Leander ISD looking to cut teacher, admin positions to make up budget deficit
The Brief
Leander ISD is looking to cut staff, including about 150 teachers, in an effort to address a budget deficit.
LISD says it is facing a projected $34.4 million deficit for the 2025-26 school year.
LISD attributes the deficit to inflation, loss of federal and state funding, and slowed growth.
LEANDER, Texas - Leander ISD has announced plans to cut staff, including teachers, in an effort to address its 2025-26 budget deficit.
Leander ISD Superintendent Bruce Gearing announced the changes in a letter to staff released on Wednesday.
By the numbers
Leander ISD says that the district is facing a projected $34.4 million deficit for the 2025-26 school year –a $21-million deficit above the board-approved deficit parameter.
The district says that it is experiencing a 22% rise in inflation like many other school districts and Texas families, as well as seeing funding cut for instructional materials, limiting resources for textbooks and classroom materials.
The district is also expecting to lose $1.5 million in Title I funds, which support academic resources for low-income students, and $1.5 million from the Medicaid reimbursement program called SHARS (Student Health and Related Services), which covers costs related to therapy support for students with disabilities.
Leander ISD also says that the district's growth has slowed, which has prompted it to use a "reduced growth" enrollment projection.
The district believes that with the announced cuts, it will be able to cut the budget gap to around $17 million, just $4 million above the board-approved deficit parameter.
The district announced on Wednesday that it is planning for a reduction of approximately $3 million (6%) at the central office level and approximately $12.8 million (5.8%) at the campus level.
Leander ISD says that 87% of its budget is dedicated to "human capacity", making changes without impacting staffing difficult.
Principals across the district received modifications to their staffing allocations for 2025-26.
By the numbers
Leander ISD broke down the staffing modifications for elementary, middle and high schools.
Leander ISD currently has 30 elementary schools, nine middle schools, six high schools and three alternative campuses. The modifications listed below are districtwide, not by campus.
At the elementary school level, Leander ISD says it plans to cut:
13.5 library instructional aides
31 teachers
1 Dual Language teacher
8 instructional aides
1 Dual Language instructional aide
3 assistant principals
1 intervention teacher
1 media/innovation specialist
4 counselors
1 PE instructional aide
2 International Baccalaureate (IB) coordinators
2 Spanish teachers
These cuts are expected to save the district $3,784,409.
The district will also add five Dual Language teacher positions and one instructional coach.
The district also plans to eliminate the IB primary years program.
At the middle school level, Leander ISD plans to cut:
6 student success facilitators (repurposing three of them)
6 assistant principals
46.5 teacher positions
These cuts are expected to save the district $4,017,562.
At the middle school level, Leander ISD plans to cut:
6 administrators
71.5 teacher positions
1 curriculum specialist
1 dean of innovation
1 administrative intern
1 counselor
2 IB coordinators
These cuts are expected to save the district $5,698,209.
The district plans to add one media specialist, one attendance clerk and one administrative assistant/registrar and eliminate the IB program.
Central office positions will also be cut and there will be a reduction in the operating budgets to the tune of $3 million.
However, the exact nature of those cuts was not outlined as of Wednesday.
Leander ISD says in addition to reducing staff, it will also be eliminating its Empowerment Fund, a $2 million grant program available to staff to drive initiatives that support deeper learning.
What's next
The district says that principals and campus leaders are working with area superintendents and human resources personnel to implement these adjustments "thoughtfully and supportively".
What you can do
The district says it will be hosting webinars for families to gain that clarity, ask questions, and express concerns.
District families are invited to attend the following virtual listening sessions:
Thursday, Feb. 6 at 6:00 p.m.
Wednesday, Feb. 12 at 8:00 a.m.
Wednesday, Feb. 12 at 4:30 p.m.
Superintendent Gearing also encouraged families to contact their state senators and representatives.
