Why Utah's governor says America needs a ‘religious revival'
'We do need, I believe, a religious revival,' Cox told the Deseret News.
Cox spoke Thursday at the annual luncheon of the Utah Foundation, a nonpartisan think tank.
The subject of his remarks was social capital, an academic term used to describe the connections that create high-trust communities.
Multiple surveys have identified Utah as having the highest level of social capital in the nation because of its No. 1 ranking on measures of family unity, charitable giving and neighborhood friendships.
But there is one factor that underlies Utah's social capital, and its status as the best state overall, the best place to start a business and the best environment for upward mobility, according to Cox.
'The truth is, we're the most religious state in the country, and that absolutely matters,' Cox said.
Religiosity is not the only way for a state to have strong social capital, Cox said.
Individuals can also build community by forming sports clubs, social groups and volunteer organizations.
But, the governor said, recent research and U.S. history tend to point in one direction.
'Religion is a shortcut to making it easier,' Cox said.
As the keynote speaker at Utah Foundation's annual luncheon, Cox said that religious organizations can unite people across different backgrounds in a time of increasing loneliness and polarization.
Churches force people to meet others they otherwise would not associate with and they create an environment of social norms that can hold people accountable, Cox told the room of business leaders, policymakers and philanthropists gathered in Salt Lake City.
'Every Sunday, I get to sit down with like 30 dudes in a room where we talk about how messed up and screwed up our families are and how many problems we have,' Cox joked. 'Where else do you get an opportunity to do that?'
As these kinds of gatherings disappear, they are often replaced by political identities that are more tribal and divisive, Cox said.
'How do we prevent that from happening? We have to build institutions,' Cox said. 'We have to use our social capital. We have to be rooted in our place.'
In his conclusion, Cox encouraged attendees to continue contributing to help 'the least of us, those who are struggling.'
It is in family, neighborhoods, schools and congregations where individuals — and society — find fulfillment, Cox said, not in 'self-centered pursuits, in pursuits of money and stuff.'
'And we need more of those connections,' Cox said.
The Utah Foundation event served to celebrate the organization's 80th anniversary and to preview its upcoming 2025 Utah Social Capital Project.
The unfinished report found that Utah tops the nation in the strength of its middle class and low levels of fraud, corruption and violent crime, Utah Foundation President Shawn Teigen said.
Utah is by far the most religious state in the country on multiple metrics.
More than three-quarters, 76%, of Utahns identify as adherents of a religion — more than any other state, according to a 2024 analysis by the University of Utah's Kem C. Gardner Policy Institute.
This is 12 percentage points higher than the next highest state of Alabama, the analysis found.
Utah also has the highest rate of weekly church attendance in the country.
A comparison made by data scientist Ryan Burge determined that 41% of Utahns attend church weekly, compared to the average of 25% across the U.S. and 14% in Europe.
A separate Deseret News/Hinckley Institute poll put Utah's attendance rate slightly higher, at 43%, with 58% of respondents saying they attend religious services at least once a month.
Recent decades have tracked a precipitous decline in religious affiliation and attendance in the U.S.
Between 1991 and 2020, the number of religiously unaffiliated Americans went from about 5% to nearly 30%, making this group the largest and the fastest-growing religious demographic in the country.
In 2021, U.S. church membership fell below 50% for the first time in recorded history, down from 70% in 1999.
Over that same time, church attendance fell from 42% to 30%, according to a Gallup survey.
But Utah — while having a slightly larger share of religious 'nones' compared to the national average — seems to be experiencing the opposite trend.
Utah is one of the few areas in the country where the number of religious congregations has actually gone up in recent years: increasing from 5,557 in 2010 to 6,018 in 2020.
The state's dominant faith organization, The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, has the highest rate of church attendance among religious groups in the U.S.
Two-thirds, 67%, of Latter-day Saints attend church weekly or nearly weekly, compared to 44% of Protestants, 38% of Muslims, 33% of Catholics and 22% of Jews, according to a 2024 Gallup survey.
The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints also has one of the highest percentages of younger people among its congregants.
The share of adults between ages 18 and 29 makes up 25% of the church's members, compared to 14% of evangelical Protestants and Catholics, as the Deseret News previously reported.
