Brawn GP F1 car heading to auction for the first time
BGP 001/01 is one of just three Brawn GP chassis ever produced, and is finished in the livery sported by Jenson Button's car at the 2009 Abu Dhabi Grand Prix, although it was Button's teammate Rubens Barrichello who raced this particular chassis at the time,
Barrichello drove the car from the Australian Grand Prix until the Singapore Grand Prix in 2009 before switching to chassis 001/03 for the final three races of the season. It scored two victories in Barrichello's hands – at the European Grand Prix in Valencia and the Italian Grand Prix at Monza, the car's penultimate outing – and a further four podiums, including second in a Mercedes one-two on the team's debut in Australia.
'This car represents the ultimate Formula 1 fairy tale – a revolutionary design that redefined what was possible,' said Louis Frankel, Miami head of sale at Bonhams. 'Chassis 001/01 is a piece of motorsport history, and its offering at auction is sure to captivate collectors worldwide.
'We are honored to present this unrepeatable opportunity over the Miami Grand Prix, a stage befitting its legendary status.'
Brawn GP's sole Formula 1 season is the stuff of legend. Rising from the ashes of the departed Honda team and running on a relatively modest budget following an 11th hour management buyout, the team shoehorned customer Mercedes engines into its car that had been developed by the team when it was still under the Japanese brand's ownership, then went on to win both the Drivers' and Constructors' championships.
In total, the team took eight wins from 17 races in 2009, including six of the first seven as it capitalized on the 'blown diffuser' loophole to get a competitive advantage in what was the first year of new aerodynamic regulations. At the end of the season Mercedes purchased the team, with it going on to add seven more Drivers' and Constructors' title doubles between 2014-2020, and another Constructors' title in 2021.
Following the 2009 season BGP 001/01 fell under Mercedes ownership as part of its acquisition of the team and went on to serve as a showcar, complete with silver livery. It was later passed on to Button as part of a contractual clause that stipulated he was to receive a car in the event of him winning the championship. Mercedes initially refused to hand over a car, and the case eventually went to London's High Court in June 2010. Bonhams states the car remained in Button's possession until 2024. It is unknown whether he is the seller.
The other two Brawn cars also survive, but have never been sold on the open market.
Chassis 001/02 – the car Button drove in every race in 2009 en route to his title win – is owned by Brawn GP team principal and namesake Ross Brawn, and is the only one of the three in running order. It ran at the Goodwood Festival of Speed in 2016 (after being restored) in the hands of Martin Brundle, and 2019 when it was driven by former-Brawn GP test driver Anthony Davidson and Barrichello, and again at Silverstone ahead of the British Grand Prix that year when Button drove it for the first time in a decade.
The third chassis is still owned by Mercedes, but is on loan to the Silverstone Museum. It too saw life as a Mercedes showcar, but has since been returned to its period livery. Nevertheless, it still sports plaid trimming in the cockpit (akin to Mercedes grand prix cars of the 1950s), a hangover from its early post-race life.
Coincidentally, news of the upcoming Brawn GP car sale comes after a Mercedes became the most expensive grand prix car sold at auction last week.
A 1954-55 W196R Stromlinienwagen (Streamliner), driven to victory in the 1955 Argentine Grand Prix by Juan Manuel Fangio and to the fastest lap of the Italian Grand Prix of the same year by Stirling Moss, sold for $53.9 million at RM Sotheby's Paris sale. It was sold from the Indianapolis Motor Speedway Museum collection, which received the car in 1965 as a donation from Mercedes parent Daimler-Benz.
That smashed the previous record for the highest price of a grand prix car sold at auction. That was another W196R, albeit in its standard guise, which was sold by Bonhams for $29.6 million at the 2013 Goodwood Festival of Speed.
The third-highest selling grand prix car at auction also happens to be a Mercedes – a 2013 F1 W04 that was driven by Lewis Hamilton to his first race win for the factory Mercedes team, and later owned by McLaren Racing CEO Zak Brown. The only modern Mercedes F1 car in private hands, it was sold to an unknown buyer for $18.8 million at RM Sotheby's auction at the Las Vegas Grand Prix in 2023.
