British man convicted of trying to spy for Russian intelligence service
But 'Dima' and 'Sasha' were in fact undercover British intelligence officers, Winchester Crown Court previously heard.
A jury found Phillips guilty of assisting a foreign intelligence service under the National Security Act on Tuesday, following a two-week trial at the same court.
The jury reached a unanimous verdict after four hours and four minutes of deliberations.
Phillips, wearing a dark suit and tie, silently shook his head in the dock as the verdict was given.
Prosecutors said Phillips intended to assist Russian agents from the end of 2023 until May last year.
Phillips offered to pass on Sir Grant's contact details as well as the location where he kept his private plane in order to 'facilitate the Russians in listening on British defence plans', the trial heard.
He was heard telling the men he wanted to work for Russia in exchange for financial independence from the UK.
The defendant's ex-wife, Amanda Phillips, told the court during the trial that he 'would dream about being like James Bond', and that he watched films to do with MI5 and MI6 as he was 'infatuated with it'.
Mrs Phillips told the court she was aware the defendant had applied for a job at the UK Border Force in October 2023, which prosecutors said was part of his bid to assist Russia's intelligence service.
Phillips previously claimed he had contacted the Russian embassy in early 2024 in a bid to track and expose Russian agents to assist Israel.
He told jurors he ascertained 'from the onset' that 'Dima' and 'Shasha' were 'definitely not Russian' and were undercover individuals, but that he carried on 'playing a role' around these agents in order to 'test the waters'.
Mrs Justice Cheema-Grubb remanded Phillips in custody and adjourned sentencing to the 'earliest available date' in the autumn.
The judge said she wanted a full pre-sentence report on the defendant ahead of sentencing as the conviction was for a 'relatively new' offence.
Addressing the jurors, she said: 'Thank you very much for the important work that you have done on this very important case.
'We are trying, as a system, to get to the right answers in these situations.'
Officers from the Metropolitan Police's Counter Terrorism Command arrested Phillips in central London on May 16 last year, after he travelled to the capital for a meeting with the two apparent Russian agents.
Detective Chief Superintendent Helen Flanagan said: 'Phillips was unemployed and his primary motivation for wanting to become a spy for the Russian Intelligence Service was financial reward.
'His conviction should act as stark warning to anyone who thinks that carrying out illegal activity on behalf of a foreign state is an attractive or easy way to earn money.
'The reality is that we take this kind of activity extremely seriously.
'Those involved will be identified, investigated and, like Phillips, will face extremely serious consequences when they are convicted.
'This case is also another successful use of the National Security Act to prosecute someone who was attempting to undermine the security of the UK and we will continue to use these powers available to us to help keep the public safe.'
Bethan David, head of the Crown Prosecution Service's counter terrorism division, said: 'This conviction sends a clear message to anyone considering spying for or assisting Russia.
'Howard Phillips clearly outlined the services he was willing to provide for a hostile state. From gaining employment within the civil service and applying for security clearance, to providing the personal details of the Secretary of State for Defence – Phillips was brazen in his pursuit for financial gain and unbothered about the potential detriment to his own country.
'It is a criminal offence to assist a foreign intelligence service, regardless of your motive or whether or not you succeed.
'We will always seek to prosecute anyone who poses a threat to the UK.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
26 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Ted Cruz shocks by saying Trump can't actually prosecute Obama over Russia hoax for a simple reason
During a late-night TV appearance Wednesday, Republican Texas Senator Ted Cruz made a shocking revelation that probably wasn't too well-received inside 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue. The junior senator from Texas told Fox News ' Laura Ingraham that former President Barack Obama could most likely not be prosecuted for treason over his handling of the 'Russia hoax.' The duo discussed the latest intel released by Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard about the 2016 presidential election, and the role that former President Barack Obama and his intelligence agencies played at the time. DNI Gabbard told members of the media at the White House Wednesday that the information released by her office has been referred to the Department of Justice and FBI to investigate the criminal implications. DNI Gabbard released a declassified report allegedly implicating Obama and his administration over the 2016 election Russia Hoax. This came the day after President Trump accused former President Obama of treason in an Oval Office exchange with the news media. 'He's not going to be prosecuted for treason,' Ingraham stated 'That's not going to happen.' 'He's not going to be prosecuted, in all likelihood, for treason,' Cruz replied agreeing with the host. Obama issued a statement via his spokesperson Patrick Rodenbush earlier this week that refuted many of the accusations circling around him. Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard responds to a question from the news media during a press conference at the White House in Washington, DC, USA, 23 July 2025. DNI Gabbard has released a declassified report allegedly implicating former President Barack Obama and his administration over the 2016 election Russia Hoax. This comes the day after President Trump accused the former President of treason in an Oval Office exchange with the news media 'The bizarre allegations are ridiculous and a weak attempt at distraction. Nothing in the document issued last week undercuts the widely accepted conclusion that Russia worked to influence the 2016 presidential election but did not successfully manipulate any votes,' Rodenbush noted. 'These findings were affirmed in a 2020 report by the bipartisan Senate Intelligence Committee, led by then-Chairman Marco Rubio' Rodenbush concluded. Regardless, GOP leadership in both the House and Senate are pursuing investigations into members of the Biden and Obama administrations as they fend off clamoring calls for transparency in the Jeffrey Epstein scandal enveloping the Trump administration. Democrats have portrayed the reintroduction of the "Russian hoax' saga as a way for the Trump Administration to distract from the demands around Epstein. Cruz is among the Republicans who have long called on the administration to release the Epstein files.
