logo
Canada vs. USA: Two fans forced to watch each country's worst 2025 NHL playoff ads

Canada vs. USA: Two fans forced to watch each country's worst 2025 NHL playoff ads

New York Times03-06-2025
Every year, there's one article more people ask me about than any other. Which is weird, because it has next to nothing to do with hockey.
That would be this one, of course — the annual 'bad ads' piece, in which two Seans from different countries create an international exchange program for annoying commercials. You know the ones; the kind you see once or twice and maybe aren't too bothered by, right up until you realize that they're going to keep popping up constantly as you try to enjoy the NHL playoffs. That's when the annoyance begins to build. Sometimes, it grows into rage. Or despair. Or whatever that was that 'Tara Tara look at her go' made us feel.
Advertisement
We first tried this back in 2020, and it's become an annual tradition. This time around, in a year where relations between our two countries have been strained, to put it mildly, it feels more important than ever. After all, we may have our differences. But at least we all know how to pronounce the word 'liberty' and buy a proper cantaloupe. Here we go…
McIndoe: I'm going to lead off with a decision that I suspect will be controversial. Canada, we have to figure out what to do with 'Lay It on the Line.' (Pauses while an entire nation shudders in terror at the mere words.)
For you Americans, 'Lay It on the Line' is, of course, the single ad that's done the most psychic damage to hockey fans up here over the last few months. It's the Rogers spot that's not really selling anything except Canadian hockey exceptionalism, and we all hate it. It's to the point where just the first few seconds trigger a rage response from Canadians.
BUT! I'm not including it as one of my three ads today, for a simple reason: I don't think it's a bad commercial. In fact, on first viewing, it's actually pretty good. The problem up here is that after that first viewing, and the second, and the third, we've been subjected to it roughly a million more times. I swear that there are times when it plays at every ad break. That's what makes it so awful. It's the cumulative effect. And that wouldn't come across in an exercise like this.
So here's my compromise: American viewers, feel free to watch the ad below. Then rewatch it. Then put it on a loop, and after about 48 consecutive hours, check back and let me know what you think.
You'll know it's working when the first drop of blood rolls out of your ear.
Beyond that, I actually got scientific this year, posting a survey on my site for Canadian readers to vote on which ads they wanted to see. And somewhat to my surprise, two ads ran away with the poll. We'll use both, with a personal (non) favorite sandwiched in between, and see where this goes.
Advertisement
Gentille: Greetings from Team America HQ, where we believe we're in a bit of a transitional season. In 2024, we held the 'What a pro wants' hammer. The year before that, it was some lady with a heart like a truck. We know all about Tara, looking at her go and things of that nature. What I'm saying is that over the years, I'd learned to lean on commercials with earwormy songs. This year, I have no such option.
Time for a different approach. I'm trying to build a contender without a true franchise player here. That worked out for Rob Blake, right? Right?
In terms of the order, we're going in escalating order of obnoxiousness. I've tried a Round 1 haymaker a time or two, but I don't think I have the option this time around. Enjoy a slower build.
Also, that was the first time I saw 'Lay It on the Line.' I get that repetition is a factor here, but if that was really the worst of the Canadian batch this spring, I might have a shot.
McIndoe: I'll lead off with the surprise winner of my reader poll. To be clear, it's not that I don't think this ad is awful, but given that it only ran for about a week, it sure seemed to leave an impression with Canadian viewers. Sean, were you aware that we recently had an election up here?
Gentille: No, but I'm a big fan of them — especially the effect that they have on watching television.
McIndoe: Well then I have good news. We had a federal election, and like every election held anywhere in the world these days, we were warned that it was the most important one ever. And so, with just about a week left in a hard-fought campaign, this was our conservative party's closing message. Nothing held back, no expenses spared, this is what they wanted us to have in mind when we went to the polls:
Feel the electricity!
Gentille: Played big, I assume, with the crucial voting bloc of 'golf dads in quarter-zips who bought their kid a house.' Gotta keep those guys in your pocket if you're the conservative party.
Also, I think this is the first instance of 'Simpsons did it' in the history of our little exercise here.
Advertisement
