logo
Who Is French President Emmanuel Macron's Wife, Brigitte Macron? All About the Former Teacher and Her Relationship with the Politician

Who Is French President Emmanuel Macron's Wife, Brigitte Macron? All About the Former Teacher and Her Relationship with the Politician

Yahoo6 days ago

French President Emmanuel Macron has been with his wife, Brigitte, for nearly two decades.
After meeting the former high school teacher while the now-president was a student, the pair tied the knot in 2007. During a September 2017 conversation with CNN, Emmanuel, who became president in 2017, said that "love" is a big part of the "balance" in his life.
'Love is part of my life and my balance,' he said. 'I do believe that you don't build something great and you don't behave properly if you're not balanced and a strong couple. I've been with my wife for decades now and she's part of me.'
More recently, on May 25, a video circulated the internet that appeared to show Emmanuel being pushed in the face by his wife. According to French outlet Le Figaro, a palace official responded to the clip by claiming it was "a moment when the president and his wife were relaxing one last time before the start of the trip by having a laugh."
"it was a moment of closeness," the official added, per the news agency.
So, who is Emmanuel Macron's wife? Here's everything to know about Brigitte Macron and her relationship with the French president.
Brigitte and Emmanuel met when he was a student at Le Providence, a Catholic school in northern France. Brigitte worked as a drama teacher and was 39 years old at the time, while Emmanuel was 15. The president's parents originally thought he was seeing Brigitte's daughter, but when they found out he had feelings for the teacher, they sent him to boarding school.
"Emmanuel had to leave for Paris," she told Paris Match. "I told myself that he would fall in love with someone his [own] age. It didn't happen."
The two kept in touch over the years, but Brigitte was married at the time and had three children who were around Emmanuel's age, and she chose to prioritize them.
"That lasted 10 years, the time to put them on the rails. You can imagine what they were hearing," she said. "But I didn't want to miss out on my life."
Brigitte, who is 25 years older than Emmanuel, was already married for three years before he was born in December 1977.
She admitted in an interview with France's RTL radio station that having an age gap in their relationship has been difficult.
"We are not a model couple," Brigitte said. "Of course we are not the ideal couple. Being a couple is complicated, it's an everyday struggle (...) When you have a big age difference, it can be even more complicated."
She added, however, that she doesn't feel the word "cougar" applies to her, and is offensive.
"What is this word, it doesn't describe anything!" she said. "I have always been attracted to men of my age. Except Emmanuel Macron, who was the exception."
Brigitte and her first husband André-Louis Auzière, a banker, had three children together: Sébastien, Laurence and Tiphaine. She also has seven grandchildren.
All of Brigitte's children went on to be successful in their own careers, becoming a cardiologist, lawyer and a statistical engineer. When Brigitte started her relationship with Emmanuel, she knew that it would hurt her children, but after putting it off for a decade, she also realized she had to do what would make her happy.
'I know that I have hurt my children, and that is the thing I reproach myself for the most. But I couldn't not do it,' she told Elle in December 2017. 'There are times in your life when you make critical choices. And for me, this was one of those times.'
Emmanuel and Brigitte tied the knot in 2007, a year afer she divorced her ex-husband, who later died in 2019. Before the reception, Brigitte told Paris Match that Emmanuel thanked her children for supporting their relationship.
'Thanks for accepting us, a not-quite-normal couple,' he said.
The politician has cited his wife as his 'anchor,' helping to keep him honest and focused in his job, without sparing him the truth.
'For me, it's very important for my personal balance to have somebody at home telling you the truth every day,' he told CNN.
He continued, 'Access to truth is one of the main challenges. Somebody with her deep convictions and knowing you for what you are and loving you for what you are — not for what you represent or your role or your honors … That is very important to me. That is my anchor.'
Brigitte confirmed to Elle that she and her husband try to avoid spending nights apart if possible, even with his busy schedule.
'It comforts me when Emmanuel is by my side,' she said. 'I wouldn't want to speak for him, but I'm pretty sure he feels the same way. We're just like any other couple. We agree, we disagree. We argue, we stop arguing. It's very fluid.'
Brigitte added that while she used to be a 'big worrier' before she married Emmanuel, since they got together they both have ceased worrying as much.
'A bit like the Platonic idea that you meet your better half and you fit together,' she said. 'Given our age difference, that fit wasn't so obvious for us, but we fit. When I read about us as a couple, I always feel like I'm reading someone else's story. Yet it's a simple story.'
In July 2024, Emmanuel and Brigitte were spotted at the Paris Olympics. The couple attended the opening ceremony, as well as several sporting events.
On May 25, a video emerged of what appeared to be Emmanuel being pushed in the face by Brigitte as they arrived in Hanoi, Vietnam, and exited the presidential plane.
According to ABC News, Emmanuel played down the incident, telling reporters, "We are bickering and joking with my wife and a video becomes a sort of geoplanetary catastrophe."
"In the world we live in, we don't have a lot of time to lose" on discussing such topics, he added.
Per the outlet, Emmanuel also denied any "domestic scene," and said that it was "all a bit of nonsense."
Read the original article on People

