Amid FEMA uncertainty, Western governors commit to more coordination on post-fire flooding
Several governors of Western states on Tuesday endorsed formalizing a partnership to help each other deal with the aftermath of increasingly devastating wildfires, citing the long-term effects of post-fire flooding and also uncertainty about the Federal Emergency Management Agency's future.
Governors from New Mexico, Utah, Wyoming and Colorado attended a panel discussion on the topic of post-fire flooding at the Western Governors' Association meeting in Santa Fe. The governors questioned experts — including state emergency response officials and a government landslide scientist — at a discussion called 'Flood After Fire – Enhancing Safety in Post-Fire Landscapes.'
The governors described the phenomenon as increasingly urgent due to wildfires burning hotter and larger across the West. High-severity wildfires can change soil composition, converting even modest rainstorms that fall on burn scars into potential floods or debris flows.
In New Mexico, for example, post-fire flooding has impeded the recovery from the 2022 Hermits Peak-Calf Canyon Fire, both for the City of Las Vegas as it tries to rebuild its water treatment facility and for smaller communities in and around the 534-square-mile burn scar. Other Western governors, including Spencer Cox of Utah, said they're increasingly concerned about flooding after fires. That was the case when Cox came across the aftermath of a fire that burned this week.
Las Vegas to get $98 million to replace water treatment facilities after 2022 wildfire damage
'The first thing I thought when I drove into that community had nothing to do with the fire or the homes burned,' he said. 'What I realized was, for the next five or six years, things are going to be pretty awful for those people because of the mudslides and the runoff, the sediment that comes down.'
The conversation occurred as at least six wildfires burn across New Mexico, and as burn scar areas in northern and southern New Mexico experience severe flooding or are warned to be on high-alert for it.
While no FEMA official sat on the panel, the agency's past performance with post-fire flooding and its future loomed over the meeting. Participants mentioned the agency's name more than 10 times, and speakers noted the challenges they'd face if the agency is dismantled, as called for briefly by Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem.
While New Mexico's United States Senators Martin Heinrich and Ben Ray Luján say the agency should still exist, they recently called on FEMA to change the way it deals with post-fire flooding. The agency has 'repeatedly struggled to respond effectively' to second-order effects from wildfires, including 'cascading disasters such as landslides, flooding and water system failures that compound damage and slow recovery,' the senators wrote.
NM's U.S. senators to Noem: Reform FEMA. Don't scrap it entirely.
Collin Haffey, a Washington post-fire recovery leader who worked for New Mexico Forestry Division during the 2022 wildfires here, spoke on the panel and said there's a 'tremendous amount of uncertainty' about the federal government's role in wildfire recovery going forward.
'If I'm trying to build my portion of the railroad track to meet them, I don't know how far to go,' he said. 'And I think that that lack of communication down to the local level is putting lives and recovery at risk.'
So he called on the WGA to create a formal agreement between Western states, one that could help states help each other deal with the aftermath of devastating wildfires amid uncertainty about what type of aid could come from the federal government.
'We have these peer-to-peer networks because I have their cell phone numbers,' Haffey said. 'But that's not necessarily the best.'
In response, Cox, who on Tuesday was named the new WGA chair, said he would spearhead an effort to create a regional partnership.