McIndoe: It might be! Also, for those of you who don't follow Canadian politics, I should point out that neither of those old golfer guys was running for prime minister. Or anything at all. They're actors. Like, they do this for a living. They auditioned for this, and the people who wanted to run our country said 'Those are our guys.'
Gentille: I love starting conversations with my friends by reminding them of their kids' relationship to them. 'Ohhh, my son David. My mailman's name is David, too. Thanks for clarifying. Anyway, I had enough money to buy him a house. Things are going terribly for me.'
McIndoe: In a shocking development, the party that ran this ad did not win. Hey, if I wanted to watch some sad old guys play golf, I'd just wait for the second round of a Leafs playoff run, am I right?
Gentille: Yeah, or you could just hang around any Congressional country club outside of D.C. and wait for the clown car to roll up. Bunch of clowns.
McIndoe: 'I think it speaks directly to a demographic that the Conservatives need to win in order to win this election,' according to this CBC article. That demographic: You guessed it, clowns.
What's your first ad?
Gentille: After I made my picks, I re-read last year's post and was reminded that we'd speculated, based on a Progressive ad featuring a ghost who sounded like Will Ferrell, that we were approaching a point where the actual Will Ferrell would show up in our nasty little collection. Lo and behold …
Again: when I put that one in the leadoff spot, I'd completely forgotten about what we said last spring.
McIndoe: Oh, so this is what 'pay your own way' means. It sucks!
Gentille: It was the second one of these PayPal ads for Ferrell, too. Weird, because sequels have typically worked out for him.
McIndoe: You see, the little kid tells him he's not cool, so that means they know he's not cool, which when you think about it means he kind of is cool, right? That's how irony works, right? I'm pretty sure that's it.
Advertisement
Gentille: Irony, at least as I understand it, is when a bazillionaire celebrity stumps for a financial service that allows you to pay for relatively inexpensive stuff in installments. Unless he actually needs it.
McIndoe: Too bad about the humidity taking out his curls. If he needs any tips on keeping his hair dry, he could always reach out to Mitch Marner.
Gentille: It gets warm in Raleigh.
McIndoe: Next time we hang out, I'm definitely kicking off the good times with a 'Swans, flock up!' That catchphrase is definitely going to go viral, as the kids say.
Gentille: I am simply begging Will Ferrell to do something funny. It's been long enough. Let's move on before I get any sadder.
McIndoe: Good idea. Since you countered my friendly Canadian golfers with some genuine Hollywood star power, I know what I must do…
McIndoe: When it's time to appeal to Canadians and you've got the budget for a legitimate if vaguely non-threatening movie star, there's only way name you turn to: Ryan Reynolds. But when you find out he's already doing weird scrambled egg ads for Tim Hortons, your next best choice is Keanu Reeves.
Gentille: I have no problem with this one. He's a famously chill and likable dude, he's not doing anything particularly annoying in the commercial and he seems to have found yet another way to make the Dogstar guys some money.
McIndoe: Oh, are those the guys from his band? I kind of like that. But I have to disagree on him not being annoying here, because the implication is that he's left an entire work meeting on hold just so he can go play guitar with his friends. That's big-league jerk behaviour, no?
Gentille: Did you forget that I did that during the Zoom where they told us that they were putting the podcast on YouTube?
McIndoe: No. That's why I chose this ad. Maybe time for some self-reflection, Sean.
Advertisement
Gentille: The only issue I might have here is that 'Keanu Reeves loves the internet' seems like a faulty premise, based on basically everything we've ever heard about him.
McIndoe: I'm not sure I can fully articulate why, but the 'crash through the window' part really bothers me. It's a classic 'super-obvious idea that we've all already thought of and rejected, but now that the boss said it we have to pretend it's brilliant' moment. Kind of like when Terry Pegula suggests they sign Taylor Hall.
Gentille: 'What if I crash through the window?'
'Yeah. I mean this is … yeah.'
McIndoe: I will say this – I appreciate the attention to detail of him painting a wolf, then having that turn out to be his Fall Guys skin. I'm a 'horse's head and boxer shorts' bean myself, but to each his own.
Gentille: I can tell we're starting to cook, because Sean just brought up the finer points of a video game that I don't play. Folks, it happens more than you'd think.
McIndoe: (miscellaneous Balatro reference)
Gentille: Alright, here's one that definitely sucks for reasons both obvious and subtle.
McIndoe: OK, so… how can I put this… um, what the hell?
