Piers Morgan urges Benjamin Netanyahu to let journalists into Gaza to ‘establish the truth'
British broadcaster Piers Morgan has called on Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to allow international journalists into Gaza, saying the lack of access has made it impossible to verify the scale of destruction and human suffering.
At the Arab Media Summit in Dubai, Morgan described Israel's refusal to grant access to foreign media as 'a complete disgrace' and said it made it 'incredibly difficult' to obtain the facts about the war.
'Facts should be sacred,' he said during a conversation with Mina Al-Oraibi, editor in chief of The National. 'We live in a very strange world where people talk about 'my truth'. You can't have your own truth. There is the truth.
'My firm message to Prime Minister Netanyahu: let the journalists in."
He said Israel was 'pretending it's because of our safety – please, we're not stupid".
"Let the international journalists in, and then we can work out whether what Israel is saying is correct. My suspicion is it's not," he added.
Morgan said his talk show Uncensored became 'a fulcrum for the big debates' around the Gaza war after a viral appearance by Egyptian satirist Bassem Youssef. 'It got 22 million views on YouTube,' Morgan said. 'We realised then that this was going to be a massive story.'
He pushed back against criticism that he had been too sympathetic to Israel in the early days of the conflict. 'I've had a lot of people in the Arab world criticise me for being too pro-Israeli. I would take issue with that,' he said.
'I've always had Palestinian-supporting guests on – probably more than any show of the kind that I do."
Morgan said he 'always tried to be firm and fair" when discussing the war, but 'what has been happening in recent weeks and months, especially since this [aid] blockade and the ferocious bombardments, has crossed the line. There are now two former Israeli prime ministers who are condemning what Israel is doing as war crimes.'
Morgan also delivered a broader warning about the erosion of journalistic standards and the growing influence of unverified voices online. He said the rise of fake news, particularly deepfakes powered by artificial intelligence, was eroding public trust.
He emphasised the importance of investing in trained journalists who can separate truth from misinformation in a digital age where everyone is a publisher, but not everyone is accountable.
'I've seen videos of me, using my face and voice, saying the exact opposite of what I actually believe,' he said. 'That becomes really damaging to a society.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The National
2 hours ago
- The National
Shooting the messenger: Trump administration increases attacks on media
The Trump administration is increasing its war on the media, with a new line of attack seeming to be that outlets reporting on Gaza are fuelling a rise in anti-Semitism in the US. Mike Huckabee, the US ambassador to Israel, has accused AP, The New York Times and CNN of spreading 'lies' and Hamas propaganda in their coverage of the long-overdue distribution of aid in Gaza, where Israel only recently began to allow food in after a nearly three-month blockade. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt levied similar charges against the BBC. Dozens of people were shot or wounded in an incident at a food distribution centre on Sunday. It remains unclear what exactly happened, largely because Israel has banned international journalists from entering the Palestinian territory. Israel denied shooting at people but witnesses and residents told The National that the Israeli army fired at civilians. The Red Cross reported a "mass casualty influx" of 179 people at a field hospital in Rafah, of whom 21 were declared dead on arrival. Yet somehow, and with total and unequivocal certainty, Mr Huckabee knows that any reports of the Israeli military shooting at people as they tried to collect food are false. 'There were no injuries, no fatalities, no shooting, no chaos,' he said in a statement published by the US embassy. 'The only source for these misleading, exaggerated and utterly fabricated stories came from Hamas sources, which are designed to fan the flames of anti-Semitic hate that is arguably contributing to violence against Jews in the United States." He said the news outlets are 'contributing to the anti-Semitic climate' that led to the murder of Israeli embassy staff members in Washington and the terror attack on a group of pro-Israel demonstrators in Colorado at the weekend. The former Arkansas governor further demanded 'an immediate retraction of the lies' and called on the media to act with 'objective professionalism'. Could Hamas have been involved in the shootings or exaggerated casualty numbers? It's possible. Could the Israeli military have opened fire on groups of civilians? It's also possible, and they acknowledged firing warning shots at crowds in an incident on Tuesday. In time, more details will emerge of what has been happening at these aid distribution sites. If the media have got it wrong, we will correct the record. One wonders if Mr Huckabee would do the same. The ambassador's statement came days after Secretary of Defence Pete Hegseth expanded his own war on the press. He issued a memo banning Pentagon reporters from roaming around America's military headquarters, a privilege they have enjoyed for decades under Republican and Democratic administrations. America used to pride itself on granting media access to the heart of its defence ministry, but now Mr Hegseth says reporters need a minder even if they are to walk from the 'bullpen' where they work to any of the Navy, Army or Marine Corps press offices dotted around the enormous building. "There is no way to sugarcoat it. [The] memo by Secretary Hegseth appears to be a direct attack on the freedom of the press and America's right to know what its military is doing," the Pentagon Press Association wrote. Mr Hegseth, who has yet to hold a proper media conference in the Pentagon since taking office, gives the risk of leaks of sensitive information as justification for his clampdown. Strange, considering one of the biggest scandals of Mr Trump's second term came when the Pentagon chief accidentally shared plans to attack the Houthis on Signal with a journalist. I should note here that the US State Department is doing much better than the Pentagon, as it continues to provide regular briefings. Mr Trump has never shown much love for journalists. During his first term, he called us the 'enemy of the people' and described as ' fake news ' many stories that were critical of his administration. Now in his second term, he is taking his views much further by curtailing traditional media access to White House events while making space for newer, and frequently right-wing, outlets. He is also threatening to sue the media industry and has punished AP for having the temerity to call the " Gulf of America" the Gulf of Mexico in its style guide. The Trump administration says it is offsetting a liberal bias in the media and boosting transparency for the American public, contrasting his free-wheeling question-and-answer sessions in the Oval Office to his predecessor Joe Biden's carefully stage-managed, yet often bumbling press engagements. It's a worrying trend with serious ramifications for a country that has long prided itself on its right to free speech, enshrined in the First Amendment of the Constitution.