A Deseret News/Hinckley Institute survey conducted in 2024 found that a slight majority, 51%, of Utahns identify as Latter-day Saints.
A recent analysis of three different surveys found that the rise of the 'nones' — those not affiliated with any organization — appears to have plateaued at around 35% of the population.
'I'm grateful to see that those numbers are starting to turn, that people are looking for something more,' Cox said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
39 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Supreme Court formally asked to overturn landmark same-sex marriage ruling
Ten years after the Supreme Court extended marriage rights to same-sex couples nationwide, the justices this fall will consider for the first time whether to take up a case that explicitly asks them to overturn that decision. Kim Davis, the former Kentucky county clerk who was jailed for six days in 2015 after refusing to issue marriage licenses to a gay couple on religious grounds, is appealing a $100,000 jury verdict for emotional damages plus $260,000 for attorneys fees. In a petition for writ of certiorari filed last month, Davis argues First Amendment protection for free exercise of religion immunizes her from personal liability for the denial of marriage licenses. More fundamentally, she claims the high court's decision in Obergefell v Hodges -- extending marriage rights for same-sex couples under the 14th Amendment's due process protections -- was "egregiously wrong." "The mistake must be corrected," wrote Davis' attorney Mathew Staver in the petition. He calls Justice Anthony Kennedy's majority opinion in Obergefell "legal fiction." The petition appears to mark the first time since 2015 that the court has been formally asked to overturn the landmark marriage decision. Davis is seen as one of the only Americans currently with legal standing to bring a challenge to the precedent. "If there ever was a case of exceptional importance," Staver wrote, "the first individual in the Republic's history who was jailed for following her religious convictions regarding the historic definition of marriage, this should be it." Lower courts have dismissed Davis' claims and most legal experts consider her bid a long shot. A federal appeals court panel concluded earlier this year that the former clerk "cannot raise the First Amendment as a defense because she is being held liable for state action, which the First Amendment does not protect." Davis, as the Rowan County Clerk in 2015, was the sole authority tasked with issuing marriage licenses on behalf of the government under state law. "Not a single judge on the U.S. Court of Appeals showed any interest in Davis's rehearing petition, and we are confident the Supreme Court will likewise agree that Davis's arguments do not merit further attention," said William Powell, attorney for David Ermold and David Moore, the now-married Kentucky couple that sued Davis for damages, in a statement to ABC News. A renewed campaign to reverse legal precedent Davis' appeal to the Supreme Court comes as conservative opponents of marriage rights for same-sex couples pursue a renewed campaign to reverse legal precedent and allow each state to set its own policy. At the time Obergefell was decided in 2015, 35 states had statutory or constitutional bans on same-sex marriages, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures. Only eight states had enacted laws explicitly allowing the unions. So far in 2025, at least nine states have either introduced legislation aimed at blocking new marriage licenses for LGBTQ people or passed resolutions urging the Supreme Court to reverse Obergefell at the earliest opportunity, according to the advocacy group Lambda Legal. In June, the Southern Baptist Convention -- the nation's largest Protestant Christian denomination -- overwhelmingly voted to make "overturning of laws and court rulings, including Obergefell v. Hodges, that defy God's design for marriage and family" a top priority. Support for equal marriage rights softening While a strong majority of Americans favor equal marriage rights, support appears to have softened in recent years, according to Gallup -- 60% of Americans supported same-sex marriages in 2015, rising to 70% support in 2025, but that level has plateaued since 2020. Among Republicans, support has notably dipped over the past decade, down from 55% in 2021 to 41% this year, Gallup found. Davis' petition argues the issue of marriage should be treated the same way the court handled the issue of abortion in its 2022 decision to overturn Roe v Wade. She zeroes in on Justice Clarence Thomas' concurrence in that case, in which he explicitly called for revisiting Obergefell. The justices "should reconsider all of this Court's substantive due process precedents, including Griswold, Lawrence, and Obergefell," Thomas wrote at the time, referring to the landmark decisions dealing with a fundamental right to privacy, due process and equal protection rights. "It is hard to say where things will go, but this will be a long slog considering how popular same-sex marriage is