X accuses French prosecutors of politically motivated free speech probe
Earlier this month, Paris prosecutors escalated a preliminary investigation into X over suspected algorithmic bias and fraudulent data extraction. Authorities enlisted police to examine potential wrongdoing by the company or its executives.
'Based on what we know so far, X believes that this investigation is distorting French law in order to serve a political agenda and, ultimately, restrict free speech,' the platform posted on its Global Government Affairs account. 'For these reasons, X has not acceded to the French authorities' demands, as we have a legal right to do.'
In a sharp rebuke, X also alleged the probe was instigated by French lawmaker Eric Bothorel, who accused the platform of manipulating its algorithm for foreign interference purposes. X dismissed the claim as 'completely false.'
The Paris prosecutors' office and Bothorel did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
Musk, a former ally of U.S. President Donald Trump, has repeatedly criticized European governments for what he sees as attacks on free speech. He has also expressed support for some of the region's far-right parties.
The French investigation could widen tensions between Washington and European capitals over online discourse regulations. Former Trump administration officials have previously accused platforms of censoring right-wing voices globally.
X further objected to prosecutors' demands for access to its recommendation algorithm and real-time user post data, which would be analyzed by researchers David Chavalarias and Maziyar Panahi. The platform accused both of showing 'open hostility towards X,' raising concerns about the probe's impartiality.
Neither researcher responded immediately to requests for comment.
X also criticized the use of organized crime charges in the investigation, which could allow authorities to wiretap employees' personal devices.
The case follows similar legal scrutiny in France against Pavel Durov, founder of Telegram, who faces judicial supervision over alleged organized crime on his platform. Durov denies wrongdoing.
Earlier this month, Musk agreed with Durov's claim that French officials were 'waging a crusade against free speech and tech progress,' responding simply, 'true.' - Reuters
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
12 minutes ago
- The Star
Russia's night attack on Kyiv leaves eight injured, including child, Ukraine says
KYIV (Reuters) -A Russian overnight air attack on Kyiv wounded eight residents of an apartment building, including a three-year-old child, authorities in the Ukrainian capital said on Monday. Four of those injured in the attack, which took place soon after midnight on Monday, have been hospitalised, with one person in serious condition, the head of Kyiv's military administration, Tymur Tkachenko, said on the Telegram messaging app. Kyiv's Mayor Vitali Klitschko said that all of the people were residents of a multi-storey apartment building in the city's Darnytskyi district on the left bank of the Dnipro River. "The blast wave damaged windows from the 6th to the 11th floor," Klitschko said in a post on Telegram. The capital and most of Ukraine were under air raid alerts for several hours overnight following Ukrainian Air Force warnings of Russian missile and drone attacks. With the threat of missile strikes on western parts of Ukraine that border Poland - a NATO member - Polish armed forces scrambled aircraft to ensure the safety of Polish airspace. The central Ukrainian city of Kropyvnytskyi came under an attack, regional Governor Andriy Raikovych said, adding that emergency services were working on the site and information about potential damage will be released later on Monday. The full scale of the Russian attack on Ukraine was not immediately known. Reuters' witnesses heard loud blasts shaking the city of Kyiv overnight in what sounded like air defence units in operation. There was no comment from Russia on the attack. Both sides deny targeting civilians in their strikes in the war that Russia started in February 2022. But thousands of civilians have died in the conflict, the vast majority of them Ukrainian. (Writing by Lidia Kelly in Melbourne; Editing by Kim Coghill and Saad Sayeed)
New Straits Times
12 minutes ago
- New Straits Times
Papering over strains, US and allies prep for Taiwan war
AS they kicked off the largest joint military exercises in Australia's history with a press conference in Sydney earlier this month, US commanders gave a simple explanation for why 35,000 troops from 19 nations were simulating high-tech warfare. In the words of US Lieutenant General Joel Vowell, deputy commander of the US Army in the Pacific, exercise TALISMAN SABRE was intended to build the ability of the US and its allies to respond to any crisis in the Pacific – and in doing so, act as a "deterrent mechanism" to prevent a future conflict. Already, 2025 has witnessed a series of the largest and most sophisticated military drills held in the Pacific since the end of World War Two, a sign of growing nervousness over a rising China. But along with other US-led activity around the region, the drills also have a much more