All three fall way short of the overall auction record for a car though. That, again, is a Mercedes – one of two 1955 300 SLR Uhlenhaut Coupes – which sold for $142 million in 2022.
Story originally appeared on Racer
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Fox Sports
3 hours ago
- Fox Sports
Connor Zilisch And Risk: Let Injury Heal And Celebrations Continue
NASCAR Cup Series Connor Zilisch And Risk: Let Injury Heal And Celebrations Continue Published Aug. 13, 2025 12:20 p.m. ET share facebook x reddit link Connor Zilisch has no reason to rush back to racing. And no reason to stop celebrating wins. Zilisch took a nasty fall Saturday afternoon after winning the Xfinity race at Watkins Glen. He put one foot up on the roof and the other on the driver's side window sill — and forgot to tuck the window net inside the door so he had a foot on that webbing. As the team tossed water in celebration, his foot on the window sill slipped and he fell awkwardly. He indicated he was briefly knocked out, and he had surgery Tuesday on his broken collarbone. He had a plate and screws put in his left shoulder to stabilize the broken bone and to make it heal faster. The Xfinity Series is off this weekend and then it heads to Daytona, the Portland road course and World Wide Technology Raceway (Gateway) for the final three races of the regular season. Zilisch could conceivably return at Daytona, but why risk it? He could conceivably return at Portland, but why risk it? He could conceivably return for the playoffs, but why risk it? ADVERTISEMENT If there is any reasonable risk that another crash could make the injury worse than it would if he was fully healed, there's little reason for Zilisch to race. He knows that he will race Cup next season (that should be announced soon). He knows, at age 19, he could have 20-plus good (or great) seasons ahead of him. An Xfinity title would be nice, but Zilisch isn't going to be judged on how many Xfinity titles he wins. And there could be the argument that the future is uncertain — what happens if he falls again and suffers injuries that end his career. Wouldn't he want that Xfinity title on his resume? Sure. But the likelihood is that he has Cup stardom in his grasp. He has six Xfinity wins this year as a rookie — and a rookie who is in his first full season of racing stock cars in any national series. He possibly could become the first driver to go from NASCAR to Formula 1 if his progression continues and he wins a couple of Cup titles quickly. So this is not the time to rush a return no matter how badly the competitor in him or the championship desires of JR Motorsports (where he races Xfinity) or Trackhouse. He should come back when doctors have confidence that another hit won't do more damage, whether that's Daytona next week or Daytona next February. Now if he does race and wins, how will he handle celebrations? Hopefully a little more carefully. He can still stand on a door. If he tucks the window net inside the car, it shouldn't be much of a problem. For sure he could fall again. But accidents happen. Winning races, as easy as he might make it look, should be celebrated. They should include emotion. Even if someone needs to bring something to put on his shoes or a mat by the car, let's still get on top of it and yell and throw beer or soda or energy drinks. Let the 19-year-old be a racer who can bask in the moment. He could just as easily slip and fall while walking around the car after the spraying of liquids in celebration. Oh don't tell me we've got to get rid of the liquids, too. Sanity, please. He needs to celebrate his wins. Just not rush to get the next one. Bob Pockrass covers NASCAR and INDYCAR for FOX Sports. He has spent decades covering motorsports, including over 30 Daytona 500s, with stints at ESPN, Sporting News, NASCAR Scene magazine and The (Daytona Beach) News-Journal. Follow him on Twitter @bobpockrass. What did you think of this story? share
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Steps the FIA will take to avoid a repeat of Mercedes' 2014 F1 dominance
Next year, both chassis and power unit regulations will undergo sweeping changes. Several technical directors in the F1 paddock have called it the biggest overhaul of the past 50 years. In addition to concerns from drivers about the racing in general, some fear it could pave the way for long-term dominance by a single manufacturer. Memories go back to 2014, when Mercedes' engine proved significantly superior to the rest of the field and the factory team went on to claim every world title through to 2020. Why the FIA doesn't fear a repeat of Mercedes' 2014 dominance The FIA, however, is confident that history won't repeat itself in F1's new era starting in 2026. 'I don't think that we are going to have a situation where a single manufacturer has such a huge advantage as was the case in 2014,' Nikolas Tombazis told The FIA's single-seater director believes the new engine formula is less complex, despite the substantial increase in electrical power: 'The engines are still not as simple as we would have liked. We would have liked to go further, but we had a lot of resistance against simplifying the regulations more. So there are things that we would have liked to be even simpler, but they are still simpler than the current generation of engines. They don't have the MGU-H, and there are a few things that have tighter limits, so we don't think the gaps will be as big as in 2014.' Back then, the MGU-H proved a major performance differentiator - and a very costly one. For both of those reasons it will disappear in 2026, a change that should provide newcomers with a more level playing field while also reducing development costs. How will the concessions' system work? That said, it cannot be ruled out that one manufacturer may still get out of the blocks significantly better than the rest, especially since the FIA acknowledges not all power unit manufacturers are equally transparent or willing to share data about their new engines. Lewis Hamilton, Mercedes W05, leads Nico Rosberg, Mercedes W05, Sebastian Vettel, Red Bull Racing RB10 Renault, Fernando Alonso, Ferrari F14T, Daniel Ricciardo, Red Bull Racing RB10 Renault, Kimi Raikkonen, Ferrari F14T, Nico Hulkenberg, Force India VJM07 Mercedes, and Kevin Magnussen, McLaren MP4-29 Mercedes, at the start But even if one manufacturer dominates next year, the FIA has learned from 2014. The new regulations include a safety net, allowing underperforming brands to close the gap through so-called concessions. 