now," said Josh Blackman, a prominent conservative constitutional scholar and professor at South Texas College of Law. Blackman predicts many members of the Supreme Court's conservative majority would want prospective challenges to Obergefell to percolate in lower courts before revisiting the debate. The court is expected to formally consider Davis' petition this fall during a private conference when the justices discuss which cases to add to their docket. If the case is accepted, it would likely be scheduled for oral argument next spring and decided by the end of June 2026. The court could also decline the case, allowing a lower court ruling to stand and avoid entirely the request to revisit Obergefell. "Justices Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett seem wildly uninterested. Maybe Justice Neil Gorsuch, too," said Sarah Isgur, an ABC News legal analyst and host of the legal podcast Advisory Opinions. "There is no world in which the court takes the case as a straight gay marriage case," Isgur added. "It would have to come up as a lower court holding that Obergefell binds judges to accept some other kind of non-traditional marital arrangement." MORE: 20 years of marriage rights for same-sex couples. Research disputes apocalyptic fears Ruling wouldn't invalidate existing marriages If the ruling were to be overturned at some point in the future, it would not invalidate marriages already performed, legal experts have pointed out. The 2022 Respect for Marriage Act requires the federal government and all states to recognize legal marriages of same-sex and interracial couples performed in any state -- even if there is a future change in the law. Davis first appealed the Supreme Court in 2019 seeking to have the damages suit against her tossed out, but her petition was rejected. Conservative Justices Thomas and Samuel Alito concurred with the decision at the time. "This petition implicates important questions about the scope of our decision in Obergefell, but it does not cleanly present them," Thomas wrote in a statement. Many LGBTQ advocates say they are apprehensive about the shifting legal and political landscape around marriage rights. There are an estimated 823,000 married same-sex couples in the U.S., including 591,000 that wed after the Supreme Court decision in June 2015, according to the Williams Institute at UCLA Law School. Nearly one in five of those married couples is parenting a child under 18. Since the Obergefell decision, the makeup of the Supreme Court has shifted rightward, now including three appointees of President Donald Trump and a 6-justice conservative supermajority. Chief Justice John Roberts, among the current members of the court who dissented in Obergefell a decade ago, sharply criticized the ruling at the time as "an act of will, not legal judgment" with "no basis in the Constitution." He also warned then that it "creates serious questions about religious liberty." Davis invoked Roberts' words in her petition to the high court, hopeful that at least four justices will vote to accept her case and hear arguments next year. Solve the daily Crossword
Newsweek
an hour ago
- Newsweek
New Social Security Garnishments Will Likely Start Soon: What To Know
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. New Social Security garnishments are set to kick in soon, and they could cause 15 percent of payments to be withheld for retired workers and Americans with disabilities. The garnishment will apply to roughly 452,000 beneficiaries who are in default on their student loans. Why It Matters Americans hold roughly $1.75 trillion in student loan debt, with some of that carried by seniors and disabled workers who are in default on their loans. The Trump administration has marked a departure from then-President Joe Biden's student loan forgiveness-friendly policies, and the shift has meant many student loan borrowers see higher payments and lose access to income-driven repayment plans like SAVE. Similarly, a percentage of Social Security payments will soon be withheld for those in default. Roughly 22 million Americans were lifted out of poverty due to their Social Security benefits in 2023, according to the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. A Social Security Administration (SSA) office in Washington, D.C., on March 26, 2025. A Social Security Administration (SSA) office in Washington, D.C., on March 26, 2025. SAUL LOEB/AFP via Getty Images What To Know The Department of Education (DOE) issued a pause in the restart of garnishments for these borrowers in early June, but the pause is expected to end soon. "If you receive monthly federal benefit payments, such as Social Security benefit payments, and Railroad and Office of Personnel Management retirement benefits you may have received a letter from the Department of Treasury that listed a date when offsets to your payments was scheduled to begin. Please be aware that the Department of Education is delaying offsets of these monthly benefits for a couple of months and plans to resume sometime this summer," the DOE said. It's not yet clear when the 15 percent