logo
'I've had a wonderful life': Former PM turns 90

'I've had a wonderful life': Former PM turns 90

Jim Bolger, who was the prime minister between 1990 and 1997, turned 90 on Saturday.
He reflected on the last nine decades of his life on Sunday morning - after having celebrated with a "big gathering" of family, friends, and neighbours.
On his political career, Bolger said the biggest issue was to get Pākehā to "face up to the reality that we owed Māori".
"We took big steps in the economy, and got the economy going, and all the rest, but the country and society is more than the economy," he said.
"Māori ... had been badly, badly treated by the early settlers, we owed Māori redress and change.
"I put that higher than managing the books, as it were, with the help of others, and of course you're always helped by others, but the Treaty principles and recognition that the early European settlers did not treat Māori fairly, I think was hugely important."
Bolger said he did not understand those, such as David Seymour - who had also been sworn in as deputy prime minister on Saturday - who "want to diminish the role of Māori in New Zealand".
"They were here first, they were here very much before everybody else, and they have been part of our history from that time on."
He said the current prime minister, Christopher Luxon, needed to tell Seymour "to shut up with his anti-Māori rhetoric" - and to thank Winston Peters for what he's doing in foreign affairs - "because I think he's doing that job well".
"Winston's a very interesting political figure, there's no question about it. He's certainly left his mark on politics in New Zealand."
Bolger said his Irish ancestry helped him engage emotionally and attitudinally with Māori.
"I sort of instinctively knew what it was like to be treated as second-class citizens, and Māori were treated as second-class citizens. And some people still want to do that."
Bolger grew up in coastal Taranaki, and said he was not taught "a single word" about the invasion of a pacifist settlement at Parihaka, but was taught about War of the Roses in England.
Reflecting on his life outside of his political career, he could not say what he was most proud of - "I think it'd be foolish to try and select one over another."
He began as a farmer - from helping his neighbour to milk cows at nine, to leaving Ōpunake High School at 15 to work on the family dairy farm, and owning his own near Rahotu at 27. He got married and moved to a sheep and beef farm in Te Kūiti two years later.
Bolger then joined the National Party and was an MP, the leader of the opposition, and then the prime minister after National won the 1990 general election.
He later became New Zealand's Ambassador to the United States, was elected Chancellor of the University of Waikato, and has been the chairman of a number of state-owned enterprises and other organisations.
Bolger was awarded the Queen Elizabeth II Silver Jubilee Medal in 1977, the New Zealand 1990 Commemoration Medal, the New Zealand Suffrage Centennial Medal in 1993, and was appointed a Member of the Order of New Zealand in 1998.
He also has nine children and 18 grandchildren.
"They were all important and very interesting positions to have, and I enjoyed it," Bolger said.
"When you get to 90, and reflecting back over my variety of positions I've had across the world, and the countries I've visited, which are without number, there's so many, that it's just been very fortunate.
"I've had a wonderful life with a wonderful wife and family, and it's all been good."
As for advice he would give to New Zealanders, Bolger said the main thing would be to listen to others.
"Don't try and dictate to them, listen to them, see what they're saying, see what their issues are, see what their concerns are, and then you might be able to make a sensible suggestion to help their lives.
"And if you approach it from that direction, you know, how can I help this person or that person, then I'm sure you'll be much more satisfied with your life, and hopefully, they will be better off."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Attorney-General rules her own Govt's voting crackdown breaches human rights
Attorney-General rules her own Govt's voting crackdown breaches human rights

