logo
Why Utah's governor says America needs a ‘religious revival'

Why Utah's governor says America needs a ‘religious revival'

Yahoo02-05-2025
Utah Gov. Spencer Cox said Americans must look beyond politics for the solution to the country's problems.
'We do need, I believe, a religious revival,' Cox told the Deseret News.
Cox spoke Thursday at the annual luncheon of the Utah Foundation, a nonpartisan think tank.
The subject of his remarks was social capital, an academic term used to describe the connections that create high-trust communities.
Multiple surveys have identified Utah as having the highest level of social capital in the nation because of its No. 1 ranking on measures of family unity, charitable giving and neighborhood friendships.
But there is one factor that underlies Utah's social capital, and its status as the best state overall, the best place to start a business and the best environment for upward mobility, according to Cox.
'The truth is, we're the most religious state in the country, and that absolutely matters,' Cox said.
Religiosity is not the only way for a state to have strong social capital, Cox said.
Individuals can also build community by forming sports clubs, social groups and volunteer organizations.
But, the governor said, recent research and U.S. history tend to point in one direction.
'Religion is a shortcut to making it easier,' Cox said.
As the keynote speaker at Utah Foundation's annual luncheon, Cox said that religious organizations can unite people across different backgrounds in a time of increasing loneliness and polarization.
Churches force people to meet others they otherwise would not associate with and they create an environment of social norms that can hold people accountable, Cox told the room of business leaders, policymakers and philanthropists gathered in Salt Lake City.
'Every Sunday, I get to sit down with like 30 dudes in a room where we talk about how messed up and screwed up our families are and how many problems we have,' Cox joked. 'Where else do you get an opportunity to do that?'
As these kinds of gatherings disappear, they are often replaced by political identities that are more tribal and divisive, Cox said.
'How do we prevent that from happening? We have to build institutions,' Cox said. 'We have to use our social capital. We have to be rooted in our place.'
In his conclusion, Cox encouraged attendees to continue contributing to help 'the least of us, those who are struggling.'
It is in family, neighborhoods, schools and congregations where individuals — and society — find fulfillment, Cox said, not in 'self-centered pursuits, in pursuits of money and stuff.'
'And we need more of those connections,' Cox said.
The Utah Foundation event served to celebrate the organization's 80th anniversary and to preview its upcoming 2025 Utah Social Capital Project.
The unfinished report found that Utah tops the nation in the strength of its middle class and low levels of fraud, corruption and violent crime, Utah Foundation President Shawn Teigen said.
Utah is by far the most religious state in the country on multiple metrics.
More than three-quarters, 76%, of Utahns identify as adherents of a religion — more than any other state, according to a 2024 analysis by the University of Utah's Kem C. Gardner Policy Institute.
This is 12 percentage points higher than the next highest state of Alabama, the analysis found.
Utah also has the highest rate of weekly church attendance in the country.
A comparison made by data scientist Ryan Burge determined that 41% of Utahns attend church weekly, compared to the average of 25% across the U.S. and 14% in Europe.
A separate Deseret News/Hinckley Institute poll put Utah's attendance rate slightly higher, at 43%, with 58% of respondents saying they attend religious services at least once a month.
Recent decades have tracked a precipitous decline in religious affiliation and attendance in the U.S.
Between 1991 and 2020, the number of religiously unaffiliated Americans went from about 5% to nearly 30%, making this group the largest and the fastest-growing religious demographic in the country.
In 2021, U.S. church membership fell below 50% for the first time in recorded history, down from 70% in 1999.
Over that same time, church attendance fell from 42% to 30%, according to a Gallup survey.
But Utah — while having a slightly larger share of religious 'nones' compared to the national average — seems to be experiencing the opposite trend.
Utah is one of the few areas in the country where the number of religious congregations has actually gone up in recent years: increasing from 5,557 in 2010 to 6,018 in 2020.
The state's dominant faith organization, The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, has the highest rate of church attendance among religious groups in the U.S.
Two-thirds, 67%, of Latter-day Saints attend church weekly or nearly weekly, compared to 44% of Protestants, 38% of Muslims, 33% of Catholics and 22% of Jews, according to a 2024 Gallup survey.
The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints also has one of the highest percentages of younger people among its congregants.
The share of adults between ages 18 and 29 makes up 25% of the church's members, compared to 14% of evangelical Protestants and Catholics, as the Deseret News previously reported.
A Deseret News/Hinckley Institute survey conducted in 2024 found that a slight majority, 51%, of Utahns identify as Latter-day Saints.
A recent analysis of three different surveys found that the rise of the 'nones' — those not affiliated with any organization — appears to have plateaued at around 35% of the population.
'I'm grateful to see that those numbers are starting to turn, that people are looking for something more,' Cox said.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Tariff ‘Mission Accomplished' hype is just that
Tariff ‘Mission Accomplished' hype is just that

