Brawn GP F1 car heading to auction for the first time
The first Brawn GP Formula 1 car is being made available to the public for the very first time as part of Bonham's auction at the Miami Grand Prix this May.
BGP 001/01 is one of just three Brawn GP chassis ever produced, and is finished in the livery sported by Jenson Button's car at the 2009 Abu Dhabi Grand Prix, although it was Button's teammate Rubens Barrichello who raced this particular chassis at the time,
Barrichello drove the car from the Australian Grand Prix until the Singapore Grand Prix in 2009 before switching to chassis 001/03 for the final three races of the season. It scored two victories in Barrichello's hands – at the European Grand Prix in Valencia and the Italian Grand Prix at Monza, the car's penultimate outing – and a further four podiums, including second in a Mercedes one-two on the team's debut in Australia.
'This car represents the ultimate Formula 1 fairy tale – a revolutionary design that redefined what was possible,' said Louis Frankel, Miami head of sale at Bonhams. 'Chassis 001/01 is a piece of motorsport history, and its offering at auction is sure to captivate collectors worldwide.
'We are honored to present this unrepeatable opportunity over the Miami Grand Prix, a stage befitting its legendary status.'
Brawn GP's sole Formula 1 season is the stuff of legend. Rising from the ashes of the departed Honda team and running on a relatively modest budget following an 11th hour management buyout, the team shoehorned customer Mercedes engines into its car that had been developed by the team when it was still under the Japanese brand's ownership, then went on to win both the Drivers' and Constructors' championships.
In total, the team took eight wins from 17 races in 2009, including six of the first seven as it capitalized on the 'blown diffuser' loophole to get a competitive advantage in what was the first year of new aerodynamic regulations. At the end of the season Mercedes purchased the team, with it going on to add seven more Drivers' and Constructors' title doubles between 2014-2020, and another Constructors' title in 2021.
Following the 2009 season BGP 001/01 fell under Mercedes ownership as part of its acquisition of the team and went on to serve as a showcar, complete with silver livery. It was later passed on to Button as part of a contractual clause that stipulated he was to receive a car in the event of him winning the championship. Mercedes initially refused to hand over a car, and the case eventually went to London's High Court in June 2010. Bonhams states the car remained in Button's possession until 2024. It is unknown whether he is the seller.
The other two Brawn cars also survive, but have never been sold on the open market.
Chassis 001/02 – the car Button drove in every race in 2009 en route to his title win – is owned by Brawn GP team principal and namesake Ross Brawn, and is the only one of the three in running order. It ran at the Goodwood Festival of Speed in 2016 (after being restored) in the hands of Martin Brundle, and 2019 when it was driven by former-Brawn GP test driver Anthony Davidson and Barrichello, and again at Silverstone ahead of the British Grand Prix that year when Button drove it for the first time in a decade.
The third chassis is still owned by Mercedes, but is on loan to the Silverstone Museum. It too saw life as a Mercedes showcar, but has since been returned to its period livery. Nevertheless, it still sports plaid trimming in the cockpit (akin to Mercedes grand prix cars of the 1950s), a hangover from its early post-race life.
Coincidentally, news of the upcoming Brawn GP car sale comes after a Mercedes became the most expensive grand prix car sold at auction last week.
A 1954-55 W196R Stromlinienwagen (Streamliner), driven to victory in the 1955 Argentine Grand Prix by Juan Manuel Fangio and to the fastest lap of the Italian Grand Prix of the same year by Stirling Moss, sold for $53.9 million at RM Sotheby's Paris sale. It was sold from the Indianapolis Motor Speedway Museum collection, which received the car in 1965 as a donation from Mercedes parent Daimler-Benz.
That smashed the previous record for the highest price of a grand prix car sold at auction. That was another W196R, albeit in its standard guise, which was sold by Bonhams for $29.6 million at the 2013 Goodwood Festival of Speed.
The third-highest selling grand prix car at auction also happens to be a Mercedes – a 2013 F1 W04 that was driven by Lewis Hamilton to his first race win for the factory Mercedes team, and later owned by McLaren Racing CEO Zak Brown. The only modern Mercedes F1 car in private hands, it was sold to an unknown buyer for $18.8 million at RM Sotheby's auction at the Las Vegas Grand Prix in 2023.