garnishment rate will apply despite the DOE saying it would kick start "sometime this summer." "These are mostly Parent PLUS loans from decades ago. Think about 70 year olds who co-signed for their kids' education in the 1990s and got buried by compound interest," Michael Ryan, a finance expert and the founder of told Newsweek. "It's a family wealth transfer in reverse. Instead of leaving something behind, these seniors are having their final safety net shredded for loans they probably forgot they even had." On July 24, Social Security garnishments were around 1 million beneficiaries who had been overpaid started, meaning 50 percent of Social Security income would be withheld until the overpayment was cleared out. During Biden's time in office, that overpayment recovery rate was just 10 percent. A significant number of federal student loan borrowers are seniors today, according to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, which found borrowers aged 62 and older jumped by 59 percent, from 1.7 million to 2.7 million between 2017 and 2023. What People Are Saying Michael Ryan, a finance expert and the founder of told Newsweek: "My advice to families with elderly parents: Check their credit reports now. If there's federal student debt lurking, you've got maybe 30 days to figure out consolidation options before the garnishments hit." Kevin Thompson, the CEO of 9i Capital Group and the host of the 9innings podcast, told Newsweek: "These garnishments target individuals in default on their student loans who are currently receiving Social Security benefits. The exact timeline for the nearly 452,000 delinquent borrowers hasn't been set, but one thing is certain — the current administration intends to collect." Alex Beene, a financial literacy instructor for the University of Tennessee at Martin, told Newsweek: "Much in the same way that a few million borrowers who are in delinquency over student debt and could face their paychecks being garnished, those receiving Social Security benefits could find themselves in the same situation if they haven't been making payments." What Happens Next For those relying solely on Social Security, the garnishment hit could be significant, especially if most of your benefits are already taxable. "Quick napkin math: If you're in the 22 percent bracket and have a 15 percent garnishment for delinquency, you're effectively losing about 26 percent of your benefits to taxes and repayments," Thompson said. "That's a painful bite for anyone on a fixed income, particularly with inflation continuing to erode real buying power."
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Don't let the sun go down on Mass: Markey slams Trump over solar funding
Good Monday morning, all. You can count U.S. Sen. Ed Markey, D-Mass., among the chorus of Bay State pols who are less than thrilled over the Trump administration's decision to cancel a $7 billion grant program for solar energy. The Malden lawmaker, who sits on the Senate's Environment and Public Works Committee, slammed the Republican White House over what he called its 'unlawful' decision to stick a fork in the Solar for All Program. Sixty states, including Massachusetts, which was in line for $156 million, were impacted. 'Instead of Solar for All, [President Donald] Trump and [U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Lee] Zeldin want higher costs for all,' Markey said in a statement. 'This latest heist from the Trump administration will cause energy costs to rise, keep Americans beholden to monopolistic electric utilities, and make our grid overburdened and less reliable,' Markey continued. 'Trump and Zeldin's attacks on the Solar for All program and their attempts to cancel legally binding contracts will mean energy bills are going to continue to spike nationwide. Massachusetts Gov. Maura Healey also weighed in on the matter last week, urging the administration not to cancel the program. The plea fell on deaf ears. 'Solar is the fastest and cheapest way to bring affordable energy into Massachusetts,' Healey said in a statement 'Affordability isn't controversial – that's why states like Texas and Florida are building so much solar. And that's why my administration has been working hard to deliver more affordable solar to our residents and businesses through new incentives and programs like Solar for All," the Democratic governor continued. Zeldin announced on social media last week that the administration was ending the program because the passage of the budget reconciliation bill in July eliminated its authority to run the program. 'The bottom line is this: EPA no longer has the statutory authority to administer the program or the appropriated funds to keep this boondoggle alive,' Zeldin wrote. The program, passed under the former Biden administration as part of the Inflation Reduction Act, would have provided zero-interest loans, solar panels at public housing and funded workforce training, all with a focus on historically underserved communities. It was set to begin in a few weeks in Massachusetts. Healey's office said the funding was set to create 3,000 jobs and provide energy-bill-lowering solar for more than 29,000 households in the state. Healey's office said the program would boost the state's solar capacity by 125 megawatts and touted the effect solar generation already has on the state. U.S. Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., also weighed in, arguing in a statement that 'canceling [the program] would be reckless and further proof that the Trump administration doesn't care about lowering costs.' On April 20, solar arrays supplied 55% of electricity across the grid in New England, Healey's office said. It said local solar relieves stress on the grid's transmission and distribution infrastructure, The Republican, of Springfield, reported. For Markey, that's a lose-lose-lose for consumers, the environment, and the economy. 'American households are already facing skyrocketing energy costs and are begging for relief, not political retribution. Solar for All was set to cut participating households' average energy bills by $400 a year, with more than $8 billion in savings overall across all fifty states,' he said. 'This program should have been a win for the Administration— cutting it means stealing $4.6 billion away from states with Republican governors or senators," he continued. 'A heist of that magnitude simply makes no political or practical sense, especially when energy bills are going up and our grid is desperate for more generation, not more gridlock.' Kraft says Wu's plans for Mass and Cass are ineffective Democratic Boston mayoral hopeful Josh Kraft has backed a Boston City Council member's call to declare a public emergency at the open-air drug market at the intersection of Massachusetts Avenue and Melnea Cass Boulevard in the city's South End. Kraft challenged incumbent Mayor Michelle Wu, also a Democrat, to explain how her office plans to tackle a public health and public safety crisis that remains an ongoing challenge after years of what he described as 'inertia' on the issue. 'Boston can no longer afford a passive response to the humanitarian crisis and public safety emergency unfolding on a daily basis,' around the area widely referred to as Mass and Cass, Kraft said in a statement. Wu, he argued, has 'offered no coherent leadership. My plan puts public order, recovery, and real housing service solutions first.' In a statement, Wu's campaign fired back, accusing Kraft of 'recycling' old ideas, The Boston Herald reported. 'Once again, Josh Kraft is willfully ignoring important work to enforce the law and address quality of life issues and root causes at Mass and Cass,' the Wu campaign said. 'Under Mayor Wu's leadership, Boston has built up pathways to recovery and permanent housing that never existed before and ended permanent encampments citywide. Hundreds of people who had been living on the streets are in treatment and housing, and fatal overdoses have dropped.' Boston City Councilor Ed Flynn, a frequent Wu critic, issued the call for the emergency declaration earlier this month, arguing that the city's approach to the area, however well-intentioned, had failed. 'Any reasonable person who visits the area will say unequivocally that what has taken place there on a daily basis for over a decade now — an open air drug market and dealing, public drug use, the trafficking of women, acts of serious violence, public defecation and urination, among others — is completely unacceptable,' Flynn wrote in a resolution supporting the declaration. Flynn said the challenges posed by the intersection have spilled into surrounding neighborhoods. 'South End and Roxbury are historic neighborhoods that are culturally diverse and host many families, seniors, and public housing residents who have lived in the area for many decades,' Flynn wrote. 'We must provide a safe and healthy environment, clean squares and parks, and a good quality of life for our residents by arresting and prosecuting those who are openly committing illegal crimes. It is critical that the Boston Police deploy more resources in addressing these complex public safety challenges.' Flynn's resolution was on last week's Boston City Council agenda. Both Wu and Kraft have acknowledged the tremendous difficulty of addressing the nationwide opioid epidemic and growing homelessness crisis at the local level. The two campaigns also have advanced their own plans for dealing with the area, MassLive previously reported. Wu's plan calls for using 'all levers' of city government, in partnership with the state and nonprofits, 'to end congregate substance use in Boston and the criminal activity that supports it,' she wrote to South End residents in a letter in June. Under Kraft's plan, police would increase enforcement of public drug consumption, trespassing, tent camping, and other quality-of-life crimes. Prosecutions would be handled in specialty courts (something that's out of the mayor's hands), aiming to drive people into recovery programs rather than prison. Kraft would also revive the Community Syringe Redemption Program, a needle collection program supported by pandemic relief money that encouraged people to return used needles for a monetary refund. The city's preliminary election is Sept. 9. Pressley calls for hearing for Epstein survivors U.S. Rep. Ayanna Pressley, D-7th District, joined by 15 of her Democratic colleagues, has called on the U.S. House Oversight Committee to hold a public hearing to 'prioritize' the voices of people abused by Jeffrey Epstein. 