Los Angeles Times

time17 minutes ago

  • Los Angeles Times

Tariff ‘Mission Accomplished' hype is just that

On May 1, 2003, George W. Bush announced, 'Major combat operations in Iraq have ended.' He was standing below a giant banner that read, 'Mission Accomplished.' At the risk of inviting charges of understatement, subsequent events didn't cooperate. But it took a while for that to be widely accepted. We're in a similar place when it comes to President Trump's experiment with a new global trading order. 'Tariffs are making our country Strong and Rich!!!' proclaims Trump, making him not only the first Republican president in living memory to brag about raising taxes on Americans, but also the first to insist that raising taxes on Americans makes us richer. MAGA's mission-accomplished groupthink relies primarily on three arguments. The first is that Trump has successfully concluded a slew of beneficial trade deals. The truth is that some of those deals are simply 'frameworks' that will take a long time to be ironed out. But Trump got the headlines he wanted. The second argument is a kind of populism-infused sleight of hand. The 'experts' — their scare quotes, not mine — are wrong once again. The White House social media account crows, 'In April, 'experts' called tariffs 'the biggest policy mistake in 95 years.' By July, they generated OVER $100 BILLION in revenue. Facts expose the haters: tariffs WORK. Trust in Trump.' But the high-fivers are leaving things out. The most-dire predictions of economic catastrophe were based on the scheme Trump announced on April 2, a.k.a. 'Liberation Day.' Trump quickly backed off that plan ('chickened out' in Wall Street parlance) in response to a bond and stock market implosion. Saying the experts were wrong under those circumstances is like saying experts opposed to defenestration were wrong when they successfully convinced a man not to jump out a window. The third argument, made by the White House and many others — that tariffs are working because they're raising money — is a response to a claim no one made. To my knowledge, no expert claimed tariffs wouldn't raise money. The estimates of these revenues from Trump world are stratospheric. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick expects somewhere between $700 billion and $1 trillion per year. Last month, the government collected $29 billion. It's likely this number will significantly increase as more tariffs come online and businesses run down the inventory they stockpiled earlier this year in anticipation of more tariffs to come. Normally, Republicans don't exult over massive revenues from tax hikes. But Trump's defenders get around this problem by insisting that money is 'pouring' and 'flowing' into America from someplace else. It's true that tariff revenue is pouring into the Treasury, but that money is coming out of American bank accounts, because American importers pay the tariff. Even Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent cannot deny this when pressed. So yes, tariffs are 'working' the way they're supposed to; the problem is Trump thinks tariffs work differently than they do. It's possible some foreign exporters might lower prices to maintain market share, and some American businesses might absorb the costs — for now — to avoid sticker shock for inflation-beleaguered consumers, but what revenue is generated still comes from Americans. Ultimately it means higher prices paid here, reduced profits for businesses here or reduced U.S. trade overall. Sometimes, when pressed, defenders of the administration will concede the true source of the revenues, but then they say the pain is necessary to force manufacturers and other businesses to build and produce in the United States. It's backdoor industrial policy masquerading as trade policy. That, too, might 'work.' But all of this will take time, no matter what. And, if it works, that will have costs, too. Manufacturing in America is more expensive — that's why we manufacture so much stuff abroad in the first place. If this 'reshoring' happens, our goods will be more expensive, and less money will 'pour in' from tariffs. It's difficult to exaggerate how well-understood all of this was on the American right until very recently. But the need to grab any argument available to declare Trump's experiment a success has a lot of people not only abandoning their previous dogma but leaping to the conclusion that the dogma was wrong all along. Maybe it was, though I don't think so. The evidence so far suggests that problems are looming. The dollar is weakening. Prices continue to rise. The job market is reeling. The stock market (an unreliable metric, according to MAGA, when it plummeted after Liberation Day) is holding on, thanks to tech stocks. The truth is we won't have real evidence for a while. It's worth remembering that Americans don't live by headlines and press releases and they don't live in the macro economy either. Declaring 'Mission Accomplished' for the macro economy won't convince people they're better off in their own micro-economies when they're not. @JonahDispatch

