10-year-old Punjab boy emerges as India's youngest civilian warrior in border conflict
Remove Ads
Recognition and ceremony
Background and personal aspirations
Context of Operation Sindoor
The Indian Army has announced it will cover the education expenses of Shvan Singh, a ten-year-old boy who supplied food and drinks to soldiers engaged in a gunfight during Operation Sindoor in Tara Wali village, Punjab. The boy provided water, ice, tea, milk, and lassi to soldiers as they faced firing from the Pakistan Army.The Golden Arrow Division of the Indian Army pledged full sponsorship of Shvan's education in recognition of his courage and enthusiasm. During a ceremony at Ferozepur Cantonment on Saturday, Lieutenant General Manoj Kumar Katiyar, General Officer Commanding-in-Chief of the Western Command, felicitated the boy. The army described Shvan's actions as emblematic of the "quiet heroes" across India who merit recognition and support.Shvan, a class 4 student from Tara Wali village near the international border in the Mamdot area of Ferozepur district, expressed a desire to join the army in the future. He stated in May, "I want to become a 'fauji' when I grow up. I want to serve the country." His father added, "We are proud of him. Even soldiers loved him," noting that Shvan independently supplied the ration without prompting.Operation Sindoor involved pre-dawn missile strikes on May 7 targeting nine terror sites in Pakistan and Pakistan-Occupied Kashmir, including strongholds of Jaish-e-Mohammad in Bahawalpur and Lashkar-e-Taiba in Muridke. The operation was a response to the April 22 Pahalgam terror attack, which caused 26 casualties. Following these Indian strikes, Pakistan launched an offensive against Indian military installations and shelled border areas for three days.(With inputs from PTI)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Wire
8 minutes ago
- The Wire
July 13 in Kashmir: On Federalised Historiography and the Silent Challenge to Federalism
In a bizarre turn of events, the Lieutenant Governor of Jammu & Kashmir effectively placed the elected government officials, including the chief minister, under house arrest on July 13, as aptly described by one local daily as an instance of 'government locking up government'. The supposed trigger for this action by the LG was the fear that the elected government and the public might commemorate July 13 as Martyrs' Day, an official holiday until 2019, which was discontinued following the abrogation of Article 370 of the Constitution. Meanwhile, the BJP's Leader of Opposition has endorsed the LG's actions and branded the 22 people killed by the Dogra ruler in 1931 (in whose memory Martyrs' Day is observed) as traitors. Beyond the political wrangling over what was undoubtedly a watershed moment in the modern history of J&K, and the constitutionally suspect nature of the actions taken by the Lieutenant Governor, the events unfolding in J&K have implications not only for federalised historiography but also for federalism itself, and should therefore concern other states as well. A monolithic past? The first issue with the BJP's actions in J&K is related to its conception of nationalist history and identity. In the BJP's attempts to advance a monolithic version of anti-colonial nationalism, it fails to appreciate that anti-colonial resistance was not a simplistic binary of the coloniser and the colonised, with the latter automatically becoming part of the Indian national movement. In the princely states, for instance, these movements were not necessarily aimed directly at the British, for British rule was not direct in these regions. Consequently, the princely rulers became the primary targets of such movements seeking self-governance, which could not, therefore, be neatly subsumed within the broader Indian national movement. This is what the moment of July 13, 1931, represents in the official histories of J&K, as one of the first major expressions of protest against the Dogra rule. Over time, this moment came to be imbued with broader political meaning, symbolising the demand for self-governance, and ultimately becoming embedded in the region's collective memory as a marker of its autonomous political identity and constitutional status. Simply because it does not align with the BJP's conception of the anti-colonial movement and nationalism, the day has been removed from the list of official holidays, and those who were killed have been branded as traitors. The issue is not merely that the 22 individuals killed on July 13, 1931, were Muslims. The issue at stake here is what the 22 people have come to represent in the official histories - a distinct political trajectory in J&K, one closely tied to the region's demand for autonomy. That is why they cannot be neatly subsumed into the nationalist narrative of the past that the BJP aims to construct. Rather, their memory poses a challenge to this brand of nationalist history, which is why it must either be banished or, worse, recast as treacherous. This explains why, in a context where Article 370 is increasingly projected as anti-India, the BJP can simultaneously appropriate someone like Maqbool Sherwani as pro-Indian while erasing the history of Martyrs' Day in Kashmir. This, of course, is riddled with absurdities. The BJP's attempt to excise from J&K's past what it retrospectively deems anti-national and treacherous, in order to produce a monolithic account of nationalist history, is historically untenable. But there is another problem here. This monolithic account of the past allows the BJP to fashion a monistic legal order i.e, fashioning the post-colonial in unitary terms and producing an account of anti-colonial history in the service of this legal order, which brings me to the question of constitutional federalism. The federal argument Nationalist history is not solely a concern of historiography; it is deeply imbricated with constitutionalism, particularly how federal units draw on history in fashioning their sense of self and political identity. July 13 was designated an official state holiday by the government led by Sheikh Abdullah, and in J&K's federated constitutional framework, came to symbolise the region's distinct constitutional identity. Following the reading down of Article 370, the BJP swiftly moved to integrate J&K by applying previously inapplicable laws to the region. However, this project of unification extends beyond the legal domain into the realm of history itself. Any historical moment (Martyrs' Day as well as Sheikh Abdullah's birthday) that has come to represent J&K's Article 370-inflected trajectory is being systematically erased, as part of a broader effort to impose homogeneity not only in the constitutional framework but also in the historical narrative now being constructed by the BJP government. That is, even in its abrogation, it is the spectre of Article 370 that haunts the BJP – hence the erasure of history. But these events or historical moments constitute more than temporal landmarks; they are central to how individual federal units understand, construct, and express their identities. It is appropriate in a federal polity for units to have a distinct imagination of history and a sense of self that is not derivative of the central government. The policies of the BJP are such that the self-conception of federal units will have to conform to the central government's imposing vision of the Indian nation and the state. Consequently, the federal units will be relegated to the status of appendages of the central government, with their existence deemed meaningful only insofar as it aligns with the centre's vision. This undermines, to the extent of even negating the possibility of the federal units cultivating sub-national identities that might diverge from the narrative set by the central government. All this is done, it must be noted, without formally altering the powers of the governments of the federal units. Constitutional debates on federalism in India have for long treated it as a matter of power-sharing between the states and the centre when in fact it also bears on questions such as self-conception of federal units, constitutional identity, and history. The actions of the BJP reflect a broader tendency on the part of the central government to impose a particular historical-cultural narrative upon federal units and consequently, shape their political identity and sense of self. This goes beyond the traditional debates on Indian federalism, raising constitutional concerns that involve a deeper contestation over the very imagination of India as a nation-state. For such practices of the central government fundamentally erode the principles of federalism and present a new challenge compared to those faced under previous central governments. Zaid Deva is a DPhil candidate with the Faculty of Law at the University of Oxford. click here.
