NCEA overhaul: Wellington student supports changing ‘flawed' education system
'Different schools have different standards as part of different courses ... I know for a fact universities don't really value course endorsement.'
Brynn Pierce is a Year 12 student at Newlands College and the Youth MP for Andy Foster.
Newlands College stopped accrediting students with NCEA Level 1 last year, raising concerns that some would no longer receive any qualification if they chose to leave school after Year 11.
Yet the introduction of the Foundational Skills Award fixes that, Pierce said.
'One of the massive challenges with NCEA at the moment is it tries to be a jack of all trades. It's our qualification for seeing if you do well in school.
'Hopefully the new standard and the new system, with a little more structure, will mean that universities have a more standardised qualification to go by in each individual subject.'
Pierce praised the revised Year 11 certificate for prioritising 'basic competency in English and maths and the skills that they might need'.
However, others' attitudes to the overall reforms have been mixed.
'There is certainly an appetite for it. Some are saying, 'Can it come sooner?' Because they want a standard which they can use overseas, which is trusted in different areas.
Wellington student Brynn Pierce has welcomed an overhaul of the "flawed" NCEA curriculum.
'Whilst others are just concerned about passing the year.'
Pierce said most people his age would 'agree that NCEA is very, very flawed in its own ways', yet Education Minister Erica Stanford would still have to contend with ensuring the new qualification is flexible enough for all students.
The main concern for students has been the curriculum pivoting away from internal assessments.
'I'd be lying if I said that students were happy about the lesser focus on internals. Most students are quite unhappy about it.'
In his experience, Pierce said internals were 'very prone to misuse and to misconduct, in particular with AI', which had created irregularities between schools and left teachers providing students with excessive help.
'That's something which simply can't really be avoided and schools aren't really equipped to deal with.'
The reforms were an opportunity to create a more structured curriculum that standardised the expectations for students nationally, Pierce said.
While the curriculum overhaul won't be implemented until after Pierce leaves school, he was excited about what it offered those younger than him.
'By giving students a greater opportunity to do well in school and by giving them an opportunity to prove their worth, that will actually change a lot of others' pathways for the better,' he said.
'I still care very much about the changes because my little sister will go through it, a lot of my friends will go through it and they deserve a really good quality education.'
Sign up to The Daily H, a free newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
3 hours ago
- RNZ News
Live: Nicola Willis and Carmel Sepuloni go head-to-head on Morning Report's new political panel
Nicola Willis and Carmel Sepuloni. Photo: RNZ Unemployment is forecast to hit a nine-year high in figures due out on Wednesday. Economists expect the rate to rise to 5.3 percent for the June quarter - the highest since the end of 2016. Wage growth is also expected to cool further. National deputy leader Nicola Willis and Labour deputy leader Carmel Sepuloni discuss this, along with emergency housing, and the plan to drop NCEA, on Morning Report 's new political panel. Listen above, on our app, or on your local RNZ frequency from about 8.10am. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
RNZ News
4 hours ago
- RNZ News
NCEA isn't perfect but NZ shouldn't forget why it was introduced in the first place
First published on Photo: 123RF Education Minister Erica Stanford has called time on "credit counting", announcing plans to scrap the National Certificate of Educational Achievement (NCEA) . Under the proposed changes, from 2028 NCEA Level 1 will be replaced by foundational literacy and numeracy tests, dramatically reducing the amount of assessment in Year 11. Levels 2 and 3 will be replaced by a New Zealand Certificate of Education and an Advanced Certificate. The current achieved, not achieved, merit and excellence grades will give way to marks out of 100 and traditional letter grades: A, B, C, D and E. Students in Years 12 and 13 will be required to study at least five complete subjects and pass four of them in order to gain each certificate. The reforms are meant to address long-standing concerns over how students accumulate credits to complete their qualifications. With NCEA, students can opt out of assessments, including final exams, once they have accumulated enough credits. But as the government seeks to address the "gaming" of the system , it shouldn't lose sight of why NCEA was introduced in the first place - and who it was designed to help. While the system has its flaws, a return to an exam-based model may not make the grade either. Education Minister Erica Stanford says there's been too much "gaming" of the system. Photo: RNZ / REECE BAKER NCEA was introduced between 2002 and 2004 to replace the School Certificate, Sixth Form Certificate and Bursary qualifications. Its aim was to broaden educational success, recognising diverse forms of learning as legitimate. The previous qualifications primarily valued traditional academic subjects because those were, in large part, the only ones available for assessment. NCEA represented a shift away from viewing vocational learning - for example, in trades or creative subjects - as less valuable and not a viable path