All three fall way short of the overall auction record for a car though. That, again, is a Mercedes – one of two 1955 300 SLR Uhlenhaut Coupes – which sold for $142 million in 2022.
Story originally appeared on Racer
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
Jay Leno Unveils Ultra-Rare 1956 Mercedes Alloy Gullwing Forgotten Even by Mercedes
⚡️ Read the full article on Motorious In his latest video, automotive icon and comedian Jay Leno unveiled one of the rarest Mercedes-Benz vehicles ever produced—a 1956 Mercedes-Benz Alloy Gullwing, so exclusive that even Mercedes-Benz doesn't know where all of them are today. Leno's discovery highlights a version of the classic 300 SL Gullwing that is rarely seen outside of elite collections. Only 29 examples of the alloy-bodied variant were produced, and this one—once owned by noted collector Rudi Klein in Los Angeles—is among the few known to remain intact. Unlike its more commonly seen steel-bodied sibling, the Alloy Gullwing was a lightweight, high-performance version built entirely out of aluminum. Its 3.0-liter inline-six engine, producing 215 horsepower, was designed for competitive driving and reduced weight. While the standard Gullwing is already a legend, the Alloy version emphasizes performance over refinement, making it highly prized among purists. Despite its value—estimated at $10 million—this Alloy Gullwing is not the most expensive Mercedes ever sold. That distinction belongs to the record-breaking 300 SLR Uhlenhaut Coupe, which fetched over $140 million in 2022. Still, the Alloy Gullwing remains one of the most valuable privately owned road cars in the world. 'This is the first true supercar,' Leno declared in the episode, challenging the often-cited claim that the Lamborghini Miura holds that title. He emphasized the Alloy Gullwing's blend of performance, rarity, and motorsport heritage, qualities that make it unlike anything else from its era. Now retired from late-night television, Leno continues to spotlight automotive rarities through his YouTube channel, Jay Leno's Garage, where he shares cars from his 300+ vehicle collection, valued north of $50 million. With each new video, Leno not only entertains but also helps preserve the legacies of cars even their manufacturers forgot existed.
Miami Herald
13 hours ago
- Miami Herald
Broward businessman sentenced to 23 years after swindling Haitian investors
A South Florida moving company owner convicted of swindling millions of dollars from thousands of investors — including nurses, school teachers and military veterans — was sentenced to 23 years in prison on Friday in Fort Lauderdale federal court. Sanjay Singh, 45, borrowed hundreds of millions from the mostly working-class investors with promises of paying them double-digit returns and ownership of the trucks in his company, Royal Bengal Logistics Inc. In the end, about 2,000 investors — many of Haitian descent — fell for Singh's sales pitch and lost $54 million in what federal prosecutors described as a 'Ponzi scheme' that warranted 25 years in prison. In November, a 12-person jury unanimously found Royal Bengal's former president guilty of conspiring with other employees, wire fraud and money laundering. On Friday, U.S. District Judge David Leibowitz condemned Singh as a 'huckster' who lied to victims while raising $158 million between 2020 and 2023 for his Coral Springs company. After sentencing him, the judge scheduled a restitution hearing for June 26. A 66-year-old victim wrote a letter filed in court describing how he had to come out of retirement after losing his life savings. 'Mr. Singh, if you are not aware, and just like you, my wife and many others you duped are immigrants who came to the US to further our education and/or seek a better life,' wrote the victim, whose name was redacted. 'You stole our happiness, our retirement, our financial freedom, and our money that we entrusted you with.' 'Lying, lying, lying' At trial, prosecutors Roger Cruz and Robert Moore said Singh stole tens of millions from investors and lied to them about how he spent their money; instead, they said, he used the proceeds to buy a Mercedes, renovate his Coral Springs home and play the stock market as a day trader, squandering millions of the victims' investments. 'He was just lying, lying, lying — gambling in the stock market,' Moore told jurors during closing arguments at trial. 