Hans India
8 minutes ago
- Hans India
After 5 years, India resumes tourist visas for Chinese nat'ls
NEW DELHI: India has announced resuming the issuance of tourist visas to Chinese nationals from this week, a move that comes as part of efforts to repair bilateral ties that came under severe strain following the military clashes in Galwan Valley. India had suspended issuance of tourist visas to Chinese nationals in 2020 largely due to Covid-19 pandemic but the restrictions continued in view of the eastern Ladakh border row. The Indian embassy in Beijing said Chinese nationals may apply for tourist visas from Thursday. In a notification, it also explained the required procedures to apply for the visas as well as documents required to be submitted at respective Indian visa application centres in Beijing, Shanghai and Guangzhou.
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
8 minutes ago
- First Post
Asia Cup 2025 meeting to go ahead as planned after BCCI reportedly makes U-turn
After much uncertainty and a reported initial boycott by the BCCI, it is now being said that the Indian cricket board has agreed to attend the Asian Cricket Council meeting virtually, where the Asia Cup 2025 could be finalised. read more In a late twist, the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) has decided to attend the Asian Cricket Council (ACC) Annual General Meeting (AGM), which will take place in Dhaka on July 24 and 25, after initially threatening to boycott the meeting over the venue selection. The ACC is currently chaired by Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB) head Mohsin Naqvi, and the BCCI was seen as unwilling to participate in a meeting in Bangladesh. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD While the ACC AGM is expected to take a final call on the Asia Cup 2025, the future of which has looked uncertain since the Pahalgam terror attack, BCCI reportedly did not want to attend a meeting in Dhaka due to worsening relations between India and Bangladesh. The BCCI also recently postponed Team India's white-ball tour to Bangladesh from August 2025 to next year. More from First Cricket India insert healthy dollop of chaos on throwback day of Test cricket at Old Trafford BCCI to attend Asia Cup meeting virtually It was also reported that the boards of Sri Lanka and Afghanistan were ready to boycott the Dhaka meeting in support of the BCCI, but in a late twist on Wednesday, the Indian cricket board decided to attend the ACC AGM, albeit virtually. 'Yes, we have decided to attend the meeting virtually,' a BCCI source told Hindustan Times. Another BCCI source confirmed the same to the newspaper The Hindu, ' BCCI will act as a big brother and attend the tournament virtually,' he said. As per media reports, BCCI tried to make countries like Afghanistan and Oman skip the ACC AGM, which would have resulted in a l ack of a quorum at the meeting, but Naqvi ensured that wasn't an issue after meeting other boards. This should be seen as a big win for the PCB as they have managed to bring together enough boards needed as per the ACC constitution for a meeting to be held legally. As per a report in Cricbuzz, PCB chairman Mohsin Naqvi and Pakistan Super League (PSL) CEO Salman Naseer have already arrived in Dhaka for the meeting along with other ACC members. The officials from the Afghanistan board are expected to arrive on 24 July. The ACC AGM will start at 2 PM local time (1.30 PM IST) in Dhaka. Asia Cup most likely to go ahead as planned ACC AGM is likely to take a final decision on the Asia Cup 2025. The tournament schedule and other important details are expected to be confirmed during the meeting in Dhaka. The reserved window for the Asia Cup 2025 is 10 to 28 September. It is expected to be hosted in the United Arab Emirates (UAE) despite India being the designated hosts. Meanwhile, Bangladesh Cricket Board (BCB) chairman Aminul Islam has tried to stay away from the controversy, saying they are only playing the part of a host. 'The ACC is an organisation that operates with five full members from Asia and 25 associate countries. The ACC asked us whether we wanted to host the AGM and we agreed to it. This is an ACC programme, and we will only provide logistical support,' he was quoted as saying by Cricbuzz. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'We are in touch with the ACC, who is informing us who is coming and who is not, as we have to make arrangements for airport pick-ups, hotel bookings and other support.'