Telegraph
26 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Get every child under 13 off social media immediately, minister tells tech giants
Every child in the UK under the age of 13 must be barred from social media platforms such as Facebook, Instagram and X, the Technology Secretary has said. In an interview with The Telegraph, Peter Kyle said he was aiming for '100 per cent' enforcement of the new laws, which come into force on Friday, requiring tech firms to block children aged under 13 from their platforms. He said he 'expected' the estimated 1.8 million children aged eight to 12 in the UK who already have social media accounts to be removed from the sites. 'I cannot see the circumstances where online activity under 13, when it comes to social media, is ever appropriate. So in this instance, it is right that the Government sets this baseline from which parents can build appropriate boundaries for their families,' said Mr Kyle. 'I've not met anybody within these companies that thinks it is appropriate or that allows their own children to use these products under the age of 13. So we should be working together to solve this issue.' 'Partnering with parents' Asked if that meant the 60 per cent of eight to 12-year-olds with social media accounts should be thrown off, he said: 'I would expect them to be removed and for the law to be rigorously enforced. 'It's going to be really hard for kids who have access that will now have it taken away. It is tough, but we're on the side of parents here. 'Parents repeatedly tell me that once they're on [social media], it is a constant battle between parent and child to get it out of their hands, particularly interrupting study time, bedtime and family time. So we are now partnering with parents, giving them the baseline to move forward.' The tech firms have been told they must either ensure their minimum age limits of 13 are properly enforced, or radically overhaul their sites to make content safe enough for the tens of thousands of underage children currently using them. The measures are part of new children's codes set by the regulator Ofcom, which require companies to block their access to harmful content, including suicide, self-harm, violence or misogyny, from July 25. From Friday, firms hosting porn will also be required by law to introduce 'highly effective' age checks such as credit cards, photo ID matching and digital ID services to prevent any under-18s accessing their sites. The top 10 adult websites, which account for 40 per cent of porn site users, have signed up to these age checks along with over 6,000 other sites including Elon Musk's X, Grindr and Reddit. Those that fail to implement age checks at the ages of 13 and 18 will face fines of up to 10 per cent of their global turnover or be banned from operating in the UK. Mr Kyle said Ofcom must not hesitate to use its powers, including blocking sites to 'send the message that access to the British economy and society is a privilege, not a right'. At least half a dozen tech firms, including a suicide forum and micro-blogging site, have already withdrawn from the UK market by geo-blocking users rather than comply with the Online Safety Act. The changes on Friday follow the implementation in March of tougher bans on illegal online content including child sex abuse, terrorism and fraud. However, Ofcom's new powers are considered more significant for protecting children from 'legal' harms such as suicide and self harm content, which are blamed for 14-year-old Molly Russell taking her own life. Mr Kyle said the move represented the 'biggest step change in the experience of young people online since the internet was created'. It also marks the culmination of an eight-year campaign by The Telegraph for a statutory duty of care on tech giants to protect children from online harms. On behalf of the Government, he offered an apology: 'My other reflection is the huge apology we owe young people who are over the age of 13 and yet lived in the online smartphone era. 'They were unprotected from the vile, harmful and damaging forces that made their way into their feeds without any restraint. I and we as a society owe them an apology, and I certainly offer it with all sincerity.' Mr Kyle said the changes would mean tech bosses, who can face up to two years in jail under the laws for persistent breaches of regulations, would 'live in anxiety' rather than the children who have previously been fed 'harmful content'. 'It means that people who peddle harmful and criminal content will finally be the people who live in anxiety, because we can and we will come after them if they continue to peddle their content,' said Mr Kyle. 'I expect the law to be enforced to the full extent of the powers that Parliament has granted.' He also warned there would be tough penalties for tech firms that tried to circumvent the new laws with, for example, Virtual Private Networks (VPNs) where users can disguise their IDs and bypass blocks on content. 'If platforms or sites signpost towards workarounds like VPNs, then that itself is a crime and will be tackled by these codes,' said Mr Kyle. 'If a company directly delivers harmful content into the feeds of children, it is the arrival into their feeds which is the offence. If they direct children via other means to that content, it has the same outcome.' He confirmed the Government was considering further measures to combat the 'addictive' nature of social media by introducing two-hour caps on app time and curfews to limit use before bedtime. They are expected to be unveiled in the Autumn. 'In the offline world, parents set boundaries on diet, exercise, social networks and sleep time but we've never had that conversation about the online world. It's time we did,' said Mr Kyle. He added: 'It is not telling parents how to parent, but offering tools to parents to set the kind of family life that they think appropriate.' Mr Kyle revealed that at every meeting with tech bosses, he imagined there was a camera in the room where parents like Molly Russell's father who lost their children in online tragedies could watch him. 'Would they feel their views and their children's experiences had been represented? I hope that they would,' he said. 'Some of those conversations I've had have been uncomfortable and ended uncomfortably.' He said that was the reason why he was aiming for all harmful content to be removed from children's feeds. 'I'm aiming for 100 per cent but I need to be realistic with people,' he said. 'If we take steps forward where 70, 80, or even more per cent of vile, hateful, damaging content disappears from children's feeds, that's a win that I'll take to the bank and move forward from. 'But these companies have the capacity to allow hundreds of millions, if not billions, of posts to go online rapidly. Don't tell me they don't have the infrastructure that enables it to be removed too. 'This Act has been one of the longest pieces of legislation in gestation, in its passage through Parliament and its pathway to implementation, than any other. They have had time. They have seen the direction of travel. Now it's time to act.'