'If we are to hold powerful people to account, our investigation must center the voices they tried to silence. To ensure that our investigation is comprehensive and credible, we urge the Committee to allow survivors the opportunity to provide their testimony if they wish to do so,' Pressley, who sits on the panel, wrote to its chairperson, U.S. Rep. James Comer, R-Ky. The letter was first reported by The 19th. Pressley, of Boston, has made no secret of her own experience as an abuse survivor and has emerged as a vocal supporter of fellow survivors. 'I know the pain and trauma that survivors carry. Those that have been victimized by Epstein and his co-conspirators, they deserve this transparency, this accountability, this healing, and I think they've not been centered enough,' Pressley told The 19th. 'People have gotten distracted and derailed with what they perceive as the political gamemanship of this and people doing what my Republican colleagues do so often, which is playing games with people's lives.' They Said It 'It's more illegal insanity from Trump.' — Massachusetts Secretary of State William L. Galvin has some thoughts on Trump's call last week for a new Census that would not count people living in the country illegally. Galvin's office administers the Census, and he is the state's chief elections officer. (h/t Axios Boston) Read more MassLive politics coverage The Voting Rights Act is 60. It's on 'life support,' Northeastern expert says. What happens next? Mass. Gov. Healey signs 'landmark' shield law update to protect people seeking reproductive care 'Severely lacking': Trump admin has backlog of 27K student loan complaints Mass. Auditor DiZoglio lawyers up, calls Legislature an 'authoritarian regime' First-time Worcester candidate has raised nearly 50% more than any competitors Springfield city councilor files lawsuit against former colleagues, alleging 'calculated attack' Housing advocates propose ballot question to bring rent control back to Mass. What Goes On A contingent of state lawmakers, agency officials and advocates is headed to Maine on Tuesday to talk to farmers and others who have been affected by so-called 'forever chemicals,' or per- and polyfluoroalkyl chemicals often referred to as PFAS chemicals. The trip is part of an effort by state Sen. Joanne M. Comerford, D-Hampshire, Franklin and Worcester, and state Rep. James Arena-DeRosa, D-8th Middlesex, to advance respective Senate and House bills aimed at tackling the environmental and public health challenge. The Bay State contingent is set to visit a PFAS-impacted farm in Arundel and then head to the state capitol in Augusta for further discussions. The trip will 'offer an opportunity to learn from Maine's nation-leading work on this issue,' Comerford's office said in a statement, noting that 'Maine was the first state in the country to investigate the impacts of sewage sludge applications on farmland.' Turned up to 11 Indie poppers Fritz and the Tantrums play the House of Blues in Boston on Aug. 18 (tickets and more info here). The band's new record, 'Man on the Moon‚' has just dropped. And from that LP, here's 'Withdrawals.' Your Monday long read The Atlantic's Anne Appelbaum takes you inside what she describes as 'the most nihilistic conflict on Earth:' the brutal and seemingly endless civil war that's consumed Sudan. Its lesson: 'This is what replaces the liberal order — anarchy and greed." Here's the germane bit: 'Statistics are sometimes used to express the scale of the destruction in Sudan. About 14 million people have been displaced by years of fighting, more than in Ukraine and Gaza combined. Some 4 million of them have fled across borders, many to arid, impoverished places — Chad, Ethiopia, South Sudan — where there are few resources to support them." 'At least 150,000 people have died in the conflict, but that's likely a significant undercounting. Half the population, nearly 25 million people, is expected to go hungry this year." Hundreds of thousands of people are directly threatened with starvation. More than 17 million children, out of 19 million, are not in school. A cholera epidemic rages. Malaria is endemic." 'But no statistics can express the sense of pointlessness, of meaninglessness, that the war has left behind alongside the physical destruction.' That's it for today. As always, tips, comments and questions can be sent to jmicek@ Have a good week, friends. Read more analysis from John L. Micek Boston's Big Wonk Summer: Thousands of lawmakers arrive for annual conference | Bay State Briefing Market Basket drama — Deli, devotion & doughnuts: Why we care so much | John L. Micek Mass. student turns terrifying choking incident into legislative action | Bay State Briefing Read the original article on MassLive. Solve the daily Crossword