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump's mega-bill faces rocky ride in Senate
Trump's mega-bill faces rocky ride in Senate

Yahoo

time13 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump's mega-bill faces rocky ride in Senate

US senators have begun weeks of what is certain to be fierce debate over the mammoth policy package President Donald Trump hopes will seal his legacy, headlined by tax cuts slated to add up to $3 trillion to the nation's debt. The Republican leader celebrated when the House passed his "big, beautiful bill," which partially covers an extension of his 2017 tax relief through budget cuts projected to strip health care from millions of low-income Americans. The Senate now gets to make its own changes, and the upper chamber's version could make or break Republicans' 2026 midterm election prospects -- and define Trump's second term. But the 1,116-page blueprint faces an uphill climb, with moderate Republicans balking at $1.5 trillion in spending cuts while fiscal hawks are blasting the bill as a ticking debt bomb. "We have enough (holdouts) to stop the process until the president gets serious about spending reduction and reducing the deficit," Senator Ron Johnson, one of half a dozen Republican opponents to the bill, told CNN. Democrats -- whose support is not required if Republicans can maintain a united front -- have focused on the tax cuts mostly benefiting the rich on the backs of a working class already struggling with high prices. The White House says the legislation will spur robust economic growth to neutralize its potential to blow up America's already burgeoning debt pile, which has ballooned to $36.9 trillion. But several independent analyses have found that -- even taking growth into account -- it will add between $2.5 trillion and $3.1 trillion to deficits over the next decade. The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office, meanwhile, found that the combined effects of tax cuts and cost savings would be a giant transfer of wealth from the poorest 10 percent to the richest 10 percent. Republicans muscled the measure through the House by a single vote on May 22 by a combination of bargaining vote holdouts on policies and deploying Trump himself to twist arms. House Speaker Mike Johnson is now pleading with the Senate not to alter the bill too much, as any tweaks will need to go back to the lower chamber. - Faultlines - The Senate wants to get the bill to Trump's desk by US Independence Day on July 4 -- an ambitious timeline given Republicans' narrow three-vote majority and wide faultlines that have opened over the proposed specifics. Independent analysts expect around seven million beneficiaries of the Medicaid health insurance program will be deprived of coverage due to new proposed eligibility restrictions and work requirements. Polling shows that the vast majority of Americans oppose cutting Medicaid -- including Trump himself, as well as some Republicans in poorer states that rely heavily on federal welfare. Senate moderates are also worried about proposed changes to funding food aid that could deprive up to 3.2 million of vital nutrition support. One thing is almost certain -- Trump himself will get involved at some point, though his negotiation tactics may be more subtle than they were when he threatened "grandstanders" holding up the tax bill in the House. Trump took to his Truth Social website on Monday to decry "so many false statements (that) are being made about 'THE ONE, BIG, BEAUTIFUL BILL'" -- and to falsely claim that it would not cut Medicaid. "The only 'cutting' we will do is for Waste, Fraud, and Abuse, something that should have been done by the Incompetent, Radical Left Democrats for the last four years, but wasn't," he said. One more wrinkle for Trump: tech billionaire Elon Musk -- no longer one of his closest aides but still an influential commentator -- has already broken with the president to criticize the mega-bill. "A bill can be big or it can be beautiful. But I don't know if it can be both," Musk said in a CBS interview criticizing its effect on debt. ft/jgc

Ashley Biden slams reporting about her dad's mental acuity as 'disrespectful and untrue'
Ashley Biden slams reporting about her dad's mental acuity as 'disrespectful and untrue'

Yahoo

time13 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Ashley Biden slams reporting about her dad's mental acuity as 'disrespectful and untrue'