"As a final thought, I would like to express that we did not get into this position overnight. There has been a systematic and prolonged effort by some to undermine public education in Texas. The State Legislature left $4.5 billion that was appropriated for public education unused last session. They are meeting again right now to decide how to spend the appropriations they have available to them in the current session. Draft House and Senate base budgets show revenue flowing to only some educators," said Gearing at the end of the announcement.
The backstory
In 2019, the Texas Legislature passed HB 3 and Gov. Greg Abbott signed it into law.
HB 3 was expected to pump billions of new dollars into schools, expanding pre-K and special needs programs, beefing up retirement plans and scaling back the controversial Robin Hood formula.
Leander ISD says the state has not increased school funding since then, despite rising operational costs. Also, the district says the Legislature left $4.5 billion that was appropriated for public education unused last session.
The Legislature also passed another HB 3 in 2023, which required school districts to have an armed security guard, armed police officer, or armed employee on every public school campus in Texas. This one was put forth in response to the May 2022 mass shooting at Robb Elementary School in Uvalde.
Local perspective
Leander ISD is also not the only Texas school district feeling the budget crunch.
Districts all across the state say they are dealing with different versions of the same problem: a lack of funding from the state, says 7 On Your Side reporter John Krinjak.
Neighboring district Austin ISD is currently operating with a $92 million deficit. The school board is finalizing plans to make that much in cuts over three years.
Districts in the Dallas area and Houston are also facing tough decisions and large budget deficits.
Dallas ISD is currently dealing with a $152 million deficit. That's about $35 million less than the original $186 million shortfall for this year. But painful cuts were made. Among them, the elimination of hundreds of positions—including cutting 55 assistant principal jobs.
Nearby, in Coppell ISD, the board of trustees recently voted to close Pinkerton Elementary.
Houston ISD is facing the largest deficit of all this year, about $250 million. That's double the original projected shortfall, after Superintendent Mike Miles said the district would dip into savings to cover things like building maintenance and classroom instruction.
All this comes after Houston ISD made major cuts last year.
Big picture view
Gov. Abbott outlined three education-related emergency items in his State of the State address: increasing teacher pay, expanding career training, and school choice.
One of those items, school choice, is being debated by the Texas Senate in the form of SB 2, which would create "education savings accounts" that incentivize pulling students from public school to attend private schools.
The bill would create education savings accounts from taxpayer money for families who are interested in private education over public with up to $10,000 per year per student. Students with disabilities could get up to $11,500.
The bill would have a lottery system where 80 percent of the funds would be allocated to students who have special needs or are in low-income households. The remaining 20 percent would be open to any student based on lottery selection.
The funds could be used to pay for private school tuition, public school costs, tutors and books.
The Source
Information in this report comes from Leander ISD and previous reporting by FOX 7 Austin.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Local leaders respond to potential Medicaid cuts
DERBY, Conn. (WTNH) — Leaders of multiple local hospitals came together Monday morning to warn what might happen if Republicans in Congress pass their proposed changes to Medicaid. They worry state and local costs will skyrocket if the federal government makes proposed changes to how the program works. One of the proposed changes involves charging low-income patients a co-pay of as much as $35 for certain medical appointments. Hartford HealthCare introduces 'Empowering New Parents' program 'What this does is act as a barrier,' said Griffin Hospital CEO Patrick Charmel. 'People will see they have an out-of-pocket responsibility and just won't pursue the care that they need.' Eventually, he said, those people will end up in the emergency room, which ends up costing more. The Trump administration contends their changes will lower insurance premiums, but Congresswoman Rosa DeLauro (D-CT3) disagrees. 'Premiums for individual plans sold on Access Health CT will increase by as much as 25% next year,' DeLauro said. DeLauro says proposed cuts threaten access to health care for nearly 14 million people nationwide. A white house spokesman had a different take in an emailed statement. 