Putin Aide DESTROYS Merz For Asking Russia To Pay For Ukraine Damages
The Supreme Court has allowed the Election Commission of India to continue with its Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls in Bihar, but not without raising serious questions about its timing and methodology. The apex court asked why such a sweeping exercise was launched just months before elections, warning that it "goes to the root of democracy and the power to vote." The Court also asked the EC to consider accepting documents like Aadhaar, voter ID, and ration cards for verifying voter eligibility, especially amid opposition fears of disenfranchisement. However, it dismissed arguments that the EC lacked the authority to conduct the revision, noting that it was last done in 2003. The next hearing is set for July 28, and the EC has until July 21 to respond. No interim order has been passed yet. Is this voter clean-up or voter suppression? The courtroom battle is far from over.#supremecourt #biharelections #voterroll #electioncommission #aadhaar #votingrights #bjpvsindia #toi #toibharat #bharat #trending #breakingnews #indianews
9.3K views | 1 day ago
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
23 minutes ago
- Time of India
Kanwar yatra: Plea in Supreme Court against UP's QR code order for eateries
A female 'kanwariya' carrying water from the Ganga river during her pilgrimage in the holy month of 'Shravan' in Haridwar. NEW DELHI: A petition has been filed in Supreme Court challenging Uttar Pradesh government's directive to shopkeepers to put up QR codes at their eateries along the route of Kanwar Yatra, which could be scanned to reveal the names of the owners. SC is likely to hear the matter on July 15. In July last year, SC had stopped govts of Uttar Pradesh and Uttarakhand, among others, from implementing their directives to shop owners and hawkers along the routes of Kanwar Yatra to display their names, along with those of staff members, at their outlets, and held that food sellers only needed to mention the kind of food they were serving. "We deem it appropriate to pass interim order prohibiting the enforcement of the impugned directives. In other words, the food sellers (including dhaba owners, restaurants, foods and vegetable sellers, hawkers, etc) may be required to display the kind of food that they are serving to the kanwariyas. But they must not be forced to display the name/identity of the owners and the employees deployed in their respective establishments," the court said in its order passed on July 22. Challenging the new order of UP govt, the plea filed in the apex court by Delhi University professor Apoorvanand Jha and activist Aakar Patel said that the measure amounted to violation of SC's last year order, since it was intended to achieve the same discriminatory profiling that was stopped by the court. "(News reports) confirm that all eateries on the Kanwar route are required to display QR codes that allow 'customers to access ownership details'. These steps effectively serve the same unconstitutional end through digital means, in wilful disobedience of this Court's directions," the petition said. "Vague and overbroad directives deliberately mix up the licensing requirements with the other unlawful demand to display religious identity, and leave scope for violent enforcement of such a manifestly arbitrary demand both by vigilante groups and by authorities on the ground. There is grave and imminent risk of irreparable injury to the fundamental rights of affected vendors, particularly from minority communities, unless this Court issues immediate directions to restrain Respondents from continuing this indirect implementation," it added.
News18
29 minutes ago
- News18
2 Days Before Execution, Supreme Court To Hear Plea Today To Save Kerala Nurse Nimisha Priya
Last Updated: The Supreme Court will hear a plea seeking urgent diplomatic intervention to save Kerala nurse Nimisha Priya from execution in Yemen on July 16. Two days before her execution, a plea seeking direction to the Centre to use diplomatic channels to save Kerala nurse Nimisha Priya will be heard by the Supreme Court on Monday. Thirty-eight-year-old Nimisha Priya, from Palakkad district of Kerala, will be executed in Yemen on July 16 for murder charges. A bench of Justices Vikram Nath and Sandeep Mehta is likely to hear the matter. The plea was filed by an organisation, 'Save Nimisha Priya International Action Council', which is extending legal support to assist the nurse, and cited a media report that stated that the tentative date for execution of Priya has been fixed as July 16 by the Yemeni administration. The matter was mentioned for urgent hearing on July 10 after advocate Subhash Chandran KR said diplomatic channels need to be explored at the earliest. He had submitted that payment of blood money to the family of the deceased permissible under Sharia law can be explored. The family of the deceased may pardon the Kerala nurse if blood money is paid, he submitted. The bench asked the counsel to serve a copy of the petition to the Attorney General and sought his assistance. Nimisha Priya was convicted of murdering her Yemeni business partner in 2017. She was sentenced to death in 2020, and her final appeal was rejected in 2023. She is currently imprisoned in a jail in Sana'a, the capital of Yemen. On Saturday, AICC general secretary KC Venugopal claimed that the central government was not taking any steps to intervene with the execution of Nimisha Priya. Venugopal contended that it was 'sad" that the Centre was not showing any urgency in the matter despite the issue being brought to the attention of the Prime Minister and the External Affairs Ministry. The AICC general secretary, who is also the MP from Alappuzha Lok Sabha constituency, in a post on X, wrote that the death sentence imposed on Priya was a 'grave travesty of justice". view comments First Published: July 14, 2025, 08:03 IST Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
India.com
an hour ago
- India.com
Opposition Questions ECs Hurry Over Nationwide Electoral Roll Revision Ahead Of SC Verdict