North Wales Chronicle
an hour ago
- North Wales Chronicle
Zelensky announces new anti-corruption Bill after public outcry and EU criticism
Opponents of the contentious law passed by politicians and approved by Mr Zelensky earlier this week said that it stripped Ukraine's anti-corruption watchdogs of their independence by granting the government more oversight of their work. Mr Zelensky said it was needed to speed up investigations, ensure more convictions and remove 'Russian influence' from the fight against corruption, though he did not provide examples of Russian meddling. In an abrupt change of course on Thursday, Mr Zelensky unexpectedly said that he had drawn up a new draft Bill on corruption that 'guarantees the real strengthening of the law and order system in Ukraine'. 'The most important thing is real tools, no Russian connections, and the independence of the (watchdogs),' he said in a Telegram post. The declaration appeared to bow to recent pressure that threatened to undermine public trust in Ukraine's leaders after more than three years of fighting Russia's full-scale invasion. The protests have not called for Mr Zelensky ousting, but they are the first major anti-government demonstrations since the war began. 'It is important that we maintain unity,' Mr Zelensky said in his post. The announcement also left some questions unanswered. Mr Zelensky had said on Wednesday that he met the heads of Ukraine's key anti-corruption and security agencies and gave them two weeks to make recommendations on how the graft law could be improved before he presented another Bill to Parliament. It is unclear what becomes of that effort to seek their input. Despite that assurance of new legislation, further street protests were scheduled for Thursday evening. The new pronouncement also left unclear whether Mr Zelensky intended to revoke the law that he approved earlier in the week after Parliament had passed it. He did not publicise details about the proposed new law. The unrest has come at a difficult time in the all-out war, which began on February 24 2022. Russia's bigger army is accelerating its efforts to pierce Ukraine's frontline defences and is escalating its bombardment of Ukrainian cities. Ukraine is also facing a question mark over whether the United States will provide more military aid and whether European commitments can take up the slack, with no end in sight to the war. Delegations from Russia and Ukraine met in Istanbul for a third round of talks in as many months on Wednesday. But once again, the talks were brief and delivered no major breakthrough. Fighting entrenched corruption is crucial for Ukraine's aspirations to join the EU and maintain access to billions of dollars in Western aid in the war. It is also an effort that enjoys broad public support. EU enlargement commissioner Marta Kos expressed concern on Wednesday over the new law, calling it 'a serious step back'. The Ukrainian branch of Transparency International criticizsed parliament's decision, saying it undermines one of the most significant reforms since what Ukraine calls its Revolution of Dignity in 2014 and damages trust with international partners. Meanwhile, two women aged 48 and 59 were killed and 14 other people were injured when Russian forces dropped four powerful glide bombs on Kostiantynivka, an industrial city in eastern Ukraine, and shelled it with artillery, Donetsk regional governor Vadym Filashkin said. Russian planes also dropped two glide bombs on the centre of Kharkiv, Ukraine's second-largest city, on Thursday morning, regional governor Oleh Syniehubov said. At least 42 people were wounded, including two babies, a 10-year-old girl and two 17 year olds, authorities said. The southern city of Odesa, and Cherkasy in central Ukraine, were also hit overnight, authorities said. The drone and missile strikes on the cities wounded 11 people, including a nine-year-old, and damaged historic landmarks and residential buildings, officials said. Ukraine has sought to step up its own long-range drone attacks on Russia, using domestic technology and manufacturing. An overnight Ukrainian drone attack on the Russian Black Sea resort of Sochi killed two women and wounded 11 other people, local authorities said Thursday. An oil depot was hit, officials said, without offering details.