'President Trump pledged to protect and preserve Medicaid, and that's exactly what The One, Big, Beautiful accomplishes by kicking illegal immigrants off the program, implementing commonsense work requirements, and enforcing basic eligibility verification to combat fraud,' wrote spokesman Kush Desai. Hartford HealthCare and Pfizer partner to tackle workplace migraines For those not on Medicaid, they may wonder why they should care about these cuts. Hospitals have to provide care to everybody who needs it, whether they can pay for it or not. If there is less money from the government coming in to pay for low-income patients, that means hospitals that are already stretched thin financially, could find themselves in serious financial trouble. 'Cuts to programs that support our communities like Medicaid will stress that ecosystem further and bring changes, challenges and collapses to some of our critical infrastructure across the state of Connecticut,' said Dr. Tom Balcezak, EVP & Chief Clinical Officer, Yale New Haven Health System. Which, they say, means fewer people seeing fewer doctors. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Markey: Trump using National Guard in LA to distract from big cuts in ‘Big Beautiful Bill'
President Donald Trump's historic decision to federalize California National Guard personnel to confront protesters in Los Angeles is little more than a stunt to distract public attention away from his deficit-busting domestic spending mega-bill and to 'create a chill' in the nation's immigrant communities, U.S. Sen. Ed Markey said Monday. 'Why are they doing it? They're trying to make families afraid,' Markey, D-Mass., told an audience of business and community leaders in Boston. 'They're trying to create a chill in all of these immigrant communities. That's what it's all about. And when Trump deploys the National Guard or federalizes it to go into [Los Angeles] in a situation that the police already had under control, it's for a very simple reason.' 'He's trying to distract America from what he's really trying to do. And that just becomes the circus.' Markey told the meeting convened by The New England Council at the Boston Harbor Hotel. 'There was never a threat ... they had it under control. The governor didn't ask for any additional help. No president for 60 years has sent in federal troops without a governor requesting it.' Golden State Gov. Gavin Newsom, a Democrat, told MSNBC that he intended to sue the Republican White House over the deployment, describing it as "an illegal act, an immoral act, an unconstitutional act.' Trump has cited a legal provision that allows him to mobilize federal service members when there is 'a rebellion or danger of a rebellion against the authority of the Government of the United States.' Roughly 300 National Guard members arrived in the city over the weekend, and Trump said he had authorized 2,000 members to deploy if needed, according to The Associated Press. The move comes as Republicans on Capitol Hill continue to eye changes to Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill,' which would cut hundreds of billions of dollars from social safety net programs to underwrite tax cuts — mostly for the richest Americans. Read More: A 'historic battle': Mass pols protest Medicaid cuts in 'Big Beautiful Bill' | John L. Micek The bill has broad implications for Massachusetts, Markey said. Markey told the crowd that he's trying to work with Republicans, most of whom represent heavily rural states, to avert cuts to Medicaid, which would hurt rural hospitals. In Massachusetts, the state's MassHealth program, as Medicaid is known here, also would be impacted. Republican cuts would cost the state's health care system $1.75 billion, affecting 250,000 people statewide, according to the Healey administration. The state's major research hospitals also depend on Medicare and Medicaid reimbursements as the bedrock to do other work, such as finding cures for diseases, he added. 'If you take that away from Mass General and Beth Israel, the Medicaid and Medicare funding, which they were expect to have there as a foundation, then it creates, basically, a seismic-like threat,' Markey said. Markey also sounded the alarm Monday about language in the bill that would phase out energy tax credits in a version of the bill approved by the U.S. House. If that language is allowed to stand, it would hurt Massachusetts' offshore wind sector, Markey said. 'And if you kill the tax breaks for solar, for offshore wind as well, you have further made our region dependent on energy sources from other regions of the country, when we had a capacity to find our own pathway for the next generation,' he said. Senate Republicans are looking to get a finished bill onto Trump's desk by the July 4 holiday, and can only afford a handful of defections under the 'reconciliation' they are using to pass the legislation. 'And at a time when our nation's politics and our very identity are at a crossroads, it's more important than ever that Democrats and Republicans come together for a business plan for our entire nation,' he said. Associated Press reports are included in this story. All Ivy League schools are supporting Harvard lawsuit — except these 2 Embassies directed to resume processing Harvard University student visas Over 12,000 Harvard alums lend weight to court battle with Trump in new filing Mass. Sen. Warren: DOGE accessed 'sensitive' student loan data at Education Dept., calls for probe Latest Donald Trump approval ratings: new poll finds good news for president Read the original article on MassLive.
