Are Investors Losing Faith In The US Financial System?
I had intended to write about universities this week but, strolling through the City of London, I was surprised, shocked even, to find myself on Trump Street, and then amused to see that it is joined by Russia Row.
My first thought was that this was part of a grand plan by the British establishment ahead of President Trump's visit to London in September, the idea being to stage an event at the nearby Guildhall and to then tell the president that a nearby street had been named after him. Trump Street was apparently named so because several trumpet makers lived there in the 18th century, but let's ignore that for the time being.
Yet, the far more meaningful coincidence of Trump Street is its proximity to Gresham Street.
Sir Thomas Gresham was a trader and financier in 16th century London, at a time when coffee houses in the lanes around the Royal Exchange formed the basis of what is known as the City. Gresham was an important player in Queen Elizabeth I's economy, and his emblem – a grasshopper – is still present in various parts of the City (there is a giant-sized golden grasshopper on the roof of the Royal Exchange….if you can dare to make it up there).
While Gresham's imprint can be seen across the City, he is remembered by Gresham's Law which was named after him and states 'bad money will drive out the good'. Gresham's Law which echoes similar observations from Copernicus and other scientists through the ages is founded on the idea that in an economy where coins with the same face value but that are made from different base metals (say nickel and copper) there is a tendency for traders to hoard the coins made of the more valuable metal and to circulate lower quality coins. Bad coins stay in circulation, good ones are re-commoditized. From an economics point of view the law is conditioned on all the coins (of variable quality) having the same face value.
Unlike the 16th century, today, coins have the same physical consistency and in general there is little incentive for people to shave bits off coins (historically coins have serrated edges to prevent this) but broadly the Gresham's Law is applicable in different domains.
Think of how cheap goods (made under questionable labour conditions) have forced quality players out of markets, or how in the run-up to the global financial crisis, low quality financial institutions offering generous loan conditions caused better quality banks to step back from lending. In both cases, regulation or policing of markets is necessary to ensure that 'bad' actors do not gain an advantage over good ones. Social media is another example, where it seems a lot of nonsense thrives at the expense of information.
Additionally, the idea of Gresham's Law is applicable to politics, where in many countries it appears that political actors with extreme views and extreme modus operandi are forcing out 'good' ones in the sense that most normal people would be terrified of a career in politics.
Readers will guess that my argument is leading back to Washington. Bad behaviour, bad ideas and bad policies are infesting themselves in public life, the economy and markets – to the surprise of many ardent supporters of President Trump. What is not clear is whether this will result in an evacuation of capital and talent from the US, or whether there will be a counter-reaction. Gresham's point in describing how bad money drives out good was to avoid the debasement of the currency (schilling), which when Elizabeth I came to power, was already in a bad state. She appointed Gresham as a finance minister of sorts in 1560, and within a year he had 'bad' coins taken out of circulation and replaced them with money made from precious metal, the result of which was a dramatic improvement in Britain's status as a trading and economic power.
The lesson of this should be very clear today. As a final point, it is interesting to note, from the point of view of coins and money, that the ratio of gold (precious metal) to a cyclical commodity (copper) is the most stretched it has been since at least the 1980's, suggesting that markets at least are thinking of Gresham's Law.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
19 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Liverpool agree £116m deal to sign Florian Wirtz from Bayer Leverkusen
Liverpool are close to securing the signing of Florian Wirtz from Bayer Leverkusen in a British record transfer deal worth £116m. Liverpool saw two bids rejected by Leverkusen, who had initially put a £126m price tag on Wirtz, before accepting an initial £100m payment, plus bonuses of up to £16m. These bonuses are understood to be heavily tied to Liverpool winning major trophies with Wirtz playing a key role. Advertisement The fee surpasses the previous British record set by Moisés Caicedo's £115 million move to Chelsea and smashes Liverpool's own record transfer of £85 million for Darwin Núñez. It also eclipses the £75 million the club paid for Virgil van Dijk in 2018. Despite serious interest from Bayern Munich and Manchester City, Wirtz opted to join the Merseyside club after being convinced by Arne Slot's vision for the future of the team. The 22-year-old, widely regarded as one of Europe's top young talents, is believed to be excited by the prospect of being a central figure in Slot's new era at Anfield. The Bundesliga Players' Player of the Season for 2024/25, Wirtz made his debut for Leverkusen at the age of 17, and has scored 57 goals in 197 games for the club. He helped them win the Bundesliga for the first time in 2024 and has scored seven goals in 31 appearances for Germany since making his national debut in 2021. Advertisement According to Paul Joyce, Liverpool's sporting director Richard Hughes led the club's negotiations with Leverkusen's Simon Rolfes, with talks intensifying over the past few weeks. David Ornstein reports the German international has signed a five-year contract running until June 2030, and is expected to undergo a medical on Merseyside next week once the transfer window officially opens. This move signals a bold new era at Anfield under Arne Slot. The Dutchman has wasted no time in stamping his authority on the squad. Wirtz will become Liverpool's second signing of the summer following the arrival of former Leverkusen teammate Jeremie Frimpong. Both players chose Liverpool not just for the club's stature, but for the ambitious project being built under Slot's leadership. Wirtz's arrival is not just a statement of intent, it's potentially a foundation for the next great Liverpool side.
