SC questions U.P.'s use of ordinance to take control of Banke Bihari temple
The Supreme Court on Monday (August 4, 2025) questioned the Uttar Pradesh government's haste in promulgating an ordinance to take over the management of the ancient Banke Bihari temple at Vrindavan in Mathura.
A Bench headed by Justice Surya Kant also expressed disapproval of the 'clandestine' manner employed by the State to secure the court's permission, getting a judgment on May 15 by filing a civil dispute to use temple funds to develop the Shri Banke Bihari Temple Corridor project.
The Bench orally considered recalling its directions in the May verdict allowing the use of the temple funds for the corridor development project, which may spell a blow to the State Government's plans. The court also suggested passing an order to have a committee manage the temple until the High Court decided the validity of the ordinance.
The Bench adjourned the case to August 5, asking Additional Solicitor General KM Nataraj, who appeared for Uttar Pradesh, to take instructions from the State Government on the suggestions.
Find a way out
'This is the land of Lord Krishna. He was the first mediator known to the world. Let's find a way out to resolve this dispute that has been pending for years and develop the area in the interests of lakhs of devotees who visit these iconic religious places. Basic amenities need to be created, as nowadays religious tourism is one of the biggest sources of revenue,' Justice Kant remarked.
The bench assured all the stakeholders, including factions engaged in pitch rivalry over the temple management, that a responsible person would take care of temple affairs besides implementing the mandate to develop the adjoining areas and small temples in nearby localities.
The managing committee members and other petitioners, who sought the recall or modification of the May 15 decision, were asked for suggestions with respect to the management of the temple.
The court was hearing a plea by the management committee of the temple, which has challenged the ordinance.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Indian Express
8 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
SC junks Madras HC order banning use of CM name in schemes
NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Wednesday quashed the Madras High Court's interim order that restrained the Tamil Nadu government from using Chief Minister M K Stalin's name and image in the 'Ungaludan Stalin' welfare outreach programme. Terming the plea by AIADMK MP C Ve Shanmugam 'totally misconceived' and an abuse of process of law, the apex court imposed a Rs 10 lakh fine on him, to be paid to the state within a week. A three-judge bench led by Chief Justice of India B R Gavai, and comprising Justices K Vinod Chandran and N V Anjaria, said the practice of naming welfare schemes after political leaders is common across the country, and selectively challenging one such scheme reflects political motive rather than genuine concern. 'We do not appreciate the anxiety of the petitioner to choose only one political party and one political leader,' the bench observed. 'If the petitioner was so concerned about the misuse of public funds, he could have challenged all such schemes.' The court noted that even during the AIADMK's tenure, many schemes were branded after CM J Jayalalithaa as 'Amma' initiatives. Senior advocates Mukul Rohatgi and Abhishek Manu Singhvi, appearing for the DMK and the state government respectively, cited similar schemes in support of their case.
Scroll.in
8 minutes ago
- Scroll.in
J&K administration bans Arundhati Roy's book, 24 other titles for ‘inciting secessionism'
The Jammu and Kashmir Home Department on Tuesday ordered a ban on 25 books, including works by author and activist Arundhati Roy and former Supreme Court lawyer and constitutional expert AG Noorani. The department, headed by Jammu and Kashmir Lieutenant Governor Manoj Sinha, claimed that the books were 'forfeited' for allegedly promoting false narratives and inciting secessionism. Among the titles that have been banned are Roy's Azadi and Noorani's The Kashmir Dispute 1947–2012. Political scientist and academic Sumantra Bose's Kashmir at the Crossroads and journalist Anuradha Bhasin's A Dismantled State are also part of the list, in addition to Do You Remember Kunan Poshpora by Essar Batool and others, Freedom Captivity by Radhika Gupta and Between Democracy and Nation by Seema Kazi. The international books that were banned include Kashmiri-American author Hafsa Kanjwal's Colonizing Kashmir: State-building Under Indian occupation, Haley Duschinski's Resisting Occupation in Kashmir, Victoria Schofield's Kashmir in Conflict and Christopher Snedden's Independent Kashmir. The action was taken under the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita section that authorises the police to seize copies of the books. The home department claimed in its order that 'credible intelligence indicate that a significant driver behind youth participation in violence and terrorism has been the systematic dissemination of false narratives and secessionist literature by its persistent internal circulation'. It further claimed that such literature is 'often disguised as historical or political commentary', but has played a critical role in 'radicalising' the youth of Jammu and Kashmir, allegedly by distorting history, glorifying terrorists, vilifying security forces and promoting religious extremism. Responding to the development, Bhasin said the books banned by the Jammu and Kashmir administration are 'well researched and not one glorifies terrorism, which this government claims to have ended'.
Hans India
8 minutes ago
- Hans India
Bihar SIR: SC seeks EC reply on deletion of 65 lakh voters
New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Wednesday sought the reply of the Election Commission of India (ECI) over a plea which alleged that the poll body had not shared the list of names of those who were removed from the Bihar voters' list after the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) conducted in the state. A bench of Justices Surya Kant, Ujjal Bhuyan, and N K Singh issued the notice on the application filed by NGO ADR. Seeking an urgent hearing, Advocate Prashant Bhushan, appearing for ADR, said, 'We have filed an IA…the draft roll they have published says 65 lakh voters' names have been omitted… They have not given a list of those names…they have said people are dead, have migrated… They should disclose who the 65 lakhs are, who are dead, who have migrated…'. Bhushan said the names have been included in the list without the recommendations of the Booth Level Officers (BLOs). 'BLOs when forwarding the forms have said this person is not recommended by BLO…Whether BLOs have recommended or not recommended… this information will be very important,' Bhushan added. Justice Kant said, according to ECI's Standard Operating Procedure (SOP), every representative of political parties would be provided with the list at the block level. Bhushan, however, claimed that this was not done. 'They have not conveyed. In case they have given to some political party, reasons are not given,' he said. Justice Kant said it was only a draft preliminary list, and reasons may be given when the final list is released. The counsel appearing for the Election Commission said the poll body was obligated to make the draft roll public. He said, 'We can show that we have shared the list with the political party representatives.' The bench asked ECI to state all it had to say in its reply. 'If you have supplied, please give a list of political parties to whom you have supplied, so that Mr Bhushan's client can collect information from those authorised representatives,' said Justice Kant, giving the Commission time till Saturday. Justice Kant added that the court will ensure that every voter who is likely to be affected gets the requisite information.