'Even if we weren't, you know, seeing FEMA reform and changes happening there, we should have been doing this anyway,' he said. 'And so let's do it anyway.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Gizmodo
a day ago
- Gizmodo
FEMA's Flood Maps Are Basically Lies
The U.S. Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps, often referred to simply as flood maps, outline flood risk. The maps are critical to determining the need for flood insurance, construction restrictions, floodplain management, and hazard mitigation. There's just one problem—75% of FEMA's maps are out of date. Writing for The Conversation, Jeremy Porter, a City University of New York researcher who studies flood-risk mapping at the nonprofit organization First Street, argues that the maps' overreliance on historical data and failure to include climate change impact are partially to blame. After horrific flash floods claimed over 100 lives in Texas' Kerr County in July, including children at a summer camp, the inaccurate flood maps' public safety implications are once again in the spotlight. 'While FEMA has improved the accuracy and accessibility of the maps over time with better data, digital tools and community input, the maps still don't capture everything—including the changing climate,' Porter wrote. 'There are areas of the country that flood, some regularly, that don't show up on the maps as at risk.' Specifically, a 2023 assessment by First Street, which conducts climate risk financial modeling, revealed that over two times as many properties in the United States were at risk of a 100-year flood (a flood that has a 1% chance of taking place any year) than those outlined in the FEMA maps. In the case of Kerr County, First Street identified over 4,500 homes at risk of flooding near the Guadalupe River. According to FEMA data, however, it was just 2,560. That means that people in areas not included in the official flood risk zones might not just be uninsured but also tragically unprepared. According to Porter, one of the problems is that the maps focus on river channels and coastal flooding mostly without taking into account flash flooding, specifically in areas with smaller channels of water. This is particularly notable within the context of climate change and global warming, which sees warmer air holding more moisture, which translates into more extreme rainstorms. Another issue is conflicts of interest. As NBC News reported, it's common for property owners to conduct their own flood risk analyses and then petition FEMA to change the flood zone designation accordingly. 'One of the problems with FEMA is it appears to be negotiable as opposed to an empirical or science-based understanding of risk,' Porter told NBC News. 'It's based on the ability to create an engineering study and negotiate with FEMA.' If you think most people ask the agency to label their area as high flood risk so they can better prepare, you're probably putting more faith in humanity than we deserve. The truth is that official flood zones can mean expensive flood insurance obligations, lower property values, and stricter construction regulations. What's more, 'Congress controls FEMA's mapping budget and sets the legal framework for how maps are created. For years, updating the flood maps has been an unpopular topic among many publicly elected officials, because new flood designations can trigger stricter building codes, higher insurance costs and development restrictions,' Porter explained on The Conversation. With President Trump threatening to potentially 'remake' FEMA, it remains to be seen what's in store for the agency's future and what that means for American lives.
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Weekend storms were rare, but they reflect the new rainfall extremes in Wisconsin
As Milwaukee-area residents pick up from the weekend's deluge, there's a common refrain: We've never seen anything like this before. While this storm may have been rare, intense rainfall events already have grown more common in Wisconsin and elsewhere. The reason has nothing to do with politics and everything to do with science. Human activities, like burning fossil fuels, are changing the climate. As our planet heats up, warmer air can hold more water vapor. For every one degree Fahrenheit of warming, the air can hold an extra 4% of moisture, according to the nonprofit climate science organization Climate Central. That means when weather conditions are right for a rainstorm, there's more moisture to let go. Emerging evidence also shows that a warmer climate produces slower-moving weather systems, said Wisconsin state climatologist Steve Vavrus. Winds in the upper atmosphere travel at slower speeds because of warmer arctic air, letting storms linger and dump more rain. In this case, the storm hovered over the Milwaukee area for hours Saturday night and Sunday morning before finally moving on. And while heavy rain doesn't always produce a flood risk, it's more likely in urban areas with concrete surfaces that can't soak up water, said Kristina Dahl, vice president for science at Climate Central. On average, Wisconsin has become nearly 20% wetter since 1950, Vavrus said. That trend is more pronounced in the southern half of the state, including Milwaukee. More: Milwaukee area flooding: Flooding resources, FEMA aid, closures from