
Leaders warn race for minerals could turn seabed into ‘wild west'
NICE : World leaders on Monday called for strong rules to govern deep-sea mining and warned against racing to exploit the ocean floor in a thinly-veiled rebuke of US President Donald Trump.
Growing anxiety over Trump's unilateral push to fast-track deep-sea mining in international waters shot to the surface at the opening of the UN Ocean Conference in southern France.
'I think it's madness to launch predatory economic action that will disrupt the deep seabed, disrupt biodiversity, destroy it and release irrecoverable carbon sinks – when we know nothing about it,' said French President Emmanuel Macron.
Imposing a moratorium on seabed mining was 'an international necessity', said Macron.
The number of countries opposed to seabed mining rose to 36 on Monday, according to a tally kept by the Deep Sea Conservation Coalition, an umbrella group of non-governmental organisations.
Trump was not among the roughly 60 heads of state and government in the seaside town of Nice but his spectre loomed large as leaders defended the global multilateralism he has spurned.
Of particular concern, his move to sidestep the International Seabed Authority (ISA) and issue permits directly to companies wanting to extract nickel and other metals from waters beyond US jurisdiction.
Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva called for 'clear action' from the seabed authority to end a 'predatory race' for deep-ocean minerals.
'We now see the threat of unilateralism looming over the ocean. We cannot allow what happened to international trade to happen to the sea,' he said.
The deep sea, Greenland and Antarctica were 'not for sale', Macron said in further remarks directed clearly at Trump's expansionist claims.
The ISA, which has jurisdiction over the ocean floor outside national waters, is meeting in July to discuss a global mining code to regulate mining in the ocean depths.
UN secretary-general Antonio Guterres said he supported these negotiations and urged caution as countries navigate these 'new waters on seabed mining'.
'The deep sea cannot become the wild west,' he said, to applause from the plenary floor.
'Wave of hope'
Island nations also spoke out against seabed mining, which scientists warn could result in untold damage to ecosystems largely unexplored by humanity.
'Here in Nice, we can feel that the looming threat of deep sea mining, and the recent reckless behaviour of the industry is seen by many states as unacceptable,' said Megan Randles from Greenpeace.
Meanwhile, a flurry of last-minute signatures in Nice brought a treaty to protect the 60% of the world's oceans outside national jurisdiction closer to law.
Macron told reporters that 55 nations had ratified the high seas treaty, just five shy of the number required for its enactment.
The president gave two thumbs up and a broad grin as he posed with the new signatories, and said the accord would come into force by Jan 1, 2026.
'Today's surge of ratifications for the High Seas Treaty is a tidal wave of hope and a huge cause for celebration,' Rebecca Hubbard, director of the High Seas Alliance, told AFP.
'Prove you're serious'
On Monday, the UK announced plans to extend a partial ban on bottom trawling in some of its protected marine areas, following a similar move by France at the weekend.
Greece, Brazil and Spain took the opportunity Monday to announce the creation of new marine parks, following recent similar action from Samoa.
And French Polynesia unveiled what will be the world's largest marine protected zone, said the International Union for Conservation of Nature.
Just 8% of global oceans are designated for marine conservation, despite a globally agreed target to achieve 30% coverage by 2030.
Macron said he hoped that coverage would grow to 12% by the summit's close on Friday.
Environment groups say that for marine parks to be considered truly protected they need to ban trawling and other harmful activities, and be properly funded.
Wealthy nations face pressure in Nice to commit money to make that level of ocean conservation a reality.
Small island states are leading the charge for money and political support to better combat rising seas, marine trash and the plunder of fish stocks that hurt their economies.
'We say to you, if you are serious about protecting the ocean, prove it,' said President Surangel Whipps Jr of Palau, a low-lying Pacific nation.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Malaysian Reserve
7 minutes ago
- Malaysian Reserve
FAIR Investigative Report: Federal Takeover of DC Police Presents Opportunity to Dismantle Unlawful Sanctuary Policies and Align with National Immigration Priorities
WASHINGTON, Aug. 15, 2025 /PRNewswire/ — Today, the Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR) released a new investigative report examining the immigration enforcement implications of President Donald Trump's August 11, 2025 executive order federalizing the Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) amid D.C.'s escalating crime crisis. The report argues that this bold federal intervention provides a pivotal chance for D.C. police and prosecutors to comply with federal immigration mandates, override the District's unlawful sanctuary policies, and prioritize the deportation of criminal illegal aliens — restoring public safety in the nation's capital. 'President Trump's decisive action to federalize MPD is a game-changer for immigration enforcement in D.C., where sanctuary policies have long shielded illegal aliens from accountability and turned our capital into a haven for criminals,' said Dale Wilcox, executive director and general counsel of FAIR. 