ICE Detains Restaurant Owner Mom for Over Two Months After 21 Years in US
ICE Detains Restaurant Owner Mom for Over Two Months After 21 Years in US

Newsweek

time18 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

ICE Detains Restaurant Owner Mom for Over Two Months After 21 Years in US

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Kelly Yu, the owner of Kawaii Sushi in Peoria, Arizona, had been detained by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) since May following a routine immigration check-in after entering the United States from China illegally decades ago. Newsweek reached out to ICE and the Department of Homeland Security via email for comment. Why it Matters Yu's detention underscores how federal immigration enforcement could affect long-term residents and small-business owners who had built deep ties in their communities, including families with U.S. citizen children—as Yu has children who were born here. Her case has also galvanized lawmakers and advocates across partisan lines, raising questions about how removal orders issued years earlier could affect people who had lived, paid taxes and employed residents for decades. The Trump administration has dramatically cracked down on illegal immigration and touted its efforts as successful, notably massive decreases in crossings at the U.S.-Mexico border since President Donald Trump came into office. However, some Americans remain ambivalent about policy end goals—including detaining non-violent, non-criminal immigrants and federal agents making arrests in schools and places of employment. Police keep watch as protesters with the group Extinction Rebellion hold a rally and march outside the immigration court at the Jacob K. Javits Federal Building on August 11, 2025, in New York City. Police keep watch as protesters with the group Extinction Rebellion hold a rally and march outside the immigration court at the Jacob K. Javits Federal Building on August 11, 2025, in New York To Know Kelly Yu was detained by ICE on May 28 and has since been held at the Eloy Detention Center in Arizona. Homeland Security Investigations told FOX 10 Phoenix that Yu entered the U.S. from Mexico in 2004 and that a federal immigration judge had issued a removal order in 2005, with subsequent appeals denied and a final appellate denial in 2016. Yu fled China in 2004 as a pregnant 18-year-old seeking asylum out of fear of China's "one child" policy. During her 21 years in the country, she has married a U.S. citizen and is a mother to an American citizen and current collegiate student, Zita, who was born shortly after Yu's U.S. arrival and is a legally protected resident. Yu owns the small business Kawaii Sushi in North Peoria. Newsweek reached out to the restaurant via email for comment. "We didn't do anything wrong," Yu said in a video interview from the detention center in July, according to local NBA affiliate 12 News. "We're not criminals." Her asylum case was denied and a federal immigration judge issued a removal order in 2005. Her appeals were later rejected, including a final denial by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in 2016. Bipartisan Support For Yu Lisa Everett, a self-described lifelong Republican who serves as the chair for GOP Legislative District 29 in Arizona, told Newsweek the following via email on Tuesday: "Recently, I had an experience that reminded me of something our society often forgets: we have far more in common than what divides us." Everett was talking about working alongside Brent Peak, a Democrat activist who heads the grassroots, all-volunteer group Northwest Valley Indivisible in Arizona's 8th Congressional District. The pair has called for Yu's release from detention. "On paper, we should be political opposites," Everett said. "But when we learned about the plight of Kelly both knew this was an issue that transcended party lines. "Kelly is everything we want in an immigrant. She is well loved in her community she gives back to. I am grateful Brent and I came together to help her." Newsweek reached out to Peak and Northwest Valley Indivisible via email for comment. Yu has spent over a decade legally navigating the complex process of becoming a U.S. citizen, Everett added, calling her "respected" and an employer of dozens of workers. She's also given back to the community. Everett said Yu "belongs home with her family in Peoria." The way she and Peak have worked to help free Yu is a lesson that all partisans and politicians can learn from while inhabiting a "polarized" political climate, Everett added. "The truth is, if we start by identifying our shared values, we can build from there," Everett said. "For example, [Peak and I] both agree that if someone is here illegally and commits a violent crime, they should be sent home. That's a starting point for reasonable discussion, not division. "Unfortunately, too many in government are more focused on scoring political points than on serving the people they represent. Somewhere along the way, Washington, state governments, and even local governments, shifted from prioritizing people to prioritizing politics. We need to get back to governing with humanity first." Yu's legal team had filed appeals and community members launched petitions and social media campaigns seeking her release. What People Are Saying ICE, in a post on X on Tuesday: "Business owners: It's time to get right with the law. You know you're not supposed to hire illegal aliens. We're enforcing the law across the board—all businesses in all industries. ICE is not currently visiting businesses that are part of our IMAGE program—we trust that they're compliant." Yu's husband, Aldo, said the following per NBC affiliate 12 News: "Every single day, someone asks us how she's doing or where she is. It's very painful." Brent Peak, co-chair of Northwest Valley Indivisible, to FOX 10 Phoenix: "She has been in the country for 20 years. There's no criminal record. She has a child who was born here and is a citizen. She's built a successful business; she has given back to the community. She is the kind of person we would want in our community." Arizona Senator Mark Kelly, a Democrat, after meeting with Yu and another detained immigrant on August 7: "Donald Trump is going after people like Kelly Yu and Maria Pelaez who are mothers, grandmothers, members of our communities, instead of using ICE resources to go after criminals. Hearing from them and their families about what they are going through was emotional at times, especially when Maria broke down into tears telling me how proud she was when her son became a Marine. "My team and I will keep fighting for Kelly Yu and Maria Pelaez and their families. Arizonans deserve real solutions for our broken border and immigration system, not what I saw today which was ripping families and communities apart." What Happens Next Arizona Senator Ruben Gallego, a Democrat, was expected to meet with Yu on Tuesday at the detention center. Newsweek reached out to his office via email for comment. Senator Mark Kelly visited Yu on August 7, pledging to continue pressing ICE and the Trump administration for answers on detention practices—as well as more transparency at the Eloy Detention Center in Arizona.