Gentille: It's annoying prima facie because 'bibberty' is an annoying word, the baby is annoying and the guy is annoying. That should be clear to even someone watching it for the first time.
What takes this thing into overdrive, though, is that there is LORE involved. Dude starred in a Liberty Mutual commercial a few years back as a 'struggling actor' who was flubbing all his lines. That's the big reveal. He dramatically pulls down the newspaper and everything — he, a guy who was in one of 10,000 simultaneously running insurance company ads from a half-decade ago.
McIndoe: What was the reaction in the Gentille living room when that newspaper came down? I'm guessing it was a 'Stone Cold in 1999' level pop.
Advertisement
Gentille: Crashed through the window like Keanu, brother. 'THERE HE IS! IT'S HIM!' Insurance commercial lore is something I've whined about here before, too. We see it with the Progressive ads starring 'Flo.' Those have been running so long, and Progressive has such a warped idea of the space they occupy in American life, that she has a family and friends and co-workers now. We are expected to enjoy them, too.
Also, I rewatched the original in prep for this. 'Liberty' is the only word Mr. 'Struggling Actor' doesn't flub. Continuity issues on top of quality issues. What a disgrace.
McIndoe: Infuriating. OK, let's take it home…
McIndoe: I'll be honest, I didn't really see this one coming as far as bad ad difference-makers. When it first debuted, it felt like a run-of-the-mill annoying commercial. But within a few days, it had emerged as the national consensus pick, and it never surrendered that lead.
Sean, I give you: An old man who has strong feelings about a cantaloupe.
Gentille: …I think this one is fine.
McIndoe: Sean.
Gentille: Yeah, man. I think the line deliveries are pretty good. I think soundtracking it with a string version of 'I Want It That Way' kind of works. There are probably funnier things she could be buying than a cantaloupe, but … I dunno. At minimum, I don't see how it would get that much worse even with repetition.
McIndoe: I'm stunned. First of all, you're overlooking the deeply weird (presumably family) dynamic here, where she's clearly so beaten down from his constant nit-picking that she just pretends to go along with every weird thing he says.
Gentille: No, I get it, and … I think that's kind of funny.
McIndoe: Also, can we normalize not expecting the minimum-wage workers we hire to do our grocery shopping to engage in bizarre rituals with our produce? If I got a lecture about cantaloupe strategy from a customer, I can't tell you what I'd be doing to that melon, but it wouldn't be knocking on it.
Advertisement
Gentille: That's the only issue I have with it. Able-bodied people should minimize how much they use apps like Instacart and DoorDash and whatever else, and in the instances that they can't-slash-won't, they should tip well and avoid bizarre requests.
McIndoe: You know what else sounds like nobody's home when you knock on it? The door to this old man's house, because he's a jerk.
Gentille: Maybe this one was, in fact, bad. Alright, I'm finishing up with one that's a lock to bother you.
McIndoe: Oh wow. Yeah, I'm mad now.
Gentille: Congrats to Jennifer Coolidge who, I'm pretty sure, is our first repeat honoree. Last year, she was harassing customer service employees. This year, she's harassing Wayne Gretzky. We should hang a jersey that she never wore from the rafters of Bad Commercial Arena.
McIndoe: I'm sure I'm not the first one to point this out, but the phrasing of 'accepted into the Hall of Fame' makes my eye twitch.
Gentille: You're not. A truly pathetic, unnatural turn of phrase that they crowbarred in solely to set up an 'accepted everywhere' reference. We love it!
I will say, though, I'd never realized that 'Gretzky' rhymes with 'jet ski.' Two of my favorite things, too.
McIndoe: Also, she drops the Hall of Fame line while gesturing at the retired numbers, which… that's not the same thing!
Gentille: Is it possible for anyone to know what a hat trick is while also never hearing of Wayne Gretzky? I don't think it's possible.
McIndoe: That's a great point that had not occurred to me, and now both eyes are twitching. I mean, what's the sales pitch here? 'You know who would probably enjoy a commercial about how unpopular hockey is? Hockey fans!'
Gentille: Also, Gretzky is sitting next to someone who isn't Kash Patel. So unrealistic.
McIndoe: Yeah, her eyes both point in the same direction. He'd never put up with that.
Gentille: 'It's the NHL on TNT, with Liam, Biz, Ace, Hank and Jetz!'
McIndoe: I'll just say it – you win this year. Dwayne Jetski just beat the competition like it was an overripe cantaloupe rind.
Gentille: He's been accepted into the Hall of Fame.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump signs executive orders to fast-track data center construction, target ‘woke' AI
Trump signs executive orders to fast-track data center construction, target ‘woke' AI

