Police issue warning after victims lose S$111,000 this month in Pokémon card scams
Photo: Wikipedia screengrab/ Klapi
SINGAPORE: On Tuesday afternoon (May 20), the Singapore Police Force issued an alert concerning a rise in e-commerce scams involving the sale of Pokémon Trading Cards. This month alone, at least 54 victims have reported with total losses amounting to a minimum of $111,000.
This particular new variant of the scam involves listings of Pokémon Trading cards, mostly on Carousell. Would-be buyers, after expressing interest in the cards listed on the platform, would be asked to shift their communication to messaging platforms, including WhatsApp.
When they confirmed their orders, they would make payments to the sellers through PayNow or bank transfers, but would never receive the products they ordered. They would then be unable to further contact the sellers. Screengrab/Singapore Police Force Screengrab/ Singapore Police Force Screengrab/ Singapore Police Force
The Police are reminding the public to exercise caution when buying products from non-authorised platforms. One way to do this is to refuse to transfer to a messaging app, but instead keep on communicating within the platform and transacting in person so that buyers can inspect the products before making any payments.
The Police also warned against e-commerce scam red flags, such as large discounts for faster transactions, adding that would-be buyers should not transfer money to anyone they do not know. They should also never disclose their personal information, internet banking, or One-Time passwords to anyone.
Additionally, would-be buyers should also look for sellers with a good history and positive reviews.
The Police are also encouraging members of the public to adopt the following crime prevention measures: Add the ScamShield App to block and filter SMSes, and set up security features for payment accounts. Check for scam signs with official sources such as the ScamShield Helpline (1799), the ScamShield app, a trusted person, or through www.scamshield.gov.sg . Tell family, friends, and the authorities about the scams you encounter.
Pokémon card collection and trade are very popular around the world, in large part due to nostalgia, the trading card game, and the influence of social media. Some cards can fetch an astounding price, such as a rare Charizard card that sold for over US$400,000 (S$516,300). See also Police warn of resurgence of scam involving "officers from China"
'If you are in doubt, call the 24/7 ScamShield Helpline at 1799 to check. For more information on scams, members of the public can visit www.scamshield.gov.sg . Fighting scams is a community effort. Together, we can ACT Against Scams to safeguard our community!' the Police added. /TISG
Read also: SCAM check: All calls from CPF Board now come from only one number: 6227 1188
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNA
an hour ago
- CNA
Jail, caning for man who extorted money from girl after she backed out of 'sugar daddy' arrangement
SINGAPORE: A man who bullied a 16-year-old girl into performing sexual acts and giving him money by falsely claiming he was taking legal action against her was sentenced to jail and caning on Monday (Jun 6). Marc Justine Landrio Chandramohan, 27, had pressured the girl after she backed out of a "sugar daddy" arrangement with him. Chandramohan will serve two years, 11 months and 10 weeks in jail from Friday after he was given a few days to settle his debts. He was also ordered to be given three strokes of the cane. The Singaporean earlier pleaded guilty to seven charges. These consist of communicating with another person for the purpose of obtaining commercial sex, abetting by distributing obscene images and videos, extortion, cheating, making obscene films, and abetting another person to perform a computer function without authority. Another nine charges, mostly related to making obscene films, were taken into consideration by Principal District Judge Victor Yeo Khee Eng for sentencing. Apart from the victim of the extortion, two other victims were filmed by Chandramohan during sex acts. All three victims cannot be named to protect their identities. Echoing what the prosecution had said in Chandramohan's earlier hearing where he pleaded guilty, Judge Yeo said in his sentencing remarks that the accused had preyed on a young and naive victim. He noted how Chandramohan had persisted with his "premeditated and predatory behaviour" to message and pressure the victim for sexual favours and money even though she owed him "absolutely nothing". Judge Yeo said the court could not ignore the adverse impact Chandramohan's acts had on the victim, who said her relationship with her family was affected by the incident. She said she felt her body was "dirty" and became sensitive to physical touch. The victim also worried about bumping into Chandramohan outside and would panic when she sees someone who resembles