'We do have newcomers, and it is always a risk at the start of a new cycle that there is some divergence initially,' Tombazis said. 'Additionally, we have a cost gap for the PU manufacturers now.' It means that manufacturers who are behind cannot simply throw unlimited money at their engine projects. To still offer them possibilities to catch up, the FIA has included a new system into the 2026 regulations. 'For that reason, there is a concept called ADUO, which is an acronym for Additional Development and Upgrade Opportunities,' Tombazis explained. 'This concept has been the product of a lot of work. It was already there from day one of the regulations, but in the last few months more detail has been put into it to define exactly how that is going to operate.' This, of course, raises the key question: how does it work? 'Essentially every five, six races there will be an average performance measured for each PU manufacturer. Those who are below a certain level, and depending on how much below they are, will get that benefit accumulating over the year. That benefit would translate into three things: one is additional development money, some more dyno hours and the possibility to make a new homologation of the engine. So people who are behind will have the opportunity to speed up and catch up.' The 2026 technical regulations specify that this assessment will be made after the first five race weekends each season: 'Over the first five Competitions of each Championship Season in the 2026-2030 period, the FIA will monitor the performance of the Internal Combustion Engine (ICE) part of all the Power Units supplied by each PU Manufacturer to its customer Competitors. For each ICE supplied by the PU Manufacturers, an average power will be calculated. The methodology to calculate this power can be found in the Appendix to the Regulations. Any PU Manufacturer whose ICE power is more than 3% below that of the highest ICE power recorded amongst all the PU Manufacturers will be granted Additional Development and Upgrade Opportunities.' These extra opportunities relate to a table in Appendix 3 of the technical regulations. A special ADUO column lists which components of the ICE may still be improved if a manufacturer is granted the special status by the FIA. Several of these components are otherwise frozen for development over a specific period of time, but with ADUO status, they may still be modified to close the gap. Nikolas Tombazis, FIA Single Seater Director FIA rejects 'absolutely any suggestion' of Balance of Performance The system is designed to prevent long-term dominance, but Tombazis emphasises that it should not be seen as a Balance of Performance, as is used in series like the World Endurance Championship. 'I want to stress that I completely refute any comment about that being a Balance of Performance or anything like that, because first of all, the regulations are exactly the same for everyone. It's not like we are giving them more cubic capacity, more fuel or whatever. 'Secondly, if there was no cost cap, they would throw a lot of money at it. When Honda were behind in 2016, 2017, for a certain period they had to spend a lot more money to catch up. With a cost cap the risk is that you would never be able to do that, and that you would be behind eternally. You would just be humiliated for a whole regulation cycle, and clearly we don't want that. We don't think that would be fair, and I have to say that PU manufacturers have been extremely collaborative on this topic.' Finally, the FIA is working on a safety net for manufacturers who suffer serious reliability issues — something that cannot be ruled out at the start of a new era. 'There is an additional initiative which addresses the situation where a PU manufacturer has huge reliability issues to start with. Imagine somebody who blows up an engine each race weekend and each engine costs a lot of money. They suddenly find that they are eating their cost cap with blown engines. They have to reduce the development to stay below the cost cap, and you can imagine that would be an awful situation. 'So we've got some initiatives, which are going through the same phase of discussion now, and will hopefully be approved quite soon, whereby once you use more than a certain number of engines, you start having a certain cost cap relief. Read Also: What's got drivers so agitated about "strange" 2026 F1 cars? 'Your engines, once you exceed that number, cost very little from a cost cap point of view. Not in terms of real money, of course, they still cost the same unfortunately, but it means that we protect them from a situation where somebody is in an awful position and has no way to react under the cost cap. That would be really unfortunate.' Combined with the slightly simpler power unit formula, this approach should avoid a repeat of 2014 and has to keep the F1 field competitive - at least on the engine side. To read more articles visit our website.
