Why is Norway's EV adoption ahead of the rest of Europe?
Norway leads Europe in electric vehicle (EV) penetration. EVs comprised 88.9% of all new car registrations in 2024, according to the Norwegian EV Association.
Comparing this to the 51.5% recorded by runner-up Denmark – the only other EU member state to have EV share surpass the majority of new registrations – Norway is indeed far ahead of its European counterparts and well on its way to becoming the first country to fully electrify its vehicle landscape.
Norway's success didn't happen by accident; it is the result of long-term government planning that started in the 1990s, when the first EV incentives were introduced. Over time, these policies were refined and became increasingly attractive for consumers.
How has Norway achieved its status as the poster child of EV adoption in Europe, and what can other European countries learn from its success?
Norway's clear and enticing EV policies have had a great impact on its EV adoption. For instance, EVs have been exempt from many taxes that apply to traditional vehicles. EVs had no purchase/import tax up until 2022, from which some purchase tax began to apply based on the EV's weight.
However, this alone does not make Norway unique; many countries have added incentives to boost EV sales and adoption. Where Norway stands out is its commitment to them over time.
The simple explanation for Norway's success in this field comes down to two words: consistency and clarity.
'Besides the actual policies or incentives, they have been consistent,' says Jaap Burger, senior advisor at the Regulatory Assistance Project (RAP), a global non-profit dedicated to accelerating the transition to clean, reliable and equitable energy systems. 'Norway has introduced a series of incentives which allowed EVs to compete on price with fossil fuel cars, or even undercut those prices, but having these policies in place for well over a decade and not changing it too much was key.'
Burger adds: 'What other European countries struggle with is introducing subsidy schemes, and then during the year, the subsidy amount dries up. Then, people are left without the subsidy, which stops EV sales. Then maybe the following year, or after the elections, they have a whole different scheme to adjust to.'
This was most evident in Germany, which not only saw a drop in EV adoption but a significant decline in sales last year. According to Power Technology's parent company, GlobalData, the overall European EV market experienced a decline in growth in 2024, at just 0.9%. Germany was the main culprit in terms of impacting the decline in growth, with GlobalData reporting a degrowth of -27%. The main cause was the country's halting and watering down of EV incentives, following a period of widespread promotion.
While Norway has also adjusted its EV policies over time, the country has signalled the transition from the beginning and ultimately stuck to broader plans, offering transparency to its citizens in terms of the road forward.
'It was quite clear for Norwegians how these incentives were in place and would be gradually reduced over time,' says Burger.
For example, the Norwegian Government declared that EVs would require no road tax until 2021, which would rise to reduced tax in 2022. Similarly, there were no charges on toll roads or ferries up until 2017, which rose to a 50% ferry fare fee from 2018 and a 50% toll road fee until 2022. The gradual reduction in such benefits could have triggered a decline in adoption; but because they were indicated from the beginning, citizens were able to choose EVs without fear of being blindsided.
Burger clarifies that it was especially helpful that the broader EV road map has been and continues to be 'supported across political colours in Norway'.
While the EV revolution has typically put emphasis on positive environmental and financial benefits to the country, Norway has made EVs appeal to its citizens through increased ease of day-to-day life.
For instance, Burger notes that 'in the Oslo region, EV users could use the bus lanes' – an incentive that has since been diluted but continues to be useful.
In doing this, EVs provided Norwegian drivers with one thing that is typically impossible to buy: the gift of time. And with it, the country offered a higher standard of living.
Considering Norway's colder climate, the government also promoted EVs' ability to preheat and defrost the vehicle via the use of a timer.
Norway also boasts a comprehensive EV charging network that isn't just limited to urban areas, ensuring ease of access to charging for EV users on a scale not yet available in many countries. Of total EV charging in Norway, 81% is done at home, with 92% of those charging at home owning a charging box, according to the Norwegian EV association. This broad coverage, extending to remote and rural regions, is essential in a country like Norway, which has vast and sparsely populated areas.