Newsroom

time2 hours ago

  • Newsroom

Attorney-General rules her own Govt's voting crackdown breaches human rights

Electoral law restrictions announced last week are in breach of the Bill of Rights Act, Attorney-General Judith Collins KC says in a report belatedly disclosed to Parliament. She indicates more than 100,000 people may be directly or indirectly disenfranchised by rules banning enrolment in the final 13 days before an elections. Young people, and areas with larger Māori, Asian and Pasifika communities, are likely to be worst affected. Denying voters the political franchise is a heavy price to pay, she says, when there are alternative, less restrictive measures that could have addressed the same problem of speeding up the vote count. But Justice Minister Paul Goldsmith has hit back. 'Allowing late enrolments, however well intentioned, has placed too much strain on the system,' he tells Newsroom. 'I don't accept that we are disenfranchising people by requiring that they are first enrolled. Many countries do this, such as Australia.' Professor Andrew Geddis, at the University of Otago, says the Bill of Rights notice ought to have been attached to the bill when it was presented, according to the wording of section 7 of the Bill of Rights Act. This would have allowed ministers to be asked about it, when the proposal first came out. 'However, it doesn't seem to have been,' he says. 'Instead, it quietly went up on the Ministry of Justice website just in time for the weekend.' 'Heavy price' for administrative convenience In its Regulatory Impact Statement, the Ministry of Justice did not recommend the option of closing enrolment earlier. 'Its impact on reducing special votes is uncertain, while its impact on democratic participation could be significant,' officials said. The Attorney-General's Bill of Rights inconsistency notice goes further, concluding the proposal for a 13-day registration deadline appears to constitute an unjustified limit on section 12 of the Bill of Rights Act, which says every New Zealand citizen aged 18-plus has the right to vote in Parliamentary elections. 'The accepted starting-point is the fundamental importance of the right to vote within a liberal democracy,' she says. 'A compelling justification is required to limit that right.' Citing Electoral Commission and Ministry of Justice data, she says about 3400 people would have their eligibility to vote directly affected by the law change. These include people returning from overseas after being away for an extended time, and people who become New Zealand residents or are released from prison during the registration period. But many more will have their right to vote indirectly affected, by being in effect excluded from the franchise by the practicalities of the operation of a 13-day pre-election registration deadline. There has been an expectation, since 1993, that electors can register as late as the day before polling day, or more recently, on polling day. Indeed, the trend (with accompanying publicity campaigns) has been towards greater flexibility as to when people may register to vote. In the 2023 general election, the special votes included more than 97,000 people who registered for the first time during the voting period, and nearly 134,000 people who changed electoral districts during the voting period. 'This gives some indication of the number of people who may be affected, and the farther out the registration deadline from polling day, the greater the disenfranchising impact is likely to be.' There were other options the Government could have embraced, Collins says, that would impose 'less onerous limits on the right to vote'. For instance, it could have reverted to a deadline of the day before election day (which was the rule from 1993 to 2020) or a deadline of three, five or seven days before polling day. The notice to Parliament also finds the announced law changes breach the rights of sentenced prisoners, by reinstating a ban on them voting. For most of New Zealand's history, sentenced prisoners have been denied the right to vote. In 1975, the Rowling Labour government gave them the vote but that enfranchisement was brief – the National government repealed it two years later. The Electoral Act 1993 allowed for a limited prisoner franchise, though those serving a a sentence of three or more years were excluded. That was repealed in 2010. Then in 2020, the Ardern Labour Government restored prisoners' ability to vote, after jailhouse lawyer Arthur Taylor took a successful case to the Supreme Court. Like the Attorney-General, the court said the ban was inconsistent with the Bill of Rights Act. Goldsmith has now announced it will (again) be repealed. And he isn't wavering, in the face of the Attorney-General's notice. 'Citizenship brings rights and responsibilities,' he says. He rejects the inclusion of prisoners' rights in the Bill of Rights Act. 'People who breach those responsibilities to the extent that they are sentenced to jail temporarily lose some of their rights, including the right to vote.' Speeding up the vote count On the wider matter of when people are allowed to enrol, the law says an eligible voter can enrol right up to and including election day, at any voting place in New Zealand. According to public advice from the Electoral Commission, if people enrol early, then voting will be faster. The commission says that those who enrol before Writ Day (about a month before election day) will have their names on the printed electoral roll at the voting place. They'll also be mailed an EasyVote card, making it faster for the person issuing voting papers to find them on the roll. 'You can still enrol after Writ Day – but you may need to fill in an extra form when you go to vote.' Goldsmith justifies barring people from voting if they don't enrol more than 13 days out from election day, saying it should enable votes to be counted faster. 'The final vote count used to take two weeks – last election it took three,' he says. 'If we leave things as they are, it could likely take even longer. 'If you want to vote, you need to be enrolled. People have a whole year to get organised. I have every confidence New Zealanders can manage.' Ockers and 'drop kicks' Goldsmith says many countries require people to be enrolled before voting. Australia required people to be enrolled 26 days before the last election, and before 2020, New Zealanders were not able to enrol on election day. 'Those people were not disenfranchised, they were simply required to be enrolled. It is not difficult.' However, the Attorney-General points out the High Court of Australia has ruled on a voter registration deadline that departed from previous settings. She endorses that court's comments, that restricting the impact on the franchise of restricting the voter registration period is a 'heavy price'. Delivering a 2010 judgment on behalf of a seven-member panel of the High Court, Chief Justice Robert French had said the heavy price imposed on the constitutional mandate was disproportionate to the benefits of a smoother and more efficient electoral system, to which the amendments were directed. Last week, Deputy Prime Minister David Seymour said only 'drop kicks' enrolled late to vote. Goldsmith reiterates his unhappiness with the Act leader's comment. 'I said last week, Mr Seymour's comment was unhelpful. The purpose of the change, and a large number of other changes, is to take pressure off the system, so that the Electoral Commission can do its job effectively and efficiently.'