to formal qualifications. It also marked a departure from "norms" based assessment, which scaled student results to fit predetermined pass and fail rates. In contrast, NCEA was "standards" based: if a student could demonstrate the required skills or knowledge, they received the credits. But since the early days of NCEA, there have been concerns students could achieve the qualifications without really having gained an adequate education. The flexibility of NCEA - allowing schools, teachers and students to tailor learning pathways - is both its greatest strength and its greatest weakness. It has been criticised for being confusing, inconsistent and lacking credibility. Last year, Mike Grimshaw, an associate professor of sociology at Canterbury University, raised concerns that students were entering university "functionally illiterate". He said New Zealand was "under-educating but over qualifying". Concerns such as this over NCEA have fuelled repeated calls for reform. Photo: Unsplash/ Greg Rosenke While few dispute changes are needed, the scale and pace of the government's proposals are another matter. Schools have already contended with numerous policy shifts under this government, including rapid curriculum changes and new assessments in primary and secondary schools. Now they are being told the entire NCEA framework will be replaced. The sheer volume and speed of these changes puts significant pressure teachers. This is not the only concern. Under NCEA, a Year 12 student who worries they might fail the calculus "standard" can still do maths, knowing they have the option not to sit the calculus exam. Under the new system, this sort of flexibility disappears. Students will either take Year 12 mathematics - or they will not. This inflexibility raises the stakes. It may deter students from taking certain subjects altogether for fear of failure. The renewed emphasis on exams is also problematic. Research has shown exam outcomes can be influenced by gender, anxiety and even personal circumstances on exam day. In other words, exams are not necessarily the "credible" measure of learning they are made out to be. There are also important questions that the government's policy consultation proposal does not answer. What are the options for a student who fails the certificate on their first attempt? Will schools still be able to tailor internal assessments to suit their students? There are, however, reasons for cautious optimism. The government has promised to retain the NCEA standards-based approach. Preserving the integrity of whole subjects means students are more likely to learn topics, such as algebra, that keep academic options open but are often left out in NCEA. But this will come at a cost. The stakes will feel higher and students will face greater pressure to succeed. NCEA delivered on the promise that we shouldn't automatically assume half of our population will fail. Over the past two decades, more young people have left school with qualifications. But did they learn more? That remains an open question. The new system will likely bring consistency and arguably credibility to high school qualifications. But some students will pay the price of this higher-stakes approach to education. * David Pomeroy is Senior Lecturer in Mathematics Education, at the University of Canterbury. This article first appeared in The Conversation .
NZ Herald
6 hours ago
- NZ Herald
Editorial: NCEA reform is a once-in-a-generation opportunity
Epsom Girls Grammar announced in May that it would start its Cambridge International exams pilot next year after being flooded with 'overwhelming community demand'. Mount Albert Grammar School principal Patrick Drumm has said his school was also under growing pressure to offer Cambridge exams from parents concerned the NCEA lacked 'rigour'. Meanwhile, the Education Review Office (ERO) has called the NCEA 'difficult to understand' and said it doesn't prepare students for future achievement. It would be tough to argue that change isn't required. When NCEA was introduced between 2002 and 2004, it was designed with the idea that each student was unique, and it offered flexibility in what students could study and demonstrate achievement and competence in. That was a shift away from the blunter, one-size-fits-all system that was School Certificate and Bursary. Education Minister Erica Stanford said this week, 'This has come at the cost of developing the critical skills and knowledge they need for clear pathways into future study, training or employment'. NCEA has often been criticised for being too hard to follow and inconsistent across students and schools. It is a different world from the one in which NCEA was designed, and whatever your view, we now have the opportunity to design a better way of assessing and preparing students for life after school. And so it is good to see acceptance of the need for change, even from those more sympathetic towards NCEA. Chris Abercrombie, president of the Post Primary Teachers' Association (PPTA), while saying NCEA should 'evolve' rather than be destroyed, said 'Reform is necessary – but it must be thoughtful, inclusive and evidence-based". Opposition leader and former Education Minister Chris Hipkins warned against taking a backward step but admitted there was 'clear evidence that NCEA is not operating as intended and there is change required'. He didn't want the debate to become 'ideological' or 'unnecessarily political'. And that will be the key to developing whatever replaces NCEA. The world is rapidly changing, and all concerned parties need to come to the table to ensure New Zealand's secondary education system is enduring and fit for purpose in 2030 and beyond.