Ashley Biden, daughter of former President Joe Biden, had harsh words for what she called "DAMN disrespectful and untrue" reports about her father's age on Monday. In an Instagram post, Ashley Biden shared a picture of herself with her parents, the former president and former first lady Jill Biden, on a beach, saying she was "too grateful to be angry about all the bulls---." "The ONLY coverup of this family is a BEACH coverup," Ashley Biden wrote. She defended her father, saying that he gave his all as president and pushed back on reporting in books like "Original Sin" that he was mentally declining while in office. 'Original Sin' Co-author Exposes 'Frantic Efforts' To Hide Biden's Cognitive Decline "He aged, YES! As we all do! And the stress of the presidency accelerates. But he was always MORE than capable of doing the job. And a damn good one. He worked harder than anyone I have ever known - he took his duty and sacred obligation to this country very seriously," she wrote. Read On The Fox News App Although she did not mention Axios' Alex Thompson and CNN's Jake Tapper's new book by name, she called out what she referred to as recent "noise" from "fake news" about Biden. "The noise is so DAMN disrespectful and untrue… AND, it's just that - noise/static - created by those committed to perpetuating and profiting from some real BS. Get lost with your anonymous sources and fake news," Ashley Biden wrote. She added that she was grateful for the support her family had received after the former president's prostate cancer diagnosis was revealed last month. Click Here For More Coverage Of Media And Culture Ashley Biden's comments came a few weeks after Biden's granddaughter Naomi Biden rebuked the book directly in an X post. "Just read a copy of this silly book, and if anyone is curious for a review from someone who lived it first-hand: this book is political fairy smut for the permanent, professional chattering class. The ones who rarely enter the arena, but profit from the spectacle of those that do. Put simply, it amounts to a bunch of unoriginal, uninspired lies written by irresponsible self promoting journalists out to make a quick buck," Naomi Biden, Hunter Biden's daughter, wrote. She claimed the book relied on "unnamed, anonymous sources pushing a self-serving false narrative." Thompson and Tapper's book, "Original Sin: President Biden's Decline, Its Cover-Up, and His Disastrous Choice to Run Again," revealed efforts by his administration to allegedly cover up Biden's mental and physical decline while in article source: Ashley Biden slams reporting about her dad's mental acuity as 'disrespectful and untrue'

Trump leans on GOP senators as they gear up to make changes to his domestic policy bill
Trump leans on GOP senators as they gear up to make changes to his domestic policy bill

Yahoo

time14 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump leans on GOP senators as they gear up to make changes to his domestic policy bill