'Our report exposes how these policies violate federal supremacy and outlines clear steps for MPD and prosecutors to align with national priorities, ensuring that no one gets a free pass based on immigration status.' Key findings and recommendations from the report include: D.C.'s Sanctuary Policies Are Unlawful: The report analyzes how D.C.'s restrictions on cooperating with federal immigration authorities — such as bans on immigration status inquiries and honoring ICE detainers — conflict with the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) and are preempted under the Supremacy Clause of the Constitution. The report also discusses how these policies exceed the District's authority under the Home Rule Act. Opportunities for MPD Under Federal Control: The report examines how President Trump has unequivocal authority under the D.C. Home Rule Act to direct a federalized MPD to bypass the District's unlawful sanctuary policies. In light of this, the report recommends that MPD implement routine immigration status checks during arrests, work with other D.C. agencies to honor ICE detainers, and report non-citizen arrestees to ICE. Prosecutors Must Reject 'Immigration Neutral' Practices: The report critiques endorsements by prominent D.C. figures of reforms favoring leniency for criminal aliens and urges even-handed prosecutions that don't advantage alien defendants at the expense of U.S. citizens. The report recommends that the U.S. Attorney for D.C. and the D.C. Attorney General adopt policies prohibiting immigration-based leniency, pursue maximum charges to trigger federal jurisdiction, coordinate with ICE as they handle cases, and track prosecution outcomes for alien defendants. 'Sanctuary policies in D.C. not only endanger residents but also undermine America's sovereignty,' said Mateo Forero, FAIR's director of investigations. 'We will continue to monitor developments in the District and will expand our investigation where appropriate — including through possible public records requests to hold government stakeholders accountable.' CONTACT: Ira Mehlman, 1-213-700-0407, imehlman@


The Star
2 hours ago
- The Star
Russian missile hits Ukraine's Dnipropetrovsk region
KYIV (Reuters) -Russia launched a ballistic missile into Ukraine's Dnipropetrovsk region on Friday, killing one and wounding at least one other person and causing a fire, the regional governor said. The attack came hours before a planned summit between U.S. President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska to discuss a ceasefire deal for Ukraine. "A truck and a minibus were damaged in a hostile attack on the Dnipro district. A man was killed. Another person was injured," Serhiy Lysak said on the Telegram messenger. The city of Dnipro is a logistics hub for Ukrainian forces, and the Dnipropetrovsk region borders the combat zone and is regularly shelled by Russian forces. (Reporting by Yuliia Dysa; editing by Mark Heinrich and Alex Richardson)

Malay Mail
3 hours ago
- Malay Mail
Why Putin is talking nukes before Trump summit on Ukraine
LONDON, Aug 15 — Russian President Vladimir Putin said on the eve of a summit with US President Donald Trump that their countries might strike a new deal on nuclear weapons as part of a wider effort to strengthen peace. The summit is about Ukraine, so why talk about nukes? Putin has been under pressure from Trump to agree to end the three-and-a-half-year-old war in Ukraine, something Moscow says is part of a complex of security issues that have raised East-West tensions to their most dangerous level since the Cold War. With Russian forces gradually advancing in Ukraine, Putin has rebuffed Kyiv's calls for a full and immediate ceasefire. But if the summit makes progress towards a new arms control treaty, Putin could argue he is engaging on wider peace issues. That could help him persuade Trump that now is not the right time to impose new sanctions on Russia and buyers of its oil and other key exports, as the US leader has threatened. It could also be part of a broader drive to improve relations with Washington, including on trade and economic issues, where the Kremlin says there is huge untapped potential. Why has Putin repeatedly talked up Russia's nuclear arsenal? Throughout the war, Putin has delivered veiled threats about using nuclear missiles and warned that entering a direct confrontation with Russia could lead to World War Three. They have included verbal statements, war games, and lowering Russia's threshold for using nuclear weapons. The fact that Russia has more nuclear weapons than any other country gives it a stature in this domain that far exceeds its conventional military or economic power, allowing Putin to face Trump as an equal on the world stage when it comes to security. How many nuclear weapons do Russia and the US have? According to the Federation of American Scientists, Russia and the United States have estimated military stockpiles of 4,309 and 3,700 nuclear warheads, respectively. China trails with an estimated 600. What does the existing US-Russia nuclear treaty say? Signed by then-US President Barack Obama and his Russian counterpart Dmitry Medvedev in 2010, the New START treaty caps the number of strategic nuclear warheads that the United States and Russia can deploy. Each is limited to no more than 1,550, and a maximum of 700 long-range missiles and bombers. Strategic weapons are those designed by each side to hit the enemy's centres of military, economic, and political power. The treaty came into force in 2011 and was extended in 2021 for five more years after US President Joe Biden took office. In 2023, Putin suspended Russia's participation, but Moscow said it would continue to observe the warhead limits. The treaty expires on February 5. Security analysts expect both sides to breach the limits if it is not extended or replaced. Trump said for the first time last month he would like to maintain the limits set in the treaty. 'That's not an agreement you want expiring. We're starting to work on that,' he said on July 25. 'When you take off nuclear restrictions, that's a big problem.' What are the other nuclear points of contention? In a symptom of the underlying tensions, Trump this month said he had ordered two US nuclear submarines to move closer to Russia because of what he called threatening comments by Medvedev about the possibility of war with the US. The Kremlin played down the move but said 'everyone should be very, very careful' with nuclear rhetoric. Separately, an arms race looms over shorter- and intermediate-range missiles, which can also carry nuclear warheads. During Trump's first presidency, in 2019, he pulled the US out of a treaty that had abolished all ground-based weapons in this category. Moscow denied his accusations that it was cheating. The United States plans to start deploying weapons, including SM-6 and Tomahawk missiles, previously placed mainly on ships, as well as new hypersonic missiles, in Germany from 2026. Russia said this month it no longer observes any restrictions on where it might deploy intermediate-range missiles. — Reuters