Gulf Today
3 hours ago
- Gulf Today
Irish university to cut links with Israel over Gaza war
Ireland's prestigious Trinity College Dublin said on Wednesday that it would cut all links with Israel in protest at "ongoing violations of international and humanitarian law." The university's board informed students by email on Wednesday that it had accepted the recommendations of a taskforce to sever "institutional links with the State of Israel, Israeli universities and companies headquartered in Israel." The recommendations would be "enacted for the duration of the ongoing violations of international and humanitarian law", said the email sent by the board's chairman Paul Farrell, and seen by AFP. The taskforce was set up after part of the university's campus in central Dublin was blockaded by students for five days last year in protest at Israel's actions in Gaza. Among the taskforce's recommendations approved by the board were pledges to divest "from all companies headquartered in Israel" and to "enter into no future supply contracts with Israeli firms" and "no new commercial relationships with Israeli entities." The university also said that it would "enter into no further mobility agreements with Israeli universities." Trinity has two current Erasmus+ exchange agreements with Israeli universities: Bar Ilan University, an agreement that ends in July 2026, and the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, which ends in July 2025, the university told AFP in an email. The board also said that the university "should not submit for approval or agree to participate in any new institutional research agreements involving Israeli participation." It "should seek to align itself with like-minded universities and bodies in an effort to influence EU policy concerning Israel's participation in such collaborations," it added. Ireland has been among the most outspoken critics of Israel's response to the October 7, 2023 attacks on southern Israel by Hamas militants that sparked the war in Gaza. Polls since the start of the war have shown overwhelming pro-Palestinian sympathy in Ireland. In May 2024, Dublin joined several other European countries in recognising Palestine as a "sovereign and independent state." It then joined South Africa in bringing a case before the International Court of Justice in the Hague accusing Israel of committing genocide in Gaza -- charges angrily denied by Israeli leaders. In December, Israel's Foreign Minister Gideon Saar ordered the closure of the country's embassy in Dublin, blaming Ireland's "extreme anti-Israel policies". Agence France-Presse
The National
4 hours ago
- The National
US vetoes UN Security Council resolution demanding full humanitarian access to Gaza
The US vetoed a UN Security Council resolution on Wednesday demanding an 'immediate, unconditional and permanent ceasefire' in Gaza and full humanitarian access, as aid groups warn of famine-like conditions in the enclave after months of war. The resolution received 14 votes in favour, with only the US opposing it. The draft resolution, proposed by the 10 non-permanent council members, also urged the 'immediate lifting of all restrictions' on humanitarian aid into Gaza, ensuring safe and large-scale distribution throughout the besieged enclave. Washington's veto blocked the measure, which required at least nine "yes" votes and no vetoes from the five permanent members – the US, Russia, China, Britain or France – to pass. The veto is the first by Washington since US President Donald Trump took office in January. And it's the fifth draft resolution on the Gaza war vetoed by the US since the conflict started in October 2023. The Security Council has struggled to act on the conflict, with previous ceasefire attempts also failing. 'US opposition to this resolution should come as no surprise,' acting US Charge D'Affaires Dorothy Shea told Council members. 'It is unacceptable for what it does say. it is unacceptable for what it does not say, and it is unacceptable for the manner in which it has been advanced." She stressed that the United States has been clear that it would not support 'any measure that fails to condemn Hamas and does not call for Hamas to disarm and leave Gaza." "We cannot allow the Security Council to reward Hamas is intransigence,' she added. The text, drafted by Slovenia alongside Algeria and Guyana, repeated the council's demand for the 'immediate, dignified and unconditional release of all hostages held by Hamas and other groups". 'It was never our intention to provoke a veto,' Slovenia's ambassador to the UN, Samuel Zbogar, told council members. 'We were aware of different positions inside the council. This is why the draft resolution had only one focus, a humanitarian one." Mr Zbogar called on the council to 'unite around this urgent demand for unimpeded humanitarian access and for food to be delivered to starving civilians'. Starving civilians and inflicting immense suffering is inhumane, he argued, and against international law. 'No war objective can justify such action,' he said. '14 votes in favour however carries a strong message. Enough of suffering of civilians. Enough of food being used as a weapon. Enough is enough is enough.' Israel has come under mounting international pressure to halt its war in Gaza, a conflict sparked by Hamas's October 7, 2023, attack on Israeli soil. Criticism has intensified over the chaotic aid distribution in Gaza, where Israel imposed a complete blockade for over two months before permitting a limited number of UN aid vehicles to enter in mid-May. The amount of aid Israel has authorised to enter Gaza amounts to 'a teaspoon', when a flood of humanitarian assistance is needed, UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres said last month. Meanwhile, the US-backed Gaza Humanitarian Fund (GHF) has faced backlash for allegedly violating established aid principles by coordinating relief efforts with a military party to the conflict. The war, now in its 20th month, has killed more than 54,000 Palestinians, according to Gaza authorities. The Palestinian militant group Hamas is still holding 58 hostages taken during the October 7 attacks. About a third are believed to still be alive.