President Donald Trump spoke with several GOP senators on Monday, including ones who have raised concerns about his domestic policy bill, as the chamber gears up to make changes to the legislation and congressional leaders aim to put the package on Trump's desk by July 4. In a sign of the challenges ahead for GOP leaders, a number of Republican senators have raised concerns about the House-passed package, demanding changes that could be tough for Speaker Mike Johnson's narrow majority to swallow when it moves back over to the House. The president met with Senate Majority Leader John Thune at the White House on Monday, who said they 'covered a lot of ground. A lot about the big, beautiful bill.' A White House official confirmed Thune and Trump met. Several of the senators who have been most vocal about their concerns — Sen. Josh Hawley of Missouri, Sen. Ron Johnson of Wisconsin and Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky — said that they discussed the package with the president. Paul told CNN that he 'had a lengthy discussion' with Trump this week and told the President that he can't back the bill if an increase to the debt ceiling remains in the package. 'It's just not a conservative thing to do, and I've told him I can't support the bill if they are together. If they were to separate out and take the debt ceiling off that, I very much could consider the rest of the bill,' said Paul, who noted that Trump 'did most of the talking' on their call. Johnson said he 'got a real nice call from the President this morning, had a nice conversation, very respectful,' as the Wisconsin Republican continues to press the President for further assurances that Congress will commit to more stringent spending cuts than what were included in the House bill. Johnson opened the door, however, to being flexible in how the White House could assuage his concerns and said he was open to getting assurances for future cuts to be made outside of just the framework of Trump's 'big, beautiful bill.' Asked if he would be open to passing something that looked like the House bill but with a 'promise' for other spending changes in the future, Johnson said, 'I want to help the president succeed in this thing so I've got a pretty open mind. My requirement has always been a commitment to a reasonable pre-pandemic level of spending and a process to achieve and maintain it.' Trump addressed Senate Republicans in a Truth Social post on Monday, writing, 'With the Senate coming back to Washington today, I call on all of my Republican friends in the Senate and House to work as fast as they can to get this Bill to MY DESK before the Fourth of JULY. Thank you for your attention to this matter!' Hawley, who has expressed deep concerns with potential changes to Medicaid, posted on X that he also spoke with the president about the bill. 'Just had a great talk with President Trump about the Big, Beautiful Bill. He said again, NO MEDICAID BENEFIT CUTS,' wrote Hawley. He told reporters later that he is very concerned about the impact of the tax on providers because it could cause already struggling rural hospitals in his state and around the county to close, something that would be akin to a cut in benefits if Medicaid recipients can't access health care. 'I'm also worried about this sick tax, you know, where now charging people to go to the doctor, pay before they can see a doctor. You know, they're on Medicaid because they can't afford to buy private health insurance. So, if they could afford to be paying out of pocket, they wouldn't be on Medicaid. So I don't know why we would tax them and penalize them,' said Hawley. Hawley said in his phone call with Trump, the president asked him what he thought the prospects for the bill are in the Senate. 'I said, 'good if we don't cut Medicaid, if we do no Medicaid benefit cuts. And he said, I'm 100% supportive of that',' he said. 'He specifically said, 'waste, fraud and abuse, fine and work requirements, fine…but no benefit cuts'. And I said, 'we are singing from the same handbook.' The various changes that GOP senators would like to see to the sweeping domestic policy bill make clear that the process of passing the 'big, beautiful bill' is far from the finish line. 'The world hasn't changed since we've been on recess,' Sen. Thom Tillis told reporters on Monday evening. 'There's work to do there.' The North Carolina Republican, who's up for reelection in 2026, noted that about 620,000 recipients have enrolled in Medicaid since his state expanded the program. It's been a concern among some lawmakers that work requirements implemented in the House's bill could particularly impact coverage in Medicaid expansion states. 'We've got to work on getting that right, giving the state legislatures and others a chance to react to it, make a recommendation or make a change, and that's all the implementation stuff that we're beginning to talk about now that we're in possession of the bill,' Tillis said. Maine Sen. Susan Collins, who will also have to defend her seat next year, finds the House-drafted work requirements 'acceptable,' but voiced other concerns with a provision related to provider taxes that could impact how states receive federal dollars. 'I'm very concerned about not only low-income families, but our rural hospitals,' she said. Sen. Shelley Moore Capito told CNN that she did roundtables with constituents in West Virginia over the recess and 'there's a lot of concern' about Medicaid at home. 'We haven't had a chance to digest how it's going to impact our hospitals,' she said. Sen. Jerry Moran of Kansas said he was also worried about 'harming hospitals that we just spent COVID money to save,' adding that he'll be 'lobbying to try to get something that's acceptable to me' on Medicaid in the bill. Another red line floated by some Senate Republicans is the roll back of Biden-era clean energy tax credits, which could begin with several consumer credits as soon as the end of this year. Tillis said he's looking at the issue 'through the lens of a businessperson,' explaining, 'it's easy, you know, from a political standpoint, to cancel programs that are out there. We need to be smart about where capital has been deployed and to minimize the impact on the message that we send businesses that every two or four years we have massive changes in our priorities for energy transition.' He said lawmakers should 'show some respect' to businesses that have employed capital on clean energy initiatives, adding 'I think we can get there' before walking into a meeting of the Senate Finance Committee. On the clean energy tax credit phaseout timeline, Moran said, 'I think there's a lot of Senate sentiment that it's too rapid.' Still, he wouldn't say if he'd vote against the existing bill, noting that he would lose 'leverage,' adding that the whole package has 'lots of things that I care about.' Sen. Markwayne Mullin, who has been playing a key role in talks with his former House colleagues, said he thinks there are 'two big issues' that the Senate can't touch, which were central in House GOP leadership's down-to-the-wire negotiations with holdouts. 'We have a structure, a great structure, the House sent over. We don't have to tear down that structure. We may have to put some more decorations in some of the rooms and maybe repaint some of the walls, but it's got a good structure to it,' he said. The Oklahoma Republican said the Senate should not go below the about $1.6 trillion in spending cuts promised to conservative hardliners or change the state and local tax deduction provisions carefully negotiated with House Republicans from high tax states. 'As long as we leave those two things there, and then we put our fingerprints on the rest of it, I think we're in good shape,' he said. Sen. John Cornyn, an ally of GOP leadership, said he thinks they'll try to have the bill on Trump's desk by July 4, 'which means things are going to have to move at a much faster schedule.' He noted that with the debt ceiling limit closing in, the House may have to just accept what passes the Senate, telling reporters, 'I've been around here long enough to see the Senate jam the House and the House jam the Senate.' CNN's David Wright and Kristen Holmes contributed.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store