After Another Delay, Trump's China Tariffs Look Even Less Like a Legitimate 'Emergency'
After Another Delay, Trump's China Tariffs Look Even Less Like a Legitimate 'Emergency'

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

After Another Delay, Trump's China Tariffs Look Even Less Like a Legitimate 'Emergency'

To place huge new tariffs on imports from China, President Donald Trump claimed that those transactions are "an unusual and extraordinary threat" to the United States. It's a threat that the White House now says it can put off addressing for another 90 days. On Monday, Trump again postponed the enforcement of his threatened 30 percent tariffs on imports from China, which were set to resume on Tuesday after being previously postponed in May. In a new executive order, Trump said the United States "continues to have discussions" with China "to address the lack of trade reciprocity in our economic relationship and our resulting national and economic security concerns." Elsewhere in the same executive order, Trump reiterated the claim that trade with China poses "an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security" of the country. The idea that mutually beneficial trade between people or businesses in different countries is some sort of national security threat is nonsense, of course. But, even if you accept Trump's premise that trade with China is an urgent threat requiring extraordinary executive powers, then how can it be acceptable to wait three more months before applying the president's chosen remedy? This is not just a rhetorical point but a question that's central to the legality of the tariffs. In front of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit last month, the Trump administration's lawyer told skeptical judges that the president's tariff powers rested upon the existence of an "unusual threat" that the president was taking action to "deal with." The latest delay in the China tariffs, then, seems to directly undermine that claim. If Trump wants to use the threat of tariffs to negotiate a new trade deal with China, fine, but then that's not an emergency—and, as a result, those tariffs cannot be implemented with the emergency powers the president is currently claiming. Of course, the delay is good news in the sense that it means three more months will pass before Americans will have to pay those import taxes—though the move does create additional uncertainty for any business that buys goods, parts, or raw materials from China. It also allows more time for the world's two largest economies to reach a deal that will give Trump an off-ramp from this self-destructive trade war. Hopefully he finds one. The words national emergency are not a magic spell that presidents can utter to unlock unlimited legislative powers for themselves. If Trump wants to impose sweeping tariffs on imports from China and the rest of the globe, he should have to go through the proper steps to do so—which means going to Congress and getting those taxes passed into law. Until that happens, every court should reject this "national emergency" as the obvious nonsense that it is. The post After Another Delay, Trump's China Tariffs Look Even Less Like a Legitimate 'Emergency' appeared first on

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store