focused goal. They are to persuade Beijing that if it goes ahead with what are now believed to be increasingly advanced plans for an invasion of Taiwan, it risks finding itself at war not just with the US but a powerful and well-armed de facto alliance. Behind the scenes, however, sits clear diplomatic awkwardness, caused by Pacific frustrations over US President Donald Trump's tariff salvoes and trade war as well as strategic uncertainty over the US and its future global role. Unlike with its Nato allies in Europe or its main Pacific partners such as Australia, the US has no binding treaty obligations to defend Taiwan if it is attacked. Nor do Australia, the Philippines and other major players in the region. This month, the Financial Times reported that US officials were exerting mounting pressure on Australia and Japan to agree to intervene militarily if China moved against Taiwan. Under terms of the Taiwan Relations Act of 1979, successive US administrations have been committed to ensuring plans and military resources are in place to protect the island against whatever Chinese menace it faces. But that does not extend to a commitment to use that force in the event of an attack. Indeed, there is a clear division of views within the Trump administration and its supporters on the wisdom of such action, as well as over how much support Washington should offer to the government in Taipei. That means America's regional allies find themselves taking a similar position. The result is a situation rather different from what the Trump administration expected to find when it entered office in January complaining loudly about a European failure to invest properly in defending their own continent and pledging to switch America's focus to confronting China. But while European Nato nations have now committed to significant spending increases – 3.5 per cent of gross domestic product on defence with an additional 1.5 per cent on defence related infrastructure, America's Pacific allies have held back. Under hefty US pressure, Taiwan itself is working to get its defence budget to 2.5 per cent of GDP, motivated by US warnings that it might be abandoned if it does not step up its efforts. Japan spent only 1.8 per cent of GDP on defence in 2025, rising to 2 per cent by 2027 – and its prime minister Shigeru Ishida was widely suspected of skipping the Nato summit in The Hague last month to avoid pressure to do more. Japan, New Zealand, Australia and South Korea are not Nato members, but often attend large alliance meetings to discuss global and Pacific security matters. "It's hard to believe, a little bit ..., but thanks to President Trump, Asian allies should look to countries in Europe as a new-found example," US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth said at the Shangri-La Security Dialogue in Singapore in May. Hegseth also warned that the Chinese threat to Taiwan was "imminent" and that Beijing viewed its capture as a key step on the road to regional domination. Since Trump took office in January, however, America's Asian allies have found themselves profoundly uncertain by the administration's cool treatment of Ukraine in the country's battle against Russian invasion. They are suddenly worried that they might similarly find themselves deprived of US arms and forced towards a deal by a future US government. Trump's tariffs and trade war rhetoric have only made such matters worse.
The Sun
12 minutes ago
- The Sun
Bordeaux winemakers face uncertainty as US tariffs loom
BORDEAUX: French winemakers in the famed Bordeaux region are bracing for the financial impact of US tariffs, with industry leaders calling the uncertainty 'the stuff of nightmares.' The US remains the top export market for Bordeaux wines, accounting for €400 million in annual sales—20% of the region's total exports. Sunday's US-EU trade deal failed to clarify tariff rates for European alcohol exports. While US President Donald Trump announced a 15% across-the-board tariff, EU chief Ursula von der Leyen hinted at possible exemptions, stating that 'zero-for-zero' agreements for alcohol could still be negotiated. Philippe Tapie, chairman of Bordeaux Negoce, expressed frustration over the unpredictability. 'One day, it is white, the next it is black—the US administration can change its mind from one day to the next,' he said. The tariffs compound existing struggles, including declining consumption and overproduction, which have already pushed a third of Bordeaux's 5,000 winegrowers into financial distress. Twins Bordeaux, a major merchant, reported a 50% drop in US-bound sales this year. Co-director Sebastien Moses revealed they had stockpiled inventory preemptively but warned this was not a sustainable solution. Some high-end wines were even airlifted to bypass delays, though at triple the cost of sea freight. Jacques Bouey, CEO of Bouey wines, noted his firm had diversified exports to mitigate risks. 'Commercial strategies can no longer rely on one or two markets,' he said. With Trump's shifting deadlines—from 10% to 30%—Tapie warned, 'At 30%, no. End of story.' The industry now faces a critical wait for final tariff terms, with August 1 looming as the next decisive date. - AFP