The Hill

time5 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Trump signs executive orders to fast-track data center construction, target ‘woke' AI

President Trump signed a trio of executive orders related to artificial intelligence (AI) on Wednesday, focusing on boosting data center construction and the adoption of American technology while targeting 'woke' AI. The three executive orders seek to fast-track permitting for data centers, promote the export of the American technology stack abroad and bar 'woke' AI systems from federal contracting. 'Under this administration, our innovation will be unmatched, and our capabilities will be unrivaled,' Trump said at an AI summit hosted by the Hill & Valley Forum and the 'All-In' podcast, where he signed the orders Wednesday evening. 'With the help of many of the people in this room, America's ultimate triumph will be absolutely unstoppable,' he continued. 'We will be unstoppable as a nation. Again, we're way ahead, and we want to stay that way.' The orders accompany the Trump administration's AI Action Plan released earlier Wednesday, which lays out a three-pronged approach to 'winning the race' on AI. In the framework, the administration called to cut federal and state AI regulations in an effort to boost innovation, pushed to expedite the buildout of AI infrastructure and sought to encourage the adoption of American technology abroad. Each of Trump's executive orders seeks to target at least some of the policy goals detailed in his AI action plan. The data center order calls on the Council for Environmental Quality to establish new categorical exclusions for certain data center projects that 'normally do not have a significant effect on the human environment.' It also seeks to identify projects that qualify for expedited permitting review. 'My administration will use every tool at our disposal to ensure that the United States can build and retain the largest, most powerful and most advanced AI infrastructure anywhere on the planet,' Trump said Wednesday evening. Meanwhile, his AI export order calls for the creation of an American AI Exports Program that will develop full-stack AI export packages, featuring U.S. chips, AI models and applications. Trump contrasted his approach with that of former President Biden, who released the AI diffusion rule at the tail-end of his presidency, placing caps on chip sales to most countries around the world. The rule faced pushback from the semiconductor industry and was repealed by the Trump administration in May. The third order targeting 'woke' AI seeks to limit agencies from signing contracts for AI models unless they are considered 'truth seeking' and maintain 'ideological neutrality,' which it defines as those that 'do not manipulate responses in favor of ideological dogmas such as DEI.'

State Department launches new investigation into Harvard
State Department launches new investigation into Harvard

Yahoo

time5 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

State Department launches new investigation into Harvard

The State Department will investigate Harvard University's eligibility to sponsor international students and researchers, Secretary of State Marco Rubio announced Wednesday, the latest attempt by the Trump administration to pressure the Ivy League university. 'The American people have the right to expect their universities to uphold national security, comply with the law, and provide safe environments for all students,' Rubio said in a statement. 'The investigation will ensure that State Department programs do not run contrary to our nation's interests.' The State Department is probing the Exchange Visitor Program at Harvard, which allows the school to bring international students, researchers and faculty to the university for temporary periods. Revoking its status as a sponsor makes it harder for the university to bring these people to its Cambridge, Massachusetts, campus. Rubio said that to maintain the 'privilege' to sponsor exchange visitors, Harvard must act in a manner that does not 'compromise' America's national security interests. This isn't the first challenge Harvard has faced during President Donald Trump's second term. A federal judge in June blocked a Trump effort to prevent international students from enrolling at the university. And Harvard is suing the Trump administration for cutting more than $2 billion in federal grants. A university spokesperson said in a statement this was "yet another retaliatory step" taken by the Trump administration to violate Harvard's First Amendment rights. "Harvard continues to enroll and sponsor international scholars, researchers, and students, and will protect its international community and support them as they apply for U.S. visas and travel to campus this fall," the spokesperson said. "The University is committed to continuing to comply with the applicable Exchange Visitor Program regulations.' The fight with one of America's most prestigious universities comes as the Trump administration says it wants to crack down on antisemitism at higher education institutions. Trump has accused Harvard of failing to protect its Jewish students — in violation of the Civil Rights Act — amid a greater reckoning on college campuses in the aftermath of pro-Palestinian protests. 'Harvard is an Anti-Semitic, Far Left Institution, as are numerous others, with students being accepted from all over the World that want to rip our Country apart,' he wrote in a Truth Social post in April. 'The place is a Liberal mess, allowing a certain group of crazed lunatics to enter and exit the classroom and spew fake ANGER AND HATE.' Trump suggested in late June that the federal government could reach a deal with Harvard, but that has yet to materialize. In an April statement, Harvard's President Alan Garber acknowledged that there are 'valid concerns' surrounding rising antisemitism but argued that the Trump administration was attempting to use these concerns as a 'justification' for unlawful actions. 'These actions have stark real-life consequences for patients, students, faculty, staff, researchers, and the standing of American higher education in the world,' Garber said.