severe weather in southeast Wisconsin More: Flood debris pickups, drop-offs and more resources for Milwaukee County and suburbs More: How to clean up a flooded basement and prevent mold after Milwaukee floods None of this is unique to Wisconsin. According to the Fifth National Climate Assessment published in 2023, the amount of precipitation falling on days with the heaviest downpours has increased by 45% across the Midwest. The 2010s were Wisconsin's wettest decade since record-keeping began around 1900. Between 2010 and 2019, the state experienced at least 21 "100-year" rainfall events, meaning a 1% chance of the event occurring in a given year. Milwaukee's weather records date back to 1871, Vavrus said, and since then there have only been 11 days where the city has seen more than four inches of rain. Seven of those have occurred in the past 30 years. The National Weather Service reports that some parts of Milwaukee received more than a foot of rain during this last weekend's storm, which would shatter the state's 24-hour rainfall record if verified. Vavrus also pointed back to the 2018 floods in Dane County, when torrential rains of more than 10 inches pummeled the area, killing a motorist and causing more than $150 million in damage. Both that storm and Milwaukee's recent one dumped "hurricane-like" rainfall amounts, he said. "If people's perceptions are that these extremes are getting more common," Vavrus said, "they're exactly right." It's a trend that scientists expect to continue if more effort isn't made to counter climate change. Madeline Heim covers health and the environment for the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel. Contact her at 920-996-7266 or mheim@ This article originally appeared on Milwaukee Journal Sentinel: Milwaukee, Wisconsin seeing more intense rains due to climate change Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Yahoo
Does car insurance cover flood damage? What drivers should know after Milwaukee flooding
When relentless downpours pounded Milwaukee over the weekend, streets quickly turned into rivers. Flash flooding swamped low-lying neighborhoods, stranded vehicles and forced road closures as more than 10 inches of rain fell in some areas. In what experts described as a "1,000-year rain event," Milwaukee experienced historic rainfall over the weekend, recording its second-wettest day on record dating back more than 150 years. For many drivers, the full extent of damage won't be clear until the waters recede, and the repair bills start piling up. That raises a pressing question: What are the options for cars damaged by flooding waters? More: Wisconsin flooding: Flooding resources, FEMA aid, closures in Milwaukee area from severe weather Does car insurance cover flood damage? If your car is damaged or ruined by flooding, your auto policy's comprehensive coverage may help pay to repair or replace your vehicle, minus your deductible — though coverage details can vary by insurer. Comprehensive coverage typically protects against water damage from flooding, heavy rain, hailstorms, and other storm-related causes, according to Progressive. This coverage also applies to other storm damage. For example, if a falling tree branch breaks your windshield or hail dents your car, comprehensive coverage can pay for repairs. Without comprehensive, you'd be responsible for repair costs out of pocket. Keep in mind many insurers impose 'binding restrictions' when a major storm is imminent. That means you generally can't add or change coverage right before a storm, so it's wise to review your policy well in advance. If you do not have comprehensive coverage, your flood insurance will not do justice as that only covers homes and personal properties, but not vehicles, which are only covered by car insurance. What kind of flood damage does car insurance cover? Flooding can happen in different ways, and comprehensive coverage may help pay for repairs in most cases, minus your deductible — depending on the circumstances. Even if you're only driving through a flooded street or large puddles, or parked in a flooded area — not necessarily caught in a major flood — your insurance may still cover the damage. Floodwaters, regardless of the severity of the event, can cause a range of problems for your vehicle — from cosmetic issues like rust and fogged headlights to mold inside the interior. Comprehensive coverage typically pays for these repairs, minus your deductible. Your insurance may also cover water damage to your engine. However, if your engine becomes fully submerged, your car is likely to be declared a total loss. In that case, your comprehensive coverage would help cover repair or replacement costs, minus your deductible, according to Progressive. What isn't covered by flood damage? Most electronics that weren't installed by the automaker likely won't be covered. This may include: Stereos, tape decks, and CD players Scanners, two-way mobile radios, and CB radios Televisions, video game systems, and computers GPS devices Car phones Stay informed. Get weather alerts via text Brandi D. Addison covers weather across the United States as the Weather Connect Reporter for the USA TODAY Network. She can be reached at baddison@ This article originally appeared on Milwaukee Journal Sentinel: Does car insurance cover flood damage? Tips after Milwaukee floods