The switch to EVs has not just been a success with personal cars; 88% of drivers were reportedly satisfied with the transition to electric trucks, according to a survey among electric truck owners and drivers' experience with electric trucks, conducted by the city of Oslo and the Norwegian EV Association in 2024.
Additionally, the Norwegian Government has been relatively successful in promoting the environmental benefits of EVs, allowing for users to feel a sense of moral well-being as they participate in the transition. In a presentation at EVision 2025, Christina Bu, secretary-general, Norwegian EV Association, revealed that CO₂ emissions from passenger cars in Norway from 2022 to 2023 were down by 12.1%.
When asked what other countries can learn from Norway, Burger says: 'Being consistent, planning for the long run over at least a ten-year period, which also includes planning for gradually scaling down incentives.
'If you plan ahead as Norway has done, you can keep the momentum of the EV transition while giving citizens a heads-up on changes to come over time.'
This notion was reiterated by Swedish vehicle manufacturer Scania's CEO Christian Levin: 'Europe needs to come together and decide, just like Norway, that we are going to commit to this.'
Norway's playbook for increasing EV adoption serves as an ideal model for other countries, both in Europe and beyond. If other European countries can adopt similar long-term, consistent policies while adapting to their local contexts, they too can accelerate the transition to sustainable transportation and join Norway in helping the EU achieve its climate targets.
"Why is Norway's EV adoption ahead of the rest of Europe? " was originally created and published by Power Technology, a GlobalData owned brand.
The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of the content on our site.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNBC
36 minutes ago
- CNBC
China extends an olive branch to Western auto giants over rare earth shortage
China appears to have offered U.S. and European auto giants something of a reprieve after industry groups warned of increasing production threats over a rare earth shortage. China's Ministry of Commerce on Saturday said it was willing to establish a so-called "green channel" for eligible export license applications to expedite the approval process to European Union firms. A Ministry of Commerce spokesperson said Wang expressed hope that the EU would take "reciprocal steps" and adopt measures to promote compliant trade of high-tech products with China. The breakthrough comes after trade talks between Chinese Commerce Minister Wang Wentao and EU Trade Commissioner Maros Sefcovic met in Paris, France last week. Beijing also granted rare earth licenses to suppliers of U.S. auto giants General Motors, Ford and Jeep-maker Stellantis, Reuters reported on Friday, citing unnamed sources. The report said China's Ministry of Commerce did not respond to a faxed request for comment. CNBC has contacted GM, Ford and Stellantis. China's Ministry of Commerce in early April imposed export restrictions on several rare earth elements and magnets widely used in the automotive, defense and energy sectors. The curbs were part of a response to U.S. President Donald Trump's tariff increase on Beijing's products. Some of the affected rare earth elements were critical components to the production of both combustion engines and electric vehicles. Maximilian Butek, an executive director and board member of the German Chamber of Commerce in China, said the weekend announcement was certainly good news for European businesses, but noted that it remains unclear whether the fast-track channel applies to large-scale firms or to sectors more broadly. "It is a huge bureaucratic monster that they've created and I'm not sure if they really can now speed up the process and give the licenses to those who need them," Butek told CNBC's "Europe Early Edition" on Monday. Europe's top automakers will welcome the diplomatic breakthrough, Butek said, while stressing the European bloc's need to improve supply chain diversification. "It all hit us quite by surprise that China is even willing to draw this card because this is a retaliation measurement towards the tariffs the U.S. implemented, right? And we, as European companies, we are now in the crossfire of this trade escalation, and this is really not where we want to be," Butek said. "It is not enough just to announce it but they have to show it," he added. China is the undisputed leader of the critical minerals supply chain, accounting for roughly 60% of the world's production of rare earth minerals and materials. U.S. officials have previously warned that this dominance poses a strategic challenge amid the pivot to more sustainable energy sources. Some analysts have compared the industry-wide squeeze on supplies of rare