Attorney General compares calls to leave international courts with Nazi Germany
Lord Richard Hermer KC said the idea that the UK can breach international obligations is a 'radical departure from the UK's constitutional tradition'.
Lord Hermer used a speech in London on Thursday to say claims that international law can be 'put aside' were made in the early 1930s in Germany.
In a version of his speech to the Royal United Services Institute (Rusi) thinktank, published on the gov.uk website, Lord Hermer suggested the Government's approach is a 'rejection of the siren song' that can be 'heard in the Palace of Westminster' in which 'Britain abandons the constraints of international law in favour of raw power'.
'This is not a new song,' he said.
'The claim that international law is fine as far as it goes, but can be put aside when conditions change, is a claim that was made in the early 1930s by 'realist' jurists in Germany, most notably Carl Schmitt, whose central thesis was in essence the claim that state power is all that counts, not law.'
Lord Hermer also said that because of what happened 'in 1933, far-sighted individuals rebuilt and transformed the institutions of international law'. That is the year that Adolf Hitler became German chancellor.
Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch has stopped short of calling for the UK to leave the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), as other Conservative figures have advocated.
However, she suggested the UK would have to leave the convention if it stops the country from doing 'what is right'.
Reform UK leader Nigel Farage has said he would get rid of the ECHR, and told ITV in April that 'we have to get back the ability to decide, can we really control our borders'.
In his same speech to Rusi on Thursday, the Attorney General said 'we must not stagnate in our approach to international rules' and that officials should 'look to apply and adapt existing obligations to address new situations'.
'We must be ready to reform where necessary,' he added.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scotsman
an hour ago
- Scotsman
Onshore wind capacity needs to double what there already is in the next five years, industry leaders say
Onshore wind farms are going to have to increase by at least double, energy bosses have said | Maritxu22 - Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... Scotland's onshore wind developments will need to double in capacity in the next five years as pressure mounts on grid upgrade works to be consented, energy leaders have said. The minimum target north of the Border for onshore wind is currently 20GW of power by 2030. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad It would mean needing to double the current total installed capacity of 10.1W to date in the next five years. Colin Innes, a partner at Shepherd and Wedderburn, and who specialises in renewables, said the significant step up comes after a lull in development since the Conservative government effectively banned onshore wind in 2015. Colin Innes, a partner at Shepherd and Wedderburn | Shepherd and Wedderburn Speaking to The Scotsman, Mr Innes said: 'What needs to happen is building and building quickly to maximise the economic benefit for Scotland and catch up on the missed years we lost when there was a limited number of turbines built comparatively. 'The 'switch off' caused a blip in terms of deployment for a period of five or six years.' Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The calls come as Scottish Conservatives described the current net zero agenda as 'unrealistic and unaffordable' with the Scottish Government having 'missed their eco targets for years.' Mr Innes said a challenge the sector faces is an ongoing 'disconnect between what the public thinks is going on and where energy developments are going to be in a decade with how much electrification is needed to meet demand.' The Climate Change Committee (CCC) says by 2040, 80 per cent of cars should be electric and one in two homes have a heat pump as part of the nation's 'decarbonising' plan. About 60,000 UK homes installed a heat pump in 2023, according to the CCC, a figure it wants to see climb to 450,000 by 2030 and 1.5 million by 2035. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Mr Innes said: 'People think we are trying to sort out electricity as it is now. 'But the reality is doubling the demand changes the system, changes the dynamic. 'All infrastructure needs to be a different scale.' Mr Innes said the onshore sector is 'buoyant' with 'a wide range of developers in the Scottish market coming through and a lot are getting consented.' Industry leaders said a recognised issue with this growth in renewable developments is a higher concentrations of turbines in 'intermediate areas' - not on the edge of towns or in protected areas - will be felt in years to come. This is due to restrictions to onshore wind turbines in areas including National Parks and National Scenic Areas, which, collectively, takes up about 20 per cent of the land in Scotland. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Dalnacardoch Estate, which sits entirely within the Cairngorms National Park, halfway between Blair Atholl and Dalwhinnie (pic: Big Partnership) Limited delivery in England due to lower wind resource, protected uplands and solar energy competitors also drives more development in what the industry has labelled as 'hotspot areas' in Scotland. These include Caithness, Dumfries and Galloway, East Ayrshire and Argyll and Bute. The Lake District | Supplied Dumfries and Galloway and Ayrshire have been named as some of the hotspots for more wind farm developments | Katharine Hay For the communities taking the brunt, Mr Innes said 'the community benefit fund has to move beyond the village hall.' He said the communication on the 'wider benefit' of onshore developments when it comes to business rates also needs to be improved. 'The way we do business rates absolutely disassociates the benefits from onshore wind farms because it goes into a central pot and it's reallocated which means it gets lost,' Mr Innes added. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad 'In Scotland terms, the more generation we have the more business rates we have, the more money for public services and communities, but it gets lost because of the way we do that which is regrettable.' While renewable energy applications are flying in, including a noticeable increase in anaerobic digesters and applications and increased government funding for 'green' hydrogen plants, the grid infrastructure, which is currently being upgraded to transmit this upsurge in electricity, is facing delays. Scottish and Southern Electricity Networks (SSEN) Transmission is investing £22 billion in grid infrastructure over a five-year period from April 2026 to March 2031 to replace old lines and build 'super highways' to transfer power from developments in the north of Scotland to where energy is needed. Alison Hill, director of project development at SSEN | SSEN Alison Hill, director of project development at SSEN, said the company is on track with submitting plans for the grid upgrade, but it needs consenting bodies to act. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The company has previously criticised the Scottish consenting system after it took four and a half years for the Beauly to Denny upgrade, a development that sparked a fierce backlash from the surrounding communities. Ms Hill said the current project to reinforce the network from Fort Augustus to Skye — the only power line serving all homes and businesses along its route and in the Western Isles - is showing serious delays. 'Two and a half years in planning and we're still waiting for that consent to be determined by the energy consent unit and the Scottish ministers,' she said. 'We're looking at replacing a line that's already there. It's not a new build. 'It's difficult to understand why it's taken so long. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad 'The overhead line route is very old. It's had ten major faults in just six years, far more than we would expect on a transmission network, so that line needs to be replaced.' Ms Hill said three new build overhead line schemes are to be submitted to the Energy Consents Unit in the coming months, adding: 'Once submitted we require the consenting bodies to act to maintain momentum for 2030.' Some of the pylon developments have drawn serious controversy from various communities across Scotland, including Aberdeenshire, where a new pylon line is proposed with some of the steel towers possibly reaching as high as 246ft (75m) and will be part of a planned 66-mile (106km) route between the town of Kintore and the village of Tealing. Earlier this year, the UK Government committed to ensuring households near new or upgraded pylons will save up to £250 a year for 10 years to be introduced through the Planning and Infrastructure Bill. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad In response to delays in consenting SSEN projects, the Scottish Government pointed to its guidance outlining the procedure to determine priority applications to install overhead line transmission infrastructure, under section 37 of the Electricity Act 1989, is within 52 weeks.