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
What Does It Cost To Charge a Rivian Monthly Compared To Gas for Other Luxury Cars?
As electric vehicles gain traction in the luxury market, many consumers are weighing the financial benefits of going electric. With volatile gas prices and growing environmental concerns, the question of electric versus gas-powered luxury vehicles has become increasingly relevant. Read More: Find Out: The Rivian R1T pickup and R1S SUV represent premium electric options, but how do their operating costs compare to BMW, Mercedes-Benz, and Audi models? Here's how monthly Rivian charging costs compare to fueling traditional luxury vehicles. Rivian Charging Costs The cost to charge a Rivian varies significantly based on location and charging method. Home charging typically costs about half of a gas tank fill-up. Discover Next: Home Charging Economics According to the U.S. Energy Information Administration, the national average electricity rate is around $0.15 per kWh, though regional variations range from $0.10 to $0.30+ per kWh. The Rivian R1T has battery capacities of 135 kWh (Large pack) or 106 kWh (Standard pack), per Rivian's official specifications. Based on the real-world efficiency of 2.5 miles per kWh: Monthly Home Charging Costs (1,000 miles): At $0.15/kWh: $75-$95 At $0.20/kWh: $100-$125 At $0.30/kWh: $150-$190 Public Charging Electrify America charges around 48 cents per kWh for fast charging. Heavy public charging users can expect $150-$250 monthly costs. Luxury Gas Car Comparison Most luxury vehicles require premium gasoline. According to AAA's Gas Prices, regular gas averages $3.15 per gallon nationally, making premium fuel approximately $3.50-$3.75 per gallon. Monthly Fuel Costs for 1,000 Miles: Luxury SUVs: BMW X5 (19 mpg): $189 Mercedes GLE (20 mpg): $180 Audi Q7 (19 mpg): $189 Luxury Sedans: BMW 5 Series (25 mpg): $144 Mercedes E-Class (26 mpg): $138 Audi A6 (25 mpg): $144 The Bottom Line For drivers charging primarily at home, Rivian offers significant monthly savings: Potential Monthly Savings: vs. Luxury SUVs: $85-$115 vs. Luxury Sedans: $45-$70 Annual savings: $540-$1,380 However, those relying heavily on public charging may find costs approaching efficient luxury sedans. Regional Impact Geographic location significantly affects this comparison. States with low electricity rates and high gas prices heavily favor electric vehicles, while areas with expensive electricity and cheap gas narrow the gap. Beyond Monthly Costs Additional Rivian advantages include minimal maintenance requirements, no oil changes, reduced brake wear, and potential HOV lane access. Traditional luxury cars offer established service networks, no range anxiety, and faster refueling. Conclusion Rivian ownership typically offers $80-$100 monthly savings compared to luxury SUVs for most drivers with home charging access. The key is understanding your usage patterns, local utility rates, and charging infrastructure before making the switch from premium gasoline to premium electrons. More From GOBankingRates 3 Luxury SUVs That Will Have Massive Price Drops in Summer 2025 10 Unreliable SUVs To Stay Away From Buying How Far $750K Plus Social Security Goes in Retirement in Every US Region This article originally appeared on What Does It Cost To Charge a Rivian Monthly Compared To Gas for Other Luxury Cars? Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