him. The District Judge said that the predominant sentencing consideration in this case was deterrence, both for Chandramohan and other like-minded potential offenders. Touching on Chandramohan's mitigation, Judge Yeo said he accepted that the accused regretted his offences and is prepared to accept responsibility and face punishment. THE OFFENCES The court previously heard that Chandramohan began chatting with the victim via the Instagram app in July 2021. He suggested paying her S$900 (US$700) in exchange for sexual favours in a "sugar daddy" arrangement. The victim initially agreed and sent Chandramohan four photos of herself in varying states of undress, with her face captured. She also sent a video of herself removing her school uniform, at Chandramohan's instruction. Chandramohan sent the victim S$100 on Jul 24, 2021. However, in the early hours of the next morning, the victim regretted the agreement. She told Chandramohan via text that she did not want to continue with it, deleted her chat with him and blocked him. But he began badgering her about the S$100 he gave her, creating new Instagram accounts to speak to her repeatedly, then threatened legal action against her. He insisted on sexual favours and said he would not stop pursuing legal action against her, even after the victim managed to ask a friend to transfer Chandramohan the S$100. Believing this to be true, the victim gave in and performed a sexual act in early 2022. Chandramohan agreed to withdraw his purported lawsuit against her. But he later pretended that legal proceedings were still ongoing and asked her for S$1,350 - allegedly half the sum of the legal fee - to pay his lawyer. He suggested again that the two return to their initial sexual arrangement. Eventually, the victim consulted her friends, who told her that Chandramohan was likely lying. She then lodged a police report. Separately, in 2023, Chandramohan applied for a Standard Chartered bank account at the behest of a friend, who asked him if he wanted to make fast cash by relinquishing control of his account. He provided his friend details relating to that bank account and received S$330 in exchange. A total of S$304,817.76 flowed through this bank account. Chandramohan was also sentenced over these offences and will have to pay a fine of S$330 in addition to his jail term. Extortion carries a jail term of between two and seven years with caning.
CNA
3 hours ago
- CNA
Cambodia to file complaint with ICJ over Thai border dispute
PHNOM PENH: Cambodia will file a complaint with the International Court of Justice (ICJ) over border disputes with Thailand, Prime Minister Hun Manet said on Monday (Jun 2), after a Cambodian soldier was killed in a recent frontier clash. "Cambodia hopes that the Thai side will agree with Cambodia to jointly bring these issues to the International Court of Justice ... to prevent armed confrontation again over border uncertainty," Hun Manet said during a meeting between MPs and senators. Military clashes between the Southeast Asian neighbours erupted in 2008 and have led to several years of sporadic violence, resulting in at least 28 deaths. The most recent occurred on Wednesday, when a Cambodian soldier was killed in a location known as the Emerald Triangle - a joint border area between Cambodia, Thailand and Laos. The day after, Cambodia's foreign ministry sent a letter to the Thai embassy in Phnom Penh demanding "an immediate and thorough investigation" into the "unprovoked attack". Describing the incident as "a violation of Cambodian sovereignty", Phnom Penh said it remained committed to resolving the issue through "peaceful and diplomatic avenues". Prime Minister Hun Manet said that even if the Thai side did not agree on bringing the issue to the ICJ, Cambodia would still file the complaint. He added that the border dispute was being "incited by small extremist groups in both countries", which could lead to further clashes. Thailand's ministry of foreign affairs did not immediately respond to a request for comment from AFP. Cambodia's military had said they were attacked first in Wednesday's incident, while the Thai side said their soldiers were responding to gunshots. The Thai and Cambodian militaries met the following day, agreeing to ease tensions. Thailand says a Joint Boundary Committee will meet in the next two weeks to resolve the issue. The Emerald Triangle is among the areas that will be named in the ICJ complaint, Hun Manet said. Another is Ta Moan Thom Temple, the backdrop for a video posted on social media earlier this year showing a woman singing a patriotic Khmer song which led to Bangkok lodging a formal protest to Phnom Penh. Cambodia and Thailand have long been at odds over their more than 800km-long border, which was largely drawn during the French occupation of Indochina. The 2008 military clashes erupted over a patch of land next to Preah Vihear Temple, a 900-year-old structure near their shared border.