'He knew his company wasn't making any money, and he knew he was lying. ... This was a Titanic. This was a sinking ship.' After Singh was found guilty by the Fort Lauderdale jury in November, the judge allowed him to remain free on a $1 million bond. But the prosecutors urged Leibowitz to cancel his bond based on allegations that he could flee to his native India, especially as he faced potentially decades in prison. They wrote that Singh 'has the means and incentive to flee pending sentencing, and a history of deceiving this Court.' Judge Leibowitz sided with the prosecutors and revoked Singh's bond. Since mid-November, he's been held at a Broward County jail that doubles as a federal-lockup. Singh's assistant federal public defenders, Abigail Becker and Victor Van Dyke, sought a lower sentence at Friday's hearing, to no avail. They portrayed him at trial as a hard-working family man who made mistakes in building his business, but he didn't intentionally mislead anyone, lie to his company's investors or commit fraud. 'It's a story of a man who grew his business from zero trucks to 200 trucks with revenue of $18 million in three years,' Van Dyke told jurors, arguing Singh didn't live lavishly. 'This case is about trucks, not Ferraris.' In a separate Securities and Exchange Commission civil complaint, Singh and his company were accused of fraudulently raising money from investors through unregistered securities and related anti-fraud violations. As a result of the enforcement action, Singh lost control of his company in June 2023. A federal judge froze Singh's and the firm's assets, including bank accounts and real estate, and appointed the Fort Lauderdale law firm Tripp Scott as Royal Bengal's receiver to work on recovering money for investors. Many of them invested between $25,000 and $250,000 in Singh's company. In South Florida, such cases are increasingly common. For decades, the region has been known as the nation's con capital for its healthcare, income-tax and credit-card scams — not to mention high-end Ponzi schemes orchestrated by such notorious figures as the late Wall Street financier Bernard Madoff and disbarred Fort Lauderdale lawyer Scott Rothstein. Preying on Haitian Americans But South Florida has also become home to 'affinity fraud,' authorities say, where investment schemers prey on unsuspecting immigrants and other minorities who tend to trust the perpetrators because they either know them or someone else who vouches for them. The Haitian-American community has been hit particularly hard, but so have immigrants from Cuba, Colombia and Venezuela. In the Singh case, the former head of Royal Bengal was accused of conspiring with other employees, including Haitian Americans, to offer high-yield investments, promising mostly working-class people in the Haitian diaspora to use their money to expand operations and increase the company's fleet to 200 semi-trucks and trailers, as well as build a maintenance facility in Lubbock, Texas. Singh assured investors that his company was generating $650,000 to $1 million a month in revenue between 2019 and 2023 — and that their investments were safe and growing in value, according to court records and the FBI. During a November 2022 investor Zoom video conference, Singh boasted that Royal Bengal was a better company than Apple and Tesla. 'Better than Tesla' 'The fundamentals of this business can be trusted,' Singh said during the presentation. 'So let's move on from the point of view that [Royal] Bengal may last one day, two days — this is not Bitcoin. Our product is better than Apple. Our product is better than Tesla. You buy Apple, you buy Tesla, you start spending money. You buy [a] Royal Bengal [investment] contract, you start making money.' SEC investigators said Singh and Royal Bengal used tens of millions of dollars of new investors' funds to make Ponzi-like payments to old investors — until the purported business model collapsed due to operating losses of $18 million since 2019. The SEC complaint named Singh and his former company itself as defendants. Also, Singh's wife, Sheetal, and Constantina Celicourt, the spouse of the firm's former vice president of business development, were named as relief defendants. (Her husband, Ricardi Celicourt, who public records show was a Royal Bengal executive, was not named in the SEC lawsuit.) Singh's wife, Sheetal, and Constantina Celicourt were not charged with any wrongdoing, but the SEC sued them to collect proceeds that authorities say they received from Singh's alleged Ponzi scheme. If the SEC and federal prosecutors prevail in their parallel cases, it is likely that Singh, his company, his wife, and Celicourt will be required to pay back the money they're accused of stealing from the Haitian-American investors and other victims of the investment scam. After his conviction in November, Singh informed the SEC in Miami that he and his wife wanted to settle the agency's claims, SEC trial lawyer Russell O'Brien wrote in a court filing last month. Now that Singh has been sentenced, the next step is to meet with the couple to finalize the terms of any settlement, O'Brien said.