Buzz Feed
20 minutes ago
- Buzz Feed
5 Ways Republicans Are Defending Kicking People Off Medicaid
WASHINGTON — In their zeal to deliver a big win to President Donald Trump by passing his sweeping tax and spending bill, Republicans have been coming up with ridiculous ways to defend their plan to strip health care from an estimated 11 million low-income people. Experts don't matter. Prove you are worthy of health care. We're all going to die anyway. Somehow, these are actual arguments GOP lawmakers and officials have been making as they try to gloss over the pain their bill would impose on poor people and families while handing big tax breaks to mostly rich people. Here are five of the most absurd ways Republicans have tried to defend their so-called Big Beautiful Bill, which guts federal health and food assistance programs by nearly $1.3 trillion. We're all going to die anyway. It was her first town hall of the year, held at 7:30 in the morning at a rural area two hours away from Des Moines — possibly to keep national attention off the senator as much as possible. Yet Republican Sen. Joni Erst of Iowa last week still managed to step in it with a flippant remark to a woman concerned about Republican plans to cut Medicaid. 'People will die!' the woman shouted at the senator. 'Well, we all are going to die,' Ernst responded with a smirk. 'For heaven's sakes, folks.' The glib comment quickly went viral on social media and Democrats pounced on her words, featuring them on signs at press conferences around the U.S. Capitol this week as they blasted the GOP tax and spending bill. It even spurred Democratic state Rep. JD Scholten to announce his entry into the race to unseat Ernst, who faces reelection next year, and election handicappers to shift the race slightly toward Democrats. Ernst later doubled down by filming a sarcastic apology video from a cemetery. 'I'm very compassionate,' she told a swarm of reporters this week. Losing health care coverage is actually healthy. From the minute Republicans started drafting the legislation this year, they knew two things: They would limit eligibility for the childless adults without disabilities covered under the Affordable Care Act's Medicaid expansion, saving hundreds of billions of dollars, and they would deny that the significant loss of coverage resulting from 'work requirements' — which would mostly kick people who have jobs off Medicaid by imposing new paperwork burdens on them — counted as a cut. In fact, as House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) explained in February, losing health care coverage would spur people to improve themselves, and they'd be better off for it. 'Work is good for you. You find dignity in work. And the people that are not doing that, we're going to try to get their attention,' Johnson said. 'So everyone needs to take a deep sigh of relief and understand that we're not going to harm any Americans with this. What we're doing is the right thing by the people.' The Congressional Budget Office said this week the proposed work requirements — better understood as a limit on benefits for people who don't prove to their state government they've participated in 80 hours per month of qualifying 'community engagement' activities — would reduce Medicaid enrollment by 5.2 million and save $344 billion over a decade. Ultimately, 4.8 million fewer people would have insurance in 2034. This week, Johnson's office pointed to a new analysis by the conservative American Enterprise Institute finding that unemployed Medicaid recipients who would be affected by the law typically spend 4.2 hours per day watching TV and playing video games, compared with 2.7 hours per day of TV and video games for Medicaid recipients with jobs. For Republicans, unemployed gamers are about as deserving of government assistance as undocumented immigrants, who are also targeted in the legislation. 'The next time a Democrat makes false claims about 'Medicaid cuts,' just remember that what they're really saying is they want illegal aliens and able-bodied adults playing video games at home to continue stealing resources from those who need it,' Johnson's office said in a statement. In a major analysis of work requirements that have been tried in various federal programs, however, the CBO found in 2022 that booting unemployed people off Medicaid didn't boost their employment. The budget office pointed to what happened when the first Trump administration let Arkansas implement a Medicaid work requirement in 2018. 