Ben Roberts-Smith loses appeal bid to overturn defamation case loss
Ethan Rix
, ABC
Ben Roberts-Smith had appealed against the 2023 Federal Court ruling.
Photo:
ABC News / Abubakr Sajid
War veteran Ben Roberts-Smith has failed in a bid to overturn his multi-million-dollar defamation loss against Nine newspapers, which found him complicit in war crimes on the balance of probabilities.
The former Special Air Service corporal also had an application to reopen the appeal with the inclusion of new evidence dismissed by the full bench of the Federal Court.
The Federal Court justices ordered Roberts-Smith to pay costs.
The appeal was heard in February last year after his defamation case against three Nine-owned newspapers was dismissed.
Roberts-Smith sued over a series of articles five years earlier on allegations of war crimes in Afghanistan, bullying and domestic violence against a woman in Canberra.
The Federal Court found the publisher had proven four allegations of unlawful killings in Afghanistan were substantially true to the civil standard, along with allegations of bullying.
While the alleged domestic violence was found to be not sufficiently supported by evidence, the court found any reputational harm fell away in the context of the overall decision.
The defamation case was estimated to have cost upwards of AU$25 million and lasted more than 100 days.
In the appeal, Roberts-Smith's legal team argued Justice Anthony Besanko made several legal errors, including incomplete fact finding, insufficient reasoning and arbitrary conclusions about witness reliability.
In a broad challenge to the judgement, they argued the evidence at trial fell short of the level of cogency required to support such serious allegations.
In late March, they began an eleventh-hour bid to add a further ground of appeal by arguing there was a miscarriage of justice in the original trial, after they were anonymously emailed a conversation recorded in secret of investigative journalist Nick McKenzie speaking to a witness in 2021.
Roberts-Smith's counsel Arthur Moses SC told the court McKenzie had made a "series of damning and unambiguous admissions" during the conversation.
"It reflects a real-time understanding by Mr McKenzie that what he was doing - receiving and using information about the appellant's legal strategy from individuals who had unauthorised access to his private email account - was professionally improper and ethically indefensible," he said.
He alleged the journalist had received details of Roberts-Smith's confidential legal strategy from the veteran's ex-wife and her friend, which McKenzie denied under cross-examination.
"Getting information about your opponent's confidential legal strategy would be a serious breach of your ethics as a journalist, correct?" the barrister asked.
McKenzie replied: "I accept that getting legally privileged information would be wrong. I do not accept I ever got legally privileged information."
A Nine spokesperson said the claims of miscarriage were "baseless" and were a "continuation of the sustained campaign of mistruths peddled" by Roberts-Smith and his backers.
"Nine has full confidence in the reporting and actions of Nick McKenzie," they said in March.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
a day ago
- RNZ News
Australia cancels far-right Israeli politician's visa ahead of speaking tour
By Jake Evans , ABC Simcha Rothman, a member of the Religious Zionist Party. Photo: LENIN NOLLY / NurPhoto via AFP The Australian federal government has cancelled the visa of Israeli politician Simcha Rothman, a member of Israel's far right Mafdal-Religious Zionism party, just days before he was due to arrive in the country for a speaking event. Rothman, whose party is part of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's governing coalition, has previously advocated for the expulsion of Palestinians from Gaza, and denied claims of starvation in the territory. In May Rothman told the UK's Channel 4 that Britain should let Palestinians "run away" from Gaza, and if it did not, "you are aiding and abetting a terrorist organisation using them as human shields". He added those refugees should not be accepted into Israel, however, because "they are our enemies". "And according to international law, treaties about refugees in a time of war, you don't let them conquer your country with refugees," he said. The Israeli politician was due to speak at events in Australia in a matter of days, including a Sydney event next Thursday hosted by the Australian Jewish Association. But his visa has been cancelled, and Rothman has been banned from travel to Australia for three years - a condition that is sometimes applied to a cancellation depending on the grounds it was cancelled on. Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke said Australia would not accept people travelling to cause division . "Our government takes a hard line on people who seek to come to our country and spread division," Burke said. "If you are coming to Australia to spread a message of hate and division, we don't want you here. "Under our government, Australia will be a country where everyone can be safe, and feel safe." Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke said Australia would not welcome visitors seeking to create division. Photo: BAY ISMOYO / AFP In a post on social media, Rothman responded to the visa cancellation. "In the decision to deny the visa, the Australian Home Affairs Minister claims that my presence and my words will have a serious impact on peace and the rule of law in Australia, meaning that the Islamist mob calling for the destruction of Israel on the streets of Sydney and Melbourne will not be happy about my presence," he wrote. "I was invited by the community in Australia due to anti-Semitic attacks on synagogues and a strong sense of alienation and hostility within the community. "The Australian government's decision to deny me the opportunity to come and speak to my people, due to expressing simple and clear positions, is clear and blatant anti-Semitism that gives a boost to terrorism." Rothman's visa cancellation is the first major action against a member of Israel's Knesset since the federal government's announcement last week that it would recognise a Palestinian state at next month's United Nations meeting. Israeli minister Itamar Ben-Gvir, one of two government members sanctioned by Australia , accused the federal government on social media of aiding Hamas. "The Australian government's active support for Hamas and terrorists, and the entry ban against MK Simcha Rothman, are a historical stain and a shame for the Australian government," Ben-Gvir said in a post in Hebrew, translated to English. "The cheers of joy by Israeli left-wing activists, Hamas collaborators, and Israel slanderers around the world, are a disgrace that will never be erased from their minds." In June, Australia joined several other nations - including New Zealand - to impose sanctions on Ben-Gvir and another minister, Bezalel Smotrich, accusing the men of inciting violence against Palestinians in the West Bank. Smotrich is the leader of the Mafdal-Religious Zionism party, of which Rothman is a member. Liberal senator Dave Sharma, who was previously an ambassador to Israel, said he was not aware of Rothman during his time in Israel but that elected representatives should as a principle be granted entry to Australia. "I would say that elected representatives from democratic nations, liberal democracies with friendly relations with Australia, the presumption should always be they are granted a visa, they are entitled to visit Australia, even if we don't always agree with their views," Senator Sharma told Sky News. "I would like to know the basis on which Tony Burke has cancelled this visa because it seems as though it was issued. And what are the comments in particular that he finds so troubling that he think would incite social unrest here in Australia?" - ABC
NZ Herald
2 days ago
- NZ Herald
Prime Minister Christopher Luxon says Government will ‘get to the bottom' of Airways outage
Prime Minister Christopher Luxon says his two ministers in charge of transport will 'get to the bottom' of what caused an air traffic control outage that disrupted operations for an hour over the weekend. The Airways software glitch closed oceanic airspace on Saturday and forced five Australia-bound flights to circle
1News
2 days ago
- 1News
Qantas fined $98 million for illegally sacking staff
Australia's largest airline has been ordered to pay a landmark penalty of AU$90 million (NZ$98.8 million) for what has been dubbed the largest case of illegal sackings in the country's history. Qantas outsourced more than 1800 baggage handlers, cleaners and ground staff in 2020, in a move the Federal Court ruled was designed to curb union bargaining power in wage negotiations. The embattled airline's appeal to the High Court was unsuccessful, paving the way for the penalty to be awarded on Monday. The Transport Workers Union sought the maximum penalty of AU$121 million (NZ$132.9 million), while Qantas urged Justice Michael Lee to impose a "mid-range" penalty between AU$40 million (NZ$43.9 million) and AU$80 million (NZ$87.8 million). The Federal Court judge cited the "sheer scale of the contraventions, being the largest of their type" as a reason to impose a penalty that would deter other businesses from similar conduct. ADVERTISEMENT He ordered Qantas to pay AU$90 million (NZ$98.9 million) in penalties, AU$50 million (NZ$54.9 million) of which is to be paid directly to the union that brought the proceedings and highlighted the illegal conduct. "To deprive someone of work illegally is to deprive someone of an aspect of their human dignity, and this is not assuaged simply by expressions of regret," Justice Lee said. He was scathing about the embattled airline's conduct after the outsourcing, pointing to efforts to place a "less than candid" picture of the outsourcing decision before the court. He noted Qantas had apologised publicly but then had attempted to deny any compensation payments to the affected workers. Qantas will have to pay the hefty bill on top of a AU$120 million (NZ$131.7 million) compensation payment it has made to the affected ground staff for their economic loss, pain and suffering following the outsourcing. However, Justice Lee said he didn't have enough evidence to be convinced those payments would be made. The court was told the scandal-plagued airline began to finally accept responsibility for its actions in 2023, Justice Lee noted, which coincided with the departure of former CEO Alan Joyce. The courtroom was packed with union members and representatives, who hugged and exchanged smiles after Justice Lee handed down his decision. It comes after Qantas also sold tickets to cancelled flights for several years, triggering more legal turmoil and a AU$100 million (NZ$109.8 million) fine after it was sued by the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission.