CNA
3 hours ago
- CNA
Jail for man who scuffled with another driver over lane-cutting, hurt him with scissors
SINGAPORE: Upset at a man who shut his car door during a brief confrontation, a driver scuffled with him and inflicted a minor injury with a pair of scissors. Sunny Tan Boon Heng, 68, later drove his car forward even as the victim, 61-year-old Lin Yansong, stood in front of his car to stop him from leaving. Tan was handed a jail term of five weeks and a driving ban of six months on Monday (Jun 2), after he pleaded guilty to one count of causing hurt, and one count of rash act endangering the victim's safety. A charge under the Protection from Harassment Act for using a rude gesture on the victim was taken into consideration for his sentencing. Tan and the victim were driving along Bedok North Avenue 3 towards Bedok Reservoir Road at about 5pm on Jan 10, 2024, before the incident occurred. Tan was on the left lane while the victim was on the right lane ahead of Tan. As the victim wanted to overtake another vehicle, he began moving into the left lane slightly in front of Tan, prompting Tan to sound his horn. Tan stopped his car to allow the victim to overtake but flashed his high beam. Both cars stopped at a traffic light, with Tan's car behind. At that point, Tan made a rude gesture, which the victim saw from his rearview mirror. The victim alighted his car to confront Tan, who then opened his car door but did not alight. After a brief argument, the victim pushed Tan's door shut and walked away, but Tan got out of his car and approached the victim while holding a pair of scissors. The pair scuffled for about a minute and the victim sustained a slight 0.5cm superficial laceration on his left middle finger. Tan then returned to his car and reversed it to drive away using the left lane. However, the victim ran to the front of Tan's car to stop him from leaving, placing his hand on the car and shouting at him. Tan drove forward again, causing the victim to move backwards. "The accused knew there was a real risk that his act might endanger the personal safety of (the victim)," said the prosecution. The victim eventually moved away and the accused drove off. The incident was recorded on the victim's dashcam. Lin did not sustain any injury from Tan's car, but had his wound from the scuffle dressed in a hospital and was given a tetanus vaccine injection. Tan's lawyer Tan Seng Kiat from HOH Law Corporation sought fines for his client's two proceeded charges. Mr Tan said that his client had been a private-hire car driver with Grab before his contract ended in September 2024. Tan has since stopped driving, largely due to the incident. Citing a previous high court case as reference, Mr Tan argued that the charge of causing hurt should not be taken as a road rage incident as Tan was responding to how the victim had pushed his car door shut. He added that his client had taken the pair of scissors in self-defence in light of the victim's conduct. His client then disengaged from the victim and was driving his car when the victim approached, Mr Tan said. Tan had driven in a gradual and slow manner, in contrast to the victim who sought to block the car without regard to his own safety, Mr Tan said. Alternatively, the lawyer sought jail terms of not more than two weeks for the charge of causing hurt, and not more than two to three weeks for the charge of rash act. Deputy Public Prosecutor Darren Sim argued against fines being imposed and asked for a jail term. He said the case was a road rage incident which called for a deterrent sentence, and added that a weapon had been involved. In sentencing, Principal District Judge Victor Yeo disagreed with the defence's argument that the case should not be viewed as part of a road rage incident, or that fines would suffice. He said the case involved road rage violence that occurred after Tan became enraged that the victim cut into his lane. Judge Yeo agreed with the prosecution that a jail term was called for and imposed the sentence accordingly.