New Delhi: With the Bihar elections approaching, the Election Commission has directed Chief Electoral Officers (CEOs) across all states to initiate preparations for a Bihar-like Special Intensive Revision of electoral rolls. However, Opposition parties have criticized the move, questioning the "hurry" of implementing a nationwide SIR without consulting political parties. Parties across the Opposition spectrum, including the Congress, Trinamool Congress, and the Left, said on Sunday that the Election Commission should have waited for the Supreme Court to conclude its hearing on the matter before issuing directions for a Bihar-like Special Intensive Revision. Last Thursday, the Supreme Court, while hearing a batch of petitions raising concerns over the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) in poll-bound Bihar, declined to restrain the Election Commission from proceeding with the exercise. However, it suggested that the Commission consider using Aadhaar, voter ID, and ration cards to update the electoral rolls. The Court allowed the EC to file a counter-affidavit by July 21, with the next hearing scheduled for July 28. According to reports dated July 5, just a day after a petition was filed in the Supreme Court challenging the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) in Bihar, the Election Commission wrote to Chief Electoral Officers across all states, directing them to begin preparations for a similar exercise, this time using January 1, 2026, as the qualifying date. The mention of January 1, 2026, as the qualifying date suggests that while the nationwide exercise may begin soon, a final timeline for its completion across the country is yet to be determined. The objective, however, is to ensure the inclusion of all individuals who turn 18 by that date. Leaders from various Opposition parties on Sunday criticized the Election Commission for moving ahead with plans to implement a Special Intensive Revision (SIR) nationwide, arguing that the poll body should have waited for the Supreme Court to deliver its judgment on the matter. They questioned the rationale behind initiating such a significant exercise without broader consultation and before the legal proceedings, specifically concerning Bihar, had concluded. Opposition leaders voiced strong reservations about the Election Commission's decision to initiate a nationwide Special Intensive Revision (SIR). Among their key concerns were the perceived haste in rolling out the exercise and the absence of prior consultation with political parties. They argued that such an important move, one that directly impacts voter inclusion and electoral transparency, should not be undertaken unilaterally, especially while the legality of the process in Bihar is still under judicial scrutiny. Speaking to the media, Congress Rajya Sabha MP Abhishek Manu Singhvi, who is representing the petitioners in the Supreme Court case challenging the SIR in Bihar, said that any statement by the Election Commission holds little weight until the Court delivers its verdict. 'A statement of the ECI is effectually meaningless because everything will depend on the outcome of the pending case in the Supreme Court, not only on July 28, but on a few dates thereafter,' Singhvi said. 'Depending on that outcome alone, everything else will proceed or not proceed. Merely giving jingoistic statements is meaningless. Let us wait for the entire Supreme Court proceedings to work itself out.' Congress MP and Lok Sabha Whip Manickam Tagore accused the Election Commission of disregarding the Supreme Court's views, saying, 'The latest directives from the ECI show it is not ready to respect the Supreme Court's views as well… it shows how the ECI has been completely compromised.' RJD Rajya Sabha member Manoj Kumar Jha expressed concerns over the timeline in Bihar and the EC's failure to consult political parties. 'As ground reports from The Indian Express and other media platforms indicate, the ECI is brazenly focusing on headline management while ignoring the concerns of enumerators and those undergoing enumeration,' he said. Samajwadi Party Rajya Sabha member Javed Ali Khan criticized both the EC and the BJP, calling the electoral roll revision 'arbitrary.' He added, 'The EC can conduct this exercise nationwide, but it should wait for the Supreme Court order in this matter.' TMC Rajya Sabha member Sagarika Ghose questioned whether the EC was effectively preparing a citizens' register under the guise of electoral roll revision. 'Our party believes the main target of the SIR exercise is Bengal. This is an NRC from the backdoor. The EC should clarify if it is preparing a citizens' register, which is not its job,' Ghose said. She further warned that millions of Indians lack the documents the EC is demanding, giving the Commission excessive discretionary power to decide what constitutes valid documentation and potentially strike voters off the rolls. 'This is a malafide exercise targeting the poorest and most vulnerable. The EC is going far beyond its remit,' she added. CPI(M) leader John Brittas clarified that the Opposition is not opposed to revising voter lists to remove fake voters. 'However, this should not be used as a ploy to conduct an NRC through the backdoor or to manipulate the electorate,' he said. Brittas emphasized that the Election Commission must heed the Supreme Court's observation that deciding citizenship is not within its mandate. 'The EC should also consult political parties before undertaking such an exercise,' he added. 'All valid IDs, including Aadhaar and voter ID cards, should be accepted for this process, and voters must be given sufficient time to participate,' John Brittas added. CPI general secretary D. Raja questioned the Election Commission's urgency in initiating a nationwide revision of electoral rolls. 'The Supreme Court is still hearing the matter, and the EC has yet to respond. Why the rush? Especially when states like Kerala, Tamil Nadu, and West Bengal face elections next year. The EC owes an explanation for this haste,' Raja said.