University of Chicago considers restructuring arts and humanities division to cut costs
University of Chicago considers restructuring arts and humanities division to cut costs

Chicago Tribune

time7 minutes ago

  • Chicago Tribune

University of Chicago considers restructuring arts and humanities division to cut costs

The University of Chicago is considering a substantial restructuring of the school's Division of the Arts and Humanities to cut costs, citing historic financial strain under the Trump administration. 'University leadership is looking across the entire institution for ways to significantly reduce costs and increase revenue, while continuing to fulfill our mission,' Nelson wrote in the email. The faculty-led committees were instructed to propose changes by the end of August. The Chicago Maroon, the university's student newspaper, first reported on the reorganization efforts Monday. A U. of C. spokesperson told The Tribune in a statement that similar 'focused planning' is taking place across the university. 'This spring and summer, academic leaders across every school and division have been working with faculty and other colleagues to make timely strategic plans for this academic year and years to come,' the spokesperson said. The move comes as the Trump administration exercises increased scrutiny against colleges and universities across the country, including taking steps to pull funding at elite institutions. Nelson pointed to cuts to federal research funding, shifting policies surrounding international students and graduate student loans, and general volatility in the American economy as sources of U. of C.'s underlying fiscal pressures. The proposed changes could be enacted for the 2026-27 academic year, she told faculty. 'The status quo is not an option,' Nelson wrote. 'To simply copy and paste means the inkpad will run dry, and the Division of the Arts & Humanities will very soon be a pale, indecipherable version of what we once aspired to be.' Nelson has been communicating with faculty since January about efforts to plan for the division's future, the university spokesperson said. More than 40 faculty members are participating in the committees. The committees target five different areas for restructuring and cuts: college teaching, divisional organization, languages, master's programs and PhD programs. Each group received a list of 'questions for exploration,' according to documents reviewed by The Tribune. Among those questions: 'Could we envision an organization with 8 departments?' and 'Are there languages we no longer need to teach?' Faculty members described an environment of confusion and frustration in the division, as speculation swirls about the impact of possible cuts. Tyler Williams, an associate professor in the Department of South Asian Languages and Civilizations and a member of the languages committee, said much of the group feels unequipped to suggest changes in a limited time frame. Many are hesitant to propose any spending reductions. 'The process is too fast and too uninformed,' Williams said. 'We're being asked to think of suggestions that could affect dozens of jobs, which could affect the way all languages are taught at the University of Chicago.' Other committees have prioritized identifying changes that would minimize the impact on students. Daisy Delogu, a professor of French literature, was assigned to the PhD programs committee. Her focus has been on finding ways to streamline the PhD process to reduce administrative spending. 'We've been asking ourselves, 'Are these requirements evaluating or advancing students towards certain goals? Do we have milestones in place that are meaningful to students' learning? Or do they feel kind of like giant hoops?'' Delogu said. Some faculty members fear the reorganizing efforts could jeopardize the work of small, specialized departments and their professors. Andrew Ollett, an associate professor and director of graduate studies in the Department of South Asian Languages and Civilizations, specializes in philology and Sanskrit. Because the discipline is so specialized, class sizes are often small — but the department is nationally ranked, Ollett said. 'We have a historic department that has had many luminaries associated with it in the past,' Ollett said. 'I'm really shocked to think that we could just cease to exist over the next year, without substantive discussion, without real faculty consultation, without a review of our program.' In recent years, U. of C. officials have outlined plans to reduce the university's climbing deficit, which topped $288 million last year. But a slew of federal changes under President Donald Trump have thrown the higher education landscape into uncertainty. The National Institutes of Health and the National Science Foundation have frozen or terminated millions of grants, with little communication to researchers and universities. U. of C. relied on $543 million in federal grant funding in 2024, which accounted for 18% of its revenue, according to bond issuance documents. The school has also faced inquiries from the U.S. Department of Justice and the Department of Homeland Security on admissions practices and international students. In her email, Dean Nelson highlighted the threat of an increased tax on the university's $10 billion endowment under Trump's 'big beautiful bill.' Federal legislators initially proposed a draft that would have cost the school more than $50 million in additional taxes — but the final version of the bill has no impact on U. of C. based on its student-adjusted endowment. 'The looming federal crisis seems to me to have been very substantially diminished or postponed,' said Clifford Ando, the Robert O. Anderson Distinguished Service Professor in the Department of Classics. 'So why not put the brakes on and run this process deliberately and carefully?' It's not the first structural change in recent months – U. of C. announced the merger of the Division of the Humanities and UChicago Arts in April. That move was a strategic decision to 'better reflect and support the incredibly vibrant intellectual and creative community' at U. of C., the spokesperson said. Nelson framed the committees as a way to ensure thoughtful faculty input wth restructuring. The Division of the Arts and Humanities remains in a 'relatively good budget position' heading into the upcoming fiscal year, she said. 'If we do nothing, or if we become divided, we will essentially hand over control of shaping the future of the arts and humanities at UChicago to others outside our division,' Nelson wrote.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store