earth magnets to the global semiconductor crisis that disrupted automotive production during the coronavirus pandemic. Speaking to CNBC before China announced plans to expedite the approval process of rare earth exports to the EU, the European Automobile Manufacturers' Association (ACEA) said some of its members were at risk of production outages starting as soon as next month. The car lobby group, which represents the likes of Stellantis, Renault, Ferrari, Volkswagen and Volvo, said rare earth export licenses by China's Ministry of Commerce had been taking a "significant" amount of time to process since the April restrictions came into force. "Generally, global stocks of these magnets are quite low. And, given that China is the bulk global supplier, it has meant that, in the absence of these export licenses, those stocks have been depleting progressively since the start of April," Jonathan O'Riordan, international trade director at ACEA, told CNBC by phone. "We're gradually coming into a very, very critical moment whereby those stocks are now being exhausted, and we are potentially going to see production stoppages," he added. ACEA's warning followed a separate ominous update from the European Association of Automotive Suppliers. Last week, the group said that several auto supplier plants and production lines had already been shut down due to Beijing's recent export restrictions, with further outages expected as rare earth inventories deplete over the coming weeks. Japanese automaker Suzuki Motor, however, suspended production of its Swift car due to China's rare earth curbs, Reuters reported Thursday, citing two unnamed sources. A Suzuki Motor spokesperson did not respond to a request for comment when contacted by CNBC. Demand for rare earths and critical minerals is expected to grow exponentially in the coming years as the clean energy transition picks up pace.
CNBC
38 minutes ago
- CNBC
Why the U.S. tax bill's Section 899 could push European firms to list in the U.S.
The decision by U.K. fintech firm Wise to move its primary stock listing to the U.S. is the latest in a series of blows to the London market — and a new provision tucked inside a U.S. tax bill could make things even worse. Section 899 of President Donald Trump's spending bill, which passed the House of Representatives in May, threatens to penalize foreign-owned firms domiciled in countries with "unfair foreign taxes," and experts say it could accelerate the trend for European companies to hop the pond. The provision introduces retaliatory tax measures against corporations and other entities from countries that have levies such as the Digital Services Taxes and the OECD's global minimum tax rules. The list of affected nations would include most European Union members, the United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, and Switzerland, among others. For publicly traded companies, Section 899 imposes a new withholding tax on U.S.-sourced income for any foreign corporation that is more than 50% owned by non-U.S. entities. The tax would start at 5% and escalate by five percentage points annually to a maximum of 20%, on top of existing taxes, which vary by country and tax treaties. That could dent earnings for companies in the Stoxx Europe 600 index, for instance, by up to 2% in the first year, and as much as 5% over four years, according to Goldman Sachs analysts. How can European firms avoid Section 899? The Wall Street bank has identified a U.S. re-listing as one of many measures that companies could take if the bill becomes law. A listing in the U.S. would provide a direct path to increasing a company's base of American investors, according to Goldman. This would help companies push their non-U.S. ownership below the critical 50% threshold, taking them out of Section 899's scope. While there are many U.K. companies with high exposure to the U.S. with a majority-U.S. shareholder base, Goldman Sachs identified consumer credit rating firm Experian and Hikma Pharmaceuticals , among others, as two FTSE 100 companies with more than half their group revenues in the U.S. but falling below the 50% threshold for U.S. ownership. The Wall Street bank suggested that such companies could use a U.S. listing as one avenue to avoid taxes imposed by Section 899. Tax experts cautioned that to avoid the impact of Section 899, it would require significantly more work than simply relisting in the U.S. with an attempt to gain U.S. shareholders. "I'm not sure that listing alone would be sufficient," said a senior executive at a large European firm with extensive operations in the U.S., who asked not to be named as they were not authorized to comment on the issue. "The proposed language [in the bill] includes a vote or value test for U.S. ownership, including publicly traded companies, and seems to say that if a company [falls under Section 899 tax] for