 'Instead of raising that, they were minus half a billion.' He also noted the capital gains tax hike in the United Kingdom which resulted in the government taking in 10 per cent less capital gains tax revenue. 'People change their behaviour,' Mr Wilson said. 'We've done economic models, we think it'll be negative to the tune of $94.5 billion on the Australian economy.' Alongside taxing unrealised gains, Labor's super tax has drawn criticism for its failure to index the $3m threshold over time. The Greens want Labor to lower the threshold to $2m and index it to the rate of inflation. New analysis from the Financial Services Council shows that under Labor's plan more than half a million Aussies currently in the workforce will be captured by the tax. Of those impacted, more than 200,000 are currently under 30, while 135,000 are between 30 and 34 and 65,000 are between 35 and 39. The number of impacted taxpayers greatly drops off for Australians 40 and over. The Greens' proposal would hit more than 200,000 Aussies currently in the workforce and is more evenly spread across the age ranges. Financial Services Council CEO Blake Briggs urged Labor to listen to feedback from consumers, industries and economists on how the tax will impact future generations. 'The superannuation industry recognises the government has the capacity to force the new tax through the Parliament with the support of the Greens, but encourages the two parties to take a more constructive and consultative approach,' Mr Briggs said. 'The Financial Services Council encourages the Government to consult on options that would not unfairly target future generations of Australian superannuation consumers and undermine confidence in our retirement system by introducing a new, contentious tax on unrealised capital gains.'
ABC News
an hour ago
- ABC News
Landmark trial to enable energy trading between solar homes and those without
Maree Tynan knew that her cottage in Mittagong, in the New South Wales Southern Tablelands 110 kilometres south of Sydney, was the place for her more or less the first time she saw it. It was more than four decades ago and, in time, her and her late partner turned what was a getaway into their permanent home. During that time, Ms Tynan has seen her fair share of changes in Mittagong and in so many other ways besides. Among them has been the extraordinary rise of rooftop solar in Australia, where one in three homes now has the technology. It's long been something she's wanted, too. "We were very keen to be part of it, but we had two major problems," recalls Ms Tynan, whose home was built in the late 1920s. "The first is it's the original roof. That is terracotta. "As you can imagine, after 100 years in a very cold climate, it is very, very fragile. "Apart from the roof, we also have a lot of trees." Faced with those challenges, Ms Tynan feared she may have been locked out of the solar market for good. That was until she came across a project aiming to connect people who don't have solar panels with those who do. "To have had rooftop solar put on, we were going to have to have the whole roof replaced," she explains. "That just seemed crazy because, yes, we'd have solar, but we'd be spending an awful lot of money. "We decided that, while ever the roof was secure and not letting rain in, we'd stick with that and we'd look for alternatives. At its heart, the project aims to enable energy trading between solar households and those without the technology. Known as WinZero, the project is centred around the Wingecarribee Shire Council. Households taking part in the so-called virtual energy network are given a smart meter and hooked up to a scheme allowing them to buy from or sell to other participants in their local area. In order to participate, they must go through small, privately-owned electricity retailer Energy Locals, which uses third party software to handle the trades. Those without panels can buy surplus solar power for a rate lower than a standard tariff over the grid. Similarly, solar householders facing ever lower — or even non-existent — feed-in tariffs can yield higher payments for their exports. Now a new study based on the Wingecarribee model is being led by Deakin University, which is hoping to widen its scope to the entire national electricity market, which spans Australia's eastern seaboard. Of particular interest to researchers are consumers who don't or can't have solar panels themselves. Andrea La Nauze, an associate professor of economics at Deakin, says Australia might lead the world in the take-up of rooftop solar, but most people are still missing out. "We have the highest rate of rooftop solar in the world," Dr La Nauze says. "But there are many of us who are renters or live in apartments or for various reasons can't install solar panels. "First of all, it's expanding access to rooftop solar, which is good for the environment. "It's also hopefully good for the back pocket." As of last year, there were more than 4 million "small-scale" solar installations across the country. Under the definition in Australia, a small-scale installation can be anything up to 100 kilowatts, meaning many businesses with solar are also grouped with the category. However, most installations are on standalone homes and the vast majority of these are owned by their occupants, according to Dr La Nauze. She says virtual energy networks could be a way of bridging what is an inherent divide. By allowing customers with excess generation to sell it to those without panels, she says, both sides of the transaction might just end up winning. "Using the existing poles and wires, people who have excess energy from their rooftop solar can sell it to their neighbour or a local cafe," she says. "They can get more, hopefully, for that energy that they sell than they otherwise would. "And the cafe or the neighbour can buy energy at a lower price than their current retail contract." More broadly, Dr La Nauze says solar trading schemes could help answer a number of thorny questions hanging over Australia's energy transition. While equity in access to clean tech is one of them, she says the over-abundance of solar generation in the middle of the day is another. "We might also relieve some of the congestion that we have on the distribution network," she says. "The poles and wires in many parts of Australia are struggling because we have so much energy coming from rooftop solar in the middle of the day. "If we can encourage households and small businesses to soak up more of that power during the middle of the day, that's beneficial for the network. Michael Dello-Iacovo from Energy Consumers Australia, which is helping to fund the new trial, says the lobby group is keen to see how feasible an expanded network is. Mr Dello-Iacovo acknowledges the idea of trading might be an intimidating idea to some householders but notes the trial would be seeking to overcome this. "It ultimately comes down to the platform itself," Mr Dello-Iacovo says. "And so the platforms that I've seen for virtual energy networks … you can be as engaged as you like and there is an option to be very disengaged. "You can set up very simple trades to either sell electricity from your solar and battery or to buy electricity from someone else with solar or battery. "You can set up more specific trades and trade with an individual you know at a set price, for example. Although such networks are in their infancy, Mr Dello-Iacovo says the notional potential of "peer-to-peer" trading is enormous. He notes there are still millions of people in Australia who do not have access to solar power, making them a huge source of potential demand. "At Energy Consumers Australia, we advocate for all energy consumers," Mr Dello-Iacovo says. "And part of that means making sure everyone who wants to have access to consumer energy resources like solar and battery can have access to it. "So this trial is really exciting for us because there's a lot of potential for bringing those benefits from the energy transition to all households, not just those who are physically able to install solar and batteries." For Mittagong householder Maree Tynan, the scheme seems to be working. She acknowledges her electricity bills are generally modest anyway because she tries to limit how much power she uses. Even still, Ms Tynan says her costs are lower now. To that extent, she reckons buying other people's surplus solar power while cutting her bills is the next best thing to have some panels herself. Asked if she would be happy to keep doing it, she says: "Oh yes, I definitely will keep going while it's available." "I'd dearly love to have solar myself," Ms Tynan says. "But I can't see it happening anytime in the near future for the reasons I've explained." She says that for people in similar circumstances to her, the scheme should hold great appeal, especially if it can help save them money. "I'm very cognisant of what's happening in the world," she says. Along with Deakin University and Energy Consumers Australia, the new trial will be delivered in partnership with QuantumNRG, ReThink Sustainability and WinZero. Anyone interested in taking part in the trial can find out more information at