Yahoo
19 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Liverpool break British transfer record to sign £116m Florian Wirtz – and here is why
Liverpool have agreed a £116 million fee with Bayer Leverkusen for Florian Wirtz, in a deal that could become a British transfer record. After weeks of negotiations, the Premier League champions have secured the Germany international's services, with the 22-year-old becoming the most expensive Liverpool player ever. He will sign pending a medical. Advertisement Liverpool will pay an initial £100 million with a further £16 million in add-ons, based on performance triggers. Although the initial outlay does not break the British record Chelsea paid Brighton for Moises Caicedo two years ago, it has the potential to eclipse it should Wirtz's Anfield career prove successful. Liverpool hope that proves to be the case. Wirtz's arrival represents a major coup as Bayern Munich and Manchester City were forced to concede defeat in the race for his signature after he indicated his preference to move to Anfield. City withdrew after citing the financial commitment required to complete the deal, before the Bundesliga champions were also informed of Wirtz's intentions. Wirtz will be a key player for Germany at next summer's World Cup - PA/Bradley Collyer Liverpool's move will be seen as a major statement in their bid to defend their title, Wirtz becoming the second recruit as the promise of a 'big' summer is realised. Advertisement Liverpool have already bought Wirtz's former Bayer Leverkusen team-mate Jeremie Frimpong for £30 million and are expected to sign left-back Milos Kerkez from Bournemouth. The previous Anfield transfer record – the £85 million paid for Darwin Nunez in 2022 – has been shattered. Wirtz has been earmarked to play as a No 10, but is equally comfortable as a wide attacker. He was the stand-out player in a Leverkusen team that became one of Europe's most talked-about clubs. Liverpool can display Olympian levels of smugness Towards the end of Liverpool's march to their 20th title, an Anfield anniversary of sorts casually slipped by without fanfare. Advertisement It is just over two years since a lone fan arranged for a light aircraft to circle the stadium demanding owners Fenway Sports Group sell up to an unspecified organisation with 'more ambition'. 'FSG OUT – KLOPP IN – ENOUGH IS ENOUGH,' read the attached banner. Two years ago, a light aircraft circled Anfield demanding the current owners sell up - PA/Peter Byrne As commemorations go, admittedly this rates low on the notability scale of memorable Anfield moments of recent times. Nevertheless, when the plane circled it was a dilemma for the reporters rolling their eyes looking to the skies as they contemplated whether one attention-seeker reflected deep-rooted and broad frustration among the Liverpool fanbase, or if the looks of bemusement and slight embarrassment from the 55,000 fans told a more accurate story. Most of those present decided upon the latter. Advertisement The trigger for the 'protest' before Liverpool's home fixture with Manchester United in March 2023 was the club's transfer strategy over successive windows, the American owners often accused of counting the pennies with their net spend while Premier League rivals seemingly splashed out mega-millions every summer. Given Liverpool won 7-0 on the day of the aircraft stunt, the stand against the regime was as badly timed as one of Darwin Nunez's runs to beat the offside trap. Now, in the immediate aftermath of the Premier League champions committing to a British record transfer to sign Wirtz, the misguided demonstration has aged worse than a heavily botoxed Hollywood actor. Mocking aside, the anti-American sentiment was not entirely without support among those sympathetic to the idea of pressuring Liverpool's hierarchy to, if not sell up, spend more on the team. When the club confirmed they would be stepping away from the pursuit of Jude Bellingham in April 2023, for example, it triggered another episode in a long-standing philosophical debate about the pros and cons of self-sustainability models in the era of nation states with unlimited budgets, or (as subsequently occurred) clubs selling hotels and women's teams to circumvent profit and sustainability rules. Liverpool's 'moneyball' policies Predictably, supporters of Manchester City and Chelsea will note the huge fee for Wirtz and wag an accusatory finger at Liverpool and yell 'hypocrisy' as the club which has made as much noise as any about the wild west of football's transfer system has ditched the Wyatt Earp impressions and opted to go on a spree worthy of Butch Cassidy's Hole-in-the-Wall gang after a particularly profitable heist. Advertisement In reality, Wirtz's signing is entirely in keeping with Liverpool's long-standing 