even one day then it is for the year." The executive also questioned whether companies will be able to identify beneficial owners — or the actual owners that control a business — "with any degree of confidence." That's because the tax bill includes "a look-through concept" — which means U.S. fund managers investing on behalf of foreign clients would not count toward the exemption requirements. "The monitoring [of the shareholder register] alone would be resource intensive," the executive added. Others point out that if European governments dropped what Trump calls their "unfair foreign tax" policies, their companies would automatically be exempted from 899. "Hill Republicans see section 899 not as a revenue-generating measure, but as a tool that gives the Treasury Department additional leverage in negotiations with other countries to encourage changes in behavior," Pat Brown, a tax expert at the consultancy PwC U.S., told CNBC. "Foreign-headquartered companies considering changes in their capital structure to reduce the impact of section 899 would need to consider that the government of their home country could, with the stroke of a pen, eliminate the need to consider section 899 as an issue," Brown added. Exacerbating a corporate-migration trend Goldman Sachs also highlighted that Section 899 could also act as a powerful incentive to a corporate migration trend that is already underway. For years, European and U.K. companies have felt disadvantaged by their home markets, a sentiment that has led to a steady flow of buyouts and re-listings elsewhere. Companies have repeatedly pointed to the valuation discount that European equities suffer compared to their U.S. peers to justify their decisions to move their listing to the U.S. Wise debuted on London's stock market in 2021 in a direct listing that valued the company at £8 billion ($10.84 billion) at the time. It is now valued at £11.07 billion, according to LSEG data. Since then, London has been mired in doubts over whether it can play host to major tech listings. The market is often criticized for lacking the depth of liquidity and industry expertise from investment analysts to accommodate such transactions. Doubts over London's stock market haven't been limited to tech, though. Last week, Glencore -backed metals investor Cobalt Holdings announced it was scrapping plans to go public in London. The IPO was expected to be the largest listing in the U.K. capital since early 2024. A spokesperson for London Stock Exchange Group (LSEG) told CNBC last week that London remains the top European exchange in terms of capital raised and the total market cap of the companies listed. They added that they had seen a "noticeable increase in interest from international companies in coming to London with many starting to prepare." — CNBC's Ryan Browne contributed reporting.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
SAfrica's coal dependency puts economy at risk: report
South Africa's coal-dependent economy could lose billions in export revenue and thousands of jobs as more countries and companies seek carbon-free imports, the Net Zero Tracker watchdog said Monday. Africa's most industrialised nation is one of the largest polluters in the world and generates about 80 percent of its electricity through coal. This makes it "uniquely vulnerable" as companies decarbonise their supply chains and countries penalise carbon-intensive imports, according to the group, a collaboration of four non-profit organisations that tracks net zero pledges. "78 percent of South Africa's exports, worth $135 billion, are traded with 139 jurisdictions which have net zero targets in place. Collectively, these exports support over 1.2 million domestic jobs," the report said. If the country fails to decarbonise its supply chains, it could lose some of that trade and related jobs, it said. The group said South Africa could avoid this scenario by phasing out coal more rapidly and positioning itself as a "strategic supplier in low-emission value chains". "South Africa has the tools to pivot -- proven renewables potential, critical minerals, and seats at global tables," said Net Zero Tracker project lead John Lang. The report argued that South Africa was "well-positioned to become a key supplier of low-emission goods". One of the driving forces behind the decarbonisation push is the European Union's Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanisms (CBAMs). Adopted in 2022, the policy imposes a carbon price on imports of goods such as steel, aluminium and cement from countries with lower environmental standards. A test period began in October 2023 before the law's full entry into force in 2026. The South African Reserve Bank has warned that carbon-based tariffs could reduce exports by up to 10 percent and that CBAMs alone could shrink exports to the EU by four percent by 2030. lhd/br/lth