Yahoo
13 hours ago
- Yahoo
Max Verstappen must control his road rage to cement his legacy as a great
There was no justification for Max Verstappen's rash and futile act of retribution at the Spanish Grand Prix, when he deliberately drove into the side of George Russell's car. The world champion knows it and on Monday admitted as much with something of a mea culpa on social media. Yet it also must be considered that it is part and parcel of what makes Verstappen so competitive, albeit in this case in an entirely unedifying and self-defeating fashion. Angry and frustrated at a sequence of events in Barcelona, including having to cede a place to Russell, Verstappen surrendered to his baser instincts. Having pulled over to give the place to Russell, he clearly then felt a point had to be made and accelerated back up the inside to collide with the Mercedes. Advertisement Related: 'Not right': Verstappen issues veiled apology for Russell crash at F1 Spanish GP He took a 10-second penalty, dropping him to 10th putting him 49 points behind title leader Oscar Piastri and had three points added to his licence. One more penalty and he will receive a one-race ban. He conceded on Monday that he was 'frustrated', his emotions were running high and that the move was 'not right and shouldn't have happened'. Clearly he had had time to cool down and put some perspective on what was a moment of madness, but even given the chain of events – which were still hardly rage-inducing stuff – this was still shocking from an F1 veteran at 27-years-old and a four-time world champion. Advertisement It was the purposeless anger that really caught the eye, rather than the severity of the action itself. The Mercedes team principal Toto Wolff described it as 'incomprehensible' and his interpretation of it in the immediate aftermath bears repeating. 'The great ones, whether it's in motor racing or in other sports, you just need to have the world against you and perform at the highest possible level,' he said. 'That's why sometimes these greats don't recognise that actually the world is not against you, it's just you who has made a mistake or you've screwed up.' Verstappen has displayed this attitude in the past, while his Red Bull team have at times positively cultivated the 'us-against-the-world' stance, with their contention they have never been quite taken seriously because they are backed by an energy drink manufacturer. Advertisement Verstappen has also been clear in the past that he believes the rules around overtaking are over-prescriptive and this too doubtless fed into his frustration. He was similarly aggrieved in Mexico last season when he was penalised twice for two rash manoeuvres on the same lap against Lando Norris. 'What is allowed, what isn't, is not very natural,' he said on Sunday, in reference to the regulations. However, even given that antipathy, it is hard not to sense that the driver who can be as controlled and composed as they come, who will grind out a result from nowhere, who has been dragging his recalcitrant car by scruff of the neck to the front of the grid this season, can sometimes simply succumb to a base, emotive response that is really beneath him but which he cannot seem to quite always suppress. Which is disappointing, because Wolff is also correct in identifying Verstappen as one of the greats. He may be flawed but he is without doubt an exceptional driver, a generational talent. His uncompromising attitude, drive and competitive spirit inform part of what makes him so good and so hard to beat but on Sunday those attributes went unrestrained to his cost. He shares those ultra-competitive traits with others, perhaps notably Michael Schumacher and Ayrton Senna but there is also a fundamental difference. When Schumacher ruthlessly and deliberately clashed with Damon Hill at Adelaide in 1994 and then Jacques Villeneuve at Jerez in 1997, he had a specific purpose in mind – the moves were with the intent of winning the world championship. Similarly, Senna taking out Alain Prost at Suzuka in 1990. Cynical, ruthless, ugly and unsportsmanlike without doubt but notably with purpose. Advertisement Nigel Mansell recalls that Senna's uncompromising attitude was aimed expressly at intimidating other drivers. Verstappen's wild lunge at Russell in Spain was none of these things. It served no end other than to vent his own anger and has left his title hopes hanging by the slenderest of threads. Worse still it coloured what has otherwise been an enormously impressive season in which he has stayed with the McLarens with immense determination and consistency, taking every opportunity and returning the maximum when he had none. This moment of madness was a pointless flailing that rendered those efforts all but futile and while he maintains he was never really in the title fight, his fearsome efforts thus far this season belie that claim because for all the rightful opprobrium from Sunday, Verstappen is better and more than the driver who gave in to his emotions. His legacy as a potentially great champion depends on him proving that.