'moneyball' policies. The critical difference is, in the FSG era, they have never been in such a strong position to flex financial muscle befitting their status, the most seismic shift with the Wirtz deal being that 10 years ago it was unthinkable that Liverpool could go head to head with Manchester City and Bayern Munich for a transfer-record-breaking prime target and emerge victorious. They have always had the will. Now they have the way. Internally, the Anfield message in 2025 is exactly the same as when the flak about prudence was at its worst. While there are limits to what any Liverpool manager can afford, every deal is scrutinised to the same degree whether the valuation is £3.5 million, £85 million or, as in this case, heading towards £116 million. The fewer the red flags, the more likely the green light. Liverpool broke the transfer record for a central defender when they bought Virgil van Dijk in 2018. They did the same for a goalkeeper when recruiting Alisson Becker in 2019. They would have spent more than anyone in English football history for a midfielder two years ago if Moises Caicedo could have been persuaded to ditch Chelsea for Liverpool. In all instances, the decision to 'go big' was the consequence of incremental increases in revenues via commercial activity and on-field success, and the equally crucial skill of being as adept at selling as buying. Advertisement Since FSG's 2010 takeover, Liverpool's revenues have increased from less than £200 million to more than £600 million, the promise John W Henry made to oversee slow and steady progress until the club's model enabled them to pitch for the world's best spectacularly vindicated. The concept of 'Liverpool spending the Philippe Coutinho money' to sign Van Dijk and Alisson has done plenty of heavy lifting in the years since. The club would have signed Van Dijk whether Coutinho had left for Barcelona or not, as was demonstrated by the fact they had tried to do the deal six months earlier. But whatever Liverpool pay for new players this summer, they can expect to recoup plenty as the combined valuations of those available could exceed £150 million. It remains to be seen what offers materialise, but it needs no stretch of the imagination to believe Wirtz will be signed with 'the Kelleher, Nunez, Elliott, Jota and Doak money'. Harvey Elliott is expected to leave Liverpool this summer - AFP/Glyn Kirk If the Anfield board wants to display Olympian levels of smugness, they could argue that the reason they can afford Wirtz is because they were prepared to be patient a year ago, the club exceptional at ignoring the 'noise' when the social media 'influencers' equate lack of spending with lack of purpose. Advertisement For all that, the Wirtz deal is a gamble. Granted, it is a calculated and meticulously thought through one, but when you commit so much, the pressure to deliver intensifies, not just on the recruit, but on those who push hardest for his signature. Big money does not guarantee success The greater the proven quality in an elite division such as the Bundesliga, the fewer the doubts. That is why such a premium is paid. But my word, it is a hell of a lot of money for one footballer. Van Dijk and Alisson looked like no-brainers at the time they posed for their club photograph and duly delivered. Naby Keita and Nunez – who cost a combined £145 million – will be filed in the warning from history chapter, despite their impressive medal haul. Advertisement As with all such captures, Wirtz will arrive amid reassuring messages about extensive scouting, data models with performance indicators suggesting the 22-year-old is already one of the world's most creative young footballers on an upward trajectory, the presumption being his value will soar during the course of his contract. The mini biographies will locate youth coaches who always knew he was destined for greatness and there is a reason so many of those with aspirations to win the Champions League next season wanted him. Excited supporters will see only guarantees of success, while rivals will ponder – as Liverpool often have when musing upon the huge fees paid by others – if signing one player for the price of three truly is good value. Either way, Wirtz's Anfield arrival is not just a statement. It is the shoutiest proclamation of intent as Liverpool look to defend their crown and pursue the Champions League. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Yahoo
19 minutes ago
- Yahoo
‘No Kings Day' Exposed: Activist Powerhouses Mobilize Across America