Scots make their feelings about the visiting US President known with humour thrown in
Scots make their feelings about the visiting US President known with humour thrown in

NZ Herald

time3 hours ago

  • NZ Herald

Scots make their feelings about the visiting US President known with humour thrown in

When Trump arrived, if he had glanced at the Scottish newspaper the National, he might have noticed its not-so-subtle front page: 'Convicted US felon to arrive in Scotland'. Hundreds of anti-Trump protesters poured onto the streets of Edinburgh, Aberdeen, and Dumfries. Further protests are planned in Aberdeenshire tomorrow. During the rallies, several signs carried messages with unmistakable Scottish flair. One protester, who was playing bagpipes, carried a sign that read: 'Pipe down Donald'. Several people held up signs proclaiming, 'Nae Trump' - a Scots phrase that simply means 'No Trump' - or that referred to Trump as a 'radge', local slang for a wild, crazy or violent person. Several signs spoofed pop culture or paid homage to Scottish icons. Some children were photographed with signs that read, 'Keep orange fizzy, not fascist', with a logo of Irn-Bru, a popular Scottish soft drink. Many referenced the late Scottish comedian Janey Godley, who famously held up an anti-Trump sign with a not-quite-rhyming expletive. 'Janey was right,' read more than one sign. Those blocked from accessing Trump's Turnberry course took their creativity to the coast, where they wrote messages in the sand, including 'Get Trump Out' and 'Free Palestine'. 'We are creative with our protests, but there is really a deeply felt kind of revulsion to the politics of Trump,' said Alena Ivanova, 37, a lead organiser at a rally in Aberdeen, which was co-ordinated by a group called the Stop Trump Coalition. The group advocates on issues such as climate change, migrants' rights, and Palestinian solidarity. More than 1000 protesters gathered outside the US Consulate in Edinburgh to let Trump know he was not welcome. Jack Nevin, who organised the Edinburgh event, said that the nation's thorny relationship with the President was summed up in a sign that said: 'Scotland hated Trump before it was cool'. The Trump organisation has stirred controversy in Scotland over its golf courses for more than a decade, and this weekend's visit rekindled those tensions. Some staples of Trump protests were visible amid the local colour. Some demonstrators waved pictures of Trump with convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, who died in prison, and at least one woman wore a Handmaid's Tale costume, which women have donned to protest against Republican positions on abortion and other reproductive issues. Trump was similarly greeted with demonstrations when he came to Scotland during his first term. Then, thousands marched through the streets of Edinburgh and the now-famous 'Trump baby blimp' floated around the city. This past weekend the crowds have been far smaller, and there were no giant inflatables. Trump does have support in parts of Scotland, including in Turnberry on the west coast, where he is seen to have helped the local economy. According to the Scotsman newspaper, Trump was seen blowing kisses to a handful of fans who shouted, 'We love you, Trump'. But other locals, including those in Aberdeenshire, in the east, are bitter over what they say are broken promises and environmental degradation. Activists placed a 'twinned with Epstein island' sign next to the main welcome sign at the course. Overall, Scots remain cool on Trump. An Ipsos survey published in March found that 71% of Scots hold an unfavourable opinion of him. Scotland is a Trump ancestral home. His mother, who married Fred Trump in 1936, was born on the Isle of Lewis. During this trip, the President was expected to open a new golf course in her honour. Even on Lewis, views are mixed. A banner reading 'Shame on you, Donald John' is currently make its away around the island, displayed at homes and private properties. 'Donald John' is a common name on the island, according to the banner's creator, Sarah Grussing. In an email, Grussing explained that the wording was chosen 'as the sort of admonishment a family member would give a child that was not living up to community values'. Asked what the people on Lewis think of Trump, Alasdair Allan, a member of the Scottish Parliament who represents the region, gave a characteristically Scottish reply. 'I can't speak for everyone in Lewis, and there will be a mixture of views here, as everywhere,' Allan said. 'However, I personally suspect that most people here will see in Mr Trump a distinct lack of those characteristics which people in Scotland's islands value particularly highly: modesty, self-deprecation, compassion, a hesitation in which to allow thinking before speaking, neighbourliness, self-awareness and a sense of humour.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store