'There, many of the targeted adults lost their health insurance as a result of the work requirement,' the CBO said. 'Employment did not appear to increase, although the evidence is scant. Research indicates that many participants were unaware of the work requirement or found it too onerous to demonstrate compliance.' Rep. Brett Guthrie (R-Ky.), lead author of the Republicans' Medicaid proposal, has said lawmakers learned from the Arkansas example and that the compliance paperwork in this case would be less onerous. Don't believe the experts. GOP lawmakers have sought to undermine the Congressional Budget Office, a nonpartisan federal agency that analyzes the fiscal effects of legislation, after it estimated that the massive tax cut package will add $2.4 trillion to the debt over the next 10 years and eliminate health insurance for nearly 11 million people. Republicans have argued that these tax cuts will spur economic growth and eventually pay for themselves, something that studies have shown did not happen after they made similar arguments about their 2017 tax cut bill. They also have a very vocal critic to contend with in billionaire Elon Musk, their one-time ally who has savaged the bill as an 'abomination' for how it will balloon the deficit. Appearing Thursday on CNN, Sen. Tim Scott (R-S.C.) also dismissed the CBO's projections about the nearly 11 million people who stand to lose their health care coverage. 'Can you say for certain no one will lose their health insurance?' CNN anchor Pamela Brown asked Scott. 'You just can't look at those numbers at face value and say they're going to happen,' Scott responded. People will find jobs eventually. Republicans who are willing to at least acknowledge that cutting Medicaid will lead to people losing health insurance argue that they will instead be able to find a job and receive employer-sponsored health care. 'People are screaming and saying, 'Hey, it's kicking people off Medicaid.' It's not kicking people off Medicaid,' Sen. James Lankford (R-Okla.) said in an interview with CNBC. 'It's transitioning from Medicaid to employer-provided health care. So, yes, we've got 10 million people that are not gonna be on Medicaid, but they then are gonna be on employer-provided health care.' That's an extremely optimistic prediction, especially since the GOP bill doesn't explicitly create any jobs itself. Even if those people who lose their Medicaid coverage are able to find a job at some point, not every employer offers health care, particularly for part-time roles. 'Few of those disenrolled from Medicaid because of the policy would have access to and enroll in employment-based coverage and none would be eligible for the premium tax credit,' CBO Director Phillip Swagel said in a letter to members of Congress on Wednesday. Prove you deserve care. Dr. Mehmet Oz, the former TV personality now running the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, said people should have to 'prove that you matter' to get Medicaid coverage. During a Wednesday interview on Fox Business, Oz defended the bill's harsh, new work requirements for Medicaid. The bill requires states to deny coverage to people age 19 to 64 applying for Medicaid if they're not already working at least 80 hours a month. It also requires states to kick people off Medicaid if they can't prove they're meeting the work requirements. The Congressional Budget Office estimates these work requirements alone will result in 5.2 million people losing their health coverage. 'We're asking that able-bodied individuals who are able to go back to work at least try to get a job or volunteer or take care of a loved one who needs help or go back into school,' Oz said. 'Do something that shows you have agency over your future.' If people aren't doing those things, he said, they'll have to get a job and get health insurance there because they shouldn't be covered by Medicaid anymore. 'Go out there. Do entry-level jobs. Get into the workforce. Prove that you matter,' Oz said. 'Get agency into your own life.' In fact, under the GOP bill, most people are projected to lose Medicaid coverage due to red tape, with states not automatically exempting certain people from work requirements who should be exempted. At least 2 in 3 enrollees would be kicked off Medicaid despite working or qualifying for an exemption, like having a disability or going to school, per the nonpartisan Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.