Left-wing agitators have been planning events scheduled for this weekend to promote hate against President Donald Trump with 'No Kings Day,' following violent anti-ICE riots across America. The 'No Kings Day' mobilizations are set for June 14 across the country, as The Dallas Express previously reported. Several of these events are occurring across the Dallas-Fort Worth metroplex and are organized by powerful national groups. The group 50501 is a leading force behind these mobilizations – the latest in a series against Trump, with 'Hands Off' and 'May Day' events earlier this year. As The Dallas Express reported, 50501 previously organized demonstrations across the DFW area. Other groups like Indivisible – an influential left-wing network – are also organizing the demonstrations. Indivisible is known for working with groups like the Democratic Socialists of America, whose 'paramilitary wing' is Antifa. According to The Federalist, Indivisible boosted previous protests like 'Hands Off' with things like 'infrastructure to get the campaign off the ground.' A spokesman for 'No Kings Day' told The Dallas Express that 50501 started anti-Trump events earlier this year, and other groups like Indivisible joined. Last month, Indivisible announced that it and other left-wing groups are helping organize the upcoming events. The 'No Kings' spokesman said he could not limit the 'goal to a singular purpose' because the demonstrations are coming from 'different local organizations in each city.' He said national groups like Indivisible, the American Federation of Teachers, SEIU, and other unions are planning the mobilizations. 'No Kings Day' partners also include the ACLU, Bernie Sanders and his group Our Revolution, Move On of the Tesla Takedown demonstrations, and the anti-Trump protest group Families Over Billionaires – which is supported by a billionaire-funded dark money network. 'People are tired of not feeling like they're being heard in Washington D.C., people are tired of feeling like Congress has abdicated its responsibility to be a check and a balance on the executive branch,' the 'No Kings' spokesman said. The upcoming events fall in the wake of violent anti-ICE riots in Los Angeles and Dallas, as The Dallas Express reported. Gov. Greg Abbott deployed the National Guard across Texas this week to keep order. The Dallas Express asked if organizers expect the 'No Kings' events to 'merge with anti-ICE actors,' and the spokesman said he could not speak to it from a 'global perspective.' 'These are grassroots organizations that people want to amplify their voices by partnering up with other organizations,' the spokesman said. 'I don't think anybody's going to say, 'Don't do that.'' The 'No Kings' spokesman said organizers are working with police and training 'marshals' to keep the mobilizations peaceful. He blamed the violence on 'one-sided escalation.' 'I think at their very nature, they're nonviolent, they're peaceful. But then when you do things like calling the National Guard, it amplifies tensions,' he said. The riots in Los Angeles featured burning vehicles, a siege against the ICE building, and attacks against state and federal police, as The Dallas Express previously reported. The Dallas Express asked the spokesman's thoughts on the riots in Los Angeles 'before the National Guard was there,' where rioters started 'throwing rocks at immigration agents and surrounding the federal building.' 'It's very strange to portray single actors throwing rocks as an entire movement if you're not doing the same thing for masked ICE agents kidnapping people in schools, in hospitals, on the streets,' the spokesman replied. The FBI is currently investigating those with 'monetary connections responsible for the riots,' as The Dallas Express previously reported. Tech tycoon Neville Singham – a Marxist sympathizer who moved to Shanghai – uses 'a global web of nonprofits and shell entities' to push Chinese Communist Party propaganda worldwide. Singham supports the Party for Socialism and Liberation, a communist group that helped organize the Los Angeles riots with a 'history of anti-Israel activism,' as The Dallas Express also reported. The group CHIRLA – Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights of Los Angeles – helped organize inflammatory rallies in the city, The Dallas Express reported at the time. Singham's wife, Jodie Evans, is the founder of the left-wing activist group Code Pink, which published an anti-ICE toolkit to resist immigration enforcement. The group advocates for Chinese interests, claiming, 'China is not our enemy.' The anti-Trump 'No Kings Day' events are set to take place in Dallas and Fort Worth, as well as the suburbs Arlington, Burleson, Denton, Euless, Flower Mound, Frisco, McKinney, and Sanger. Fort Worth Mayor Mattie Parker previously told The Dallas Express she has 'full faith' in police to keep Saturday's demonstrations under control. Both the Fort Worth Police Department and the Dallas Police Department are monitoring the events. The Dallas Express reached out to Indivisible and 50501 but did not hear back in time for publication.