Daily Record
2 hours ago
- Daily Record
Scots would pay price for Nigel Farage's proposed funding shakeup
Nigel Farage wants to unleash economic chaos on Scotland. The Reform UK leader made it clear yesterday he does not agree with how public services north of the Border are currently funded. While the Clacton MP insisted he's committed to devolution, he said it was time the Scottish Government raised more of its own revenues. When pressed by the Record on whether he wanted to scrap the Barnett Formula, he admitted he thought it was out of date. The existing system determines the level of public spending in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland. Under it, extra funding – or cuts – from Westminster are allocated according to the population size of each nation and which powers are devolved to them. But there is a very simple reason why the Barnett Formula has survived for more than four decades. Providing basic public services such as schools and hospitals costs a lot more in rural areas than it does in cities. Scotland's Highland and island communities are relatively sparsely populated compared to the south-east of England, where population density is at its highest. Even the Conservative governments of David Cameron, Theresa May and Boris Johnson never dared to rip it up. Scrapping it could cost Scotland billions in funding and lead to brutal cuts to our treasured public services. Farage, yet again, showed why Scots should run a mile from his party. Not Putin up with it Keir Starmer's 'war readiness' defence review was good news for Scotland, the UK and the Western world. Vladimir Putin has shown he has never got over the break up of the USSR. Russia's invasion of Ukraine should have surprised nobody. Defence analysts fear Russia could seek to invade other countries and the West must be prepared. The Labour Government's spending review should be welcomed on a number of fronts. How Starmer plans to foot the bill is less obvious. When the public finances are as tight as they are, every decision has a cost – and pumping billions of pounds into defence will mean other areas lose out. Extra attack submarines, £15billion on nuclear warheads and thousands of long-range weapons will all make the UK safer. Increasing defence spending to 2.5 per cent of gross domestic should also set an example to other countries in NATO. Starmer's decision to launch the review at BAE Systems' shipyard in Govan in the shadow of Type 26 frigates being built there was symbolic. Scotland is central to meeting the UK's defence needs and the announcement should safeguard thousands of jobs.
South Wales Guardian
5 hours ago
- South Wales Guardian
Trade Secretary to push for timeline on US tariff exemption
Sir Keir Starmer and Mr Trump announced the broad terms of an agreement last month that would exempt the UK from some of the US president's tariffs on steel and cars while increasing market access for other goods. The Prime Minister hailed the announcement as a major achievement, saying the UK was the first nation to reach such an agreement with Mr Trump. But the details are still being worked out ahead of a formal deal, and the Government hopes for an agreement within weeks. Mr Reynolds is expected to discuss implementing the deal during talks with US trade representative Jamieson Greer in Paris on Tuesday, where he is attending a meeting of the OECD. That meeting comes amid uncertainty about the future of Mr Trump's tariffs after a US court last week ruled many of them unlawful, before an appeals court reinstated the levies pending a further hearing. Last week also saw Mr Trump announce that he would double tariffs on steel to 50%, starting on Wednesday, and it remains unclear how the UK would be affected. Mr Reynolds's visit to Paris is part of a three-day trip, during which he is expected to meet other trade ministers and attend a G7 ministerial meeting before heading to Brussels for meetings with his EU counterparts. During the trip, the Trade Secretary will argue that the UK is a dependable partner in an era of increasing global volatility. He said: 'Our deals with the US, EU and India are proof that the UK is the most connected country in the world to do business. Along with our modern industrial strategy, our Plan for Change is making the UK a safe, stable bet in uncertain times. 'We recognise our relationship with G7 allies and EU counterparts must continue to evolve and deliver a better trading environment for our businesses and exporters. 'That's why we want to wipe away costly, business-blocking barriers and open up opportunities to grow our economy, create jobs and put more money in people's pockets.' Andrew Griffith, Conservative shadow business secretary, said: 'Labour told the British public we had a deal with the US – but one month on there is no deal in sight, meaning British businesses and workers continue to suffer because of Labour's failed negotiations. 'After snatching the winter fuel payment, lying about not increasing taxes, and misleading the public by saying the US trade deal was done, the public will rightly not trust a word Labour says. 'As all the other political parties wrangle over how to spend more taxpayers money, only the Conservatives are committed to being responsible with the public finances.'
